Guest guest Posted March 2, 2012 Report Share Posted March 2, 2012 There seems to be a bit of confusion about the MN Raw Milk Access Bill (SF 147/HF 255) so here is some information to help clarify what it is and what it isn't. - First and foremost, it protects the RELATIONSHIP between the farmer and the consumer. It protects their RIGHT TO PRIVATE CONTRACT. - The bill clarifies and improves a vague, restrictive and outdated law that's on the books from the 1940s called MN statute 32.393. The proposed bill protects the farmer and consumer from the state potentially misinterpreting the old law, as it has done in the past, due to its vagueness. It brings the law up to date and in line with modern, private farm-to-consumer commerce. - RAW MILK IS LEGAL IN MINNESOTA and always has been. The bill is essentially a transportation bill giving practical access to an already legal food. Farmers are already delivering ILLEGALLY to consumers, and this bill makes private delivery LEGAL. - Under the new bill, it would be possible, IF THEY WANT TO, for a farmer or person the farmer designates to deliver raw milk and raw milk products such as cheese, cottage cheese, butter, ice cream, etc., directly to private homes, drop sites or any locations determined by the farmer and consumer. Alternatively, it allows the consumer or person the consumer designates to pick up and deliver these foods. - These options are not mandated and the bill does not require anyone to do anything. It does NOT REQUIRE the farmer to transport. - This bill simply defines what the delivery possibilities and options are, so that the state no longer has the capacity to misinterpret the law and question these practices of modern, direct farmer-to-consumer commerce. The state would not be able to raid consumers or farmers for these types of private transactions because the options are clearly spelled out. - The bill deals only with raw milk and raw milk products and has nothing to do with pasteurized dairy. It does NOT allow for or pertain to retail sales or any type of commerce to the general public; it is about private transactions between a farmer and a consumer. It does not pertain to regulation and inspection. It does not preclude the state from investigating cases of food-borne illness that it already has the ability to do for all foods. It does not preclude or prevent future laws people might want to pass such as herd share laws, voluntary testing, etc.; those are separate issues not within the scope of this bill. In summary, the bill updates the law so that raw dairy foods can be delivered off the farm or picked up by consumers with the same freedoms and options afforded to other farm foods (think CSAs, etc.) The consumer no longer has to drive to the farm unless the farmer and consumer agree that is what they want to do. The objective is that the CONSUMER AND FARMER HAVE A PROTECTED RELATIONSHIP. It's about FOOD FREEDOM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.