Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I have already posted on this - I am pretty certain it refers to the worship of idols = idolism. > > > > What does " idiolism " mean? It looks as if it would sound like > > " ID-ee-oh-lizz-um " - a word I have never heard. But, whatever it > > sounds like, I cannot find it in any dictionary. > > > > > > Yours for better letters, > > Kate Gladstone > > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > > handwritingrepair@ > > http://learn.to/handwrite, > http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > > 325 South Manning Boulevard > > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > > telephone 518/482-6763 > > AND REMEMBER ... > > you can order books through my site! > > (Amazon.com link - > > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: On 3/4/06, ravenmagic2003 <ravenmagic2003@...> wrote: > Phonetically, it sounds like " idealism " which is in the dictionary. So? Accurately (rather than approximately/sloppily) applying the complex and exception-rife patterns of English spelling accurately, rather than approximately (which I learned to do as part of learning to read and spell accurately) yields the non-existent " ID-ee-oh-lizz-um " (rather than " ie-DEE-uh-lizz-um " ) as the spoken counterpart of the non-existent " idiolism. " 's weak grasp of those patterns does not always leave his writing easily intelligible. If I wrote " colonel, " would you reasonably expect that others ought to read it as " colonial " because the two resemble each other about as much as " idiolism " resembles " idealism " ? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: On 3/4/06, ravenmagic2003 <ravenmagic2003@...> wrote: > Phonetically, it sounds like " idealism " which is in the dictionary. So? Accurately (rather than approximately/sloppily) applying the complex and exception-rife patterns of English spelling accurately, rather than approximately (which I learned to do as part of learning to read and spell accurately) yields the non-existent " ID-ee-oh-lizz-um " (rather than " ie-DEE-uh-lizz-um " ) as the spoken counterpart of the non-existent " idiolism. " 's weak grasp of those patterns does not always leave his writing easily intelligible. If I wrote " colonel, " would you reasonably expect that others ought to read it as " colonial " because the two resemble each other about as much as " idiolism " resembles " idealism " ? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 If and when I do have the time to write something up it takes more time to edit it for incessant perfectionism then writing it. I can spend 10 minutes writing something and spend over an hour editing it. Also changing it because I have tendencies of thinking to say one thing and it is mixes up when expressing it, I was told that was mixed expressive language issues. There is the challenge of taking visual spatial reasoning and putting it into words. I can see (envision within the mind) greater complexity then I can articulate. Which is why I have to make up words sometimes that some that I have noticed can understand others not. Still expression like early on in life is a source of frustration, there is a gab between one ability and the other per say. Expressionally I am not to par of my liking, as words are dauntingly limited. Also I was in special Ed for grammar but anyone ridiculously incessant of grammatical perfection will not enjoy me. I do have a grammar teacher that lives next door now, I was thinking of having that person or another edit important expression of mine. I do not want to ask the next door lady though. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: On 3/4/06, ravenmagic2003 <ravenmagic2003@...> wrote: > Phonetically, it sounds like "idealism" which is in the dictionary. So? Accurately (rather than approximately/sloppily) applying the complex and exception-rife patterns of English spelling accurately, rather than approximately (which I learned to do as part of learning to read and spell accurately) yields the non-existent "ID-ee-oh-lizz-um" (rather than "ie-DEE-uh-lizz-um") as the spoken counterpart of the non-existent "idiolism." 's weak grasp of those patterns does not always leave his writing easily intelligible. If I wrote "colonel," would you reasonably expect that others ought to read it as "colonial" because the two resemble each other about as much as "idiolism" resembles "idealism"? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > If and when I do have the time to write something up it takes more time to edit it >for incessant perfectionism then writing it. Thanks for explaining that. When I don't understand, or don't feel sure that I understand, what you wrote, may I ask? E.g., did your " per say " mean " _per_se_ " or did it mean something else that I just might not happen to know? > Expressionally I am not to par of my liking, What does " to par of my liking " mean, please? >as words are dauntingly limited. Also I was in special Ed for grammar but anyone >ridiculously incessant of grammatical perfection will not enjoy me. I enjoy your writing. What did your school find ungrammatical in your writing or speech? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > ... incessant of grammatical perfection ... I can't find a meaning of " incessant " that will fit here. , what other word did you mean when you write " incessant " ? To me, your grammar looks good - why did Special Ed send you to grammar class when (as far as I can see) the problems instead involve vocabulary and spelling? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > ... incessant of grammatical perfection ... I can't find a meaning of " incessant " that will fit here. , what other word did you mean when you write " incessant " ? To me, your grammar looks good - why did Special Ed send you to grammar class when (as far as I can see) the problems instead involve vocabulary and spelling? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I'd prefer people ask then my blind (unknown interpretations from others) attempt at finding differing ways of expressing. I write how it sounds. "per say" mean "_per_se_" Yes I am not sure what is wrong with my grammar, I have written much more in the past 2 years then any other time in my life, in so doing I have obtained more skills through experience. To par of my liking is in this context saying I am still frustrated by the inability to articulate certain ideas and some other ideas clearly enough. Language is like another level / layer of consciousness that I consider imperfect but unfortunately required. Also I was a bit tired last night and trying to respond immediately as to retain interests mutually in correspondence with the debate. Additional errors occurred with that but with this communication platform I cannot edit errors. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > If and when I do have the time to write something up it takes more time to edit it >for incessant perfectionism then writing it. Thanks for explaining that. When I don't understand, or don't feel sure that I understand, what you wrote, may I ask? E.g., did your "per say" mean "_per_se_" or did it mean something else that I just might not happen to know? > Expressionally I am not to par of my liking, What does "to par of my liking" mean, please? >as words are dauntingly limited. Also I was in special Ed for grammar but anyone >ridiculously incessant of grammatical perfection will not enjoy me. I enjoy your writing. What did your school find ungrammatical in your writing or speech? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I'd prefer people ask then my blind (unknown interpretations from others) attempt at finding differing ways of expressing. I write how it sounds. "per say" mean "_per_se_" Yes I am not sure what is wrong with my grammar, I have written much more in the past 2 years then any other time in my life, in so doing I have obtained more skills through experience. To par of my liking is in this context saying I am still frustrated by the inability to articulate certain ideas and some other ideas clearly enough. Language is like another level / layer of consciousness that I consider imperfect but unfortunately required. Also I was a bit tired last night and trying to respond immediately as to retain interests mutually in correspondence with the debate. Additional errors occurred with that but with this communication platform I cannot edit errors. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > If and when I do have the time to write something up it takes more time to edit it >for incessant perfectionism then writing it. Thanks for explaining that. When I don't understand, or don't feel sure that I understand, what you wrote, may I ask? E.g., did your "per say" mean "_per_se_" or did it mean something else that I just might not happen to know? > Expressionally I am not to par of my liking, What does "to par of my liking" mean, please? >as words are dauntingly limited. Also I was in special Ed for grammar but anyone >ridiculously incessant of grammatical perfection will not enjoy me. I enjoy your writing. What did your school find ungrammatical in your writing or speech? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 - thanks for preferring that people ask. Re: > I am not sure what is wrong with my grammar Well, what (if anything) have people claimed to find wrong with your grammar? Knowing what others have said might give me a clue about just why they would look at something with perfectly fine grammar and call it " poor grammar. " Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Not sure.. I never understood grammar in depth but after trial and error I find proper methodologies of expression. Yet proper expression might not be unique expression as I find myself attentive to originality over structured methodologies of regularity. IIncessant could have been necessant. They sound the same. It was desired to mean a heightened attentiveness to a way, or perhaps the psychological need to attend to edification or certain methodology not otherwise specified. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > ... incessant of grammatical perfection ... I can't find a meaning of "incessant" that will fit here. , what other word did you mean when you write "incessant"? To me, your grammar looks good - why did Special Ed send you to grammar class when (as far as I can see) the problems instead involve vocabulary and spelling? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Not sure.. I never understood grammar in depth but after trial and error I find proper methodologies of expression. Yet proper expression might not be unique expression as I find myself attentive to originality over structured methodologies of regularity. IIncessant could have been necessant. They sound the same. It was desired to mean a heightened attentiveness to a way, or perhaps the psychological need to attend to edification or certain methodology not otherwise specified. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > ... incessant of grammatical perfection ... I can't find a meaning of "incessant" that will fit here. , what other word did you mean when you write "incessant"? To me, your grammar looks good - why did Special Ed send you to grammar class when (as far as I can see) the problems instead involve vocabulary and spelling? Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I started to read about psychology and other related things to just figure all the confussion out. I don't understand much of the I.E.P stuff which included why I was in grammer class..Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: - thanks for preferring that people ask. Re: > I am not sure what is wrong with my grammar Well, what (if anything) have people claimed to find wrong with your grammar? Knowing what others have said might give me a clue about just why they would look at something with perfectly fine grammar and call it "poor grammar." Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > I never understood grammar in depth " Not understanding grammar in depth " does not apply to any native speaker (of English or whatever language) over the age of two. If you speak (or write) English above the level of " where food? " and " all gone crayons, " you understand and use English grammar. Again, your problems as I see them involve vocabulary and sometimes spelling ... but *not* grammar. > IIncessant could have been necessant. I don't know " necessant. " Do you mean " incessant " or " insistant. " >They sound the same. No, they sound similar. " Similar " and " same " mean different things. >It was desired to mean a heightened attentiveness to a way, Excuse me, but I don't understand what you meant by " way " here - and I can't think of any word that sounds similar to " way " and would fit here to convey a meaning. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > I never understood grammar in depth " Not understanding grammar in depth " does not apply to any native speaker (of English or whatever language) over the age of two. If you speak (or write) English above the level of " where food? " and " all gone crayons, " you understand and use English grammar. Again, your problems as I see them involve vocabulary and sometimes spelling ... but *not* grammar. > IIncessant could have been necessant. I don't know " necessant. " Do you mean " incessant " or " insistant. " >They sound the same. No, they sound similar. " Similar " and " same " mean different things. >It was desired to mean a heightened attentiveness to a way, Excuse me, but I don't understand what you meant by " way " here - and I can't think of any word that sounds similar to " way " and would fit here to convey a meaning. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 - the spelling " confussion " contradicts your earlier statement that you words as they sound. If a word " confussion " existed, it would sound very different from the word " confusion " which I suppose you meant to spell. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 My computer had a glitch between " you " and " words " in the previous message, at the point where I should have typed " spell " ; I'll try again: - the spelling " confussion " contradicts your earlier statement that you spell words as they sound. If a word " confussion " existed, it would sound very different from the word " confusion " which I suppose you meant to spell. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would not be able to keep up with it. Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. Similarity are both the gift and not. There are similarities in abstraction and in comparative reasoning. However there and their is similar and also words that sound similar. So I confuse those things but still though the similarity is the word similarity it is a constant source of errors as well as ability. I will never order a grammar text book. Similarities as my gift is both a gift and a curse (deficit like a type of dyslexia sort of) per-se. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > I never understood grammar in depth "Not understanding grammar in depth" does not apply to any native speaker (of English or whatever language) over the age of two. If you speak (or write) English above the level of "where food?" and "all gone crayons," you understand and use English grammar. Again, your problems as I see them involve vocabulary and sometimes spelling ... but *not* grammar. > IIncessant could have been necessant. I don't know "necessant." Do you mean "incessant" or "insistant." >They sound the same. No, they sound similar. "Similar" and "same" mean different things. >It was desired to mean a heightened attentiveness to a way, Excuse me, but I don't understand what you meant by "way" here - and I can't think of any word that sounds similar to "way" and would fit here to convey a meaning. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would not be able to keep up with it. Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. Similarity are both the gift and not. There are similarities in abstraction and in comparative reasoning. However there and their is similar and also words that sound similar. So I confuse those things but still though the similarity is the word similarity it is a constant source of errors as well as ability. I will never order a grammar text book. Similarities as my gift is both a gift and a curse (deficit like a type of dyslexia sort of) per-se. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > I never understood grammar in depth "Not understanding grammar in depth" does not apply to any native speaker (of English or whatever language) over the age of two. If you speak (or write) English above the level of "where food?" and "all gone crayons," you understand and use English grammar. Again, your problems as I see them involve vocabulary and sometimes spelling ... but *not* grammar. > IIncessant could have been necessant. I don't know "necessant." Do you mean "incessant" or "insistant." >They sound the same. No, they sound similar. "Similar" and "same" mean different things. >It was desired to mean a heightened attentiveness to a way, Excuse me, but I don't understand what you meant by "way" here - and I can't think of any word that sounds similar to "way" and would fit here to convey a meaning. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would not be able to keep up with it. Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. Similarity are both the gift and not. There are similarities in abstraction and in comparative reasoning. However there and their is similar and also words that sound similar. So I confuse those things but still though the similarity is the word similarity it is a constant source of errors as well as ability. I will never order a grammar text book. I have already defined the contextual intent of meaning of the incorrect word configuration, how about persistent or even similarly consistent? It would not be consistently true as certain words have been learned correctly, yet still at times I default back to the sound. It depends on how often I use the word and through repetition of use and the spell check correcting it with my noticing the correct way I then default to that.. At age 9 or 10 I recall saying in speech and language class its how it sounds not how it's spelled and I have always had to lessen my worry of the proper spelling as to entertain idea. That rather then avoidance of certain ways of expression due to the embarrassment of correct spelling. Also WS word does change the words sometimes in spell check and I do not always notice it. Recalling how it sounds is preferred rather then how it is spelled. It is not a universal truth, however one that is preferred by how my mind words. Also I use MS WORD spell check. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: My computer had a glitch between "you" and "words" in the previous message, at the point where I should have typed "spell"; I'll try again: - the spelling "confussion" contradicts your earlier statement that you spell words as they sound. If a word "confussion" existed, it would sound very different from the word "confusion" which I suppose you meant to spell. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would not be able to keep up with it. Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. Similarity are both the gift and not. There are similarities in abstraction and in comparative reasoning. However there and their is similar and also words that sound similar. So I confuse those things but still though the similarity is the word similarity it is a constant source of errors as well as ability. I will never order a grammar text book. I have already defined the contextual intent of meaning of the incorrect word configuration, how about persistent or even similarly consistent? It would not be consistently true as certain words have been learned correctly, yet still at times I default back to the sound. It depends on how often I use the word and through repetition of use and the spell check correcting it with my noticing the correct way I then default to that.. At age 9 or 10 I recall saying in speech and language class its how it sounds not how it's spelled and I have always had to lessen my worry of the proper spelling as to entertain idea. That rather then avoidance of certain ways of expression due to the embarrassment of correct spelling. Also WS word does change the words sometimes in spell check and I do not always notice it. Recalling how it sounds is preferred rather then how it is spelled. It is not a universal truth, however one that is preferred by how my mind words. Also I use MS WORD spell check. Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: My computer had a glitch between "you" and "words" in the previous message, at the point where I should have typed "spell"; I'll try again: - the spelling "confussion" contradicts your earlier statement that you spell words as they sound. If a word "confussion" existed, it would sound very different from the word "confusion" which I suppose you meant to spell. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would >not be able to keep up with it. I think that you can very easily un-confuse yourself by a simple but stupid-sounding process that has worked for others I know: ask your nearest college or university with a Department of Linguistics to put you in touch with one of the professors in that department, then ask this professor to explain the similarities differences between " grammar as taught in school " and " the actual grammar of English [or whatever] language. " > Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like >psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. Sorry, I don't know what you meant by this. In particular, I do not know what you meant by the long clause starting with " like. " > > I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. I suspect that you understand correctly far more words than you use correctly. > Similarity are both the gift and not. Sorry, I don't understand this sentence. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 Re: > When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would >not be able to keep up with it. I think that you can very easily un-confuse yourself by a simple but stupid-sounding process that has worked for others I know: ask your nearest college or university with a Department of Linguistics to put you in touch with one of the professors in that department, then ask this professor to explain the similarities differences between " grammar as taught in school " and " the actual grammar of English [or whatever] language. " > Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like >psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. Sorry, I don't know what you meant by this. In particular, I do not know what you meant by the long clause starting with " like. " > > I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. I suspect that you understand correctly far more words than you use correctly. > Similarity are both the gift and not. Sorry, I don't understand this sentence. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I'm fairly confident with how I expressed myself here, is there some sort of receptive pattern that can derived as to reason why it is not understood? I can understand more words then I use, such as in text books. Big words a good things but when it comes to medical terminologies those are hard to remember but easy to recognize. I am working with two organizations now to work with the disability departmnet of the college to partake. I don't care about grammer classes.Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would >not be able to keep up with it. I think that you can very easily un-confuse yourself by a simple but stupid-sounding process that has worked for others I know: ask your nearest college or university with a Department of Linguistics to put you in touch with one of the professors in that department, then ask this professor to explain the similarities differences between "grammar as taught in school" and "the actual grammar of English [or whatever] language." > Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like >psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. Sorry, I don't know what you meant by this. In particular, I do not know what you meant by the long clause starting with "like." > > I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. I suspect that you understand correctly far more words than you use correctly. > Similarity are both the gift and not. Sorry, I don't understand this sentence. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2006 Report Share Posted March 4, 2006 I'm fairly confident with how I expressed myself here, is there some sort of receptive pattern that can derived as to reason why it is not understood? I can understand more words then I use, such as in text books. Big words a good things but when it comes to medical terminologies those are hard to remember but easy to recognize. I am working with two organizations now to work with the disability departmnet of the college to partake. I don't care about grammer classes.Kate Gladstone <handwritingrepair@...> wrote: Re: > When a teacher taught grammar I could not really keep up with it, still I would >not be able to keep up with it. I think that you can very easily un-confuse yourself by a simple but stupid-sounding process that has worked for others I know: ask your nearest college or university with a Department of Linguistics to put you in touch with one of the professors in that department, then ask this professor to explain the similarities differences between "grammar as taught in school" and "the actual grammar of English [or whatever] language." > Basic grammar in how it is presented and understood is a constant, like >psychology to the psychologist many things become of psychology. Sorry, I don't know what you meant by this. In particular, I do not know what you meant by the long clause starting with "like." > > I am not sure, my vocabulary was tested at above average. I suspect that you understand correctly far more words than you use correctly. > Similarity are both the gift and not. Sorry, I don't understand this sentence. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.