Re: Frequency (2 channel common ref.) or phase Bipolar montage?

[Guest guest]

Pete,

Thanks for your earlier response. Just to get a practical modus operandi,

would you generally train for " phase " (bipolar montage) on 2 intra-hemispheric

locations, and then subsequently work toward leveling or aligning independent

bandwiths (second approach - 2 channel monopolar montage)once you have a further

idea of what the client is presenting or has concern about? Is this a level

approach or is there a general rule of thumb?

Thanks!

Mike

> >

> > > **

> > > Can someone clear up for me which is the preferred training regimen at

> > > locations F4 and C4: 2 active-channel (frequency training), A2 common

> > > reference~ F4/A2/Cz(g)/C4/A2 window squash, with 12-15Hz in the window; or

> > > 1 Channel Bipolar montage~ F4/C4/A2 rewarding 12-15Hz?

> > >

> > >

> > > Which is more effective to impact training-the Coherence training in the 1

> > > Channel bipolar montage (with the understanding by training under a

bipolar

> > > montage you are either increasing or decreasing the 12-15 Hz amplitude but

> > > you are increasing the coherence and communication between these sites) or

> > > the 2 Active-Channel Windowed squash focusing solely on increasing the

> > > 12-15Hz bandwith at these locations?

> > > Thanks!

> > > Mike

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>