Re: All I can say is - BF question.....

[Guest guest]

,

I have a friend who continues to use a scale that measures very high,

but just uses that one scale to ensure a consistent measure-despite whatever

the number may be. So ifyou see a 7% decrease, terrific work! That's amazing.

Keep it up! :-)

[Guest guest]

are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

reading than one would think?

I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

it seemed to high.

Naomi

--- <karenmb@...> wrote:

> condescending Loser! I am glad that Andy has left the

> list, and I am

> sure I am not the only one, because everyone else has

> been so quiet!I

> am new here, and he was driving me nuts! ERRR!!

> I think he has something going on with this NHE thing or

> he wouldn't

> be so adamant about promoting it!

> So can we get back to the support that we joined this

> list for? And

> can someone give me some feedback on my bodyfat post that

> seems to

> have gotten lost?

>

>

>

> > < Andy...You're very 'wordy' and have some good points,

> BUT there

> is

> > no way you can say this works equally for men and

> women. Women have

> > CYCLES...our hormones fluctuate with those cycles. Men

> don't. WE

> ARE

> > NOT THE SAME. Our body chemistry does not work the

> same! >

> >

> > Then why do both men and women here insist on eating by

> the *same*

> > plan (BFL)? You just attacked not only the NHE eating

> plan, but

> the

> > BFL eating plan as well, since the BFL eating plan is

> also intended

> > to apply to both men and women.

> >

> > < I don't want more natural testosterone anyway because

> then there

> > are certain woman characteristics that I would lose,

> plus the

> > inability to have children. >

> >

> > Uh, no. The NHE plan would not undermine your

> femininity or make

> you

> > unable to have children. You simply aren't familiar

> with the

> > contents and research of the book.

> >

> > < I know a lot about women's hormones, and you with all

> your

> > wordiness will not convince me or most others here

> otherwise. >

> >

> > , if you'd paid a little more attention to

> anything I'd

> posted,

> > you'd have seen that I never once questioned the

> medical facts

> about

> > women's hormonal cycles.

> >

> > < SO, please quit beating this dead horse to the

> ground. Talk about

> > BFL and offer SUPPORT. If you keep insisting on this

> discussion you

> > will be losing support from others. If you want to

> discuss

> > this...start your own group. OK, enough!!???

> > < ...who is very hormonal right now, and wishes

> this will end.

> >

> >

> > With all due respect, if such discussions get you that

> upset, then

> > you need a lot more in your life than a

> workout/nutrition plan.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Andy

>

>

=====

-Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in

Australia.

Schultz -

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

reading than one would think?

I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

it seemed to high.

Naomi

--- <karenmb@...> wrote:

> condescending Loser! I am glad that Andy has left the

> list, and I am

> sure I am not the only one, because everyone else has

> been so quiet!I

> am new here, and he was driving me nuts! ERRR!!

> I think he has something going on with this NHE thing or

> he wouldn't

> be so adamant about promoting it!

> So can we get back to the support that we joined this

> list for? And

> can someone give me some feedback on my bodyfat post that

> seems to

> have gotten lost?

>

>

>

> > < Andy...You're very 'wordy' and have some good points,

> BUT there

> is

> > no way you can say this works equally for men and

> women. Women have

> > CYCLES...our hormones fluctuate with those cycles. Men

> don't. WE

> ARE

> > NOT THE SAME. Our body chemistry does not work the

> same! >

> >

> > Then why do both men and women here insist on eating by

> the *same*

> > plan (BFL)? You just attacked not only the NHE eating

> plan, but

> the

> > BFL eating plan as well, since the BFL eating plan is

> also intended

> > to apply to both men and women.

> >

> > < I don't want more natural testosterone anyway because

> then there

> > are certain woman characteristics that I would lose,

> plus the

> > inability to have children. >

> >

> > Uh, no. The NHE plan would not undermine your

> femininity or make

> you

> > unable to have children. You simply aren't familiar

> with the

> > contents and research of the book.

> >

> > < I know a lot about women's hormones, and you with all

> your

> > wordiness will not convince me or most others here

> otherwise. >

> >

> > , if you'd paid a little more attention to

> anything I'd

> posted,

> > you'd have seen that I never once questioned the

> medical facts

> about

> > women's hormonal cycles.

> >

> > < SO, please quit beating this dead horse to the

> ground. Talk about

> > BFL and offer SUPPORT. If you keep insisting on this

> discussion you

> > will be losing support from others. If you want to

> discuss

> > this...start your own group. OK, enough!!???

> > < ...who is very hormonal right now, and wishes

> this will end.

> >

> >

> > With all due respect, if such discussions get you that

> upset, then

> > you need a lot more in your life than a

> workout/nutrition plan.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Andy

>

>

=====

-Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in

Australia.

Schultz -

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

It seemed too high to me too. I am about the same height, a lot more

in weight and my bf is around 30% (down from 37% in January...woo

hoo) but still......I think that your reading is high .

> are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

> reading than one would think?

>

> I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

> it seemed to high.

> Naomi

[Guest guest]

It seemed too high to me too. I am about the same height, a lot more

in weight and my bf is around 30% (down from 37% in January...woo

hoo) but still......I think that your reading is high .

> are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

> reading than one would think?

>

> I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

> it seemed to high.

> Naomi

[Guest guest]

Congrats in the 7% drop that is wonderful...

- In bodyforlife@y..., " SJ " <s_j_e@w...> wrote:

> It seemed too high to me too. I am about the same height, a lot

more

> in weight and my bf is around 30% (down from 37% in January...woo

> hoo) but still......I think that your reading is high .

>

>

> > are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

> > reading than one would think?

> >

> > I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

> > it seemed to high.

> > Naomi

[Guest guest]

Congrats in the 7% drop that is wonderful...

- In bodyforlife@y..., " SJ " <s_j_e@w...> wrote:

> It seemed too high to me too. I am about the same height, a lot

more

> in weight and my bf is around 30% (down from 37% in January...woo

> hoo) but still......I think that your reading is high .

>

>

> > are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

> > reading than one would think?

> >

> > I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

> > it seemed to high.

> > Naomi

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the response! But it was measured also about the same at

the gym with calipers, and my DH seems to think his reading was

pretty accurate, though by this boards calculations it is

high...about 17%, and he has weight trained all his life, but has

been pretty sporadic about it for the last year. Though he is still

very toned with visable BF. Oh well, I guess as long as it's going

down. I am going to go to my gym and get remeasured in about a month.

Thanks!

> > are you the lady that is around 135 and had a higher

> > reading than one would think?

> >

> > I think the bf scale must be out of whack ...to eb honest

> > it seemed to high.

> > Naomi