Guest guest Posted November 1, 2006 Report Share Posted November 1, 2006 Additionally I will liken it to this experience. My eldest daughter was born to me when I was a teen. Her father made promises to me and betrayed my trust when he found that sex led to pregnancy. I choose to keep my daughter and he made his position clear. He was never gong to be intrested in being a hather or even human to her. True to his word he has been a class a JERK. with all the caps, but I have always known what his position, no back and forth or soul serching (although my daughter tried to reach her dad's heart) He pays child support and is a jerk, but he never lied about being anything more than that. Does that make him a good person NO. Does it make him honest Yes. likely he isn't the greatest husband or dad but you know where you stand. Let the woman who married him beware, She however might be lying to herself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 Mmmmmmm I actually agree with you, I much prefer to know where I stand with people, even if that truth may be painful, not nice. The truth may be painful, but it's better than a kife in the back :-) " Let the woman who married him beware, She however might be lying to herself " Now this gets me wondering. I often see the good in people, not always a good trait, especially if most of what makes the person up is bad. I often see people misinterpretted too - so will often give people the benefit of the doubt. However I don't think I can take a man and change him, which leads me to wonder - do some women believe such? Especially when it comes to abusive partners - often the woman wants to believe the man will change because of her love, she also believes that the man loves her - to me is odd. How much can someone love you if they are abusing you? Maybe some men do change, but I am thinking that such is rare. > > Additionally I will liken it to this experience. My eldest daughter > was born to me when I was a teen. Her father made promises to me and > betrayed my trust when he found that sex led to pregnancy. I choose > to keep my daughter and he made his position clear. He was never gong > to be intrested in being a hather or even human to her. True to his > word he has been a class a JERK. with all the caps, but I have always > known what his position, no back and forth or soul serching (although > my daughter tried to reach her dad's heart) He pays child support and > is a jerk, but he never lied about being anything more than that. > Does that make him a good person NO. Does it make him honest Yes. > likely he isn't the greatest husband or dad but you know where you > stand. Let the woman who married him beware, She however might be > lying to herself > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 yes,some do. Abusers do not always show their "bad" side while dating. What tends to surprrise me is that the ones who DO show signs have women who willingly go into the relationship. If you love something, set it free! So it is with books. See what I mean atwww.bookcrossing.com/friend/nheckoblogcritics.orghttp://notesfromnancy.blogspot.com Heckofreelance proofreadernancygailus@... Re: Abolishing Corporations take 2 Mmmmmmm I actually agree with you, I much prefer to know where I stand with people, even if that truth may be painful, not nice. The truth may be painful, but it's better than a kife in the back :-)"Let the woman who married him beware, She however might be lying to herself :)"Now this gets me wondering. I often see the good in people, not always a good trait, especially if most of what makes the person up is bad. I often see people misinterpretted too - so will often give people the benefit of the doubt.However I don't think I can take a man and change him, which leads me to wonder - do some women believe such? Especially when it comes to abusive partners - often the woman wants to believe the man will change because of her love, she also believes that the man loves her - to me is odd. How much can someone love you if they are abusing you? Maybe some men do change, but I am thinking that such is rare.>> Additionally I will liken it to this experience. My eldest daughter > was born to me when I was a teen. Her father made promises to me and > betrayed my trust when he found that sex led to pregnancy. I choose > to keep my daughter and he made his position clear. He was never gong > to be intrested in being a hather or even human to her. True to his > word he has been a class a JERK. with all the caps, but I have always > known what his position, no back and forth or soul serching (although > my daughter tried to reach her dad's heart) He pays child support and > is a jerk, but he never lied about being anything more than that. > Does that make him a good person NO. Does it make him honest Yes. > likely he isn't the greatest husband or dad but you know where you > stand. Let the woman who married him beware, She however might be > lying to herself > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 's tagline: " If you love something, set it free! So it is with books. See what I mean at > www.bookcrossing.com/friend/nhecko > blogcritics.org > http://notesfromnancy.blogspot.com , since other people have been asked to refrain from advertising their business (Kate Gladstone being an example), I would think that it would also pertain to your signature. Maybe I'm overstepping my bounds here as a member, but I think that fairness is important. Either everyone advertises their business or no one advertises their business and if everyone advertises their business, then this forum becomes just another advertising place where commercialism rules the day and getting away from the NT world is impossible. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 In a message dated 11/3/2006 9:42:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, healingintoauthenticity@... writes: Women have been brought up in a corrupt society. they have not been really brought up to like and want nice men. This is true. When I was in high school years ago we had foreign students and they remarked that American girls were easy (meaning sexually) but very spoiled. I've heard this in other places too that so many American girls are easy but are so chaotic and unstable that they aren't long term material. I can see some merit to this based on the way so many women I know act. It is also true that they don't like nice men. Being nice is seen as being weak or gay. If you aren't loud, obnoxious and love to party and fight, then something is wrong with you. Sure they will date a nice guy, but only to use him to get nice presents and things. I've been places where I have heard women talking about men, sizing up their possessions, earning, position in whatever agency and so on. If men were sizing up women like that they would get sued for harassment or something. When I was in college, I had a few girls act nice, but it was to get something. One stunning girl was flirting hot and heavy with me outside of class one day trying to get me to "help" her with a paper. Of course she really wanted me to write it for her. What amazed me was how so many of the guys were looking on with pure jealousy. It was plain to me what she was up to. I almost got in serious trouble for this, but I said I would but I wanted payment up front. She asked what I meant and I said I wanted what she was promising up front, then she would get her paper. She nearly slapped me. Turns out she got some sucker to write it for her, though if she paid up I don't know. A couple of others were nice to me, but didn't like to be seen alone with me, like walking across campus together or whatever. Something I do find amusing is that several times while waiting at a train station, girls or younger women (meaning in their 20s) have sat down near me. In each case they never said anything beyond hello, but stayed near me as long as I stayed where I was. I find this amusing because it was like they were using me to shield them from other men by pretending to be with me, but at the same time they barely acknowledged my presence. Other times I have seen the girls flock around Mr. Charisma and compete for his attention. So when they don't feel safe or want to be left alone, they would come to me, but when they wanted to play they found someone else. I've also had girls or younger women walk close behind me when I've been touring. They liked to seem like they were with someone, but if I stopped or tried to talk to them, it through them for a loop and they would go on their way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2006 Report Share Posted November 3, 2006 In a message dated 11/3/2006 8:41:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, no_reply writes: My experience with (up until now) has been that as much as women may claim it, they do NOT like nice men. At least for the 8 or 9 women I have dated this truth holds. My experience bears this out too. I've heard them talk about wanting nice men but avoiding them while swarming over the jerks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Some men will never change. However, one issue that does not appear to get much press is that if the relationship is dysfunctional in the first place, both the man and the woman will feed off each other's anger and turn it back on each other cyclically. Once the relationships end, it can and does happen that eachpartner may move on to find new partners that are more compatible, and there is hardly any dysfunctional behavior at all. One of the things my counselor taught me is that good relationships are ones where both partners accept themselves and each other, and they admit to what they are looking for in a partner and go for it. Sometimes dysfuctional relationships occur when partners choose who they THINK really want, but cannot accept those partners anyway because they doing so may go against their values somehow. For instance, maybe they want a partner who is sexually knowledgable, yet they cannot accept that such a person may have an extensive sexual history due to moral issues. For such a person, it would be better to choose what they REALLY want (but don't realize they want): Someone with a similar past who may NOT be sexually knowledgable. Tom Administrator " However I don't think I can take a man and change him, which leads me to wonder - do some women believe such? Especially when it comes to abusive partners - often the woman wants to believe the man will change because of her love, she also believes that the man loves her - to me is odd. How much can someone love you if they are abusing you? Maybe some men do change, but I am thinking that such is rare. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Dear Tom, It is wondeful that you have found a good companion that respects you and is someone that you can value for who she is. Women have been brought up in a corrupt society. they have not been really brought up to like and want nice men. I watch my brother be taken advantage of - he is Aspie - he even said to his current gal that she wanted the farm and the life that he has made (she chased him) - but that she didn't want him . . . she agreed. But he still is fence sitting . . She is an intelligent person, educated and has great qualities - when we discuss this ongoing emotional abuse my brother and I quickly state, " We are not judging_______, we love her . . but is this correct behavior? " I am supporting your point. I don't feel that most women are ready to be companioned and really cared for. On the other hand most guys don't want a woman for who she really is . . . they don't want a companion who takes responsiblity for herself . . . It is a a very difficult situation today for men and women. Thanks. Deborah > > " Abusers do not always show their " bad " side while dating. What tends > to surprrise me is that the ones who DO show signs have women who > willingly go into the relationship. " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 " On the other hand most guys don't want a woman for who she really is . . . they don't want a companion who takes responsiblity for herself . . . " This statement is true, and not true. It's NOT true because most guys DO want a companion who takes responsiblity for herself. But that sort of woman is incompatible with the drop dead gorgeous model who puts out on demand that most guys also want. So your statement is also true. Tom Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 I knew about this stuff ever since preschool. I remembered going to girls who were pretty. It's a curse. They grow up looking at men as objects because all of their lives they've been catered to and not loved. Love is tough. Being catered to is not love. Therefore, they won't ever have the joy of experiencing love and they'll grow sicker with each decade. VISIGOTH@... wrote: In a message dated 11/3/2006 8:41:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, no_reply writes: My experience with (up until now) has been that as much as women may claim it, they do NOT like nice men. At least for the 8 or 9 women I have dated this truth holds. My experience bears this out too. I've heard them talk about wanting nice men but avoiding them while swarming over the jerks. Cheap Talk? Check out Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Dear , What you describe is terrible. It is why for many years I did not have women friends - growing up I played with my male cousins and brother and the boys in the neighborhood - we had one female friend - who we treasured - because she too, was a " Tom boy. " I loved to learn but I did not like school as I suddenly had to wear a dress and that very " insulting " act caused me, in fifties St. Louis, to be consigned to the girl's side and not be allowed a school to play baseball, tag, catch and what I considered, " Real Play. " The only saving grace in Kindergarten was the only black girl in school befriended me and took me under her wing. Of course, being Aspie, I had no idea why the other girls wouldn't speak to her. She was so nice and kind. I personally was horrified by the girl's games - they seemed to be centered on usng the monkey bars to do flips specifically to show their underpants - and I found that rediculous and horrifying. Jumping rope to rhymes seemed pointless. When my friend left for Chicago a the end of kintergarden I never had another friend in that school. I would stand next to the teachers on the playground and watch the " Gender Clubs " , wondering what brought such a Division. AT home I would thankfully free myself from the confines of the stupid costume that took away my rights to do real things - in my experience - and get on with life with the neighborhood dogs and boys. My brother, a fellow Aspie and I, had a wordless communication and would spend hours together - we slept in the same room till I was seven and often afterwards till I hit puberty and the real gender clubbing began. Fifties television offered very Gender clubbed shows - men were cowboys and heros - as were our baseball players, wise farmers, working dads who did interesting things - or they were bad guys or gangster rats. But they had a wide range of choices. Women were either house moms who baked cookies in shirt waist dresses and smiled while doing laundry and cleaning windows as it gave them such pleasure to do so - or they were sluts - Bar Room Miss Kitty was a wise crackin, bar room gal, who had her own career - which I could not figure out what it was - and was best friends with Matt Dylan, the sheriff, on Gun Smoke. But basically women were portrayed as fairly stupid, or simple and pure, and no where without men. Our fifties mothers were basically the same - only I didn't see the neighborhood women smiling while they did the enless chores of laundry, child care, ironing (this could take two days as the sheets and everything had to be ironed) - mending (even in middle class families everything was mended and many of our clothes and mittens were sewn and or knitted - cheap clothing in an endless variety was not availible as it is today) - the " ettiquitte " of the time said that windows were washed once a week - even when they had maids the women that i knew and saw were always cooking, cleaning, sewing and the expected to change into nice clothes with dinner on the table and a cocktail when their husbands, our fathers were home. I refused from early childhood to play with dolls - everyone remarked at it - but who wanted to turn into the drudges that I saw all around me???? I loved playing with our baby cousins - as did all of my male cousins and brother - but they were real beings, not plastic substitues trying to enslave my mind into something that I didn't want. I remember my last summer before puberty. I didn't, honestly, understand what puberty was. I remember playing in the vast woods of Connecticut with our dogs, my brother and our two neighborhood friends, brothers, who we spent all waking play time with for three years. We would wear shorts and sneakers, playing as boys do, shirtless. I remember a feeling of golden light being on everything - and I kept sensing that I had to cherish every single breath - every toad we caught, every thing bike ride we took - all the forts we built - all the discussions as to whether Wolf Man was stronger than enstein, etc. And that winter I went to seventh grade and started to grow a bust. Not only was I friendless at school but my body was betraying me - or so I felt. Somehow in my innocence I just felt that one grew up to be who one was. Not that I ever wanted a penis - never did - nor was I gay - But there were no images and role models of women who were really doing things AND having families. AND all the girls seemed organized into getting boyfriends. The word being " getting. " We had to take make up classes as part of our schooling - and all the girls would titter on and on as to who were the best boys. I just could not imagine it - but I was Aspie. Now, I look back and seee that it was very, very hard for any of the NT girls to resist programming that began from the moment they were born. Girls are brought up to think that they are nothing without a man. And a man must be " caught. " I realize that there are a number of girls that escape that - and young people in their teens, twenties and thirties have had role models of women who have somehow dropped the " gender clubbing " in favor of being a person - just as there are men who have dropped that. One of the things that I think may separate Aspies is that we are not as easily programmed - we may hold beliefs that have been certainly colored by the over culture - but if given an opportunity to think them out - and discuss them - we can change our opinions. I don't think that deprogramming people as to what is gender based - works for most adults. We have to get the children now. But look what is happening as the discussions on this board have reflected - while there are role models for young girls to follow of women who are both women and doing something - astronauts, soccer players, doctors, scientists - as well as mothers and wives - the " retro " programming that renders them useless - literally turns them into Stepford Wives - is hitting at the young girls even stronger than previous. Bras and Slut dancing poles for six year olds??????!!!!!!! There are lines of purses and make up that they market to small girls - between this and giving them dolls we are warping their minds! I personaly feel that giving girls dolls and kitchen sets at two and three is more dangerous than giving children toy guns - YES that is inflamatory in a way - but I grew up in the fifites and although I am Quaker now, and do not carry a gun! - we were taught early on not to point guns, even toy guns and that guns kill - although my father was extremely violent behind closed doors - as were many men given the pressure cooker lives they were in and that they had PTSD from World War Two that was undiagnosed and unresolved as that generation of men were expected to come home and just shut up and work! - but gun and knife violence in domestic situations was rare . . . . because we used those things and were taught from knee high to a duck respect and proper use . . . anyway . . . all of this is to say that the situation with most women does not make for a good situation for most men seeking real companionship and marriage. Many women do see men as Big Game to be hunted. I am very sorry for all that you and other men here have gone through in regards to that. Thanks. Deborah In very simple, Fifties and early sixties television > > > In a message dated 11/3/2006 9:42:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, > healingintoauthenticity@... writes: > > Women have been brought up in a corrupt society. they have not been really > brought up > to like and want nice men. > > > This is true. When I was in high school years ago we had foreign students > and they remarked that American girls were easy (meaning sexually) but very > spoiled. I've heard this in other places too that so many American girls are > easy but are so chaotic and unstable that they aren't long term material. I can > see some merit to this based on the way so many women I know act. > > It is also true that they don't like nice men. Being nice is seen as being > weak or gay. If you aren't loud, obnoxious and love to party and fight, then > something is wrong with you. Sure they will date a nice guy, but only to use > him to get nice presents and things. > > I've been places where I have heard women talking about men, sizing up their > possessions, earning, position in whatever agency and so on. If men were > sizing up women like that they would get sued for harassment or something. > > When I was in college, I had a few girls act nice, but it was to get > something. One stunning girl was flirting hot and heavy with me outside of class one > day trying to get me to " help " her with a paper. Of course she really wanted > me to write it for her. What amazed me was how so many of the guys were > looking on with pure jealousy. It was plain to me what she was up to. I almost got > in serious trouble for this, but I said I would but I wanted payment up > front. She asked what I meant and I said I wanted what she was promising up > front, then she would get her paper. She nearly slapped me. Turns out she got some > sucker to write it for her, though if she paid up I don't know. > > A couple of others were nice to me, but didn't like to be seen alone with > me, like walking across campus together or whatever. > > Something I do find amusing is that several times while waiting at a train > station, girls or younger women (meaning in their 20s) have sat down near me. > In each case they never said anything beyond hello, but stayed near me as long > as I stayed where I was. I find this amusing because it was like they were > using me to shield them from other men by pretending to be with me, but at the > same time they barely acknowledged my presence. Other times I have seen the > girls flock around Mr. Charisma and compete for his attention. So when they > don't feel safe or want to be left alone, they would come to me, but when they > wanted to play they found someone else. > > I've also had girls or younger women walk close behind me when I've been > touring. They liked to seem like they were with someone, but if I stopped or > tried to talk to them, it through them for a loop and they would go on their > way. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Now this is where it gets interesting - I have found quite a few guys have been attracted to me they say because I have my own mind, my own ideas - can think for myself, but further into the relationship this becomes a problem. The thing they say attracted them to me then becomes a stumbling block because I don't always agree with them - the ability to think for oneself becomes a double edged sword (so to speak). I have found this to happen in some friendships too - the person initially likes me for my ability to think and question and not just automatically accept things I am told and then they expect me to believe without question something they tell me, purely because I am thier friend and should not question them. Is this a non aspie thing?, where different rules apply to/in different situations/people? I don't understand why it should be one rule for one and a different rule for another. > > " On the other hand most guys don't want a woman for who she really > is . . . they don't want a companion who takes responsiblity for > herself . . . " > > > This statement is true, and not true. > > It's NOT true because most guys DO want a companion who takes > responsiblity for herself. > > But that sort of woman is incompatible with the drop dead gorgeous > model who puts out on demand that most guys also want. > > So your statement is also true. > > Tom > Administrator > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Dear , when you wrote your post I had to think . . " did I write that? " I curently have an attack of Chronic Bronchitus, am feverish and did lots of posting last night so I was wondering what I had not remembered posting . . . I did not know how to answer Tom because I know that there are many men who do want a companion and he is one. In many ways, my AS brother is that way too - truly appreciating women and then he often gets stuck being manipulated by women who are used to " strong, Marboro type men that they have been trained since birth to manipulate " I was wondering if since I am 54 it is a generational thing. As a very strong Aspie, but " passing " by the " outward beauty " standards when I was younger - men thought I was some sort of wild, intelligent muse who could hike, camp, move furniture, build things, discuss politics, religion, psychology and yet at 97 pounds and 5'1, blond, blue eyed I matched some sort of standard they were looking for . . . But with men my age and older they would suddenly want a psychological mother - not a buddy and work mate in the world. It was as if a button had been pressed. I do think that this is changing = and knowing my brother and other aspies who are younger - this is so. But I must say that my older Aspie friends and uncles expected a woman - my aunts and my friends, their wives - to create and keep a home, take care of the children while they lived in their own world and dropped in when they felt like it. My one friend, 72, has been around his wife since he was 1 and she was three - they have been married for more than fifty years - they have seven children, many grandchildren (some aspie) - but his idea of having the family over is for me and him to sit in his warehouse - sometimes moving things with the back hoe or fork lift, - selling dirt, gravel and dog food - playing with the dogs that he is boarding - while his wife is at home cooking and doing the holiday - she is lovely, but at 74 she is frazzled - all of us know that he is just too old to change after all of these years (I adore him but sometimes his behavior with his wife, although he seems totally oblivious - is just not nice) Many guys over the years have been attacted to me because of My " intensity " - which they claim to adore. Shortly - they hate the intensity. I used to always theorize that sex seemed to set something off in their NT psyches that caused them to want a mother figure and also to hate a mother figure. My own husband and I dated, in our forties, for five years - me living in Connecticut and he in Quebec - for me - it worked - but he begged, pleaded for more professional partnership - when I got here all of my freedom went downt he tubes . . I won't go into it but he forced me to take care of the medical business and his needs while he went blithely on. Yes, he is ill with Paranoid Schizophrenia - but in that illness his hatred of women and making me into his mother was bizzarre because I am not motherly!!!!! In business - my colleagues would be attracted as friends to my mind - but as you said they would end up saying that I was too intense. for me - I want to talk about new methods in psychology - theatre, phiilosophy - I remember my one friend saying to me - Deb, you are just too intense . . you should be teaching all the time . . . I want a buddy and I want to be a buddy. At my age I have just about given up on it though - I am not sure I will date after my divorse. My brother, at 52, whose relationship is troubled, is not sure that he will ever date again. We want interaction but the whole interaction thing and the constant twists and turns of intimate relationship - at least with NTs - is too difficult. I did date an Aspie for five years when I was in my twenties and stil know him - but he went on a path of drugs and alcohol - which I just couldn't follow and he stil does - but when we were together it was the easiest and nicest relationship that I had ever had - but I had also known him from the time I was fourteen, so when we started dating as adults there were no surprizes as to who he was and where he was going other than his decision to use drugs - I knew his parents and sisters and he knew mine .. . I know that this is not an easy question to discuss as we all have many personal stories Deborah > > > > " On the other hand most guys don't want a woman for who she really > > is . . . they don't want a companion who takes responsiblity for > > herself . . . " > > > > > > This statement is true, and not true. > > > > It's NOT true because most guys DO want a companion who takes > > responsiblity for herself. > > > > But that sort of woman is incompatible with the drop dead gorgeous > > model who puts out on demand that most guys also want. > > > > So your statement is also true. > > > > Tom > > Administrator > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Ah! I feel vindicated. The folks at AFF and Fractalus thinks FAM is such a terrible place, but the fact that you can voice all these things and more shows that I HAVE been right in fighting the big guys and letting my small little forums stay open. YOU yourself can serve as role model to other women be stating your opinion and showing what can be accomplished with will and determination. Thanks for posting. Tom Administrator " But look what is happening as the discussions on this board have reflected - while there are role models for young girls to follow of women who are both women and doing something - astronauts, soccer players, doctors, scientists - as well as mothers and wives - the " retro " programming that renders them useless - literally turns them into Stepford Wives - is hitting at the young girls even stronger than previous. Bras and Slut dancing poles for six year olds??????!!!!!!! There are lines of purses and make up that they market to small girls - between this and giving them dolls we are warping their minds! " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Hello! I am not quite sure what being a role model to young girls has to do with AFF and the other that you mentioned - Are they against personal responsibility????? I do beleive that we have to be role models, to the best of our ability, by taking responsibility in our lives and doing the best we can with what we have. When I grew up I didn't know I had AS - but my grandparents always encouraged us to try, take care of others and do the best with the gifts that we have . . . thanks, Deborah > > " But look what is happening as the discussions on this board have > reflected - while there are role models for young girls to follow of > women who are both women and doing something - astronauts, soccer > players, doctors, scientists - as well as mothers and wives - > the " retro " programming that renders them useless - literally turns > them into Stepford Wives - is hitting at the young girls even > stronger than previous. Bras and Slut dancing poles for six year > olds??????!!!!!!! There are lines of purses and make up that they > market to small girls - between this and giving them dolls we are > warping their minds! " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 " I have found quite a few guys have been attracted to me they say because I have my own mind, my own ideas - can think for myself, but further into the relationship this becomes a problem. The thing they say attracted them to me then becomes a stumbling block because I don't always agree with them - the ability to think for oneself becomes a double edged sword (so to speak). " I think what guys want is a woman who can hold her own in a relationship, but men have also been trained from boyhood that they are the ones that are to " take charge " in a relationship. So when the woman asserts herself, a guy then begins to question his masculinity, and he also questions his own role in the relationship. I do beleive then men and women are physically built to fulfill certain functions. (A man cannot bear children, and a woman may not have the physical strength to do certain kinds of heavy labor.) But at the same time, I think it is weak for a man to question himself if the woman asserts her (God given, according to the Bible) right to have an equal say in the relationship. The Bible says that a woman must subit to a man...but only in terms of spiritual matters. In all others, a man must be subserviant to his wife, and a wife must be subserviant to her huband, meaning that they both treat one another equally and give each other equal respect and accomodation. Even if a person is not Christian, these are good rules to follow. If we jettison the social stigma that comes with " The woman wearing the pants around the house " and " stay at home dads " and just allow two partners to develop a relationship that allows each person's strengths to grow and manifest themselves, then we can more easily avoid conflict, and love our partners without bad inner turmoil. Tom Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 AFF (Aspies For Freedom) thinks that, now that Aspies are coming together, they need to advocate for themselves by marching in portests and engaging in millitaristic tactics to get what they want. I believe that Aspies can support themselves by developing themselves from within and through group support. This means building up self-esteem, embarking on and achieving personal goals, and providing moral support and sympathy to those Aspies who need it. AFF thinks my approach is too lovey-dovey. The fact that people get fed up with AFF'S version of the autistic rights movement and come here has caused them to try, in various ways, to slander this group and get it shut down. Bill Gates has been diagnosed with AS and serves as a role model for Aspies, I think. Their role model is Dawson, who seems to think that bullying your way to the top in order to get what you want is the way to go. We have the same purpose: To make things better for Aspies, but we also have two different approaches. The difference is, I ignore them whereas they try to me down. Tom Administrator Re: Abolishing Corporations take 2 Hello! I am not quite sure what being a role model to young girls has to do with AFF and the other that you mentioned - Are they against personal responsibility????? I do beleive that we have to be role models, to the best of our ability, by taking rsponsibility in our lives and doing the best we can with what we have. When I gew up I didn't know I had AS - but my grandparents always encouraged us to try, take care of others and do the best with the gifts that we have . . . thanks, Deborah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 Thank you Tom, Thank you for clarifying that. I sense that many people find their way to AFF and then don't know where else to go. I have been there and found that many of the newer ones were quite nice and probably not aware of any politics per se. I sense that the people behind the scene are more political than those coming for chat and trying to find out about themselves. There are certaiin individuals there who are very negative - they seem negative towards any " American " as they identify it, idea of self determination and responsiblity. I have been several times upset that parents, coming on the chatline, with newly diagnosed chldren, and very nervous because they were not given any support re the diagnoses have been given, if certain people are online, very awful statistics saying that we can't look forward to having careers, etc. This has been upsetting to me as I have seen my brother and myself, although we have struggled and I do believe that there are things that need addressed that can aid children - we have had good success in life. the few times that I chatted with parents over there I tried to emphasize the positive - not hit them with all sorts of negative. I avoid certain people because I have been slammed for being positive . . . on the other hand there are a number of new people who just have no idea what is going on. I agree with you re Bill Gates. My brother is one of the top sled dog U.S. sprint racers and he to me, is a very good model (although as you know he doesn't want to pursue anything re the AS and I agree with you that that is his choise; as I support my cousins and friends; it is just for me that I like to know more and know people like the ones here who are activiely exploring and thinking and sharing) I personally feel that we do need rights and awareness - but that what we can do needs to be emphasized over the negative. I don't believe that negativity is going to get us very far. I know that there must be a number of successful adults in North America who can be positive role models. I am concerned that there seems to be a segment of the therapy community who is exploiting parents fears for gain . . . I am not sure if I am seeing that correctly or not. Just so you know, when I was over there, I never heard anything re you - I would have come right over to explore if I had. I started searching for Aspies talking more of what you speak of here a few weeks ago and as I am a a member of a group for adults with abusive parents and Christian women going through a divorse, I did a search on what might be availible for Aspies and found these lists. Thanks again. Deborah > > Re: Abolishing Corporations take 2 > > Hello! > > I am not quite sure what being a role model to young girls has to do > with AFF and the other that you mentioned - Are they against > personal responsibility????? > > I do beleive that we have to be role models, to the best of our > ability, by taking rsponsibility in our lives and doing the best we > can with what we have. When I gew up I didn't know I had AS - but my > grandparents always encouraged us to try, take care of others and do > the best with the gifts that we have . . . > > thanks, > > Deborah > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 It is usually considered that a woman is better at networking and socializing than a man - but in my life I have found every single man I have met is better at socializing and networking than I am :-( even the ones that were considered anti-social by others; usually during their time dating me became more outgoing. This does annoy me to some extent, because throughout my life I have been told that this is something I should be good at - women are meant to be good at this and I am a woman, therefore I should be good at it - I find such frustrating. Yet on the plus side I can hyperfocus, something women aren't meant to be good at :-) > > " Many guys over the years have been attacted to me because of > My " intensity " - which they claim to adore. Shortly - they hate the > intensity. I used to always theorize that sex seemed to set > something off in their NT psyches that caused them to want a mother > figure > and also to hate a mother figure. " > > Go back to your ellucidation on toys and you may see why this is. > > Boys are given toys that teach them to problem solve and take > charge. They build things with blocks. They movie toy armies across > toy battlefields. They shoot the bad guys with cap guns. > > Girls are given Barbie dolls and easy bake ovens, ergo they are > supposed to grow up and be good wives and home-makers. > > That boyyhood training never leaves men. > > What entices men about a woman who is independent (at first) is that > here is an atypical woman who can do things that men do and still be > feminine. Thus he thinks he finds a mirror image of himself, and > someone who can sympathize with the downside of being a man. > > What he forgets is that a woman is still a woman, which means that > even if she does things that are thought to be a " manly " role, she > will have developed a feminine way of dealing with things. Her > feminine brain may have developed solutions to problems and issues > that he has never thought of, and she may see his problems as petty. > Or hemay see himself as inferior. > > And so now you have the initial " perfect " pairing beginning to > fracture. > > To mend this rift requires that both partners recognize that > whatever they do with their lives, both are functioning within > engineering tolerances with the bodies and minds they were given. > > My partner is a self-determined Aspie female who runs her own > business. She has much more marketing and netowrking sense than I > do, and I accept that. Further, rather than be jealous of her, I > admire her skills and have tried to learn from them. > > Nowonce in a while she will have a bad day. In days past, when I was > still working in the office, if I had a bad day, I would just grit > my teeth and take it, and maybe whine and complain a bit afterwards > when I got home. > > When she has a bad day, she gets irritable and might cry. > > Here is another opportunity to facilitate the relationship. An > insecure male would use her crying as an opportunity to pick on her > while bragging about his own ability to weather such days. But I try > to listen and comfort her. > > Thus she can still be the better marketer an networker AND feel self- > actualized with her self-esteem intact. > > In return for this, she recognizes my strengths as well. > > It's a relationship that is built on positives instead of one that > opportunistically preys on weaknesses. But for it to work at all > requires getting out of that mindset instilled into us in childhood > that says a man MUST do certain things and fulfill certain roles and > a woman MUST do certain other things and fulfill certain other roles. > > Tom > Administrator > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2006 Report Share Posted November 4, 2006 I network well only because I can closely approximately NT interactions during business networking situations provided these situations to not go on for too long. Raven > > It is usually considered that a woman is better at networking and > socializing than a man - but in my life I have found every single man > I have met is better at socializing and networking than I am :-( even > the ones that were considered anti-social by others; usually during > their time dating me became more outgoing. > > This does annoy me to some extent, because throughout my life I have > been told that this is something I should be good at - women are > meant to be good at this and I am a woman, therefore I should be good > at it - I find such frustrating. Yet on the plus side I can > hyperfocus, something women aren't meant to be good at :-) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 I wouldn't know if I were just too socially blind... but I honestly have no idea except as presented in movies and books as to what people are talking about. Probably just too blind. I don't remember having any girls not interested in me because I was too 'nice'. I'm pretty sure sometimes it was because of my social skills... you know if I can't figure out how to chit chat the entire time next thing you know they are being flirting at by bystanders...While I was courting my wife that wasn't a problem at all because we understood each others social ineptness. Instead of feeling really awkward because neither of us had anything to say it was more basking in the wonderfulness that neither of us would judge the other for the poor sociality we were displaying.I know sometimes my social skills problems drove gals away in high school... but never to flee into the arms of my worst enemy or some heavy muscle thug that made them feel happy to be attached to such a bulky conglomeration of flesh.But then I was home schooled and so in the social environments I participated in I wasn't competing with say... the foot ball team. I went to a lot of youth dances and plenty of people tried to pay attention to me. My lack of social inhibitions actually made me comfortable dancing when everybody else was say slightly shuffling. Made me look cool. Girls would try to talk to me only to discover I was a crazy nerd or something. Never really felt I wasn't 'bad' enough for them. Just too weird.Crouchingowlzarinangel <healingintoauthenticity@...> wrote: Dear , when you wrote your post I had to think . . "did I write that?" I curently have an attack of Chronic Bronchitus, am feverish and did lots of posting last night so I was wondering what I had not remembered posting . . . I did not know how to answer Tom because I know that there are many men who do want a companion and he is one. In many ways, my AS brother is that way too - truly appreciating women and then he often gets stuck being manipulated by women who are used to "strong, Marboro type men that they have been trained since birth to manipulate" I was wondering if since I am 54 it is a generational thing. As a very strong Aspie, but "passing" by the "outward beauty" standards when I was younger - men thought I was some sort of wild, intelligent muse who could hike, camp, move furniture, build things, discuss politics, religion, psychology and yet at 97 pounds and 5'1, blond, blue eyed I matched some sort of standard they were looking for . . . But with men my age and older they would suddenly want a psychological mother - not a buddy and work mate in the world. It was as if a button had been pressed. I do think that this is changing = and knowing my brother and other aspies who are younger - this is so. But I must say that my older Aspie friends and uncles expected a woman - my aunts and my friends, their wives - to create and keep a home, take care of the children while they lived in their own world and dropped in when they felt like it. My one friend, 72, has been around his wife since he was 1 and she was three - they have been married for more than fifty years - they have seven children, many grandchildren (some aspie) - but his idea of having the family over is for me and him to sit in his warehouse - sometimes moving things with the back hoe or fork lift, - selling dirt, gravel and dog food - playing with the dogs that he is boarding - while his wife is at home cooking and doing the holiday - she is lovely, but at 74 she is frazzled - all of us know that he is just too old to change after all of these years (I adore him but sometimes his behavior with his wife, although he seems totally oblivious - is just not nice) Many guys over the years have been attacted to me because of My "intensity" - which they claim to adore. Shortly - they hate the intensity. I used to always theorize that sex seemed to set something off in their NT psyches that caused them to want a mother figure and also to hate a mother figure. My own husband and I dated, in our forties, for five years - me living in Connecticut and he in Quebec - for me - it worked - but he begged, pleaded for more professional partnership - when I got here all of my freedom went downt he tubes . . I won't go into it but he forced me to take care of the medical business and his needs while he went blithely on. Yes, he is ill with Paranoid Schizophrenia - but in that illness his hatred of women and making me into his mother was bizzarre because I am not motherly!!!!! In business - my colleagues would be attracted as friends to my mind - but as you said they would end up saying that I was too intense. for me - I want to talk about new methods in psychology - theatre, phiilosophy - I remember my one friend saying to me - Deb, you are just too intense . . you should be teaching all the time . . . I want a buddy and I want to be a buddy. At my age I have just about given up on it though - I am not sure I will date after my divorse. My brother, at 52, whose relationship is troubled, is not sure that he will ever date again. We want interaction but the whole interaction thing and the constant twists and turns of intimate relationship - at least with NTs - is too difficult. I did date an Aspie for five years when I was in my twenties and stil know him - but he went on a path of drugs and alcohol - which I just couldn't follow and he stil does - but when we were together it was the easiest and nicest relationship that I had ever had - but I had also known him from the time I was fourteen, so when we started dating as adults there were no surprizes as to who he was and where he was going other than his decision to use drugs - I knew his parents and sisters and he knew mine . . I know that this is not an easy question to discuss as we all have many personal stories Deborah > > > > "On the other hand most guys don't want a woman for who she really > > is . . . they don't want a companion who takes responsiblity for > > herself . . ." > > > > > > This statement is true, and not true. > > > > It's NOT true because most guys DO want a companion who takes > > responsiblity for herself. > > > > But that sort of woman is incompatible with the drop dead gorgeous > > model who puts out on demand that most guys also want. > > > > So your statement is also true. > > > > Tom > > Administrator > > > Sponsored Link For just $24.99/mo., Vonage offers unlimited local and long- distance calling. Sign up now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 " I don't remember having any girls not interested in me because I was too 'nice'. I'm pretty sure sometimes it was because of my social skills... you know if I can't figure out how to chit chat the entire time next thing you know they are being flirting at by bystanders... " I was socially inept as well, which tended to put off women. However, with the ones I managed to actually date, a new problem arose: They could not keep an in-depth conversation going. Not to be mean at all here, but I think I understand why it is non- Aspies keep changing the subject all the time: It's so that they can APPEAR to be knowledgable about things and thus attractive to members of the opposite sex. But in reality, their " warehouse " of facts and anecdotes from which to draw on is almost empty, their ability to construct arguments is poor, they have a limited vocabulary, and their attention span is short. Thus they hate it when you stick to facts, quote sources, create logical arguments, use precise diction, and talk at length. I did enjoy many aspects of the relationships I had with non-Aspie women, but the one area that was lacking in these relationsips were in depth conversations, which I really REALLY needed. And for the record, my experience has been that when a non-Aspie woman says she needs " deep " conversations, " deep " by her definition means just below the water's surface, whereas to me in means the The na Trench (the deepest point on the Earth's surface). Tom Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 One thing might be to date women who are five years older. More life experience, more things to talk about. Maybe the metaphor of a sports broadcast for a baseball game, yeah, you might have interesting, deep, significant stories, but as the flow of the game is changed, a lot of these stories are just dropped and on to the next topic. Yeah, I don't really understand it, I find it frustrating, I feel like I'm not getting the attention I deserve for my achievements. But the Zen of it all, I might not need to do all this, I might get the attention and the appreciation just for being me well, maybe ------ Another topic, in elementary school and junior high, I can remember feeling incredible emphathy toward situations of social justice, that other kids seemed to not get at all. There might be a situation about poverty and exclusion and unfairness, and the other kids didn't get it. It's like I have two skills and I move across them and sometimes miss the other. Whereas other people have one set of skills, which they stay in and get good at, and are very predictable to others. Most people seem to accept competition as a given, aspire to the upper middle class, are interested in acquisition in vivid and direct ways---but also have a very well-honed sense of what constitutes cheating, and thus are concerned with ethics in their own way. But they are not concerned with the larger issues of building a better society (for example I ask why can't we have enough good jobs for everyone, etc, etc) -Doug > > " I don't remember having any girls not interested in me because I > was too 'nice'. I'm pretty sure sometimes it was because of my > social skills... you know if I can't figure out how to chit chat the > entire time next thing you know they are being flirting at by > bystanders... " > > I was socially inept as well, which tended to put off women. > However, with the ones I managed to actually date, a new problem > arose: They could not keep an in-depth conversation going. > > Not to be mean at all here, but I think I understand why it is non- > Aspies keep changing the subject all the time: It's so that they can > APPEAR to be knowledgable about things and thus attractive to > members of the opposite sex. > > But in reality, their " warehouse " of facts and anecdotes from which > to draw on is almost empty, their ability to construct arguments is > poor, they have a limited vocabulary, and their attention span is > short. > > Thus they hate it when you stick to facts, quote sources, create > logical arguments, use precise diction, and talk at length. > > I did enjoy many aspects of the relationships I had with non-Aspie > women, but the one area that was lacking in these relationsips were > in depth conversations, which I really REALLY needed. > > And for the record, my experience has been that when a non-Aspie > woman says she needs " deep " conversations, " deep " by her definition > means just below the water's surface, whereas to me in means the The > na Trench (the deepest point on the Earth's surface). > > Tom > Administrator > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 " One thing might be to date women who are five years older. More life experience, more things to talk about. " I have nearly always dated older women, and it seems that older non- Aspie women have trouble holding their own in deep conversations as well as younger non-Aspie women. But I will say that older non-Aspie women are better at holding their own than younger non Aspie women. Incidentally, since I usually date smart women, I have been ale to determine that intelligence is a factor in whether or not a non- Aspie woman can hold a deep conversation. I think argumentation and all the other things that go with conversing that I have listed out in a prior post must be based in a separate portion of thebrain than the one that controls intelligence, or else it is simply that discussing things in depth is an undeveloped ability in most non- Aspie women. I am dating an older woman now who is an Aspie. She and I can go on endlessly with one another, and sometimes she blows my mind out of the water. maybe it is just that Aspies and aspies can connect better because they have similar mindsets. I do not know. " Another topic, in elementary school and junior high, I can remember feeling incredible emphathy toward situations of social justice, that other kids seemed to not get at all. " I felt the same way about things. I used to be upset, for example, about how all the Native Americans were moved west by the settlers, but my fellow students seemed to believe that might makes right, and that if the " Indians " had been the stronger -and thus deserving- power, they would have driven out the rights and " deserved " to keep their land. I also hated how minorities and poor folks were picked on at my school(s). Tom Administrator There might be a situation about poverty and exclusion and unfairness, and the other kids didn't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2006 Report Share Posted November 6, 2006 vermontredfox wrote: " One thing might be to date women who are five years older. More life experience, more things to talk about. " Tom wrote: " I am dating an older woman now who is an Aspie. She and I can go on endlessly with one another, and sometimes she blows my mind out of the water. maybe it is just that Aspies and aspies can connect better because they have similar mindsets. I do not know. " Do either of you men know just how terribly improbable it is for an intelligent Aspie woman to find an intelligent man with whom she can carry on an intelligant conversation? I will tell you, however, that once she has met her match, it's a wondrous feeling to know that deep conversation is reflected back to her. :-D Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.