Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Daily Health Policy Report http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=38517 Kaiser network.org - Washington,DC Administration News | Los Angeles Times Examines Conflict-of- Interest Concerns Related to National Cancer Institute Researcher [Jul 17, 2006] The Los Angeles Times on Sunday examined conflict-of-interest concerns related to a National Cancer Institute researcher and FDA approval of two medications for severe invasive fungal infections. Walsh, head of a medical research and treatment section within the pediatric division of NCI, helped " design, oversee and interpret " clinical trials of Cancidas, manufactured by Merck, and AmBisome, manufactured by Fujisawa. According to the Times, some researchers have raised concerns that the trials " artificially boosted the new products by comparing them to drugs that were given at doses that were too low. " Walsh has accepted consulting fees from Merck and donations for research from Merck and Fujisawa. In addition, Merck in 2001 called Walsh as a witness as part of a presentation of the results of the Cancidas trial to an FDA advisory committee. Walsh testified for Merck, although " U.S. law generally prohibits a federal employee from representing an outside party before a government agency, " the Times reports. Fujisawa in 1997 also called Walsh as a witness to an FDA advisory committee as part of a presentation of the results of the AmBisome trial. According to the Times, the " full extent of Walsh's ties with industry is not open to view by outsiders " and is exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act (Willman [1], Los Angeles Times, 7/16). Merck spokesperson Loder said that the company paid Walsh fees of $2,000 in 1999 and $1,000 in 2001 for his participation in " Merck meetings " but did not pay him to help develop Cancidas (Willman [2], Los Angeles Times, 7/16). Reaction Walsh said he has testified before FDA advisory committees only as an NCI researcher, adding, " I am not and have never been a representative of, or advocate for, any pharmaceutical company. " He said, " There is no conflict of interest, and the trials were well and appropriately designed. " Walsh said his position " frequently includes collaboration with companies that research and develop new compounds " for the treatment of " life-threatening infections in children and adults with cancer. " Three NCI officials who supervise Walsh and seven researchers who participated in the Cancidas trial or the AmBisome trial said that the results were scientifically sound. NIH Director Elias Zerhouni in a statement said, " We revamped our rules last year and continue to carry out a vigorous program of education, oversight and enforcement. Violations of the ethics rules are unacceptable, and I remain determined to pursue any information brought to my attention. " Curt Furberg, former head of clinical research for the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and a professor at Wake Forest University, said, " I can see why the companies are eager to get an easy comparison, a drug they can beat. " Furberg added, " When you set up studies with controversial comparisons, you risk misleading everybody -- regulatory agencies, physicians and patients " (Willman [1], Los Angeles Times, 7/16). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.