Guest guest Posted June 27, 2012 Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 Thinking about this week's post about farmer's markets produce quality got me curious about any technology that could quickly and inexpensively test food quality and chemical residues, especially below the outside skin. So, last week I dug into energy signatures of DNA and foods and how Kirlian photography shows the activity of food in terms of pure energy. This may test energy potential, but not every available nutrient which can vary significantly based on how well the soil has been built and maintained. Does anyone know how effective this type of camera would be on produce sprayed with chemicals after harvest? Chemically treated, conventionally produced stuff has a very low energy signature and would be obvious. That makes sense when you think about glyphosate chelating (binding) to critical minerals like magnesium and reducing the food's nutrient value. Any experiences with this would be great to hear about, so please message me directly. Thanks! in Minneapolis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.