Dr Mercola's Raw Milk Article Dec 15, 2010

[Guest guest]

Here's the latest article by Dr. Mercola on the raw milk battle -- and

food rights.

This Natural Food Should Not be Consumed by Anyone at Any time for Any

Reason Posted By Dr. Mercola

<http://articles.mercola.com/members/Dr.-Mercola/default.aspx>

| December 15 2010 | 203,825 views

<http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Farticles.mercola.com%\

2Fsites%2Farticles%2Farchive%2F2010%2F12%2F15%2Fthe-war-over-raw-milk.as\

px & t=Time%20Magazine%20Runs%20Article%20on%20Raw%20Milk%20Wars & src=sp>

Milk may be a symbol of wholesomeness for most of us, but according to

Time Magazine, it's also a battleground between government regulators

and natural health food proponents who want to drink whole, raw milk.

The war is a test of their freedom to choose to drink a rich-tasting

beverage full of beneficial bacteria, enzymes, vitamins and amino acids,

that are mostly destroyed through pasteurization, the proponents say.

But to the FDA, it's a basic health issue: " Raw milk is an inherently

dangerous product, and it really should not be consumed by anyone at

any time for any reason, " a representative from the FDA tells TIME.

Unfortunately, if the FDA sergeants get their way, they'll win the war

with help from Congress and the proposed Food Safety Modernization Act.

Meanwhile, a federal court has struck down Ohio's law banning labels on

dairy products that say they're made with milk that's free of hormones.

As reported on NPR.org, that means companies that want to say their

products are " rbGH free " and " rbST free " and " artificial hormone free "

are now free to do so.

" But the bigger deal might be that the ruling challenges the FDA's

17-year-old finding that there's " no significant difference " between

the milk of cows given growth hormone and those that aren't, " NPR said.

" Just that sort of distinction, or lack of it actually, is part of the

ongoing debate about how to label genetically engineered salmon. "

The Court of Appeals also listed the reasons why there is a difference

between milk from cows given growth hormones and those that don't get

hormones †" and one was that there is more pus in the

hormone-treated cows' milk than in hormone-free.

Other states have already given permission for special labels on milk,

but NPR.org speculated that if the FDA approves genetically modified

salmon (GM), consumer groups may use the court's ruling to label

non-genetically engineered salmon.

Sources: [0]

Time Magazine September 20, 2010

<http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017205,00.html?xid=rs\

s-topstories & utm_source=feedburner & utm_medium=feed & utm_campaign=Feed%3A+\

time%2Ftopstories+%28TIME%3A+Top+Stories%29> [0]

NPR.org October 1, 2010

<http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2010/10/01/130270131/court-give-hormone\

-free-label-on-dairy-products-an-ok-in-ohio?sc=17 & f=1001%3Ehttp://www.np\

r.org/blogs/health/2010/10/01/130270131/court-give-hormone-free-label-on\

-dairy-products-an-ok-in-ohio?sc=17>

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

<http://twitter.com/mercola> <http://www.facebook.com/doctor.health>

Time Magazine

<http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2017205,00.html?xid=rs\

s-topstories & utm_source=feedburner & utm_medium=feed & utm_campaign=Feed%3A+\

time%2Ftopstories+%28TIME%3A+Top+Stories%29> couldn't be more correct

when stating that " for some Americans, milk has become a test of their

freedom. And they're not paranoid kooks either; the government really

is out to get them, authorizing seizures of bottles and jugs of

unpasteurized milk and, in one recent case, a full-on,

agents-brandishing-guns raid. "

There is indeed a war going on, and it's threatening one of your most

basic freedoms †" the right to eat a wholly natural, healthful

food!

The FDA has long banned the sale of raw milk across state lines, and in

many states it's illegal to sell raw milk entirely. (For more

information about laws in various US states, please see this link

<http://www.realmilk.com/happening.html> . For information about raw

milk in other countries go here

<http://www.realmilk.com/happening-other.html> .)

Why has a natural food source been banned for sale in so many areas?

Well, they claim raw milk is simply too dangerous to consume and by

restricting its sale they are serving the public health and reducing

the risk of illness....

Yet shockingly there's no evidence backing up this claim.

According to CDC data, from 1993 to 2006, only about 116 illnesses a

year were linked to raw milk. That amounts to less than .000002 percent

of the 76 million people who contract a food-borne illness in the

United States each year!

Looking at the evidence

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/20/raw-milk-\

bans-are-about-protecting-big-dairy.aspx> , or rather lack thereof, it

is quite clear that raw milk has been unfairly singled out and targeted

by the FDA, the USDA, and even the FBI, despite the fact that it's so

low on the food-borne illness risk scale it's hardly measurable.

The recent enforcement efforts against raw milk sales is so

disproportionate to the risk it poses to consumers that it defies all

logic.

Is the Ban on Raw Milk Unconstitutional?

Raw milk enthusiasts and raw dairy suppliers began fighting back in

early 2010, filing suit against the FDA

<http://www.farmtoconsumer.org/press/press-22feb2010.html> , claiming

that banning interstate sales is unconstitutional.

The rebuttal received from the FDA was shocking to say the least.

It contained the following outrageous statements, which make it very

clear they believe you have no right to natural, unadulterated food

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/29/fda-says-\

you-have-no-right-to-real-food-unless-they-give-you-permission-first.asp\

x> :

" There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular

food. "

" There is no 'deeply rooted' historical tradition of unfettered access

to foods of all kinds. "

" Plaintiffs' assertion of a 'fundamental right to their own bodily and

physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to

consume for themselves and their families' is similarly unavailing

because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food

they wish. "

The FDA's brief goes on to state that " even if such a right did exist,

it would not render the FDA's regulations unconstitutional because

prohibiting the interstate sale and distribution of unpasteurized milk

promotes bodily and physical health. "

" There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract. "

With these assertions, the FDA essentially claims to have the authority

to prohibit any food of their choosing, and make it a crime for you to

seek it out.

This is simply unacceptable.

Raw Milk Safety Standards †" Actually HIGHER than Those for

Pasteurized Milk

It's essential to understand the reasons why most dairy is pasteurized

in the first place.

The dairy cows used to produce much of the pasteurized dairy sold in

the United States are raised in such unsanitary conditions that it

affects the cows' health and hence the quality of their milk.

Factory farming conditions are the reason why the milk has to be

pasteurized in the first place. If it wasn't, it simply would not be

safe to drink. This fact is also what prevents the conventional dairy

industry from competing with smaller organic farms.

In terms of quality and nutritional content of the milk, you simply

cannot compare the milk produced by factory farms to that of organic

farm that raise their cattle on grasses and let them out to pasture.

These cows are healthy, and produce high quality, uncontaminated milk

that does not require pasteurization to kill off dangerous pathogens.

Still, despite the fact that grass-fed organically-raised cows are at a

distinct advantage, from the get-go when it comes to the quality of

their milk, organic dairy farms in most states still must meet or exceed

pasteurized milk standards, without pasteurizing.

California, specifically, (where raw milk is legal) has its own special

set of standards for raw milk for human consumption.

So, if it's not really about food safety, what's all the hubbub about?

In a word: money.

The conventional dairy industry, realizing that consumers are flocking

toward raw milk because of its health benefits, has redoubled their

efforts to quench raw milk sales.

You might think that if raw dairy became attractive enough the dairy

industry would simply follow suit and begin producing raw products to

meet the demand. Alas... this is virtually impossible because of the

way their overcrowded farms are run.

You simply CANNOT drink factory farmed milk raw. It would be extremely

unsafe. Their business depends on pasteurization, and that is why their

powerful lobbyists will stop at nothing to persuade government agencies

to keep raw milk bans

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/07/20/raw-milk-\

bans-are-about-protecting-big-dairy.aspx> in full force.

Big Dairy simply cannot compete, so to maintain their market share,

they're employing dirty tactics to destroy the competition instead.

Still, There is Good News!

In the middle of all this fascist-like drama, a federal court has

repealed Ohio's law banning the use of 'rBGH-free' labels on dairy

products, giving raw dairy producers and consumers new hope.

This ruling means that companies that want to clearly state that their

products are " rBGH free, " " rBST free, " or " artificial hormone free " are

now allowed to do so.

This is an important victory that may shape the future of other

genetically modified (GM) foods, such as GM salmon †" the approval

of which is currently being debated by the FDA.

If the salmon is approved, the next question is whether or not it must

be labeled as genetically modified

<http://www.stltoday.com/news/national/article_5a19abb7-542c-56db-922a-6\

b67a1c7ecb4.html> .

For the past 17 years, the FDA's has held on to their initial finding

that there's " no significant difference "

<http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidanc\

eDocuments/FoodLabelingNutrition/ucm059036.htm> between the milk of

cows given genetically modified artificial growth hormone

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/09/13/monsanto-\

rbgh-can-cause-cancer.aspx> and those that aren't.

By overturning the ban on " rBGH free " labels in Ohio, it reopens the

debate, which is exactly what needs to happen. In worst case, if the FDA

decides not to label GM salmon as such, consumer groups can use this

court ruling to label natural, NON-GM salmon instead.

Get Informed and Protect Your Food Freedom

I urge you to a take a stand to protect your freedom of food choice by

joining the Raw Milk Campaign <http://www.realmilk.com/why.html> to

make access to healthy raw milk a right for all Americans. You can find

Local Chapters and Chapter Leaders by sending an email to:

chapters@... <mailto:chapters@...> .

For more information, I urge you to listen to my interview with Mark

McAfee

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/01/mark-mcaf\

ee-interview.aspx> , the founder of Organic Pastures, one of the

largest producers of raw milk in the United States, along with this

video with health and business journalist E. Gumpert

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Choosing-\

Between-Raw-Milk-and-a-Dead-White-Liquid.aspx> .

You can also find lots of valuable information in Gumpert's book, The

Raw Milk Revolution

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1603582193/optimalwellnessc> ,

and on McAfee's website <http://www.organicpastures.com/> .

Finally, if you're interested in purchasing raw milk, RealMilk.com

<http://realmilk.com/why.html> can help you find a high-quality

source

<http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/05/01/mark-mcaf\

ee-interview.aspx> in your area.

Related