Re: autism and lead poisoning re:toys

[Guest guest]

I doubt they would know this since they can't even figure out the total number of autism cases(referring to the gov't, however). I think there is a lot more info on the levels of testosteerone in child's body being the major factor-altho lead levels certainly could contribute, IMO. maurineizvestiaca <izvestiaca@...> wrote: Although I do believe that my son's autism was due to vaccines, I'm willing to entertain the thought that lead could be the culprit, china and lead toys..So lets say someone's

first child was a boy. And this boy received lead laced toys and over the next few months these toys caused Autism. Studies have stated that if a family has one son with Autism, they are likely to have another. - They are also likely to give him the same toys to play with. They are unlikely to have disposed of the first toys and re-puchased new ones. However, if the second child is a girl, the percentage of chance that this girl develops Autism is significantly lower. It is also likely that this female child has completely different toys. It is unlikely she has been given the same boy toys.Does anyone know the percentage of Girl, Girl autism cases?Or the percentage of Boy, Girl Autism cases?This thought has been keeping me up nights.

Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.

[Guest guest]

I think you have an interesting idea, but imo it is not likely

and either/or situation. Lead toxicity reduces methylation

ability (from what I have read--sorry, no ref offhand), and also

according to Haley, lead increases mercury toxicity.

So I think previous lead exposure could definitely be a part

of the puzzle as to why mercury in vaccines might be more

toxic to some than others.

I think that the whole problem in this controversy is that

there are multiple factors involved, not just one. It seems

to me that our current mainstream medical system is

really poorly designed to cope with multivariate analysis.

So much of what they do is designed around trying to test one

treatment, or look at one potential cause of a problem. Thus,

they attempt to limit their testing/experiments to one variable,

which, in biology, is completely impossible, and generally does

not relate to what is going on in the real world.

Sue

>

> Although I do believe that my son's autism was due to vaccines, I'm

> willing to entertain the thought that lead could be the culprit,

> china and lead toys..

>

> So lets say someone's first child was a boy. And this boy received

> lead laced toys and over the next few months these toys caused

> Autism.

>

> Studies have stated that if a family has one son with Autism, they

> are likely to have another. - They are also likely to give him the

> same toys to play with. They are unlikely to have disposed of the

> first toys and re-puchased new ones.

>

> However, if the second child is a girl, the percentage of chance that

> this girl develops Autism is significantly lower. It is also likely

> that this female child has completely different toys. It is unlikely

> she has been given the same boy toys.

>

> Does anyone know the percentage of Girl, Girl autism cases?

> Or the percentage of Boy, Girl Autism cases?

>

> This thought has been keeping me up nights.

>

[Guest guest]

Doesn't the UPPA reveal whether there is mercury, lead, or arsenic

poisoning?

, FA ~

http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=autism

> >

> > Although I do believe that my son's autism was due to vaccines,

I'm

> > willing to entertain the thought that lead could be the culprit,

> > china and lead toys..

> >

> > So lets say someone's first child was a boy. And this boy

received

> > lead laced toys and over the next few months these toys caused

> > Autism.

> >

> > Studies have stated that if a family has one son with Autism,

they

> > are likely to have another. - They are also likely to give him

the

> > same toys to play with. They are unlikely to have disposed of the

> > first toys and re-puchased new ones.

> >

> > However, if the second child is a girl, the percentage of chance

that

> > this girl develops Autism is significantly lower. It is also

likely

> > that this female child has completely different toys. It is

unlikely

> > she has been given the same boy toys.

> >

> > Does anyone know the percentage of Girl, Girl autism cases?

> > Or the percentage of Boy, Girl Autism cases?

> >

> > This thought has been keeping me up nights.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

The problem with the reductionism of mainstream science is also

simply that they aim at a profitable solution. Pharmacogenetics

attempts to link up genetic disorders with corresponding drugs and

therefore are bent on finding genetic cause alone. Proof of physical

cause (or even pschological cause, such trauma causing PTSD) are

mere nuisances to this line of research because physical and

emotional cause imply " preventability " . If ill effects are

prevented, how can the industry make money?!

> >

> > Although I do believe that my son's autism was due to vaccines,

I'm

> > willing to entertain the thought that lead could be the culprit,

> > china and lead toys..

> >

> > So lets say someone's first child was a boy. And this boy

received

> > lead laced toys and over the next few months these toys caused

> > Autism.

> >

> > Studies have stated that if a family has one son with Autism,

they

> > are likely to have another. - They are also likely to give him

the

> > same toys to play with. They are unlikely to have disposed of

the

> > first toys and re-puchased new ones.

> >

> > However, if the second child is a girl, the percentage of chance

that

> > this girl develops Autism is significantly lower. It is also

likely

> > that this female child has completely different toys. It is

unlikely

> > she has been given the same boy toys.

> >

> > Does anyone know the percentage of Girl, Girl autism cases?

> > Or the percentage of Boy, Girl Autism cases?

> >

> > This thought has been keeping me up nights.

> >

>