Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Posted on Fri, Jul. 28, 2006 Mold forces police station to seek temporary home http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/local/states/califor nia/15143393.htm RICHMOND: New digs will be necessary until 2008, when a new station is expected to be built By Geluardi CONTRA COSTA TIMES Walnut Creek CA. The discovery of mold in the 57-year-old Richmond police station has the department looking for a new home. A July 21 report by the San Francisco-based Amherst company confirmed elevated levels of mold in the building. The report recommended immediate relocation to avoid exposing the department's 200 employees to worsening conditions during the next rainy season. Roof and window casement leaks are responsible for the mold in the three-story, concrete-and-masonry building. The basement is frequently flooded with as many as 12 inches of ground water during the rainy season, according to the report. The city rejected a $35 million estimate to repair the building and instead decided to move the department to a temporary location until a new police department is built sometime in 2008. The move is expected to be a massive undertaking, Police Chief Magnus said. " We can't compromise employee health and safety, so the goal is to be out by the next rainy season, " he said. " Moving will be a huge undertaking. There are so many technical pieces that have to be moved, it's a little overwhelming. " The department will require about 50,000 square feet of space with lockers for officers' gear as well as sufficient parking for a large fleet of police vehicles. The temporary building will also require securable rooms for weapons and evidence. Currently, the police keep evidence, paper records and private property in a 6,000-square-foot area in the station's basement. The City Council on Tuesday asked staff members to prepare a list of suitable locations and moving cost estimates. The council will consider the list when it returns from break in September. The city ordered the testing after 28 employees filed workers' compensation claims over a four-month period. The claims cited mold and asbestos as the cause of ailments, which ranged from chronic sniffles to skin infections. The July 21 report did not conclude that there are dangerous levels of asbestos in the building. The employees were not seeking compensation, according to union officials, but wanted to document the conditions should they become ill in the future. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Reach Geluardi at 510-262-2787 or jgeluardi@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.