Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

helmet and FDA approval

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

HI. This is what I was told at our last visit regarding our daughters

helmet. The helmet isnt FDA approved yet but is in the process. The

clinic where we got our helmet can no longer make them until it does

become FDA approved. There is a few states that have already gotton it

approved. Does anyone know why the band costs a lot more than the

helmet when they both basically do the same thing?

Dawn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

First! I must say:

" Happy St. 's Day!! "

and my condolences of you who are not of Irish descent!!!

Now, on to much more serious matters.

Dawn wrote:

>

> HI. This is what I was told at our last visit regarding our daughters

> helmet. The helmet isnt FDA approved yet but is in the process. The

> clinic where we got our helmet can no longer make them until it does

> become FDA approved. There is a few states that have already gotton it

> approved. Does anyone know why the band costs a lot more than the

> helmet when they both basically do the same thing?

I can comment on some of this. I became aware of the DOC band in 1991. At that

time I was a research scientist at the Advanced Surgical Institute in Dallas,

Texas. The reason I become involved is because (to be quite frank) we were a

skeptical about the DOC band. " Helmets " had been tried before many time before

and then abandoned. While this helmets did reshape the head, generally resulted

in other deformities. My concern in 1991 was that the DOC band was another

helmet. I was very surpised and pleased to discover that I was wrong. I went

from skeptic (cynic) to supporter after seeing it work and have since worked

with Cranial Tech to document and demonstrate that the DOC Band works (recent

publications in major medical journals are available at

http://www.plagiocephaly.org).

I am not aware of any helmets that are FDA approved nor I'm I aware of any

published reports of successful helmet programs. If any of you are visiting a

clinic that can provide that information, please let me know. I'd be happy to

make that information available at www.plagiocephaly.org. But, as I said I do

not believe that that information exists for any helmet program. I should

mention that the FDA does not approve " states " to use devices--they approve the

devices (and drugs, etc.) The DOC Band is the only medical device has been

approved by the FDA and is available in many states. Plus, the results of years

of treatment have been published and are publicly available.

Hope this information helps.

Sincerely,

M.

http://www.plagiocephaly.org

http://www.EyeOnIowa.com/StPats/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dawn, All I have heard about difference in cost had to do with FDA approval.

If I understand correctly, the people responsible for band have spent a great

deal of $$$$ for that approval. I guess they feel they are entittled to more

money since it has been approved. I don't see much difference either.

Belinda(Indiana)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

Thank you so much for helping us out on the FDA discussion. I really appreciate you being here, A LOT!

C./subscribe/Plagiocephaly

----- Original Message -----

From: M.

Plagiocephalyonelist

Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 11:32 AM

Subject: Re: helmet and FDA approval

From: " M. " <kevin@...> First! I must say:"Happy St. 's Day!!"and my condolences of you who are not of Irish descent!!!Now, on to much more serious matters.Dawn wrote:>> HI. This is what I was told at our last visit regarding our daughters> helmet. The helmet isnt FDA approved yet but is in the process. The> clinic where we got our helmet can no longer make them until it does> become FDA approved. There is a few states that have already gotton it> approved. Does anyone know why the band costs a lot more than the> helmet when they both basically do the same thing?I can comment on some of this. I became aware of the DOC band in 1991. At thattime I was a research scientist at the Advanced Surgical Institute in Dallas,Texas. The reason I become involved is because (to be quite frank) we were askeptical about the DOC band. "Helmets" had been tried before many time beforeand then abandoned. While this helmets did reshape the head, generally resultedin other deformities. My concern in 1991 was that the DOC band was anotherhelmet. I was very surpised and pleased to discover that I was wrong. I wentfrom skeptic (cynic) to supporter after seeing it work and have since workedwith Cranial Tech to document and demonstrate that the DOC Band works (recentpublications in major medical journals are available athttp://www.plagiocephaly.org).I am not aware of any helmets that are FDA approved nor I'm I aware of anypublished reports of successful helmet programs. If any of you are visiting aclinic that can provide that information, please let me know. I'd be happy tomake that information available at www.plagiocephaly.org. But, as I said I donot believe that that information exists for any helmet program. I shouldmention that the FDA does not approve "states" to use devices--they approve thedevices (and drugs, etc.) The DOC Band is the only medical device has beenapproved by the FDA and is available in many states. Plus, the results of yearsof treatment have been published and are publicly available.Hope this information helps.Sincerely, M. http://www.plagiocephaly.orghttp://www.EyeOnIowa.com/StPats/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

Hi,

My son has a helmet and I was concerned when I read

your message that helmets helped shape heads but

resulted in other deformities. Could you please

explain?

--- " M. " <kevin@...> wrote:

> First! I must say:

>

> " Happy St. 's Day!! "

> and my condolences of you who are not of Irish

> descent!!!

>

> Now, on to much more serious matters.

>

> Dawn wrote:

> >

> > HI. This is what I was told at our last visit

> regarding our daughters

> > helmet. The helmet isnt FDA approved yet but is

> in the process. The

> > clinic where we got our helmet can no longer make

> them until it does

> > become FDA approved. There is a few states that

> have already gotton it

> > approved. Does anyone know why the band costs a

> lot more than the

> > helmet when they both basically do the same thing?

>

> I can comment on some of this. I became aware of

> the DOC band in 1991. At that

> time I was a research scientist at the Advanced

> Surgical Institute in Dallas,

> Texas. The reason I become involved is because (to

> be quite frank) we were a

> skeptical about the DOC band. " Helmets " had been

> tried before many time before

> and then abandoned. While this helmets did reshape

> the head, generally resulted

> in other deformities. My concern in 1991 was that

> the DOC band was another

> helmet. I was very surpised and pleased to discover

> that I was wrong. I went

> from skeptic (cynic) to supporter after seeing it

> work and have since worked

> with Cranial Tech to document and demonstrate that

> the DOC Band works (recent

> publications in major medical journals are available

> at

> http://www.plagiocephaly.org).

>

> I am not aware of any helmets that are FDA approved

> nor I'm I aware of any

> published reports of successful helmet programs. If

> any of you are visiting a

> clinic that can provide that information, please let

> me know. I'd be happy to

> make that information available at

> www.plagiocephaly.org. But, as I said I do

> not believe that that information exists for any

> helmet program. I should

> mention that the FDA does not approve " states " to

> use devices--they approve the

> devices (and drugs, etc.) The DOC Band is the only

> medical device has been

> approved by the FDA and is available in many states.

> Plus, the results of years

> of treatment have been published and are publicly

> available.

>

> Hope this information helps.

>

> Sincerely,

>

> M.

> http://www.plagiocephaly.org

> http://www.EyeOnIowa.com/StPats/

>

>

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Belinda wrote:

>Dawn, All I have heard about difference in cost had to do with FDA

>approval.

>If I understand correctly, the people responsible for band have

>spent a great

>deal of $$$$ for that approval.

Maybe I should correct what seems to be a fairly standard misconception.

Cranial Technologies did not go looking for FDA approval. The FDA came to

Cranial Technologies and basically said " Hey, that device needs to have FDA

approval. " Like other groups making cranial orthosis, Cranial Tech was

working under that assumption that the device (i.e., the DOC band) was

exempt. They were wrong! The DOC Band was not exempt, however now it is

approved. Remember, companies (including those that make drugs and

pacemakers) don't go to the FDA so they can charge more, they seek FDA

approval so they can provide a product to consumers.

Fortunately, Cranial Technologies had been proactive in establish treatment

protocols, standard laboratory practices, etc. PLUS they had been collecting

data on head shape and growth. So, all of that information was available to

provide to the FDA. As a matter of fact the article, , KM,

Littlefield, TR, Pomatto, JK, Manwaring, KH, and Beals, SP (1999) Cranial

growth unrestricted during treatment of deformational plagiocephaly.

Pediatric Neurosurgery, 30: 193-199. (available at

http://www.Plagiocephaly.org) was written based one small part of FDA

request. That's another thing, they tell you what information you will

provide.

I guess they feel they are

>entittled to more

>money since it has been approved.

I do not know much about the companies finances. However, I can say that a

great deal of time and effort is spent to assure that a DOC band put on an

infant in North Carolina or Chicago or Spain is a good as one delivered in

Phoenix.

I'm not certain how may helmet programs there are, but it is event from the

discussion on this list all helmet are not of the same design (plus seem my

next comments.)

Back to the money issue>>>>Plus--this is no big secret--they are spending

considerable time and effort trying to understand the cause of plagiocephaly

it can either be prevented or recognized and treated sooner.

> I don't see much difference either.

As I said earlier if anyone you know of a study that has compared helmet

(the question is which helmet) and the DOC band, please let me know. All I

can say is that information on the effectiveness of the DOC band has been

published.

I hope this information helps. I'm sorry that I cannot tell you how well

that different helmets work--that information simply has not been made

available. But if any of you ever have a question, you direct it to me on

the list or privately.

M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>From: heidi bosinger-waldron <bosingerwaldronh@...>

>

>,

>

>Hi,

>My son has a helmet and I was concerned when I read

>your message that helmets helped shape heads but

>resulted in other deformities. Could you please

>explain?

>

I really can't comment about the helmets that are being used today. I'm

gathering that there are a number of different kinds and so far, none of the

recent helmet makers have published about a sufficient number to make for me

to comment. My comment about " other deformities " was a general comment

about helmets predating my exposure to the DOC band. In general those

earlier devices--when they worked--produced rounder, higher head. You might

ask " What's wrong with a rounder, higher head? " First, a normal head is not

round. It's actually wider in the back than in the front. Second, higher

head (noticeable a higher forehead) is also very noticeable. This rounder,

higher head was evidence of restricted growth.

That was the old helmet. Unfortunately, I have not seen any of the helmets

that are being discussed here. So, I cannot comment on them. My

recommendation is just to ask the physician who recommended the helmet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>I don't see much difference either.

Hi... just to shed a little more light on the picture (though knows the most out of all of us...) -- I just got some literature from Cranial Technologies to share with my pediatrician and the neurosurgeon. Some of the articles are the same ones on the web. There are also a couple of articles from Pediatric News and the Chicago Tribune -- one of these articles describes the helmet as something that "does not mold the head but simply provides a tight round space for the head to grow into, according to Dr. Argenta" (of course, there are probably a lot of different helmets out there, and this just describes one...)

it further states:

the [DOC] band is a "custom fitted, semi-rigid headband," and "applies pressure to bulging areas of the skull, according to Cranial Technologies in Phoenix"

In our case, since Quinn has a scaphocephalic head shape, I definitely feel that the gentle pressure treatment would be more beneficial. And I also feel that the neurosurgeon who kind of dismissed the helmet for treatment (I didn't know about the band then, and just inquired about the possibility of using a helmet -- he said it was only used in the opposite case... flat back, protruding front...) probably doesn't have much knowledge of the band.

For a lot of positional plagiocephlic cases though, the helmet works just fine because it keeps the child off the flat spot, and just gently gives the skull a new place to go/grow. Depending on the severity of the head shape, I would have to say that the helmet would probably be just as effective. The bottom line is what you and your doctor(s) feel is best for your child. As with all medical treatments, each case is individual and depends on a lot of factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...