Guest guest Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 These is a list of data I remember: Truvada containing regimens do not cause lipoatrophy in most cases. 15 percent of patients starting on Truvada plus Sustiva may have some lipoatrophy, however. None of the switch studies from protease inh to non nukes have shown decreases in visceral (belly fat) A study that switched patients from Kaletra plus Truvada to boosted reyataz plus Truvada showed no decreases in body fat, but good decreases in triglycerides. Another study showed that visceral fat decreased with that switch Now the Castle study is showing that both kaletra and boosted reyataz cause fat gain. Boosted reyataz increases fat more than kaletra in thinner people. In heavier people, kaletra increases fat more than reyataz. I am not aware of any baseline CD4 differences among the thin and heavier patients. Another study that started people with over 250 CD4s with boosted Aptivus and Truvada showed no increases whatsover in belly fat. This drug is not used as much as others. I think we are getting closer to the conclusion that the earlier you start HIV treatments (higher CD4 cell counts) the lower is the risk of increased fat. I know this information will probably make people more open to starting therapy. Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.