Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 " Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? " I don't think I have learnt them yet. I suppose I've mastered that 'how are you' is meant to be answered by 'I'm fine and you' although I don't buy into it. I hate all these silly games and rituals, I would never have got the door one. As for the leaving one, it seems silly to me for someone to ask me to stay if they really want me to go - this kind of communication makes no sense to me. I have a habit of asking them if they are just being 'socially polite' and then watch them squirm - why should I follow the illogical rules. > > There are some overt features of AS that I don't have. I'm good at > small talk. I seek social contact albeit limited. I take care of daily > living activites. I'm not intensely hyperfocused on one topic. I'm ok > with environmentals -- noise, light, clothing. I'm ok at eye contact. > > What fits with AS for me is being too honest, not knowing what kinds of > information is personal and what is public. I would ask questions of > other people say about how they met their life partner -- usually public > information. But somehow I kept asking questions delving into things > too personal and I failed to detect that my converstation partner was > irritated and offended until she marched off in a huff. Retrospectively > I can usually see my errors but not in live action. I was soooooooo > lonely as a kid. I wasn't unusually picked on but I was some. I > preferred relating to adults. Once I became an adult people perceived > me as very immature. I was deeply wounded when my closest friend didn't > ask me to be in her wedding. She had a friend she had known for only a > year be in her wedding. Now looking back I realize that the > realtionship was not mutual, it was unilateral. I needed her > companionship but she didn't need mine. I gravitated towards pendantic > speech just because it was fun. It took a long time for me to get jokes. > In an office environment in the US there are " door rules " which are > unwritten but are always understood -- except by me at first. If an > office door is open, you are welcome to approach the occupant and ask a > business related question or even limited small talk. If an office door > is closed, then you may NOT knock on the door under any circumstances > short of a major emergency -- such as an accident, a fire -- maybe for a > computer meltdown. If the office door is nearly closed, then only > important business related exchanges are " allowed. " While I was doing > my masters, my major professor told me to come to him at any time. His > door was always open to me. I took that literally and walked right past > his closed door. It was only after violating these " rules of the door " > several times did I figure it out. Couldn't figure out why the prof > seemed annoyed. I wonder if others learned such " rules of the door " by > formal analysis as I did. > > Other cultural rituals were baffling. Say I was having lunch with a > friend and when the check arrives there is an obligatory " squabble " of > sorts as to who pays the bill. " Oh let me pay for it. " " No you paid > last time. " " But tomorrow is your birthday. " There are 3-4 exchanges > before someone " wins " the argument and pays the check. Then the other > says " Ok, but I'll pay the tip. " This " squabble " is governed by rules > that are mysterious. > Another baffling ritual is leave-taking. If I'm at someone's home for > supper, when am I supposed to leave? It is entirely up to the guest in > the US in initating the leave-taking ritual. The host may not ever > suggest that you leave. You aren't supposed to leave too soon, that > would be rude. It's also rude if you stay too late. So say at 8:00 the > guest starts the " leave taking argument " by standing up and saying " it's > time for me to get going. " The host is supposed to say " Oh you don't > have to leave yet. " Then the guest insists, to which the host objects > and says something like " just have another piece of pie and coffee. " > Then the guest insists on going -- thanking profusely for the wonderful > meal, and offer of pie. The guest has " won " and then leaves. <whew> > Many many times I've realized after the event that I had stayed way too > long. I believed the host's protests that I shouldn't leave. I started > the leave-taking properly several times in the evening, " I'd better get > going. " Then the host says " oh just stay a little longer. " So I did. > I ended up staying till midnight because I didn't understand the rules > of " leave-taking " properly. > > Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? > > and the zoo. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 > Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? > > and the zoo. > I think rituals like those are better not learned. I have always been given agonies of social ill-confidence by knowing that polite promises of hospitality aren't kept to the letter and are sometimes plain lies. Any reasoning beings should be able to learn from the stresses of playing these rules that they are unworkable. It is our mission to teach the normal world so by not working that way among ourselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 > > There are some overt features of AS that I don't have. I'm good at > small talk. I seek social contact albeit limited. I take care of daily > living activites. I'm not intensely hyperfocused on one topic. I'm ok > with environmentals -- noise, light, clothing. I'm ok at eye contact. > > What fits with AS for me is being too honest, not knowing what kinds of > information is personal and what is public. I would ask questions of > other people say about how they met their life partner -- usually public > information. But somehow I kept asking questions delving into things > too personal and I failed to detect that my converstation partner was > irritated and offended until she marched off in a huff. Retrospectively > I can usually see my errors but not in live action. I was soooooooo > lonely as a kid. I wasn't unusually picked on but I was some. I > preferred relating to adults. Once I became an adult people perceived > me as very immature. I was deeply wounded when my closest friend didn't > ask me to be in her wedding. She had a friend she had known for only a > year be in her wedding. Now looking back I realize that the > realtionship was not mutual, it was unilateral. I needed her > companionship but she didn't need mine. I gravitated towards pendantic > speech just because it was fun. It took a long time for me to get jokes. > In an office environment in the US there are " door rules " which are > unwritten but are always understood -- except by me at first. If an > office door is open, you are welcome to approach the occupant and ask a > business related question or even limited small talk. If an office door > is closed, then you may NOT knock on the door under any circumstances > short of a major emergency -- such as an accident, a fire -- maybe for a > computer meltdown. If the office door is nearly closed, then only > important business related exchanges are " allowed. " While I was doing > my masters, my major professor told me to come to him at any time. His > door was always open to me. I took that literally and walked right past > his closed door. It was only after violating these " rules of the door " > several times did I figure it out. Couldn't figure out why the prof > seemed annoyed. I wonder if others learned such " rules of the door " by > formal analysis as I did. > > Other cultural rituals were baffling. Say I was having lunch with a > friend and when the check arrives there is an obligatory " squabble " of > sorts as to who pays the bill. " Oh let me pay for it. " " No you paid > last time. " " But tomorrow is your birthday. " There are 3-4 exchanges > before someone " wins " the argument and pays the check. Then the other > says " Ok, but I'll pay the tip. " This " squabble " is governed by rules > that are mysterious. > Another baffling ritual is leave-taking. If I'm at someone's home for > supper, when am I supposed to leave? It is entirely up to the guest in > the US in initating the leave-taking ritual. The host may not ever > suggest that you leave. You aren't supposed to leave too soon, that > would be rude. It's also rude if you stay too late. So say at 8:00 the > guest starts the " leave taking argument " by standing up and saying " it's > time for me to get going. " The host is supposed to say " Oh you don't > have to leave yet. " Then the guest insists, to which the host objects > and says something like " just have another piece of pie and coffee. " > Then the guest insists on going -- thanking profusely for the wonderful > meal, and offer of pie. The guest has " won " and then leaves. <whew> > Many many times I've realized after the event that I had stayed way too > long. I believed the host's protests that I shouldn't leave. I started > the leave-taking properly several times in the evening, " I'd better get > going. " Then the host says " oh just stay a little longer. " So I did. > I ended up staying till midnight because I didn't understand the rules > of " leave-taking " properly. > > Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? > > and the zoo. OH YES. It's taken me a long time to get where I am and it's still difficult. I am grateful for my NT husband to whom I can ask myriads of questions about these complicated rules that he and other NTs just seem to know. I have a hard time with the leave-taking ritual too! I usually go when I see others going and when the hostess says to stay a little longer she doesn't always mean it (though sometimes she does, you have to discern which by her tone of voice, sigh.)so I just tell her what a great time I had, thank you very much but I must be going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? , I tried for a while and then gave it up. This was because I began to realize that the stress of trying to decipher what was going on outweighed the benefits of any " happiness " I might receive by fitting in. Therefore it was best that I stayed away from social situations and avoided the stress altogether. When you think about it from a purely logical standpoint, there is no good reason for socializing. The fact that you can get an " in " with someone if they like you, or the fact that you can make them " owe you one " if you pay for lunch is really pointless given that their loyalties and debts to you can change on the merest whim. Or else someone else can come along and overthrow you as " Number 1 " in their thoughts. I believe that " society " sometimes means " ficklenes " when you get right down to it. What is the point of having a social system that is not based on any firm and predictable order? It does not make sense to me. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Has anyone ever noticed that if you are the only AS person in a group of people that your own social rules are the only ones never to get followed and are also the only ones to get found fault with? Logic does not appear to play any significant or respected role in neurotypical social structures. Tom Administrator I have a habit of asking them if they are just being 'socially polite' and then watch them squirm - why should I follow the illogical rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Maurice, I agree with this statement: " I think rituals like those are better not learned. " And I have also had experiences similar to what you describe here: " I have always been given agonies of social ill-confidence by knowing that polite promises of hospitality aren't kept to the letter and are sometimes plain lies. " And again, I agree with this: Any reasoning beings should be able to learn from the stresses of playing these rules that they are unworkable. " You last line, I believe, is of utmost importance for us all: " It is our mission to teach the normal world so by not working that way among ourselves. " I'm sure any attempts to teach them will fail (because they will either be unwilling to learn, or unwilling to accept our point of view), but to continue to try is noble. Tom Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 , Since the rules tend to change at every non-Aspie social event I go to, I tend to take people at their word and sometimes go so far as to tell them that I am doing so. And so if they say " stay " I stay. If they tell me something is " no bother " I assume that it's no bother. I like to think it's a backhanded way of forcing them to be honest. In other words, if they keeping telling me to stay but really want me to go, I'll be happy to stay until they say " GET OUT! " And if they continue to tell me I am " no bother " but really believe I am hard work, I will wait for them to say " You're impossible and a royal pain! " I don't see what's wrong with anyone saying what they mean anyway. I would like for people to tell me when my fly is open, or when I have egg on my face, and I have no problem telling other people those things when they need to be told. I think though we would be hurt from time to time when being told the truth the world would be a better place if people were honest with one another. Being " socially dishonest " in the non-Aspie way sort of gives people leave to be deceptive both in word and deed. There ought not to be required an understanding of a non-definined and ever shifting code as a test for social acceptance. Tom I usually go when I see others going and when the hostess says to stay a little longer she doesn't always mean it (though sometimes she does, you have to discern which by her tone of voice, sigh.)so I just tell her what a great time I had, thank you very much but I must be going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 > > > Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? > > > > and the zoo. > > > I think rituals like those are better not learned. > I have always been given agonies of social ill-confidence by knowing > that polite promises of hospitality aren't kept to the letter and are > sometimes plain lies. Any reasoning beings should be able to learn > from the stresses of playing these rules that they are unworkable. It > is our mission to teach the normal world so by not working that way > among ourselves. > How about this painful scenario: moving from up north to down south where there is less directness and more hidden social rules to learn! I had to add this major understanding: promises of hospitality are just like saying, " See you later. " ! They have nothing to do with actual invitations for you to come over or for us to get together, MAYBE we'll get together some time in the future but maybe not. On the other hand, they may hate your guts yet they'll say it anyway. It's like what Jethro says at the end of 'The Beverly Hillbillies': " Ya'll come back now, ya hear? " Meaning = 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Sometimes I force people to be honest or reasonable in that way, as well. I feel a little guilty about it, especially when I pretend to be dumb, but I feel it's for a greater good and for their benefit, too. Mostly, though, I have to admit, I try to follow their social rules. I agree with what you and some of the others say about wanting to change all these rules, especially when they're deliberately deceitful and cruel to anyone that's different, but after all these years of living in the world not knowing that I was AS or about AS at all, I don't know how to go back to the way I was when I was younger and unaffected and I don't think I would want to lose some of my adaptations. I admire my husband so much because he's a popular NT who uses his popularity to try and change peoples' narrow ideas and he's always sticking up for the underdog. Since they like him they really do listen to him and often gain a different understanding and make changes, so I see the benefit of being like them but then using that common ground to try and change them. Kind of like making changes from the inside. Of course, I'm really not like them so maybe I should stop kidding myself as you can't accomplish anything by sitting on the fence (but it seems I have had some success.) But maybe we can use both ways, depending on our personalities. I'm happy to find out that we are great defenders of what is just (and I find it especially interesting that most of us are environmentalists. I LOVE that. Our poor world needs us for sure). If there are as many of us out there as my husband says, and as I'm seeing, we can really be a force for change. > > I usually go when I see others going and when the hostess says to > stay a little longer she doesn't always mean it (though sometimes she > does, you have to discern which by her tone of voice, sigh.)so I just > tell her what a great time I had, thank you very much but I must be > going. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 WFTW... The point that most NT's don't understand is that Aspies or forced to live in what is to them an alien world ALL the time 24/7/365 and have done that for most of their lives... If NT's were forced to live in a world were Aspies were the dominate group them would understand better... To fit in at all is a strain and it builds up over time... I know that to most people I'm a bit odd so I will generally accept the majority view and let what I consider attacks, abuses, etc slide (They don't understand my view and they didn't mean it the way I took it) but there are times when people try to play games and intentionally pick on my generally subtle oddness and I don't react well to the... to be lied to when the facts clearly show the an assertion to be false upsets me... I'm not big on touching people or them touching me but there are people that have a (in my view) sick need to grope each and slobber on them (hug and kiss) I will tolerate an quick arm around and reciprocate but I refuse to 'lick' them and will pull away if they try to 'lick' me. Some people want to perform religious rituals before meals or at the start of some social functions... I bow my head slightly and sit or stand quitely while they do their thing... Sometime I get questioned about it and I tell them that I respect that they believe in the ritual and their right to do (if they are obnoxious about it I may add that I have the right not to believe and/or do it and point out that I didn't question them about why they felt the need to do what they did in the first place... I find that makes them huffy and they quickly go away, I don't do it often) It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of view... Ender Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 It is always fun at the end of meeting someone new when I inform them honestly that it has been pertrifying for me meeting them - or interesting - rather than the socially polite 'it was nice meeting you' - I never find it nice meeting someone new - to me it is always nerve wracking, so for me to say 'it was nice meeting you' would be a lie :-) Also I don't see the point in saying 'we'll have to get together again' unless I mean it. Oh all those socially polite lines like 'it was great meeting you' and 'we'll have to do this again' - I can never really tell whether the other person means it - am often tempted to mutter 'yeah, whatever'. Maybe next time I am in one of these situations - which I tend to avoid like the plauge (so is unlikely to happen for some time), maybe I should put them on the spot and say 'oh that's nice, what did you find great/nice about it?' and 'yeah we should do this again - when?' but of course that would not be playing by the rules and I hate most social situations anyway. > > I have a habit of asking them if they are just being 'socially polite' > and then watch them squirm - why should I follow the illogical rules. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 I hate the 'How are you?' 'I'm fine' conversation (if you could call it that). I often get critisized for not even saying hello or goodbye to people I see often because it oftens seems unnessesary and meaningless. But saying 'fine' when you're not because you know the other person doesn't care is worse, it feels hurtful to me. On a deeper note, we had a family friend who used to say, " Why is it that when you ask someone how they are they always say,'Fine'[You'd have to hear the way he said it to truly appreciate his satire--kind of a nasally, clipped 'Fine']. We laughed and said, how true, but then he committed suicide. He was asking for help in the smallest of ways by saying that society doesn't want to know or care if you have problems. So sad. (Am I making too many posts? I often overwhelm NTs with my intensity so I stopped saying too much, but here I am writing too much to make up for it! I don't want to appear to hijack the posts or be a persuading force in any way. I'll back down a little. ) > > > > I have a habit of asking them if they are just being 'socially > polite' > > and then watch them squirm - why should I follow the illogical > rules. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 " (Am I making too many posts? I often overwhelm NTs with my intensity so I stopped saying too much, but here I am writing too much to make up for it! I don't want to appear to hijack the posts or be a persuading force in any way. I'll back down a little. ) " I don't think you are making too many posts. I think I go through phases, sometimes I post a lot, other times I don't - I sometimes think I am posting a lot, but it usually just means that I have time and am finding the discussions thought provoking and am able to put my thoughts into words - I can't always do so - so I make up for it the times when I can :-) like now :-) Plus I'd feel lonely if I was the only one posting :-) > > I hate the 'How are you?' 'I'm fine' conversation (if you could call > it that). I often get critisized for not even saying hello or goodbye > to people I see often because it oftens seems unnessesary and > meaningless. But saying 'fine' when you're not because you know the > other person doesn't care is worse, it feels hurtful to me. On a > deeper note, we had a family friend who used to say, " Why is it that > when you ask someone how they are they always say,'Fine'[You'd have > to hear the way he said it to truly appreciate his satire--kind of a > nasally, clipped 'Fine']. We laughed and said, how true, but then he > committed suicide. He was asking for help in the smallest of ways by > saying that society doesn't want to know or care if you have > problems. So sad. > > (Am I making too many posts? I often overwhelm NTs with my intensity > so I stopped saying too much, but here I am writing too much to make > up for it! I don't want to appear to hijack the posts or be a > persuading force in any way. I'll back down a little. ) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 , I made these boards for everyone, which means you can use them as much or as little as you please. If you stay here for a while, you will discover that some folks drop in daily and post once or twice, others pop in every few weeks and post twenty posts. The activity here can be deceptively high and deceptively low, depending on when you drop in. Feel free to post as much as you like. Everything you've posted so far has been very interesting. Also check your e-mail for a special message. Tom Administrator (Am I making too many posts? I often overwhelm NTs with my intensity so I stopped saying too much, but here I am writing too much to make up for it! I don't want to appear to hijack the posts or be a persuading force in any way. I'll back down a little. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 , I made these boards for everyone, which means you can use them as much or as little as you please. If you stay here for a while, you will discover that some folks drop in daily and post once or twice, others pop in every few weeks and post twenty posts. The activity here can be deceptively high and deceptively low, depending on when you drop in. Feel free to post as much as you like. Everything you've posted so far has been very interesting. Also check your e-mail for a special message. Tom Administrator (Am I making too many posts? I often overwhelm NTs with my intensity so I stopped saying too much, but here I am writing too much to make up for it! I don't want to appear to hijack the posts or be a persuading force in any way. I'll back down a little. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Ender, Speaking as a religious person, I find that irreligious people are usually much more tolerant than religious people in terms of accepting other people's belief systems. It seems like religious people are always trying to " convert " others to their way of thing which is why I mostly tend to keep my religious opinions to myself when in public or social gatherings. And I agree with your statement that: " It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of view... " Tom Administrator Some people want to perform religious rituals before meals or at the start of some social functions... I bow my head slightly and sit or stand quitely while they do their thing... Sometime I get questioned about it and I tell them that I respect that they believe in the ritual and their right to do (if they are obnoxious about it I may add that I have the right not to believe and/or do it and point out that I didn't question them about why they felt the need to do what they did in the first place... I find that makes them huffy and they quickly go away, I don't do it often) It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of view... Ender Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 , I am sorry to hear about your loss. Read Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. There are many different interpretations one can derive from the novel, but one of the messages you can get is that anytime someone stops a minute and hops off the societal ferris wheel to see what the wheel actually looks like, one is regarded with suspicion and usually either " reeducated " or put on drugs. As much as suicidal people are labeled as being mentally disturbed, I sometimes think that they may have a clear and UNOBSTRUCTED perception of reality, and it is this lack of a buffer zone between what is real and what is wished and hoped for and PRETENDED that drives them over the edge. I have lost three friends to suicide and I have tried to kill myself a few times as well. And I know others who have made the attempt. All were, of course, depressed, including me. Is taking ones own life sane? A topic for another time perhaps. But I believe that people who find themselves wishing to end it all have seen and witnessed things in a way that other people have not, and this is why they become the way they do. Tom Administrator On a deeper note, we had a family friend who used to say, " Why is it that when you ask someone how they are they always say,'Fine'[You'd have to hear the way he said it to truly appreciate his satire--kind of a nasally, clipped 'Fine']. We laughed and said, how true, but then he committed suicide. He was asking for help in the smallest of ways by saying that society doesn't want to know or care if you have problems. So sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Tom, The problem is they are all certain that they have the only way... all religion were started by men (male or female) and regardless of the intention of the founder, people that want to control other people end up in charge... some may truly mean well but based on my observation most want the power... I'm non-religious but that doesn't mean I deny the existence of a high power... I feel it is likely that some where in the universe there are beings that most people would consider gods but I ask who do they call god... In my view the underlaying purpose of all religion is help people get along with each other, the treat other as they want others to treat them... to foster self-respect and self-worth and to accept that others deserve the same... Unfortunately the number one cause for man's in humanity to man is the play ground bully saying " my god is better then your god " .... there is only one supreme power regardless of what you call it or how you acknowledge it... Sorry... it's just that I can't understand why people thing that going to church nullifies treating other badly... I would think living in accordance with the basic intent is more important that some ritual the some man dreamed up in the first place... sorry for the rant... I'll crawl back in my hole now... Ender At 03:47 PM 10/27/2005, you wrote: >Ender, > >Speaking as a religious person, I find that irreligious people are >usually much more tolerant than religious people in terms of >accepting other people's belief systems. It seems like religious >people are always trying to " convert " others to their way of thing >which is why I mostly tend to keep my religious opinions to myself >when in public or social gatherings. > >And I agree with your statement that: > > " It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for >everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of >view... " > >Tom >Administrator > > > > >Some people want to perform religious rituals before meals or at the >start of some social functions... I bow my head slightly and sit or >stand quitely while they do their thing... Sometime I get questioned >about it and I tell them that I respect that they believe in the >ritual and their right to do (if they are obnoxious about it I may >add that I have the right not to believe and/or do it and point out >that I didn't question them about why they felt the need to do what >they did in the first place... I find that makes them huffy and they >quickly go away, I don't do it often) > >It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for >everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of >view... > >Ender > > > > > >FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, >support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > >Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links page >in the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 I agree with you, Ender. And welcome, by the way. Lida Ender wrote: Tom,The problem is they are all certain that they have the only way... all religion were started by men (male or female) and regardless of the intention of the founder, people that want to control other people end up in charge... some may truly mean well but based on my observation most want the power...I'm non-religious but that doesn't mean I deny the existence of a high power... I feel it is likely that some where in the universe there are beings that most people would consider gods but I ask who do they call god...In my view the underlaying purpose of all religion is help people get along with each other, the treat other as they want others to treat them... to foster self-respect and self-worth and to accept that others deserve the same...Unfortunately the number one cause for man's in humanity to man is the play ground bully saying "my god is better then your god".... there is only one supreme power regardless of what you call it or how you acknowledge it...Sorry... it's just that I can't understand why people thing that going to church nullifies treating other badly... I would think living in accordance with the basic intent is more important that some ritual the some man dreamed up in the first place...sorry for the rant... I'll crawl back in my hole now...EnderAt 03:47 PM 10/27/2005, you wrote:>Ender,>>Speaking as a religious person, I find that irreligious people are>usually much more tolerant than religious people in terms of>accepting other people's belief systems. It seems like religious>people are always trying to "convert" others to their way of thing>which is why I mostly tend to keep my religious opinions to myself>when in public or social gatherings.>>And I agree with your statement that:>>"It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for>everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of>view...">>Tom>Administrator>>>>>Some people want to perform religious rituals before meals or at the>start of some social functions... I bow my head slightly and sit or>stand quitely while they do their thing... Sometime I get questioned>about it and I tell them that I respect that they believe in the>ritual and their right to do (if they are obnoxious about it I may>add that I have the right not to believe and/or do it and point out>that I didn't question them about why they felt the need to do what>they did in the first place... I find that makes them huffy and they>quickly go away, I don't do it often)>>It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for>everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of>view...>>Ender>>>>>>FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, >support and acceptance. Everyone is valued.>>Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links page >in the folder marked "Other FAM Sites.">>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Ender, this is so true what you write. Tolerance is something this world needs much more of. Did you ever see this reality show where two fathers from totally different walks of life got to trade places with each other? I rarely have time to watch such shows but I happened to see one spisode where a really fundamentalist vegetarian New Age dad living in a commune got to trade places with a tough biker, looking exactly like the typical image of a Hells Angel. It was one of the most touching things I've ever seen on TV. After some initial disasters and outright wars, both families eventualy learned a lot from the experience and turned out much more balanced, happy and tolerant as a result of it. I sometimes wish some non-autistic people could trade places with one of us for just a week. Inger > > WFTW... The point that most NT's don't understand is that Aspies or > forced to live in what is to them an alien world ALL the time > 24/7/365 and have done that for most of their lives... If NT's were > forced to live in a world were Aspies were the dominate group them > would understand better... > > To fit in at all is a strain and it builds up over time... I know > that to most people I'm a bit odd so I will generally accept the > majority view and let what I consider attacks, abuses, etc slide > (They don't understand my view and they didn't mean it the way I took > it) but there are times when people try to play games and > intentionally pick on my generally subtle oddness and I don't react > well to the... to be lied to when the facts clearly show the an > assertion to be false upsets me... > > I'm not big on touching people or them touching me but there are > people that have a (in my view) sick need to grope each and slobber > on them (hug and kiss) I will tolerate an quick arm around and > reciprocate but I refuse to 'lick' them and will pull away if they > try to 'lick' me. > > Some people want to perform religious rituals before meals or at the > start of some social functions... I bow my head slightly and sit or > stand quitely while they do their thing... Sometime I get questioned > about it and I tell them that I respect that they believe in the > ritual and their right to do (if they are obnoxious about it I may > add that I have the right not to believe and/or do it and point out > that I didn't question them about why they felt the need to do what > they did in the first place... I find that makes them huffy and they > quickly go away, I don't do it often) > > It is really all about everyone having some level of tolerance for > everyone else and try to look at things from the other guys point of view... > > Ender > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 greebohere wrote: > " Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? " > > I don't think I have learnt them yet. I suppose I've mastered > that 'how are you' is meant to be answered by 'I'm fine and you' Yes... The " Hi how are you " and " Fine " conversation is simply the greeting. I distilled this down to the following: The two speakers are mearly acknowledging each other's presence. The actual words used are immaterial and both parties know it but this acknowledging each other's existence is essential. You could almost replace it with " The garbage can is out back " and " My new fish tank arrived yesterday. " The greeting is a dance like a waltz. The two partners have very predefined steps which cannot be varied and still be considered a waltz. It's not legal to change the words in the greeting ritual, but sometimes I'd like to try and see if anyone would notice. ;-) and the zoo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 environmental1st2003 wrote: > Has anyone ever noticed that if you are the only AS person in a group > of people that your own social rules are the only ones never to get > followed and are also the only ones to get found fault with? Those NTs have absolutely no clue that they are even following cultural rituals. They are stunned if we do the social rules wrong but in a way, they are simply trying to do the relational stuff too. They don't understand what they know.. In a ballroom dance like the Tango, both parties have clearly defined steps which they must follow otherwise it's not considered a Tango. Each of the dancers in the competition are superbe athletes and artists. And after rehearsing and rehearsing, and performing and performing the dance, it becomes so automatic the dancer doesn't even remember that they had to learn the dance at the beginning. Each one knows the dance steps without even thinking. At any time a dancer can start dancing with someone else knowing that the new partner lives and breaths tango as well. and the zoo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Hi , In addition to what you said (and this is just supposition here because I am as clueless as the next person) I am thinking that maybe tossing out these greetings upon meeting is also like trying to get a sense about what sort of mood people are in by how they respond. If someone is snappy and curt during their response, it could mean they are in a bad mood and don't want to be bothered. Posture is another indicator, and whether they are looking at you or not when they respond. (In other words, they may be busy or preoccupied). What I find annoying about these greetings is that they are designed to FORCE you into a mood you may not be feeling. For instance, if I am having a bad day and someone says " Hi! How are you? " I know that the proper response is to say " Fine, and you? " because they could really care less about how I am feeling and don't want to hear if I am having a rotten day, nor do they want to be forced to provide some sort of support (moral, financial, or otherwise) to someone who may need it. And yet I may feel miserable even when I say I feel fine. AND, I also may not care enough about what the other person is feeling to ask them how THEY are. Yet if I DO respond and say that I am feeling " Miserable, and that tell them that I could care less how they're feeling, then I am the one who is the bad guy...just for being honest. So twice over I am the loser. Not only do I have to suppress my feelings of misery and pretend that everything is well when it's not, but I also have to fake interest in someone I may not care about at that moment. How fair is that? And on a more general level, I have a question: How can this sort of social ritual be in any way psychologically healthy for either people involved in it? One person fakes interest in another by asking " How are you? " The second person lies and says " Fine " and is made to feel as though it's an imposition to say " I'm feeling miserable. " The first person gets what he or she wants by forcing the other person not to be honest. And the second person is made to feel anti-social because implied in the whole exchange is the idea that if you don't feel fine, there is somenthing wrong with you. It's sort of like happy people bullying the downtrodden, only it's socially accepted and considered normal. How stupid it is that the psychiatric profession believes that this sort of social interaction is and ought to be considered " normal " but the straightforward and honest AS way of communicating is " abnormal. " It makes me feel like mental health practitioners came straight out of an asylum and somehow gained control over all of us. Who are the insane ones here? Them or us? Or are we the insane ones for not raising a bigger stink about all this social nosense in the first place? Tom (Ranting and pontificating) Administrator > " Anyone else have to overtly learn rituals? " > > I don't think I have learnt them yet. I suppose I've mastered > that 'how are you' is meant to be answered by 'I'm fine and you' Yes... The " Hi how are you " and " Fine " conversation is simply the greeting. I distilled this down to the following: The two speakers are mearly acknowledging each other's presence. The actual words used are immaterial and both parties know it but this acknowledging each other's existence is essential. You could almost replace it with " The garbage can is out back " and " My new fish tank arrived yesterday. " The greeting is a dance like a waltz. The two partners have very predefined steps which cannot be varied and still be considered a waltz. It's not legal to change the words in the greeting ritual, but sometimes I'd like to try and see if anyone would notice. ;-) and the zoo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Okay, good, I'm probably too sensitive from living in the NT world and always wondering if I'm doing something wrong! I didn't get the email--I may have deleted it thinking it was junk mail, can you resend it? > > (Am I making too many posts? I often overwhelm NTs with my intensity > so I stopped saying too much, but here I am writing too much to make > up for it! I don't want to appear to hijack the posts or be a > persuading force in any way. I'll back down a little. ) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 I resent. You should receive a message from this group shortly. Tom Okay, good, I'm probably too sensitive from living in the NT world and always wondering if I'm doing something wrong! I didn't get the email--I may have deleted it thinking it was junk mail, can you resend it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.