Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 " It's not like we tell anyone to be scared or something. " Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 " It's not like we tell anyone to be scared or something. " Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 > Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed > to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. Uhm, I don't speak FOR anyone, I speak ABOUT the people I know. I don't think I ever mentioned the word " all " anywhere..? I'm confused... I can hardly expect people from my groups to collect signatures to post here to show how many people fear the Christians? And what good would that do? Asides, I'm perfectly authorized to speak " on behalf " of my tradition, and my friends would expect me to speak on their behalf any time where such general matters are concerned. Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 " Asides, I'm perfectly authorized to speak " on behalf " of my tradition, and my friends would expect me to speak on their behalf any time where such general matters are concerned. " And you do not have permission to speak on behalf of those who have not granted you such liberties with their words. You do not have the right to taint all shamans and non-Christian Spiritual people with your brush of perceptions. You still haven't answered how Aboriginal Spirituality and Australia are tied together in your previous post. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Raven, in the rest of the world the phrase " aboriginal " is most commonly used about the Australian Aboriginals specifically, even if it is technically correct that any native people are aboriginal too (e.g. the Saame of of Norhern Scandinavia). We Europeans are most used to the term " Native American " when talking of the people you represent. Arania/Lwaxy is from Germany, if I remember correctly. Thus, the linguistic confusion. Inger Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al " It's not like we tell anyone to be scared or something. " Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. Raven FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Raven, in the rest of the world the phrase " aboriginal " is most commonly used about the Australian Aboriginals specifically, even if it is technically correct that any native people are aboriginal too (e.g. the Saame of of Norhern Scandinavia). We Europeans are most used to the term " Native American " when talking of the people you represent. Arania/Lwaxy is from Germany, if I remember correctly. Thus, the linguistic confusion. Inger Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al " It's not like we tell anyone to be scared or something. " Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. Raven FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Aboriginals in Canada are members of the Six First Nations. We do not use the term Native Americans. We are who we are ... not Australians, not Americans. Raven " It's not like we tell anyone to be scared or something. " > > Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed > to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. > > Raven > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and > acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > Check the Links section for more FAM forums. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 How about Native Canadians? ;-) Inger Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al Aboriginals in Canada are members of the Six First Nations. We do not use the term Native Americans. We are who we are ... not Australians, not Americans. Raven " It's not like we tell anyone to be scared or something. " > > Then you should only speak on behalf of those you represent as opposed > to " all " those who practice what you call non-Christian spirituality. > > Raven > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and > acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > Check the Links section for more FAM forums. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Raven: > I've never known an Aboriginal in Canada who referred to himself or > herself as a Native Canadian. I've known a lot of white guys who > are Canadian who refer to themselves as Native Canadians though. ;-) So you are a Canadian Aboriginal? I find that quite interesting. Do you know more about the background? Does that make you Amerindian, Inuit or something else? Sorry if I'm ignorant. Leif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Now you are splitting hairs, Raven... > Perhaps you forgot post 21909 in which you stated in response to > 's question, " Who are the 'many of us' you refer to? " " I told her exactly from what groups the many come. Nothing at all wrong with that. > When you speak in such broad terms, you pretend to speak for ALL who > are not the Christians whom you accuse of such actions. No, I do not. If I do, I specifically use the word ALL. I have not used that word. I know better who I mean, that I am sure of. Sorry, but it is absolutely silly and nonsense to expect me to go through my groups and count who is who and then post numbers. > You can only speak for yourself and for those who have granted you > permission to speak on their behalf. And that I do. Sorry, but if you cannot see that then it is not my problem. Logic alone dictates I was talking about my groups, especially since I nowhere said ALL. > And you do not have permission to speak on behalf of those who have > not granted you such liberties with their words. You do not have > the right to taint all shamans and non-Christian Spiritual people > with your brush of perceptions. And as I said, I didn't, and it's quite exhausting to have to repeat the obvious. You are interpreting my words according to your own feelings. But that is not supposed to be my problem. > You still haven't answered how Aboriginal Spirituality and Australia > are tied together in your previous post. Aboriginals are predominantly in Australia, no? So since we don't have many, if any, people from Australia it's logical to assume we do not have many, if any, Aboriginals. And unless your people's spirituality has spread to Germany, which I really don't think it has save the occassional traveler, I don't really need to look at the Germans. The topic has also not popped up in any posts on my forums that I can remember. Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 I am Métis of Abenaki descent and very aware of my ancestors and the role my people have played in the history of the World. Thank you for asking. Raven > > Raven: > > I've never known any Aboriginal in Canada who referred to himself or > > herself as a Native Canadian. I've known a lot of white guys who > > are Canadian who refer to themselves as Native Canadians though. ;-) > > So you are a Canadian Aboriginal? I find that quite interesting. Do you > know more about the background? Does that make you Amerindian, > Inuit or something else? Sorry if I'm ignorant. > > Leif > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Re: > What has Aboriginal Spirituality got to do with Australians > specifically? In many English-speaking nations - e.g., the USA and Australia - " Aboriginal " with a capital " A " means, specifically, " Australian aboriginal. " In Canada, as I recall, " Aboriginal " with a capital " A " means what the USA currently calls " Native American. " Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 I wasn't even aware that the term is used in any other connection. Interesting. We do have Native Americans on some of the boards, but they insisted on being called just that - probably because in German, the term " Indianer " is used, which is different enough from Inder (Indian) to not want a new term. Oh, and the German translation for aboriginals (Eingeborene) as a general term has a bad taste because it was and partly still is used as a negative term close to babarians. Instead we now use Einheimische, I am not sure if there is a seperate English translation right now. Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 " Aboriginals are predominantly in Australia, no? " You are not very educated if you believe that Aboriginals are predominantly in Australia. Do not make assumptions based on minimal knowledge of facts. Open a book once in a while and broaden your knowledge base or ask questions of those who are apt to know the facts. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Very interesting. In Swedish, we also have the difference between " indier " (from India) and " indianer " (Native Americans). " Einheimishe " would be " native " in English. ( " Inhemsk " in Swedish. Aboriginal is " urbefolkning " in Swedish.) Inger Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al I wasn't even aware that the term is used in any other connection. Interesting. We do have Native Americans on some of the boards, but they insisted on being called just that - probably because in German, the term " Indianer " is used, which is different enough from Inder (Indian) to not want a new term. Oh, and the German translation for aboriginals (Eingeborene) as a general term has a bad taste because it was and partly still is used as a negative term close to babarians. Instead we now use Einheimische, I am not sure if there is a seperate English translation right now. Lwaxy FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 > No I'm not. You are being purposely evasive. Yes, you are, and do not tell me what I am or not, because I know I was very clear and to the point, while you are using lots of excuses to turn my words around like an NT. People do this to me all the dang time, and I do not need such silly games in an Aspie forum, really. > Your definition of the groups included Shamans and non-Christian > spirituality people. Since Aboriginal people have Shamans and are > non-Christian spirituality people, your own words prove that you > have mispoken on at least two levels. Sheeehs... BECAUSE WE HAVE THOSE IN OUR GROUPS. What is so hard to understand about that??? I said that lots of times now, maybe learn to read for a change. And why in the name of all Devas would I have to mention " in my groups " everytime specifically for you, when this is an OBVIOUS fact that everyone else but you seems to get? > You are not very educated if you believe that Aboriginals are > predominantly in Australia. Do not make assumptions based on > minimal knowledge of facts. Open a book once in a while and broaden > your knowledge base or ask questions of those who are apt to know > the facts. Yeah sure... how arrogant of you. No, Aboriginals with a big A means Australia in German. Maybe you should read sometimes instead of insisting everyone go by your own definition. Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Raven, please cool it now! I and Kate have just explained the linguistic differences between Europe and English-speaking countries. To not know what Canadian natives call themselves is not " uneducated " as such information is not part of regular curriculum here, it is simply *not knowing* due to not having been informed. You have informed us now, so now we know. I also think Arania has explained herself sufficiently. Inger Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al " Aboriginals are predominantly in Australia, no? " You are not very educated if you believe that Aboriginals are predominantly in Australia. Do not make assumptions based on minimal knowledge of facts. Open a book once in a while and broaden your knowledge base or ask questions of those who are apt to know the facts. Raven FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 > Very interesting. In Swedish, we also have the difference between " indier " > (from India) and " indianer " (Native Americans). So we aren't the only ones to keep outdated terms with slight changes. > " Einheimishe " would be " native " in English. ( " Inhemsk " in Swedish. > Aboriginal is " urbefolkning " in Swedish.) We use Urbevölkerung, too, sometimes, but it often gets misunderstood for ancestors, so it's not done often unless we want to state which German tribes, for example, originally lived somewhere. Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 OK, that goes for you too, Arania! I can see why you both are feeling annoyed at this point, but no insults here, please. Inger Co-administrator Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al > No I'm not. You are being purposely evasive. Yes, you are, and do not tell me what I am or not, because I know I was very clear and to the point, while you are using lots of excuses to turn my words around like an NT. People do this to me all the dang time, and I do not need such silly games in an Aspie forum, really. > Your definition of the groups included Shamans and non-Christian > spirituality people. Since Aboriginal people have Shamans and are > non-Christian spirituality people, your own words prove that you > have mispoken on at least two levels. Sheeehs... BECAUSE WE HAVE THOSE IN OUR GROUPS. What is so hard to understand about that??? I said that lots of times now, maybe learn to read for a change. And why in the name of all Devas would I have to mention " in my groups " everytime specifically for you, when this is an OBVIOUS fact that everyone else but you seems to get? > You are not very educated if you believe that Aboriginals are > predominantly in Australia. Do not make assumptions based on > minimal knowledge of facts. Open a book once in a while and broaden > your knowledge base or ask questions of those who are apt to know > the facts. Yeah sure... how arrogant of you. No, Aboriginals with a big A means Australia in German. Maybe you should read sometimes instead of insisting everyone go by your own definition. Lwaxy FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 " Yeah sure... how arrogant of you. No, Aboriginals with a big A means Australia in German. Maybe you should read sometimes instead of insisting everyone go by your own definition. " Insufferable attitude without facts is arrogance. Attitude with facts is admirable. You call this arrogance because you do not know. The definition is not mine when it comes to the term Aboriginal. Just as any African American would bristle at the term NIGGER being used to describe Afridan Americans, I bristle at your ignorance of facts wherein Aboriginals are concerned. Perhaps the words of Tecumseh (1795) will help you understand that in speaking about shamans and non-Christian spirituality people, you are perhaps unknowingly tainting Aboriginals with your comments. " My heart is a stone. Heavy with sadness for my people; cold with the knowledge that no treaty will keep the whites out of our land; hard with determination to resist as long as I live and breathe. Now we are weak and many of our people are afraid. But Hear Me: a single twig breaks, but the bundle of twigs is strong. Someday I will embrace our brother tribes and draw them into a bundle and together we will win our country back from the whites. " (Tecumseh, 1795) " The First Nation Aboriginals do not need the Lwaxy's of this world to speak for us. Each of us has a voice and together we are heard, speaking our truths and living our spirituality. And so you know ... Aboriginals in Australia refer to Aboriginals in Canada as Aboriginals. Raven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 > > OK, that goes for you too, Arania! > > I can see why you both are feeling annoyed at this point, but no insults > here, please. Sorry, I've been having a rather annoying day. Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Raven: " The definition is not mine when it comes to the term Aboriginal. Just as any African American would bristle at the term NIGGER being used to describe Afridan Americans, I bristle at your ignorance of facts wherein Aboriginals are concerned. " Raven, that's ENOUGH! You are getting yourself worked up over a simple linguistic difference. Not knowing what your people call themselves is NOT the same as calling a African Americans " nigger " . Arania did CLEARLY not intentionally wish to insult you or your people, she - like most of us here - had just had not been informed. Feel free to issue a complaint to the German and Swedish educational system about that, if you find that intolerable. But first, please take a deep breath or two and let this topic rest now. You have both said what you wished to convey and I can't see it getting anywhere but into a fight. Inger Co-administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 > Insufferable attitude without facts is arrogance. Attitude with > facts is admirable. You call this arrogance because you do not know. Actually, I called you arrogant because I think you are in this case. You turn my words around as it pleases you and present yourself very defensive. Maybe you have all reason to get upset at other nations a lot, but that's clearly not my fault. Maybe it happes all the time that outsiders try to talk for you, but that is not really a reason to accuse me to do the same. If you want to educate others about your people, it does not help to go out there and expect everyone would know what you know and use the same terms because we do not. It also doesn't help to make it seem as if your people are the only ones to go by. > The definition is not mine when it comes to the term Aboriginal. > Just as any African American would bristle at the term NIGGER being > used to describe Afridan Americans, I bristle at your ignorance of > facts wherein Aboriginals are concerned. Actually, many American blacks (who often don't even want the term African there anymore, because they are not African anymore) use the word nigger perfectly well, and I am not only refering to certain circles. This is mostly done so the whites won't have power over them anymore by using a supposed bad word. I'm not completely sure where the comparison is though. > Perhaps the words of Tecumseh (1795) will help you understand that > in speaking about shamans and non-Christian spirituality people, you > are perhaps unknowingly tainting Aboriginals with your comments. I do not, because I speak about those I know and have every right to do so. We do have shamans who fear Christians, that is a fact. As I said plenty of times now, I was clearly speaking about those, why is this so hard to get for you? As you likely know, " shaman " is not a title that's strictly reserved for natives of Nothern America or Australia. We do have native German shamans, too, and although the term we use locally is slightly different, internationally the word shaman is used. Maybe it should not be used internationally, there are debates about that a lot, but at the moment, it is. It may suprise you but I know about Tecumseh very well, as he and his people were the object of a 7th grade research project about the differences in civilisations. And this research was the main reason for me to research different paths than my own traditions. > The First Nation Aboriginals do not need the Lwaxy's of this world > to speak for us. Each of us has a voice and together we are heard, > speaking our truths and living our spirituality. And the rest of the world certainly does not need you to force them into your own set of definition. Maybe if you would have read what I wrote you would have understood that you got carried away by assumptions and emotions. Asides, there is only ONE of me. ) > And so you know ... Aboriginals in Australia refer to Aboriginals in > Canada as Aboriginals. Yes, that's good to know. But, serious question, how do we generally know what Aboriginals we are talking of if we do not add the respective country? Lwaxy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 As an Administrator here, I am NOT going to take sides in this debate! Well, yes I am. Clearly Raven is merelt trying to assert that certain terms, such as " Indians " or even " Native Americans " can cause offense. Now that the assertion has been made, and presumably understood by all parties, we can proceed without argumentation over the point. Henceforth, when referring to what I would call Native Americans, and what others would call Indians, we will call people of such descent Aboriginals. Tom Administrator Raven: " The definition is not mine when it comes to the term Aboriginal. Just as any African American would bristle at the term NIGGER being used to describe Afridan Americans, I bristle at your ignorance of facts wherein Aboriginals are concerned. " Raven, that's ENOUGH! You are getting yourself worked up over a simple linguistic difference. Not knowing what your people call themselves is NOT the same as calling a African Americans " nigger " . Arania did CLEARLY not intentionally wish to insult you or your people, she - like most of us here - had just had not been informed. Feel free to issue a complaint to the German and Swedish educational system about that, if you find that intolerable. But first, please take a deep breath or two and let this topic rest now. You have both said what you wished to convey and I can't see it getting anywhere but into a fight. Inger Co-administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 I am having a hard time knowing what happens to be preferred respectful phrase for various groups on the other side of the Atlantic. I thought Native American was a respectful designation because that's what I've been told. I thought African American was respectful because that's what I've been told. If those have recently changed into other, even MORE respectful designations, I'd be happy to be informed of it. Is there like a list of which names are currently appropriate so that I as an ignorant European don't to insulting anyone inadvertently? Thanks to Raven, I now know that Canadian Aboriginals don't wish to be called Native Americans. But just to avoid confusion with other Aboriginals, how about calling them Canadian Aboriginals? Inger Re: Witches, druids, shamans, et al As an Administrator here, I am NOT going to take sides in this debate! Well, yes I am. Clearly Raven is merelt trying to assert that certain terms, such as " Indians " or even " Native Americans " can cause offense. Now that the assertion has been made, and presumably understood by all parties, we can proceed without argumentation over the point. Henceforth, when referring to what I would call Native Americans, and what others would call Indians, we will call people of such descent Aboriginals. Tom Administrator Raven: " The definition is not mine when it comes to the term Aboriginal. Just as any African American would bristle at the term NIGGER being used to describe Afridan Americans, I bristle at your ignorance of facts wherein Aboriginals are concerned. " Raven, that's ENOUGH! You are getting yourself worked up over a simple linguistic difference. Not knowing what your people call themselves is NOT the same as calling a African Americans " nigger " . Arania did CLEARLY not intentionally wish to insult you or your people, she - like most of us here - had just had not been informed. Feel free to issue a complaint to the German and Swedish educational system about that, if you find that intolerable. But first, please take a deep breath or two and let this topic rest now. You have both said what you wished to convey and I can't see it getting anywhere but into a fight. Inger Co-administrator FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.