Re: Re: MMJ

[Guest guest]

It is not illegal in California.. Also freedom of speech allows the discussion of this, even on the T.V, radio and in the newspapers. China, well that country doesn’t allow certain things to be said, like censoring things on internet. Here in the United States we can, my father served this country as well as others to protect those freedoms. I understand not talking about making a bomb to destroy people, that is talking about an illegal act by desiring to want to do it, still it is freedom of speech. Illegal, such as discussing methodologies of making drugs or committing crimes such as fraud. I sit in my chair, in the

United States in the state of California where the voters, not a few judges passed it. Hundreds of thousands of voters or more? A few judges? Does the vote mean anything anymore? Well sure it does, that's why medical patients are not put in jail by the police and even certain agencies have said publicly with law enforcement now they will not take someone in if they have a doctors note. The technicalities of the argument and by comparison to true illegal items of discussion are in no way violating the rules. Compassion and ethicality of this topic are a concern, with respects to the quality of life of those whom are ill and whom have been authorized by the voters. If young minds are reading now, they have every right to be witness to issues in which they will grow up to vote for as well. What if your grandmother or

grandfather, or even mother or father became so seriously ill that this medicine could help them, despite the true illegal circumstances of it being used for non-medical purposes? I think anyone that has any ethic and compassion would agree that if it helps prolong life, increase the quality of life such as less suffering then its properly used for medical purposes. It's only illegal by crossing state lines, otherwise peoples votes no longer matter and this is not the U.S I was brought up in and taught about in school. Nor is it the same country that my father served in and others died for.environmental1st2003 <no_reply > wrote: We discussed this. It's written as a rule in the FAQ section that topics of an illegal nature are not to be discussed. Since the use of

marijauna for any reason - including medical - is illegal under federal law in the US, we should not be talking about it. I have allowed it to persist, I suppose, because I don't want to censor the members. And I feel sucked into the discussion and post articles sometimes. The posting of articles after the discussion has abated is probably something I shouldn't do, but unfortunately, these articles tend not to conveniently pop up during the debate. Until I have the proof of the articles to post, as Rainbow says, I am only posting opinions. But the articles themselves are truth, and cannot be argued with. Tom Administrator Tom, I wish you'd make up your mind if this topic is permitted for discussion or not. If you really don't want it discussed here at all for legal, personal or other reasons,

why do you keep posting articles against it, when you know that's likely to spawn more discussion? Inger New Songhttp://www.aspergershosting.com/audio/Onwah.wma

Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Messenger with Voice.

[Guest guest]

No where did I state it was legal or not legal for him to do so, I think he doesnt agree with the topic and is taking the say away. Excuse for a debate he can't win.Inger Lorelei <inglori@...> wrote: I agree with all that you have stated, . But mailing lists are not public and thus freedom of speech is not an automatic right in private lists. Much as I would love a more democratic set-up, it is still up to the list owner to dictate the rules. If he wants to put a ban on a subject being discussed,

he in within legal right to do so and those who wish to discuss that subject anyway may start their own list to discuss these matters among themselves. Inger Re: Re: MMJ It

is not illegal in California.. Also freedom of speech allows the discussion of this, even on the T.V, radio and in the newspapers.China, well that country doesn’t allow certain things to be said, like censoring things on internet.Here in the United States we can, my father served this country as well as others to protect those freedoms.I understand not talking about making a bomb to destroy people, that is talking about an illegal act by desiring to want to do it, still it is freedom of speech.Illegal, such as discussing methodologies of making drugs or committing crimes such as fraud. I sit in my chair, in the United

States in the state of California where the voters, not a few judges passed it. Hundreds of thousands of voters or more? A few judges?Does the vote mean anything anymore? Well sure it does, that's why medical patients are not put in jail by the police and even certain agencies have said publicly with law enforcement now they will not take someone in if they have a doctors note.The technicalities of the argument and by comparison to true illegal items of discussion are in no way violating the rules. Compassion and ethicality of this topic are a concern, with respects to the quality of life of those whom are ill and whom have been authorized by the voters.If young minds are reading now, they have every right to be witness to issues in which they will grow up to vote for as well. What if your grandmother or grandfather, or even mother or father became so

seriously ill that this medicine could help them, despite the true illegal circumstances of it being used for non-medical purposes?I think anyone that has any ethic and compassion would agree that if it helps prolong life, increase the quality of life such as less suffering then its properly used for medical purposes.It's only illegal by crossing state lines, otherwise peoples votes no longer matter and this is not the U.S I was brought up in and taught about in school. Nor is it the same country that my father served in and others died for.environmental1st2003 <no_reply > wrote: We discussed this. It's written as a rule in the FAQ section that topics of an illegal nature are not to be discussed. Since the use of marijauna for any reason - including medical - is illegal under

federal law in the US, we should not be talking about it. I have allowed it to persist, I suppose, because I don't want to censor the members. And I feel sucked into the discussion and post articles sometimes. The posting of articles after the discussion has abated is probably something I shouldn't do, but unfortunately, these articles tend not to conveniently pop up during the debate.Until I have the proof of the articles to post, as Rainbow says, I am only posting opinions. But the articles themselves are truth, and cannot be argued with.TomAdministratorTom, I wish you'd make up your mind if this topic is permitted fordiscussion or not. If you really don't want it discussed here at all forlegal, personal or other reasons, why do you keep posting articles againstit, when you know that's likely to

spawn more discussion?IngerNew Songhttp://www.aspergershosting.com/audio/Onwah.wma

Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

[Guest guest]

I never did, that’s the result of peer pressure. I believe in safer ways for patients to obtain it where kids or adults who do not have a prescription can gain access safely without funding criminals. Those kinds of folks are conducting an illegal act which has not been approved by the voters in mass, I do not believe in legalization for everyone to use it. environmental1st2003 <no_reply > wrote: I once posted a study about how many kids tried pot before the age of 18. A huge amount in the US. 3 out of 5 or something like that. I'm sure no adult forced them to use it. Yet they did, because so many adults do say pot is "no big deal." Tom Administrator A bit over-protective, unless you are like some other religious folk who ignorantly call it the flower of satan. New Songhttp://www.aspergershosting.com/audio/Onwah.wma

Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Messenger with Voice.