Re:Cancer cured!

[Guest guest]

"Nutritional protocols for curing cancer exist and have existed formany years. Are they 100 percent effective? There is no certainty, butthey are considerably more effective than the toxic mainstreamoncologists' approach."This is delusional. While the success rate for cancer chemotherapy is uneven, there are some amazing success stories. Childhood leukemias, Hodgkin's disease, have 80% cure rates.Testicular cancer? used to be a death sentence, and look at Lance!There are many things remaining to be done, but to treat cancer with "vitamins" is homicidal negligence, at best.JB

[Guest guest]

,

Since you have not studied Dr. method and know nothing about

it - you say he uses vitamins. Vitamins are not the basis for his therapy.

Study it -- put a little effort into looking at it and then post a

comment, please. We would all benefit from your criticism, but it

shouldn't be another knee-jerk attack where you don't know what you're

talking about.

And as far as homicidal negligence on the doctor's part. Well, the

National Cancer Institute funded him with 1.4 million dollars to

conduct a second study on his method which has much better success

rates than Sloan-Kettering does. NCI wants to know why his nutritional

therapy works better than chemo. NCI doesn't fund " homicidal negligence. "

Mooney

www.michaelmooney.net

wwwe.medibolics.com

> " Nutritional protocols for curing cancer exist and have existed for

> many years. Are they 100 percent effective? There is no certainty, but

> they are considerably more effective than the toxic mainstream

> oncologists' approach. "

> This is delusional.

> While the success rate for cancer chemotherapy is uneven, there are

> some amazing success stories. Childhood leukemias, Hodgkin's

> disease, have 80% cure rates.

> Testicular cancer? used to be a death sentence, and look at Lance!

> There are many things remaining to be done, but to treat cancer with

> " vitamins " is homicidal negligence, at best.

> JB