Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Its about time. Forced integration was a bad thing. It is amusing that a society that claims to be colorblind would use measures like this and not simply make sure funding and teacher qualifications were equal in each school district. See what's free at AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Its about time. Forced integration was a bad thing. It is amusing that a society that claims to be colorblind would use measures like this and not simply make sure funding and teacher qualifications were equal in each school district. See what's free at AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 > simply > make sure funding and teacher qualifications were equal in each school > district. > > > um the nation has always been blined by money and equality by offering the same is never going to happen. that would threaten privilage and might make people have to do more than breathe. Not all rich people are good or bad but humanity needs better teachers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 In a message dated 7/11/2007 10:53:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mnmimi@... writes: um the nation has always been blined by money and equality by offering the same is never going to happen. that would threaten privilage and might make people have to do more than breathe. Not all rich people are good or bad but humanity needs better teachers The US has been blind to monetary equity in schools for some time. The national average per student spending is around $9,500. Many of the best performing school systems spend less than that. One of the highest spending in the US is Washington, DC, which spends something over $15,000 per student, but is practically last in terms of performance. There are many other factors in play, particularly parental involvement in education and just how valued education is. Technically it is not the education system devalues education, but rather the legal system's laxity toward crime and the welfare system. If both of those were tightened up, then it would indeed be much harder for people to do nothing but breathe, and vote, for a living. Certain districts, like New Orleans, were so bad that well under 50% of murders were solved and the rates were lower for other crimes. Indeed, it was a wonder that they had to empty the jails before Katrina because so many criminals were allowed to walk the streets to begin with. Even around here, crime isn't overly controlled. We had a murder less then 100 yards from here on July 4, and last night around 1 AM from the same area, there were more gunshots. Didn't even bother to check the papers on that it happens so often. What is sad about all this is that we have long been in an area where human capital is the most valuable asset. Adam was the first to put it to writing, that the true wealth of a nation isn't the gold piled in its vaults, but the people of the country. It is their efforts and labors that create the economy from which all else flows. In his day, that mostly meant the value of physical labor in the fields and factories where education helped, but wasn't entirely necessary, beyond apprenticeships and on the job training. These days, human capital requires an education, if you want to get ahead. It may be a little overly valued in some cases, like the high college education requirements for some jobs which is silly in many cases (apprenticeships and on the job training could handle much of that, if the person had a basic college education). Even a trade training program like we used to have, to train people for the many blue collar jobs out there enhances human capital. If people choose not to get their education or training, then they are opting to have a low market value and will be treated accordingly in terms of hiring, etc. It is just a shame that we have a system that actually encourages that. When I was in college, there was a girl, a white girl, in one of my classes that said she was going to drop out of college as soon as she had her baby and go on welfare because it paid more than her minimum wage job (which would have only been temporary, wagewise, especially after she got her degree) and she could do what she wanted. She stopped coming to class about halfway through, so I guess she did it. Her choice, though it would be interesting to see what she is doing now. Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 In a message dated 7/11/2007 10:53:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mnmimi@... writes: um the nation has always been blined by money and equality by offering the same is never going to happen. that would threaten privilage and might make people have to do more than breathe. Not all rich people are good or bad but humanity needs better teachers The US has been blind to monetary equity in schools for some time. The national average per student spending is around $9,500. Many of the best performing school systems spend less than that. One of the highest spending in the US is Washington, DC, which spends something over $15,000 per student, but is practically last in terms of performance. There are many other factors in play, particularly parental involvement in education and just how valued education is. Technically it is not the education system devalues education, but rather the legal system's laxity toward crime and the welfare system. If both of those were tightened up, then it would indeed be much harder for people to do nothing but breathe, and vote, for a living. Certain districts, like New Orleans, were so bad that well under 50% of murders were solved and the rates were lower for other crimes. Indeed, it was a wonder that they had to empty the jails before Katrina because so many criminals were allowed to walk the streets to begin with. Even around here, crime isn't overly controlled. We had a murder less then 100 yards from here on July 4, and last night around 1 AM from the same area, there were more gunshots. Didn't even bother to check the papers on that it happens so often. What is sad about all this is that we have long been in an area where human capital is the most valuable asset. Adam was the first to put it to writing, that the true wealth of a nation isn't the gold piled in its vaults, but the people of the country. It is their efforts and labors that create the economy from which all else flows. In his day, that mostly meant the value of physical labor in the fields and factories where education helped, but wasn't entirely necessary, beyond apprenticeships and on the job training. These days, human capital requires an education, if you want to get ahead. It may be a little overly valued in some cases, like the high college education requirements for some jobs which is silly in many cases (apprenticeships and on the job training could handle much of that, if the person had a basic college education). Even a trade training program like we used to have, to train people for the many blue collar jobs out there enhances human capital. If people choose not to get their education or training, then they are opting to have a low market value and will be treated accordingly in terms of hiring, etc. It is just a shame that we have a system that actually encourages that. When I was in college, there was a girl, a white girl, in one of my classes that said she was going to drop out of college as soon as she had her baby and go on welfare because it paid more than her minimum wage job (which would have only been temporary, wagewise, especially after she got her degree) and she could do what she wanted. She stopped coming to class about halfway through, so I guess she did it. Her choice, though it would be interesting to see what she is doing now. Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2007 Report Share Posted July 18, 2007 In a message dated 7/18/2007 2:51:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, julie.stevenson16@... writes: Perhaps she did not realise what a challenging job responsible parenting is - however irresponsible parenting is not difficult and there are plenty of examples of that about sadly :-(Also the cost of raising a child is by no means inexpensive. She knew that if she went on welfare, she would get a free place to live, free food, free spending money, and more money per child. In her mind, that free money was of more value that getting an education. Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2007 Report Share Posted July 18, 2007 In a message dated 7/18/2007 2:51:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, julie.stevenson16@... writes: Perhaps she did not realise what a challenging job responsible parenting is - however irresponsible parenting is not difficult and there are plenty of examples of that about sadly :-(Also the cost of raising a child is by no means inexpensive. She knew that if she went on welfare, she would get a free place to live, free food, free spending money, and more money per child. In her mind, that free money was of more value that getting an education. Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2007 Report Share Posted July 18, 2007 " I was in college, there was a girl, a white girl, in one of my classes that said she was going to drop out of college as soon as she had her baby and go on welfare because it paid more than her minimum wage job (which would have only been temporary, wagewise, especially after she got her degree) and she could do what she wanted. " Perhaps she did not realise what a challenging job responsible parenting is - however irresponsible parenting is not difficult and there are plenty of examples of that about sadly :-( Also the cost of raising a child is by no means inexpensive. > > > In a message dated 7/11/2007 10:53:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > mnmimi@... writes: > > um the nation has always been blined by money and equality by offering > the same is never going to happen. that would threaten privilage and > might make people have to do more than breathe. Not all rich people are > good or bad but humanity needs better teachers > > > > > The US has been blind to monetary equity in schools for some time. The > national average per student spending is around $9,500. Many of the best > performing school systems spend less than that. One of the highest spending in the US > is Washington, DC, which spends something over $15,000 per student, but is > practically last in terms of performance. There are many other factors in play, > particularly parental involvement in education and just how valued education > is. > > Technically it is not the education system devalues education, but rather > the legal system's laxity toward crime and the welfare system. If both of those > were tightened up, then it would indeed be much harder for people to do > nothing but breathe, and vote, for a living. Certain districts, like New Orleans, > were so bad that well under 50% of murders were solved and the rates were > lower for other crimes. Indeed, it was a wonder that they had to empty the jails > before Katrina because so many criminals were allowed to walk the streets to > begin with. Even around here, crime isn't overly controlled. We had a murder > less then 100 yards from here on July 4, and last night around 1 AM from the > same area, there were more gunshots. Didn't even bother to check the papers > on that it happens so often. > > What is sad about all this is that we have long been in an area where human > capital is the most valuable asset. Adam was the first to put it to > writing, that the true wealth of a nation isn't the gold piled in its vaults, > but the people of the country. It is their efforts and labors that create the > economy from which all else flows. In his day, that mostly meant the value of > physical labor in the fields and factories where education helped, but wasn't > entirely necessary, beyond apprenticeships and on the job training. > > These days, human capital requires an education, if you want to get ahead. > It may be a little overly valued in some cases, like the high college education > requirements for some jobs which is silly in many cases (apprenticeships and > on the job training could handle much of that, if the person had a basic > college education). Even a trade training program like we used to have, to train > people for the many blue collar jobs out there enhances human capital. If > people choose not to get their education or training, then they are opting to > have a low market value and will be treated accordingly in terms of hiring, > etc. > > It is just a shame that we have a system that actually encourages that. When > I was in college, there was a girl, a white girl, in one of my classes that > said she was going to drop out of college as soon as she had her baby and go > on welfare because it paid more than her minimum wage job (which would have > only been temporary, wagewise, especially after she got her degree) and she > could do what she wanted. She stopped coming to class about halfway through, so > I guess she did it. Her choice, though it would be interesting to see what > she is doing now. > > > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peak of the all- new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2007 Report Share Posted July 19, 2007 > > " I was in college, there was a girl, a white girl, in one of my > classes that said she was going to drop out of college as soon as she > had her baby and go on welfare because it paid more than her minimum > wage job (which would have only been temporary, wagewise, especially > after she got her degree) and she could do what she wanted. " Oh julie, i heard that so amny times in highschool, college and after that I could go postal from the thoughts. Usually the speaked was a bit loose and as an added bonus an alcoholic or pot or crack user. (I am not talking about addiction) I am talking about casual destructive use. some thought they could lose weight by taking speed(rather than refraining) None were interested in school a job or professional life of any kind. most simply could not concieve of the aging process and were living in that moment. Some lost their babies to DSS, others adopted out a drug addicted baby. it was ugly and scary, and hard to find light in that tunnel. Sometimes looking back I am sort of blessed to be here(my early years being something of a bad redition of 8 mile) > Perhaps she did not realise what a challenging job responsible > parenting is - however irresponsible parenting is not difficult and > there are plenty of examples of that about sadly :-( > > Also the cost of raising a child is by no means inexpensive. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2007 Report Share Posted July 24, 2007 Mmmmmm I didn't write the above bit (of the below) you quoted as being wrote by me, did. > > > > " I was in college, there was a girl, a white girl, in one of my > > classes that said she was going to drop out of college as soon as she > > had her baby and go on welfare because it paid more than her minimum > > wage job (which would have only been temporary, wagewise, especially > > after she got her degree) and she could do what she wanted. " > > Oh julie, i heard that so amny times in highschool, college and after > that I could go postal from the thoughts. Usually the speaked was a > bit loose and as an added bonus an alcoholic or pot or crack user. (I > am not talking about addiction) I am talking about casual destructive > use. some thought they could lose weight by taking speed(rather than > refraining) None were interested in school a job or professional life > of any kind. most simply could not concieve of the aging process and > were living in that moment. Some lost their babies to DSS, others > adopted out a drug addicted baby. it was ugly and scary, and hard to > find light in that tunnel. Sometimes looking back I am sort of blessed > to be here(my early years being something of a bad redition of 8 mile) > > > > Perhaps she did not realise what a challenging job responsible > > parenting is - however irresponsible parenting is not difficult and > > there are plenty of examples of that about sadly :-( > > > > Also the cost of raising a child is by no means inexpensive. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 > > Mmmmmm I didn't write the above bit (of the below) you quoted as > being wrote by me, did. > > > whoops sorry. that sounding alike thing :0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.