Guest guest Posted October 4, 2006 Report Share Posted October 4, 2006 Newport housing residents report maintenance, management problems ArmyTimes.com - Springfield,VA By Jowers Staff writer http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2135820.php The breezes from scenic Narragansett Bay could do nothing to mask the stench of carpets saturated with dog urine. That wasn't the only surprise awaiting the Army colonel and his wife, who had just walked into their home for the first time in July near the Naval War College, a multiservice school in Newport, R.I. The toilet was clogged with feces, pubic hairs were all over the bathroom and layers of grime and filth covered the kitchen. " It was disgusting, " said Kathy, the colonel's wife, who asked that only her first name be used. She and some other residents are still upset about the condition of their housing when they moved in this summer. She and six other wives, mostly spouses of O-5 and O-6 students at the war college, complain that the landlord for their privatized military housing, GMH Military Housing, is not responsive to their repeated maintenance requests. " If this is the way we're being treated, what's happening to enlisted families? " Kathy said. But GMH says that when it took over the military housing at Newport in November 2004, it inherited a mountain of maintenance problems in units that had not been renovated in decades, and has been doing its best to play catch-up ever since. Meanwhile, tenants say the Navy has backed out of the picture. When their housing was under military control, Newport tenants could bring housing issues to the chain of command. Now, " Navy Housing says there's nothing they can do, " said Maddox, wife of a Navy lieutenant commander. Whose responsibility? A survey by an independent company of Newport residents, a copy of which was obtained by Military Times, shows that tenant satisfaction dropped 4.7 percentage points in the first year after GMH took over in late 2004. In contrast, tenant satisfaction has increased at seven other GMH-run communities in the Navy's Northeast Region. Navy officials, who had the results of the survey in hand as early as March, did not respond to questions about why they did not take action earlier. In a written response to other questions, they said their role has decreased significantly since GMH became property manager of the housing communities in the Navy's Northeast Region. But, they added, " We continue to work collectively with our partner to ensure the quality of life of our military families continues to remain a top priority. " Officials acknowledged that the issues at Newport are " a cause for concern, " and said they have conducted site visits and have talked to residents to identify areas that need more attention. Senior Navy officials are due to meet with GMH representatives in October to review proposed revisions to maintenance and management plans. The Navy will also sponsor " partnering " sessions with GMH and Navy staff to improve communications. Joe Sikes, director of the Pentagon's Office of Housing and Competitive Sourcing, said that while he has not looked at the Newport situation in depth, " from the reports I've received, it sounds like there's a housing office that does not understand its responsibility. " " I've been told the Navy Installations Command " is working with the base to figure out what the problem is, " he said. GMH is an " excellent " partner at the many other locations where it has agreements with the military services to build, renovate, maintain and manage military housing, Sikes said. He also noted that the services do have some leverage if a company does not hold up its end of the deal. For example, Navy officials said their privatization deals include an incentive fee that is paid based on the quality of maintenance services and residents' satisfaction with those services. Inherited problems Complaints about GMH are not universal, even at Newport. Suzanne Mckechnie, the wife of an Air Force colonel, said GMH replaced a broken dishwasher " in a timely manner. " And residents interviewed in New York at Fort Hamilton, Mitchel Field and Mitchel Manor — other privatized military housing properties run by GMH — also praised the company's quick response to maintenance calls, even at odd hours. Mark Lavin, vice president of project management for GMH, said the company is aware of all the issues raised at Newport, and admits some problems have fallen through the cracks, mainly because of their sheer number. When GMH took control of the 1,351 units at Newport almost two years ago, it was hit with 3,500 maintenance requests in just the first three months, partly because the company encouraged residents to resubmit work orders they had previously lodged with the local Navy housing office, said GMH spokeswoman Kathy Grim. Lavin said GMH workers have found that the homes, which have not been renovated for decades, often have hidden problems that have been uncovered while addressing other comparatively minor maintenance requests. For example, unconnected and leaking pipes have been found behind walls, exacerbating an already-prevalent mold problem. In one home, beneath a urine-soaked carpet and pad, workers found another layer of older carpet over a pad that had been glued to the floor, Lavin said. " We are working to improve what we were left with, " he said. " The housing is tired. " GMH is hiring more maintenance workers, a quality-assurance supervisor to ensure homes are ready for new tenants and a customer relations person to randomly check on tenant satisfaction and follow up on negative comments, he said. The company also is taking some homes " off line " for four to six months to do whatever is needed to fix their problems, said Lavin, who vowed that all the homes will be fixed " within the next two to three years. " That effort will play out in addition to the other renovations and construction envisioned in the original master plan for privatizing the Newport housing. The plan calls for all work to be done by 2010, with the current stock of 1,351 units due to be cut to 869, although officials said that number could change. While GMH struggles to bring the Newport housing up to speed, some residents have had enough. Navy wife Sherri said she and her husband lived for seven weeks in the Fort area of the Newport housing run by GMH. She said workers were at her house every week to fix problems that should have been addressed before they moved in. The " straw that broke the camel's back, " she said, was the mold workers found behind walls in a bathroom — the second area of black mold in their home. GMH had installed new carpet in their unit before they arrived, but they didn't address the mold in the house that was making her family sick, she said. At one point, she became so angry that she made up a sign depicting GMH as " Grossly Mismanaged Housing, Fleecing the Fleet, " taped it to her van and parked it outside a meeting of GMH and Navy officials. " At the beginning of all this, I asked my husband to leave the war college and to get out of the Navy — forget retirement, " she said, even though he has been in uniform 17 years. The s chose to move onto the local economy. GMH refunded them a month and a week of their rent. Air Force spouse Sheri Zachary and her husband were the previous tenants of the s' unit, and had allergic reactions to the mold. But she said there were other problems, too. " I called weekly for more than two months about a broken dishwasher, " she said. " I didn't get a repair on my oven until I threw a temper tantrum. " That was the day before Thanksgiving, she said. Prior to the repairs, she said, " It would have taken a week to cook a turkey in that oven. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.