Guest guest Posted September 22, 2006 Report Share Posted September 22, 2006 One thing that Dr. Shoemaker exceptionally (and others have done partly in progressive medicine) is to expand even the most extensive labs, and take the body study to serious and important new realms of examination, so that it is very clear from many hormone systems, inflammation systems, protein systems, and others that the somatization is impossible based on the labs. And this can be done at the nations largest labs, so one does not have to fight over the individual lab--they are ones most USA docs use. In this Shoemaker has added much to new medicine. Things like low MSH and inflammation always effect the brain first and worst. So what is the surprise that the most fragile organ shows some signs? It is utterly amazing what passes as expert mental health science. The tools are there to burst out of the simplistic basic training these folks have and look beyond a few new drugs or new studies each year and realize this is a flaming serious thing. Wake up dear boy and blow your nose for an hour. You might have an idea from the 90's if blow long enough. Schaller, MD www.HopeAcademic.com [] Rolling Uterus? Moss? Toxic Mold? Disgusting and Derogatory!!!!!!! Hi , To contact the current President of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (theAACN.org) the information is: Jerry J. Sweet, Ph.D. Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences ENH Medical Group 909 Street, #160 ton, IL 60201 USA Office Phone: (847) 425-6445 FAX Number: (847) 425-6408 E-Mail: j-sweet@... Status: Active Member This is by far the most outrageous paper to date. They took 6 medical exams done by defense court order and made the broad conclusion we are all just a bunch of women (uteruses) that need psychiatric help. Never mind what illnesses mold/mycotoxin are well known to cause. I think this is retaliatory because Saxon of Harbor UCLA has been forced to disclose how much money he is generating as an expert witness for the defense in mold litigation when he writes within medical journals both here and in the UK, (which BTW, is up to $70K per case!!!) Roll on, Uteruses, Roll on!!!! Clin Neuropsychol.Clin Neuropsychol.<WBClin " Has the rolling uterus finally gathered moss? Somatization and malingering of cognitive deficit in six cases of " toxic mold " exposure. " Stone DC_ Boone KB_ Back-Madruga C Lesser IM Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Institute, Torrance, CA, USA. This article reports six cases of litigants claiming neuropsychiatric impairment due to toxic mold exposure. In spite of recent growth in personal injury claims due to mold, numerous reviews of the literature have failed to find an association between environmental exposure to mold and neuropsychiatric and/or neuropsychological damage. We report data on six patients claiming harm, 4 of whom revealed a long history of somatization by history and psychological testing, and 2 of whom were shown to be malingering based on multiple indicators of non-credible performance. Of the 6 patients, only the 2 somatoform patients who were also depressed showed credible evidence of neuropsychological dysfunction. We review two other studies that have examined the link between mold exposure and cognitive impairment and discuss their limitations in view of the presenting behaviors of these 6 patients. Until the literature has established a credible link between mold and neuropsychiatric/neuropsychiatricneuropsychiatric/<WBR>neuropsychologic<WBR>al impairment, jurists and clinici harm of exposing somatoform patients to multiple unwarranted medical evaluations. Principles for forensic evaluations in this special population are reviewed. PMID: 16980261 [PubMed - in process] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.