Re: Fwd: Dr Wakefield verdict is in ZOE

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/01/2010 08:24:49 GMT Standard Time, neno@... writes:

will they? With moody involved I'd be surprised if they don’t... oh what a field day it would be. Unless high court made of the same stuff as gmc, which is entirely possible of course

>>the key word is JURY in the high court and you have JURY SELECTION before you start

Mandi x

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 29/01/2010 09:40:04 GMT Standard Time, neno@... writes:

you mean jury can be hand-picked?

>>All jurys go through selection as far as I know, they can only pick from the people called up, not pick their own people

Mandi x

[Guest guest]

Would not fancy being a juror in that trial....probably would not be allowed

anyhow as being a mere parent of a child with autism I would be considered far

too hysterical

In Autism Treatment , Sara Moroza-

<Moroza-@...> wrote:

>

> HA HA. That will be be a novelty. Poor sods though, having to go through

> it all again.

>

> Mum231ASD@... wrote:

> >

> > In a message dated 28/01/2010 23:10:49 GMT Standard Time,

> > zoe@... writes:

> >

> > Do we know if the docs can challenge any of the GMC rulings

> > legally? If people bore false witness that surely is a crime??

> > I know the GMC is a professional body and outside of the courts

> > but am hoping the 3 doctors will be able to get their issues into

> > court.....anybody know?

> >

> > from a well connected source:-

> > Yes. They have a right to appeal in the High court. At which point

> > there is a requirement for the jury to actually look at the evidence.

> > Mandi x

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I think any Appeal would be looked at by a judge and not involve a jury. And I

think an Appeal would have to be on a point of law and not on the facts of the

case. Still, well worth a try if they can afford to do it.

Margaret

>

>

> In a message dated 28/01/2010 23:10:49 GMT Standard Time, zoe@...

> writes:

>

> Do we know if the docs can challenge any of the GMC rulings legally? If

> people bore false witness that surely is a crime??

> I know the GMC is a professional body and outside of the courts but am

> hoping the 3 doctors will be able to get their issues into court.....anybody

> know?

>

>

>

> from a well connected source:-

>

> Yes. They have a right to appeal in the High court. At which point there is

> a requirement for the jury to actually look at the evidence.

>

> Mandi x

>

[Guest guest]

you mean jury can be hand-picked?

In a message dated 29/01/2010 08:24:49 GMT Standard Time, neno@... writes:

will they? With moody involved I'd be surprised if they don’t...

oh what a field day it would be. Unless high court made of the same stuff as gmc, which is entirely possible of course

>>the key word is JURY in the high court and you have JURY SELECTION before you start

Mandi x

[Guest guest]

didn’t mean that only one can ‘object’ to someone being picked, but more like what is high court’s involvement in the process of jury selection etc?

you mean jury can be hand-picked?

In a message dated 29/01/2010 08:24:49 GMT Standard Time, neno@... writes:

will they? With moody involved I'd be surprised if they don’t...

oh what a field day it would be. Unless high court made of the same stuff as gmc, which is entirely possible of course

>>the key word is JURY in the high court and you have JURY SELECTION before you start

Mandi x

[Guest guest]

Fanfuckingtastic

Thats what we need - a jury and due process. Hooray.

Zoe

>

>

> In a message dated 28/01/2010 23:10:49 GMT Standard Time, zoe@...

> writes:

>

> Do we know if the docs can challenge any of the GMC rulings legally? If

> people bore false witness that surely is a crime??

> I know the GMC is a professional body and outside of the courts but am

> hoping the 3 doctors will be able to get their issues into court.....anybody

> know?

>

>

>

> from a well connected source:-

>

> Yes. They have a right to appeal in the High court. At which point there is

> a requirement for the jury to actually look at the evidence.

>

> Mandi x

>

[Guest guest]

Scarily I think Margaret is right - High Court = Judicial Review (no jury and

appeal is on point of law, not facts of case)

to get to High Court they would have to first bring case to lower court - can

you get your source to elaborate Manders?

Zoe

> >

> >

> > In a message dated 28/01/2010 23:10:49 GMT Standard Time, zoe@

> > writes:

> >

> > Do we know if the docs can challenge any of the GMC rulings legally? If

> > people bore false witness that surely is a crime??

> > I know the GMC is a professional body and outside of the courts but am

> > hoping the 3 doctors will be able to get their issues into

court.....anybody

> > know?

> >

> >

> >

> > from a well connected source:-

> >

> > Yes. They have a right to appeal in the High court. At which point there is

> > a requirement for the jury to actually look at the evidence.

> >

> > Mandi x

> >

>