Guest guest Posted July 25, 2012 Report Share Posted July 25, 2012 Here's some excellent reading that modern medicine totally ignored....The causation of almost all cancer (and degerative disease) has been known for 170 years! Everything here parallels exactly with WAPF, Paleo, Drs. Atkins, Mercola, and Cowan, and what most of us believe!! Will Winter Farmesota TAKING OUT THE CARBAGE– By Ballerstedt PeteB@... www.grassbasedhealth.blogspot.com A physician named Stanislas Tanchou studied the statistical distribution of cancer. He documented evidence of increased malignancy with increased civilization. One of the prime indicators of a civilizing trend was a diet that included sugar and white flour. As their consumption increased, the incidence of malignancy increased. Tanchou presented his complex statistical examination to the Paris Science Society ... in 1843! Since then many physicians serving varying populations throughout the world have documented the increased incidence of " Western Diseases " (including cancer) as refined carbohydrate in the diet increased. A cancer & #8208;avoiding diet would appear, therefore, to be one that is low in refined carbohydrate. Doll (the man that proved the link between cigarette smoking and cancer) and Peto wrote in 1981: At least 75 to 80 percent of cancers in the U.S. would be avoidable with appropriate changes in diet and lifestyle. Food additives, pollution and occupational exposures play a minimal role. Diet plays the largest role – from 10 to 70 percent of all cancer. Higginson, the first director of the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer, wrote: " It appears that only a very small part of the total cancer burden can be directly related to industrialization. " It wasn't industrialization that introduced cancer and other Western Diseases to populations, it was refined carbohydrates! It seems so clear, yet official policy and legislation has been focused in other directions & #8208; in part because of faulty science, and in part because of competing interests. " If [environmentalists] could possibly make people believe that cancer was going to result from pollution, this would enable them to facilitate the clean & #8208;up of water, of the air, or whatever it is... to make cancer the whipping boy for every environmental evil may prevent effective action when it does matter. " & #8208; Higginson One of the implied benefits of " organic " food is that consumers will reduce their risk of cancer by consuming it. But if Tanchou and all the others are right, it's " carbage " (organic or conventional) that poses the greatest risk for cancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.