Guest guest Posted December 15, 2006 Report Share Posted December 15, 2006 Of course, there has been no separation within the small country of Belgium. However, the separatist movement in the north is very much alive and has been for many decades now. When I lived in Brussels for a year in 1968, even I -- being just a child and a very young one at that -- was acutely aware of the civil unrest with regards to this particular situation. The reaction to the announcement on Wednesday was not paranoid. It was a legitimate reaction to a very real possibility. Raven > > There's no revolution in Belgium. Really > > This article reminds me of the reactionary paranoid psychosis of the > first airing of War of The Worlds on the radio. > > http://news./s/ap/20061214/ap_on_re_eu/belgium_independence_ho > ax > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Hey look a TIME arcticle said it was like War of the Worlds for the country as well. I said that to and this is the first time I saw this TIME article. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1570141,00.html > > > > There's no revolution in Belgium. Really > > > > This article reminds me of the reactionary paranoid psychosis of the > > first airing of War of The Worlds on the radio. > > > > > http://news./s/ap/20061214/ap_on_re_eu/belgium_independence_ho > > ax > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 wrote: " Hey look a TIME arcticle said it was like War of the Worlds for the country as well. I said that to and this is the first time I saw this TIME article. " http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1570141,00.html Raven answered: , I am not saying that the ensuing pandemonium was not real. It was. However, with War of the Worlds, Orson Wells had made it clear at the beginning of the radio transmission that it was a radio play and not real. It was also a far-fetched plot with aliens from outerspace invading and over the course of the radio play, the timeline was impossible for it to be real (remember, they did not have the ability to get to a news story and then get it to the people as instantly as we do now). With the Belgian situation, the announcement cut IN to regular programming and back out again like a real news announcement would do. It was a very real and palpable situation since the fight for separation within Belgium has been going on for decades now. The timeline was possible because they did not come back on air and provide 'news footage' that was impossible in this day and age to get as quickly as it would have been gotten. In other words, it was taken at face value because it was presented exactly as it would if it was real and because the threat of separation in Belgium is very real. This was my point. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Just the similarity of what I said to compare it coming up elsewhere in the mainstream in facinating. It is two different things however.ravenmagic2003 <ravenmagic2003@...> wrote: wrote: "Hey look a TIME arcticle said it was like War of the Worlds for the country as well. I said that to and this is the first time I saw this TIME article." http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1570141,00.html Raven answered: , I am not saying that the ensuing pandemonium was not real. It was. However, with War of the Worlds, Orson Wells had made it clear at the beginning of the radio transmission that it was a radio play and not real. It was also a far-fetched plot with aliens from outerspace invading and over the course of the radio play, the timeline was impossible for it to be real (remember, they did not have the ability to get to a news story and then get it to the people as instantly as we do now). With the Belgian situation, the announcement cut IN to regular programming and back out again like a real news announcement would do. It was a very real and palpable situation since the fight for separation within Belgium has been going on for decades now. The timeline was possible because they did not come back on air and provide 'news footage' that was impossible in this day and age to get as quickly as it would have been gotten. In other words, it was taken at face value because it was presented exactly as it would if it was real and because the threat of separation in Belgium is very real. This was my point. Raven Turning In Big BrotherMy First Authored BookOnline For Free..http://www.nathanyoung.net __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.