Guest guest Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 forwarding..... After the Vioxx scandal new clinical research regulations have come into force. Trials that begin enrolment of patients after 1 July 2005 must register before their start in a recognised trials registry to be considered for publication and they must be published within 90 days after the ending regardless of whether the results are positive, negative or inconclusive. Curiously, almost all of the major trials that have been published since then have failed. How can we explain the discrepancy between the the older positive trials and the negative recent ones? This is a crucial question put by the French researcher and THINCS member Michel de Lorgeril in this paper: http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jln/19/1/65/_pdf Uffe Ravnskov This letter has been sent to you because you have previously shown interest in the many contradictions of the diet-cholesterol-heart hypothesis and/or the work of our group THINCS, The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics (www.thincs.org ). If you do not wish to be on the mailing list, please contact me and I shall delete your name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.