Guest guest Posted December 31, 2000 Report Share Posted December 31, 2000 Please note the date on this EPA document for arsenic (June 22, 2000). ALSO NOTE that the changes are being lowered by 10 times the current standards from 50 ppb (parts per BILLION) to 5 ppb. When someone tells you that your dead or autistic or sick child is OK with the toxic levels that they have remember the acceptable toxic levels are being lowered every day, and the current acceptable toxic levels are not reality. If the acceptable levels of a toxic substance kills the child is that OK????!!!!!!!!! Counting rules are OK for people that can count. I can not; I will accept the only toxic level that I can understand for myself, and that is zero. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/proposalfs.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2001 Report Share Posted January 1, 2001 The EPA report we got on arsenic years ago said what little testing had been done on arsenic just confused things more because a lethal dose to one person could sometimes show no negative affects on another. It was a 150 page book that basically concluded that they had no idea about the affects of arsenic -- comforting, huh? Just got back from visiting relatives who were overwhelmed at how much Curtis has grown and progressed over the past year. Amazing how much a body can catch up when it's not battling poison and digesting food . He is catching up radically now -- outgrowing clothes almost daily and getting heavier all the time. Gaylen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.