Guest guest Posted December 28, 2000 Report Share Posted December 28, 2000 Some of the Iraq victims were chelated, but not in any way that would remove mercury from the brain. There are a few literature reports on this. The minamata victims were not chelated to the best of my konwledge, but there is an enormous amount of literature on them. The only way to make the MD's responsive is to eliminate the licensure laws that let them have an income (by being free from competent competition) without providing the appropriate services. Andy Cutler > It's great that you're back, Andy. > > I've always wondered if there have been followup studies on the children who were harmed by mercury in Japan " Minamata disease " or in Iraq > (from grain given them by the USA)? Were any of these children treated with DMSA or any chelator? > I want to know more about outcomes of children who received treatment....(in order to be better informed regarding my own 10yrs old son's chelation) > Also, if there are research organizations in the USA who have " donated autistic brains " - how can we recommend that they be tested for Mercury toxicity? > Wouldn't this be a very good way to see problems from Thimerosal??? at least in some of the specimins that might be less than 10 years? > This denial of mercury toxicity that doctors seem to expouse has got to stop. Doctors should be ashamed that it was parents and educators who kept blowing the whistle about an autism explosion - and not them. They had better not fail us now. > Aly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 , I had the same frustration. Our urine was sent to North Carolina, too and only a few metals were tested for and supposedly NONE were outside normal limits. So even though we've been chelating for months and even though my daughter is improving, Nothing significant is coming out? Makes No sense whatsoever. I'm using Great Smokies next time - it'll be worth the $. This last one was a collosal waste of time! hrumph, [ ] Question for ANDY CUTLER I need direction. Kaiser Permanente blew the 24 hour Heavy Metal Urine Screen. Today, I got the results: Regarding Arsenic and Mercury: Test results said: "Quantity not sufficient. Test not performed." Urine Lead: "No Total Volume Recorded. Urine Lead Result is 8.0 mcg/L - Ref. Range <100 mcg/24hr. I personally saw that my son almost filled the large collection bottle. I saw the volume at 1975. The lab report was also consistent with this number - Yet why would they be unable to test for Mercury and Arsenic??? Do other kids give them more volume in 24 hours?? On this test, does Doctors Data, Inc. ONLY check Arsenic, Mercury and Lead??? Aren't other metals checked at DDI?? Kaiser used some lab in North Carolina (American Labs. I think).. My son has been chelating for 11 weeks - 11 cycles of DMSA and ALA. He is 10 years old. I asked the Head of the Kaiser Lab. (in a letter - because he wasn't there) to PLEASE repeat this test using Doctor's Data, Inc. and also see if they can give our son a Fecal toxic panel, also. Am I correct in this? I can't see another 24 hour test to be wasted on an inept lab - Aly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 I was told the DDI test cost $110 on the phone. Did they give me the prepay price or the price they would normally charge? $55 is HALF that and would make all the difference in the world as to which lab I'm going to use! Thanks for any and all replies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 and , The mainstream labs have reference ranges that are designed to find high level acute toxicity from recent exposure. DDI's reference range for lead is 0-20 mcg per 24 hours and 0-15 per gram of creatinine. Since your son's volume was 1975 ml (1.975 L) his lead per 24 hours was 15.8 mcg. Dr. Amy thinks that the amount per gram of creatinine is a better measure for kids though. The last DDI test cost $55 (it costs a lot more if you don't pre-pay) , it might be worth it to have urine tests run by DDI next time. Doctor's Data tests for aluminum, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, bismuth, cadmium, lead, mercury, nickel, platinium, thallium, thorium, tin, tungsten, and uranium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 Thank you so much, . I am going to approach my doctor with the forms to sign (if possible) and pay for these tests, myself. Just don't want to put my son through 24 hours of going to the bathroom with mom or dad with no end result....Appreciate the help! Aly Re: [ ] Question for ANDY CUTLER > and , > > The mainstream labs have reference ranges that are designed to find high level acute > toxicity from recent exposure. DDI's reference range for lead is 0-20 mcg per 24 > hours and 0-15 per gram of creatinine. Since your son's volume was 1975 ml (1.975 L) > his lead per 24 hours was 15.8 mcg. Dr. Amy thinks that the amount per gram of > creatinine is a better measure for kids though. The last DDI test cost $55 (it costs > a lot more if you don't pre-pay) , it might be worth it to have urine tests run by > DDI next time. Doctor's Data tests for aluminum, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, > bismuth, cadmium, lead, mercury, nickel, platinium, thallium, thorium, tin, tungsten, > and uranium. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 , I haven't run the test in a while, but the pre-pay price was $55 the last time we did test my son's urine. Maybe someone who has used Doctor's Data more recently could comment. fullarmor@... wrote: > I was told the DDI test cost $110 on the phone. Did they give me the prepay > price or the price they would normally charge? $55 is HALF that and would > make all the difference in the world as to which lab I'm going to use! > Thanks for any and all replies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 , We ran our tests in mid-December with Doctor's Data. The cost was $55.00. a > > > I was told the DDI test cost $110 on the phone. Did they give me the prepay > > price or the price they would normally charge? $55 is HALF that and would > > make all the difference in the world as to which lab I'm going to use! > > Thanks for any and all replies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2000 Report Share Posted December 31, 2000 There are a lot of different tests. Urine toxics, urine toxics and essentials, urine mercury, hair elements, etc. Which one costs what? Anyone got the info sheet? Andy > I was told the DDI test cost $110 on the phone. Did they give me the prepay > price or the price they would normally charge? $55 is HALF that and would > make all the difference in the world as to which lab I'm going to use! > Thanks for any and all replies! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.