Debating - Comparatives and their effects. #2

[Guest guest]

"2. I compared lies and the us. Vs. them mentality within a group combined as that of the propagandas of WWII. Where fabrications, exaggerations and other non-factual things become the factual within the mentality of an “us. vs. them” mentality. (N.T vs. People with a form of autism). Either politically or otherwise. " For this example am I to feel poorly to desire to incite the need for thought concerning some political views that use fear? The comparison is a whole other reality to incite thought comparatively. Such as saying: 1. The N.T's will take away the children of those with forms of autism just because of autism. A. Is it true all

the time or partly? 2. Points of views were it makes it where the N.T's are a source of oppression and anti-autistic views. I humbly disagree with the N.T label and its usage in reference to the entirety of mankind. Somehow it is twisted meaning when falsely used politically and I think it has some psychological effects I am not qualified to speak of. It is a worry for me I suppose. It is empathy for a possibility of social crises of an "us Vs. them" mentality within a group as an example. Am I worrying to much? Should I seek out and document separatistic ideal, anti-N.T ideologies or not concern myself with it as it likely the expressions of inner grievance of experiences reflecting upon ones opinion of others? Certainly I am not the mind of another but I feel strongly against the spreading of any possible false fact to the minds of others without rational fact checking review. This especially being said

when it comes to autism and politics and not generally. Please reply if you can to reason with what I have said.