Guest guest Posted August 12, 2009 Report Share Posted August 12, 2009 By the way, the storm study is reviewed on page 8 at http://www.michaelmooney.net/CalciumFvF2002.pdf > > > > " --- and maybe some other nutrients that also have publications > > showing that they contribute to better bone density and bone health. I > > wonder whether taking optimal potencies of 6 to 8 of the nutrients > > required to make healthy bone, will do a better job than Fosamax for > > some people, without causing any of the problems like jaw bone > > deterioration that Fosamax can cause. > > > > What do you think? Is that a possibility? " > > > > , > > > > It would not surprise me if some people did benefit from such a > > regimen. Still, the problem with osteoporosis is not that there is > > not new bone formation, but that there is destruction of bone as an > > alteration of a natural " remodeling " process. There is supposed to be > > a balanced process of new bone formation and removal, but the cells > > that " eat up " old bone go wild. > > > > One " experiment of nature " that make you wonder about dietary calcium > > and treatment of osteoporosis is that the group of women most > > affected, Northern European Women, probably has the highest dietary > > consumption of dairy products. > > > > I certainly think all young girls and women should take calcium, > > vitamin D, etc. as a routine measure, as they are still making lots of > > new bone, and laying down this material early in life may protect them > > in later years. > > > > JB > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.