Breeding Ground for Mass Murderers

[Guest guest]

http://tinyurl.com/2vzcnn

[Guest guest]

Interesting point. A victim of an NIMH-funded psychosurgery

experiment performed by two Harvard neurosurgeons in the sixties

understood that he'd had his brain fried by electrodes, yet he also

(when this former brilliant engineer could even speak after the

expiriments) believed the painful procedure had also endowed him

with the world's highest IQ. He would mumble this from under a

newspaper, which he kept wrapped around his head. He both understood

what had been done to him and suffered delusions about it at the

same time. It's called, I think, ego dystonia: the conviction that

one is not mad. I'd say he had this only partially.

I do partly disagree with one point: that the Nebraska shooter and

the Finnish shooter were necessarily damaged by vaccines before

being damaged by the drugs. Vaccine injuries aren't a precondition

for psychotrope-induced psychosis. I'm sure that a previous vaccine

injury wouldn't help per se, but it's not necessary for drug-induced

suicidal/violent ideation. Neither is depression: people with no

previous history of depression who were being treated with SSRIs for

migraines, blood pressure or insomnia, have also become sometimes

irreversibly psychotic from even short exposure to the drugs and

have generated reports of suicidal/violent ideation and incidents.

This is true especially for children.

Furthermore, I believe there are documented incidents of children

being diagnosed with Aspergers only following drug-induced brain

injury: many of the effects of metals and environmental toxins are

mimmicked by psychotropic brain damage. The parallels are actually

quite astounding, at least as far as external behavior goes, but

fall apart once certain biomarkers are looked into and certain

details of the behavior and onset are looked into, proving only that

the brain's reaction to damage might have somewhat finite external

expressions. So some of the people on these lists may think they're

aspergers because their shrinks didn't want to admit that the drugs

did it. I think that explains why some need to believe that it's

aspergers and protest too much when the inconsistencies are

challenged: they're addicted to their psych drugs and don't want to

stop taking them, don't want to know the drugs are doing the damage

and prefer a helpless " genetic " condition that gives them civil

rightsy kinds of creds. This also has a name, it's called " drug

spellbinding " (there's a long technical name which I can't

remember).

I think the main culprit here is the same- the pharmaceutical

industry. Big surprise. But each division- the vaccine manufacturing

division and the psychopharmaceutical manufactering division- is a

devil deserving its own due. Keeping careful track of which crap did

what damage alone or in combination is very important because only

the truth will " set us free " and we have to be more right than the

other side. Of course it gets more confusing when drugs are given

to already vaccine injured children, a confusion that the drug

companies depend on to cover for the injuries that the drugs alone

can do. They'll try to keep the " genetic autism " myth going as long

as they can even just to provide a an expanded genetic " catch all "

diagnosis in the hopes that this will eventually by used to explain

away all the drug-induced injuries which are being currently caused

to small children.

Since the pharmaceutical industry is facing tens of thousands of

pending law suits for psychotropic drug injury cases, they depend a

bit on many groups falling for the smoke they're trying to generate

around all these separate and combined cases of brain maiming.

If we, for instance, claim that all cases of ADHD were caused by

vaccines, it does boost our numbers a bit in sending up the alarm

that many, many kids are being damaged by vacciens, but in the end

it serves the industry. This is because many of the cases of ADHD

previous to the autism epidemic were just normal kids being put in

chemical straight jackets and industry is happy if that becomes

obfuscated. This is STILL true, though now some of the cases

have " become real " and vaccine injured kids provide more behavioral

fodder for a label of attentional problems. What was once a fake

dx became a more real one once pharma began bombarding children

with more vaccine toxins.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that we can't rush to say that all

these school shootings represent vaccine injured people who were

mucked up more by drugs. Incidents of violence, murder and suicide

have run rampant among the age groups which received only three or

seven vaccinations or none and the common denominator is just the

drugs alone. With Cho it could have certainly been both and maybe

this will be true for other shooters as well, but just the drugs

alone can do it.

Sharna Olfman's new book gets into how a lot of similar confusion

has generated around the issue of iatrogenic bipolarity. The final

chapter is about environmental toxins. Here's a review:

http://tinyurl.com/yqlr73

>

> http://tinyurl.com/2vzcnn

>