Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Stan wrote: " That seems to relate to a " go read this book " list. " Your comment seems to relate to an " it's not my problem " attitude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Stan wrote: " No, I don't think it's a significant factor, but if someone were to show that it does cause violence, then I would accept that. As of now, we have very mixed results. More significantly, patterns of violence and patterns of youth violence don't correspond to what one would suppose are patterns of video game use. " You don't see the patterns because you refuse -- as evidenced by your previous posts -- to read the studies that prove this correlation. Since you are unwilling to read factual information but insist on arguing your point, I can only drop this subject since it is illogical to continue discussing a subject with someone who is so close minded that he cannot consider data from reputable sources. Raven Co-Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Not that I want to get caught up in this discussion, but, in answer to your question, the proof lies with the fact that they murdered the homeless person and did not appear to regret it until they were caught. In reading the actual article, it didn't seem like the boy who committed the crime was remorseful. Just philosophical. Sort of like " Yeah, I killed a guy. I wonder what made me do it. It all seemed like a video game. Pretty wild huh? " Tom Administrator How do you prove that they do not know murder is wrong? Where could I find proof that those who've murdered homeless persons believe that they think the homeless aren't people/humans/soul based other than your personal experiences? Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 I actually agree on this. Whe placed in a board of advisors/trustees/directors, or funding capacity, even if the member of any of these boards cannot by the rules of the institution determine policy, the person holding the position still has an obligation to publically note if something is out of kilter, and if they are not listened to, they should quit. Quitting a board would mean one less thing to put on their resume, yet it would bode well if future employees saw that one quit a board for moral or ethical reasons. Tom Administrator " Wow, that's a lot. Since I'm not in a decision making capacity regarding this, I would not be in a position to evaluate this. (The school will establish what rules it requires according to people who supervise those things.) " Raven said: " When adults abdicate their responsibilities to help create and help safeguard a good environment for minors, the first thing they do is say they aren't in a position to evaluate studies with excellent data. It's an easy way of saying it's not really their problem after all. It's someone else's problem and someone else's job and when things go terribly wrong, they are the first to shout loudly that they had absolutely nothing to do with how things have gone terribly wrong. How very interesting. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Probably. There is no point in discussing things with someone who ignores evidence from the American Psychological Association which has published extensive studies that prove his viewpoint is wrong. Tom Administrator This thread is starting to get personal. Perhaps we should give it a rest for a while? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Just thought I would point something out Stan. You wrote; " Since I'm not in a decision making capacity regarding this, I would not be in a position to evaluate this. (The school will establish what rules it requires according to people who supervise those things.) " I do not sit on the board of governors of the school my son attends (although I do know some that do) and neither am I in a position to establish the rules of said school. However doesn't mean I don't question them - especially if I am aware of anything I consider suspect and it does go on even though such things are generally attempted to be covered up. I consider my son's school enviroment important and not just his, but other children's educational enviroments too - so if I suspect something is amiss, I gather facts and data and make said school aware of such and or others in positions that can do something about the situation. I also provide the school with written evidence, articles, facts etc on points I am trying to get across to them - so they can see that it is not just 'my' opinion and that I have research to back up my points. " Wow, that's a lot. Since I'm not in a decision making > capacity regarding this, I would not be in a position to evaluate > this. (The school will establish what rules it requires according to > people who supervise those things.) " > > When adults abdicate their responsibilities to help create and help > safeguard a good environment for minors, the first thing they do is say > they aren't in a position to evaluate studies with excellent data. > It's an easy way of saying it's not really their problem after all. > It's someone else's problem and someone else's job and when things go > terribly wrong, they are the first to shout loudly that they had > absolutely nothing to do with how things have gone terribly wrong. How > very interesting. > > Raven > Co-Administrator > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 I suppose it all depends how important one considers the issue - for me I find it important - but I am aware that it will be less of a priority to others. " Wow, that's a lot. Since I'm not in a decision making > > capacity regarding this, I would not be in a position to evaluate > > this. (The school will establish what rules it requires according to > > people who supervise those things.) " > > > > When adults abdicate their responsibilities to help create and help > > safeguard a good environment for minors, the first thing they do is say > > they aren't in a position to evaluate studies with excellent data. > > It's an easy way of saying it's not really their problem after all. > > It's someone else's problem and someone else's job and when things go > > terribly wrong, they are the first to shout loudly that they had > > absolutely nothing to do with how things have gone terribly wrong. How > > very interesting. > > That seems to relate to a " go read this book " list. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Stan I think there has already been an article posted here involving a study showing that there is a link between violence in games and that in turn causing more violent behaviour/thoughts in people. Maybe you do not read all the posts? or perhaps you skimmed over the one I mention above? " I think it would be possible to determine if the games > > cause bullying behaviour or the like, and more to the point, what kind > > of games cause that. " > > > > Are you then changing your opinion on the subject at hand and agreeing > > that violent video games do indeed cause aggression and violence in > > those who engage in gameplaying of violent video games? > > No, I don't think it's a significant factor, but if someone were > to show that it does cause violence, then I would accept that. > As of now, we have very mixed results. More significantly, > patterns of violence and patterns of youth violence don't > correspond to what one would suppose are patterns of video game > use. > > I don't think there's a " but for " circumstance by which some > regulation of video games or any other media will cure the > problem. > > - s > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Ooooooooooops sorry - I read the posts in order and have only got to this one now and have already posted on this thread. > > > > This thread is starting to get personal. Perhaps we should give it a rest > for a while? > > > <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free > email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > http://www.aol.com. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 This is a point I tried to make earlier on in this thread, that it is scary that someone can be so detached from reality and I don't think such is that isolated really. For instance we have an increase in virtual stuff, I am mostly aware of what is real and what is not - but even for informed adults the boundaries can be blurred. For example, not everything one sees, reads in the news is always neccecarily true, often it is biased and potrayed in such a way as to lead the viewer/reader to the conclusion that 'they' (the producers of such) want you to come to. Also many I have spoken to don't consider people on-line as Real as the people they interact with off-line. I personally do not understand this belief/thought - I am well aware that those who contribute to this board (and others on the net) are real life flesh and blood people, with feelings and thoughts. I am aware that many can put up a 'image' online (or some at least try) as they feel a certain amount of anonymity, but such people are probably very likely capable of lying off line too. I've digressed a little - but it is nonetheless worrying that some are becoming more and more detached and escaping into a virtual world that is blurring their perception of reality. > > How do you prove that they do not know murder is wrong? Where could > I find proof that those who've murdered homeless persons believe > that they think the homeless aren't people/humans/soul based other > than your personal experiences? > > > Kim > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 On 24 Feb 2007 greebohere wrote: > I do not sit on the board of governors of the school my son attends > ... However doesn't mean I don't question them I can see people are somewhat invested in this issue. I think all points have been thoroughly discussed. While it's unlikely that I would make a decision to be part of one organization based on the consensus of a completely different group, this is largely a non-issue, in part because residency is a long way off. - s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.