Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

zinc & HIV meds

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

My Leather Daddy is in the process of getting a lower denture that ultimately

will attach via two implants. In the meantime, he needs to use fixative. This

weekend he read about a lawsuit regarding zinc poisoning from the zinc in

denture fixatives. (Background here

http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/denture-cream-lawsuit-zinc-poisoning\

-and-the-poligrip-lawsuit-819899.html )

He has concerns for the 5 months that he will need fixative to hold the denture

in place while the bone heals before the implants are placed:

1) What effect could zinc have on his HIV meds (EpZiCom, Viread, Viramune)?

2) 10 days ago the implants were slated for installation. The surgeon began the

process, only to find inadequate bone growth over the previous 10 weeks. The

surgeon put synthetic bone in and told us to wait 90 days and return for the

installation.

a) Could the slow growth be caused by the zinc from the fixative; from his HIV

meds; or from a combination?

B) Could the zinc affect the attachment of the synthetic bone that the surgeon

installed to fill the gap?

3) His neuropathy has been in remission for a number of years. He's concerned

that the zinc may cause a flare if he uses fixative over the next five months.

Any suggestions for alternatives, or, if no alternative, a way to minimize the

harm from the zinc?

Thanks!

Wes

San Diego, CA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly, the individuals who started this lawsuit were using something like 10-15 times the recommended amounts for several years. With the new formulations, you only need 3-4 small dabs (pea size) to hold the partials in place. As a partial wearer, I know of what I speak, being able to eat steak, apples, and even corn on the cob with my partial in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wes,

I've no familiarity with this, but when a lawsuit alleges " fatigue " as

a complication, it usually means there is little evidence of a real

problem, and they want to get as many people as plaintiffs, as possible.

In the absence of compelling evidence, I'd assume the lawyers went

after Poligrip for deep pockets, and not worry about this.

JB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...