Re: I Am Legend

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 12/14/2007 11:33:35 PM Central Standard Time, fightingautism@... writes:

The worst part of the movie was a preview section/commerical with a

bunch of Hollywood celebs about how wonderful St. Jude Hospital is,

after St. Jude fought tooth & nail to block TN's legislation to limit

thimerosal in vaccines

What interest does St. Jude have in blocking this legislation? Anyone know?**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

[Guest guest]

A vax turns people into zombies? So it's non-fiction?

You have to wonder if certain stars are expressing views through

choice of material. Maybe I'm totally wrong, but when I saw 's

son in " Pursuit of Happyness " , I thought, now there's a kid who

probably wasn't vaccinated in infancy. That's what our son should

have been like.

>

> We went to see the movie tonight. Don't know if you all are

familiar

> with the plot, a doctor develops a mutated measles virus that ends

up

> being a cure for cancer. However, it has an unwanted side effect of

> making people turn into freaks that eat other people and everyone

> either dies or turns into these monsters. I'll leave the rest of

it at

> that, but found it to be pretty interesting plot.

>

> The worst part of the movie was a preview section/commerical with a

> bunch of Hollywood celebs about how wonderful St. Jude Hospital is,

> after St. Jude fought tooth & nail to block TN's legislation to

limit

> thimerosal in vaccines. I hope McCarthy can share with

> Anniston, Marlo , and all the others what a piece of crap St.

> Jude is when it comes to preserving increasing autism rates. Found

it

> pretty ironic they were in the same showing as this movie.

>

> At any rate, thought you all might enjoy the movie. It was

DEFINITELY

> a thriller and, as usual, Will wasn't too hard on the eyes,

> either. he delivered another fantastic performance.

>

> Deb

>

[Guest guest]

Actually, St Jude IS wonderful. My cousin's 5 year old son is being

treated for cancer there at no cost to his parents who cannot afford

it otherwise. My son is vaccine damaged but I don't begrudge them

getting help at that institution. Sometimes you have to take the good

with the bad. I am thankful for St. Jude no matter what their

policies are on vaccines. Vicki

>

> We went to see the movie tonight. Don't know if you all are familiar

> with the plot, a doctor develops a mutated measles virus that ends up

> being a cure for cancer. However, it has an unwanted side effect of

> making people turn into freaks that eat other people and everyone

> either dies or turns into these monsters. I'll leave the rest of it at

> that, but found it to be pretty interesting plot.

>

> The worst part of the movie was a preview section/commerical with a

> bunch of Hollywood celebs about how wonderful St. Jude Hospital is,

> after St. Jude fought tooth & nail to block TN's legislation to limit

> thimerosal in vaccines. I hope McCarthy can share with

> Anniston, Marlo , and all the others what a piece of crap St.

> Jude is when it comes to preserving increasing autism rates. Found it

> pretty ironic they were in the same showing as this movie.

>

> At any rate, thought you all might enjoy the movie. It was DEFINITELY

> a thriller and, as usual, Will wasn't too hard on the eyes,

> either. he delivered another fantastic performance.

>

> Deb

>

[Guest guest]

I've been told they were doing research with thimerosal as a treatment

for cancer, along with researching cancer vaccines. That said, I have

no citation or reference to back it up, so it may just be rumor.

I think this was 2005-2006, I can't remember exactly, but I still have

the memos passed back & forth between our speak of house, who's on the

St. Jude board and married to the biggest lobbyist in Nashville.

naifeh's office said St. Jude contacted them, St. Jude says naifeh's

office contacted them.

Debi

>

> In a message dated 12/14/2007 11:33:35 PM Central Standard Time,

> fightingautism@... writes:

>

> What interest does St. Jude have in blocking this legislation?

Anyone know?

>

>

>

> **************************************

> See AOL's top rated recipes

> (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

>

[Guest guest]

I'm not against St. Jude treating kids for cancer, I think it's

wondeful. But I cannot express how I feel watching their feel-good ads

while knowing the lengths they went to to block legislation that could

have spared thousands from this autism thing. Regardless of the good

work they do in cancer, it does not dismiss their responsibility of

furthering poisoning of children. For me it's the same thing as the

mantra about how vaccines save lives, therefore those who are vaccine

injured are expendable. Even worse in some ways, because they had no

need what so ever to get involved in the thimerosal legislation, they

ACTIVELY fought against it.

If I save one kid while harming another, does that make me a good person?

Debi

>

> Actually, St Jude IS wonderful. My cousin's 5 year old son is being

> treated for cancer there at no cost to his parents who cannot afford

> it otherwise. My son is vaccine damaged but I don't begrudge them

> getting help at that institution. Sometimes you have to take the good

> with the bad. I am thankful for St. Jude no matter what their

> policies are on vaccines. Vicki

>

[Guest guest]

And, by the way, I don't begrudge them at all for helping kids. I

begrudge them for using their reputation of helping kids to harm

others. Since they blocked the legislation, are they now going to

treat every child who has mercury poisoning in the state of TN at no

cost from date of dropping the bill to current? I think not.

> >

> > Actually, St Jude IS wonderful. My cousin's 5 year old son is being

> > treated for cancer there at no cost to his parents who cannot afford

> > it otherwise. My son is vaccine damaged but I don't begrudge them

> > getting help at that institution. Sometimes you have to take the good

> > with the bad. I am thankful for St. Jude no matter what their

> > policies are on vaccines. Vicki

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Um, hello St. Jude, Marlo , et all, thanks for all you do BUT

Thimerosal CAUSES certain types of cancer!!!!!!!! Not to mention

autism, alzheimer's, genetic mutations, etc........

Lord have mercy.

, FA ~

http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=autism

> >

> > In a message dated 12/14/2007 11:33:35 PM Central Standard Time,

> > fightingautism@ writes:

>

> >

> > What interest does St. Jude have in blocking this legislation?

> Anyone know?

> >

> >

> >

> > **************************************

> > See AOL's top rated recipes

> > (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I think the bottom line is this. If St. Jude had enough pressure put

on them, they'd do a 180 regarding TN's failed legislation. I think

they did it for 2 reasons. 1, naifeh's wife (naifeh is TN's speaker of

house) got the command from his wife to block the legislation because

she's a paid lobbyist for some of the drug mfg & naifeh figured he'd

get the respected St. Jude (no one would ever dare argue against a

place helping little sick children with cancer) to publicly go against

it and then naifeh gets his pockets lined, OR St. Jude has vested

interest in keeping the thimerosal in as many vaccines as possible, or

a little bit of both.

Don't you think if enough people, esp Hollywood, came out & blasted

st. Jude for its behavior, they'd turn around? I definitely think that

those in hollywood supporting this hospital should know what st jude

has done. Like I said, I think it's great what St. Jude is doing with

the cancer stuff, God knows if my child got cancer I'd be glad for

them to help. But, I DO have a child with autism who gets LITTLE/NO

help, just like thousands others in this state, and the thousands who

have contracted autism since the legislation failed. We aren't CA; in

our state early intervention is 1 hr/wk, we have NO ABA therapists in

East TN, no DAN, etc. So St jude pushed to keep injuring children and

giving absolutely no help.

It's just not right to hide behind their helping little

cancer-stricken children mantra to continue to poison an entire other

segment. It should go completely against what they stand for, but

obviously their actions speak regarding who they really are. It's the

very same tactic pro vaccine people do to make us look like

child-abusing nut jobs for trying to keep our kids safe.

Debi

>

> I would not be at all surprised to find that many of the cancers

which are occurring today, were caused by vaccines injected in the

past. That is likely a " given " , since most (perhaps even all) vaccines

have not been tested for the potential to cause carcinogenicity. It is

interesting that almost all vaccine manufacturers attach this brief

note in their product information/product insert section. Does this

mean they will get away with whatever damages were caused? They likely

will, thanks to riders which absolved them of any responsibility for

damages caused by vaccines, which they developed and/or promoted, but

WERE NOT EVALUATED FOR THEIR POTENTIAL TO CAUSE CARCINOGENICITY, and

GENOTOXICITY. Why are people allowing vaccines that have not been

tested/evaluated for their potential to cause CARCINOGENICITY and

GENOTOXICITY to be injected into their children or even themselves?

They must either be a bunch of idiots, or they know nothing about

this. I would think the latter is

> true. Do your homework, friends, before the powers that be (and

want to continue being so...) get the best of you!

>

> Aasa

[Guest guest]

Vets have noted cancers in dogs at injection sites..

> >

> > Actually, St Jude IS wonderful. My cousin's 5 year old son is

being

> > treated for cancer there at no cost to his parents who cannot

afford

> > it otherwise. My son is vaccine damaged but I don't begrudge them

> > getting help at that institution. Sometimes you have to take the

good

> > with the bad. I am thankful for St. Jude no matter what their

> > policies are on vaccines. Vicki

> >

>

[Guest guest]

St Jude/cancer help? Deirdre Imus is the one I would turn to. St.

Jude's entire group of paradigms are wrongs.

> >

> > I would not be at all surprised to find that many of the cancers

> which are occurring today, were caused by vaccines injected in the

> past. That is likely a " given " , since most (perhaps even all)

vaccines

> have not been tested for the potential to cause carcinogenicity. It

is

> interesting that almost all vaccine manufacturers attach this brief

> note in their product information/product insert section. Does this

> mean they will get away with whatever damages were caused? They

likely

> will, thanks to riders which absolved them of any responsibility for

> damages caused by vaccines, which they developed and/or promoted,

but

> WERE NOT EVALUATED FOR THEIR POTENTIAL TO CAUSE CARCINOGENICITY, and

> GENOTOXICITY. Why are people allowing vaccines that have not been

> tested/evaluated for their potential to cause CARCINOGENICITY and

> GENOTOXICITY to be injected into their children or even themselves?

> They must either be a bunch of idiots, or they know nothing about

> this. I would think the latter is

> > true. Do your homework, friends, before the powers that be (and

> want to continue being so...) get the best of you!

> >

> > Aasa

>

[Guest guest]

A couple of yrs ago I took in my daughter's cat. She got rabies &

feline leukemia. She didn't eat after that, a day later we took her

back, the vet took one look at her & immediately started an IV. He

said, " I believe she's had what's called a 'vaccine reaction.' That's

when -- "

I stopped him right there & said, " YOu don't have to explain it to me,

you see that little girl out there? She has autism because of a

vaccine reaction, only me would this also happen to with our cat after

every thing else! "

He told me it was probably the FeLV and he would recommend in the

future to...I don't even remember what I he said. I told him not to

worry, there would be no more " next time. " We probably will do rabies

again because she is an outdoor cat & we have lots of 'possums &

racoons in the neighborhood, along with active cases of rabies in the

region each summer. But we ain't ever doing the FeLV again. We also

have a service dog in training, so we have to have the mandatory ones

for her to have public access.

Debi

[Guest guest]

I agree. I'll be honest, I've always not paid animal shots too much

attention because...well...they're animals & since I've had kids I

don't get nearly as attached. But, my kids do. And, since we've

invested so much time & energy into getting our SD trained, I've

become far more concerned. The last thing we need is to have put so

much time into a dog that gets sick because of a shot. It is hard,

though, in a region where access isn't so easily given to a SD to then

fight the shots battle on top of it, on top of already fighting it for

kids.

I don't think Lyme is required here, but I could be wrong.

Debi

>

> You can request that your vet order the rabies vaccine

> withOUT the thimerasol (MERCURY). Same manufacturer

> and I think it even costs less. GO FIGURE! Our vet

> listened to me and now only gives that vaccine mercury

> free.

>

> Unfortunately not all of the vaccines are offered

> without thimerasol but if more of us ask or refuse to

> vaccinate they may change the ingredients.

>

> FWIW our vet does not think the lyme vaccine is

> effective....she has vaccinated lots of dogs for lyme

> that did get lyme anyway. The lyme vaccine can only be

> purchased with mercury.

>

>