Raven...I find this interesting

[Guest guest]

Your last post to my " Conspiracy Theory " post referred to the idea

that " Conspiracy Theories are still just Conspiracy Theories. " You

perpetuated the belief that any theory that deals with any form of

conspiracy, must be false. To which I responded that most " Conspiracy

Theories " are mostly Conspiracy Hypotheses. And that Theories of

Conspiracy have been found to be true in the past...such as the

Watergate Conspiracy. had also agreed with your summation that

Conspiracy Theories could not be true.

What I find interesting is that after my analysis of Theories vs.

Hypothesis...everyone became silent.

Was it because there was some major flaw in my reasoning that didn't

merit a response? Or, did I hit a nerve that such Theories of

Conspiracy (sounds different when reworded) could actually have merit

if supported by factual analysis? Such as a Watergate Conspiracy Theory.