Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Wakefields Response to Deer Times Article 31.12.06

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Deer has written an irresponsible article about Dr. Wakefield in today's Times.Here is Dr. Wakefield's response:I hope that the points below will answer any questions you may have about the issue of Experts'’s fees in the MMR litigation. 1. I worked as an expert in the MMR class action litigation for nearly nine years. As Instructed, I charged for my services and this was at an hourly rate recommended by the British Medical Association after consulting with them on this matter. 2. I worked extremely hard on this very onerous litigation because I believed and still Believe in the just cause of the matter under investigation. This work involved nights, Weekends, and much of my holidays such that I saw little of my family during this time. The price for standing by these children has been high both for my family and my Professional status.3. The money that I received was, after tax and out of pocket expenses, donated to an Initiative to create a new center, in the first instance at the Royal Free Hospital, for the care Of autistic children and those with bowel disease. This intention was made clear, in Writing, to senior members of the medical school. The initiative was unsuccessful at the Royal Free but ultimately succeeded in the US. 4. My role as an expert was declared as a conflict of interest in relevant publications (see References below) that discussed the possible role of MMR vaccine intestinal disease and Autism and to journal editors in other instances. I have referenced the relevant Publications below for your convenience. 5. The costs judge has revised the sum payable by nearly ?100,000 and I am happy to Abide by this ruling. He has done the same for other experts and I am informed that this is Common practice in cases such as this. A substantial part of this money was not paid to Me in the first place. 6. My actions were at times taken in the best interests of children potentially damaged by The MMR vaccine. It was my earnest desire to establish a centre of excellence for the care Of these children in the UK. Sadly, the political climate there made this impossible. I Remain dedicated to helping these children and resolving the issue of whether vaccines are Involved in this disorder or not. I will not be intimidated or coerced into stopping this work Prematurely. References:Stott C et al Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2004;9:89-91Wakefield AJ et al. Medical Veritas 2006;3:796-802

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...