Guest guest Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I think it's outrageous that the US is still imposing discriminatory restrictions on PWA.  This travel ban was lifted when "W" signed PEPFAR. So, why the delay? Is it just lack of communication? Red tape? Denial?  If so, I think it's time to make this an issue.  Hopefully, after Jan 20, things will change.  We don't even have a national AIDS policy, for God's sake!  I think it's time to take serious and deliberate action.  This shouldn't be too much of a difficult issue to address... A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 There was a law specifically targeting people with AIDS or HIV which was eliminated with the PEPFAR reauthorization. However, HIV/AIDS is still on the list of excluded diseases that CDC or whichever govt entity keeps. That list has things like malaria, stds, cancer...etc. Hell will freeze over before hiv is removed from that list, so in effect striking down that other hiv-specific law will have limited effect. That law excluded all hiv poz people regardless whether they have health insurance or not. So for example if you were a French citizen with the best health care in the world, with all your medicines and health care paid by the state, you were still prohibited from coming to the US because you had hiv. If they somehow discovered that fact they could just deny entry. The CDC list prevents all the world's sick and poor coming to the US and overloading the healthcare system. While many dont give much credit to W, he is probably smart enough to realize this. > > I think it's outrageous that the US is still imposing discriminatory restrictions on PWA.  This travel ban was lifted when " W " signed PEPFAR. So, why the delay? Is it just lack of communication? Red tape? Denial?  If so, I think it's time to make this an issue.  Hopefully, after Jan 20, things will change.  We don't even have a national AIDS policy, for God's sake!  I think it's time to take serious and deliberate action.  This shouldn't be too much of a difficult issue to address... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 "That law excluded all hiv poz people regardless whether theyhave health insurance or not. So for example if you were a Frenchcitizen with the best health care in the world, with all yourmedicines and health care paid by the state, you were still prohibitedfrom coming to the US because you had hiv. If they somehow discoveredthat fact they could just deny entry. The CDC list prevents all theworld's sick and poor coming to the US and overloading the healthcaresystem. While many dont give much credit to W, he is probably smartenough to realize this. "I think that the Bush administration just decided to leave the regulatory changes to the Obama team. You will see lifting of the regulations after the inauguration.Border states, such as California, Arizona, Texas, and Florida will feel the burden of increased costs of immigrants with HIV. How this is dealt with will be the next big issue.JB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.