Vaccinated V. Unvaccinated Here is How We FUND IT

[Guest guest]

Vaccinated V. Unvaccinated Here is How We FUND IT

If anyone on this board has serious connections with a related non-

profit, we can start a chip in campaign to fund this study. I

realize it takes millions to do a study like this, but I think it's

possible for us to virally spread this campaign to thousands of

websites using the following tool:

http://www.chipin.com/

Ron raised $20 million entirely online in the 4th quarter of

2007. We could certainly do $10 million, we've got the same type of

pissed-off and fired-up folks that he had.

>

> I found this posted on the UK JABS forum today, but unfortunately

there was no link added:

>

> 03/20/2008

> Vaccinated V Unvaccinated.

> by Professor Boyd Haley.

> The attempt by the CDC and AAP to promote the concept that

thimerosal containing vaccines are safe for all but those

with " underlying mitochondrial disorder " is similar to the previous

attempt to label autism as a genetic disorder. This attempt is geared

to place research funds into areas other than looking at vaccines in

general and thimerosal in specific as the cause for the recent

increase in autism.

> We need to push for academic funding to do an epidemiological study

not controlled by the CDC or AAP on the diseases and illnesses

between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations. The CDC and

AAP refuse to do this for reasons unknown, but most likely fear of

the facts that may be found which may even involve more than autism

causation --- like whether or not the flu vaccines work, or any

possible relationship between early vaccines and asthma rates.

> It appears as if no governmental agency or body can understand the

importance of the vaccinated versus non-vaccinated study to the

welfare of our children and the overall cost of encompassing medical

treatments in the USA. However, in my opinion, the CDC is impeding

this due to the fear of a handful of bureaucrats who played an

important role in implementing the CDC mandated vaccine program. In

my opinion, the AAP does not support such a study due to the

implications that forcing patients to follow the CDC mandate through

pediatric programs has caused a major epidemic in our children and

the loss of financial benefits presented by a forced well baby visits

system.

> What I am proposing, along with many others, regarding the study of

vaccinated versus non-vaccinated populations represents straight-

forward scientific logic. The fact that the major medical agencies

and associations refuse to do this and insist on spending millions on

genetic or mitochondrial disorder research suggests a force is

working hard to prevent such a study -- perhaps because they already

know the answer. I would heartily promise to quite hammering vaccines

if a reliable USA-located academic institution was assigned the task

to evaluate the vaccinated versus non-vaccinated populations and

found no harmful effects of our vaccination program. The recent

report from Manitoba, Canada, on an approximate 5% versus 16% asthma

rate on adolescents receiving thimerosal containing DPT at 4 months

versus 2 months of age, respectively, tells us that there is a lot

about the various aspects of the mandated vaccine program that

science does not understand at this time. A

> comprehensive study of the vaccinated versus the non-vaccinated

followed by the design of global monitoring of identified " vaccine

risk factors " would provide the basis of implementing a much safer

vaccine program.

> Everyone should be aware of the fact that most of the

epidemiological studies routinely quoted by the CDC, AAP and others

as showing no connection between vaccines with thimerosal and autism

were funded by the CDC, done by non-USA citizens, mostly done in

Europe by individuals involved in producing thimerosal containing

vaccines and on populations where the autism rate was more than 13

times less than in the USA. Interestingly, three of the

epidemiological studies most quoted by pediatricians as proving

thimerosal safety actually showed that thimerosal removal led to an

increase in autism; in one, this increase was about 20 fold. To

report that decreasing exposure to a potent neurotoxin like

thimerosal decreased any specific neurological disease is ridiculous.

Perhaps this is why the countries where the data was collected

(Denmark, Sweden, England) and the reports filed have not followed

the conclusion of the authors and still maintain thimerosal removal

from pediatric

> vaccines. In my opinion, only our CDC and AAP give any scientific

credence to the obviously low quality epidemiological studies done by

these Danish, Swedish and English researchers who had obvious vested

interests in the outcome. Again, this begs the question why our

government does not fund a major epidemiological study on vaccinated

versus non-vaccinated American children done by a prestigious

American university!

> I can only imagine the embarrassment to some professional groups

when the American public finally finds out that the autism epidemic

was brought to light through considerable efforts by the mothers and

fathers of autistic children, and not the government agencies or

medical organizations that should have been in the forefront of

recognizing this disaster. Where was the CDC, AAP, AMA, our

neurological associations, etc. when the epidemic was in its early

stages? I was involved in the autism issue starting in 1998 because

of parents of autistic children, and what I distinctly remember was a

flat denial by many of our aforementioned medical groups that an

autism epidemic even existed. The very fact that we are having the

CDC, who in my opinion caused the autistic epidemic through their

mandated vaccine program which was not evaluated for safety, still

involved in determining the cause of the autism epidemic is a failure

of our government and our national medical programs.

> During the upcoming elections we have the opportunity to use our

voting privileges to elect officials that will push for a complete

evaluation of our national vaccine program. I strongly suggest that

making foundation research based on vaccinated versus non-vaccinated

populations regarding the autism/vaccine safety concern should be a

major campaign issue.

>