Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: My RAW MILK- COUNTERPOINT editorial I submitted to the Mpls. Trib today....

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Will WOW this is what you do best thank you so much and damn was our BLT

good last night! Hats off to you!

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota <holistic@...>wrote:

>

>

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

> " Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

> protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

> farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and,

> in addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by

> the knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially

> since the writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of

> being scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

> distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

> " facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

> example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

> unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to

> sail solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these

> same critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their

> daily supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third

> of the children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes

> raging in our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring

> Sugar's Danger! " .

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off

> as a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " ,

> know-nothings who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers

> who want to poison them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled

> fools clearly need the government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a

> shred of scientific backbone to the article. Science begins with a

> literature review and there was no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn,

> MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty' milk is not `pasteurized' or

> `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. " We all want clean,

> wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and

> legalization of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The

> typical raw dairy customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the

> average supermarket shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents

> who duly note the well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and

> nutrient density of " conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is

> no 100% safe food. We know that if every category of food that ever caused

> an occasional incidence of food poisoning were made illegal, there would be

> no hamburger, no lettuce, no eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach.

> Virtually nothing to eat! We also know that improvements are always

> appreciated and necessary. We welcome those changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family

> farms. Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a

> huge corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a

> family farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that

> feeds us. This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few

> are exposed, and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year

> ago, one contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory

> farm-sourced, mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million

> pounds of potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school

> children had already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with

> nearly 400 food recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm

> outbreak, while also tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is

> very easy to trace and correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

> donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost

> always consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine

> prescribed raw milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome

> nourishment as when God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land

> of the Canaanites, promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw

> milk is still consumed all around the world in vastly greater amounts than

> pasteurized milk. It was never considered a potential pathogen-source in the

> United States until we had " factory " dairies that employed tubercular and

> sick immigrants who milked by hand. We never had an epic problem with

> pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy cattle were fed by-product feeds

> from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened animals produced dirty milk

> that was made slightly safer by heating it. Pasteurization was offered as a

> " band-aid " in order to continue the business of selling dirty milk. It's

> gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized

> markets and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization

> has become law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even

> coliform organisms has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic

> bacteria are NOT routinely found on small family farms using pasture-based

> farming, clean facilities, and the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory

> standards. Milk no longer touches dirty hands nor an open milk bucket but

> runs through glass and stainless steel pipes to the bulk tank. Deadly

> pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use of feedlot-runoff

> irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary conditions. Pathogens

> take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors, confined and

> over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are " allergic "

> to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive on

> wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

> was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus,

> to artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces

> of mold from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured

> proteins from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization

> and homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

> showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and

> elixir! Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as

> the founders of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the

> European " milk cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB,

> Brucellosis, and chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by

> inpatient treatment at the Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw

> milk for cure. Staff physician J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that

> after 15 years of seeing more cures with the milk cure than any other form

> of medicine that " the medical man is disinterested in this natural cure " . It

> was apparently " too simple to believe " . There is only one " perfect food " in

> the world, meaning a food that would sustain your life (in excellent health)

> alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk. Pasteurized milk will not do

> that.

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

> people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness

> until recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the

> reports, found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit.

> The Hartmann cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that

> have devoted their lives towards making the best milk humanly possible.

> Likewise, if problems exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the

> problems. The article states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch "

> if they saw the Hartmann farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of

> commercial dairy farms in my work, farms that sell milk that could only be

> sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that would definitely sicken you if you tried

> it raw. These farms made me sick. I can't even describe here the cruelty and

> shortcuts taken in the corporate desire to manufacture massive quantities of

> a super cheap white liquid that vaguely resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

> found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

> fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

> source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness

> from food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the

> bacteria that may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by

> pasteurization. Raw milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens

> via a natural preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind

> both sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More

> states are expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific

> information about the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE

> UNTOLD STORY OF MILK by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC

> DISEASE by Dr Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING

> NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD by s, MD. There is also

> excellent information on www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com,

> www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org, The Farm to Consumer Legal

> Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION HANDBOOK by Tim

> Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy, nutritious,

> safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

>

>

--

Kathy-jo

c. 612.386.4240

ebay store: http://stores.ebay.com/Uptown-rags

http://finance./group/MNBlueSkyGuideExchange/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Ditto- but we didn't have BLTs:) Very nicely worded.

Susie

On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Kathy-jo <kaje62@...> wrote:

> Will WOW this is what you do best thank you so much and damn was our BLT

> good last night! Hats off to you!

>

> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota <holistic@...>wrote:

>

>>

>>

>> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

>> " Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

>> protect families "

>>

>> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

>> farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and,

>> in addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by

>> the knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially

>> since the writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of

>> being scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

>> distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

>> " facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>>

>> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

>> example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

>> unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to

>> sail solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these

>> same critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their

>> daily supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third

>> of the children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes

>> raging in our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring

>> Sugar's Danger! " .

>>

>> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off

>> as a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " ,

>> know-nothings who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers

>> who want to poison them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled

>> fools clearly need the government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a

>> shred of scientific backbone to the article. Science begins with a

>> literature review and there was no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn,

>> MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty' milk is not `pasteurized' or

>> `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. " We all want clean,

>> wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or lettuce.

>>

>> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and

>> legalization of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The

>> typical raw dairy customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the

>> average supermarket shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents

>> who duly note the well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and

>> nutrient density of " conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is

>> no 100% safe food. We know that if every category of food that ever caused

>> an occasional incidence of food poisoning were made illegal, there would be

>> no hamburger, no lettuce, no eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach.

>> Virtually nothing to eat! We also know that improvements are always

>> appreciated and necessary. We welcome those changes.

>>

>> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family

>> farms. Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a

>> huge corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a

>> family farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that

>> feeds us. This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few

>> are exposed, and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year

>> ago, one contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory

>> farm-sourced, mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million

>> pounds of potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school

>> children had already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with

>> nearly 400 food recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm

>> outbreak, while also tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is

>> very easy to trace and correct.

>>

>> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

>> donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost

>> always consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine

>> prescribed raw milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome

>> nourishment as when God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land

>> of the Canaanites, promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw

>> milk is still consumed all around the world in vastly greater amounts than

>> pasteurized milk. It was never considered a potential pathogen-source in the

>> United States until we had " factory " dairies that employed tubercular and

>> sick immigrants who milked by hand. We never had an epic problem with

>> pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy cattle were fed by-product feeds

>> from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened animals produced dirty milk

>> that was made slightly safer by heating it. Pasteurization was offered as a

>> " band-aid " in order to continue the business of selling dirty milk. It's

>> gotten worse.

>>

>> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized

>> markets and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization

>> has become law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even

>> coliform organisms has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic

>> bacteria are NOT routinely found on small family farms using pasture-based

>> farming, clean facilities, and the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory

>> standards. Milk no longer touches dirty hands nor an open milk bucket but

>> runs through glass and stainless steel pipes to the bulk tank. Deadly

>> pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use of feedlot-runoff

>> irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary conditions. Pathogens

>> take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors, confined and

>> over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are " allergic "

>> to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive on

>> wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

>> was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus,

>> to artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces

>> of mold from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured

>> proteins from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization

>> and homogenization.

>>

>> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

>> showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and

>> elixir! Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as

>> the founders of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the

>> European " milk cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB,

>> Brucellosis, and chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by

>> inpatient treatment at the Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw

>> milk for cure. Staff physician J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that

>> after 15 years of seeing more cures with the milk cure than any other form

>> of medicine that " the medical man is disinterested in this natural cure " . It

>> was apparently " too simple to believe " . There is only one " perfect food " in

>> the world, meaning a food that would sustain your life (in excellent health)

>> alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk. Pasteurized milk will not do

>> that.

>>

>> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

>> people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness

>> until recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the

>> reports, found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit.

>> The Hartmann cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that

>> have devoted their lives towards making the best milk humanly possible.

>> Likewise, if problems exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the

>> problems. The article states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch "

>> if they saw the Hartmann farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of

>> commercial dairy farms in my work, farms that sell milk that could only be

>> sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that would definitely sicken you if you tried

>> it raw. These farms made me sick. I can't even describe here the cruelty and

>> shortcuts taken in the corporate desire to manufacture massive quantities of

>> a super cheap white liquid that vaguely resembles milk.

>>

>> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

>> found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

>> fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

>> source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness

>> from food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the

>> bacteria that may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by

>> pasteurization. Raw milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens

>> via a natural preservation system.

>>

>> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind

>> both sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More

>> states are expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific

>> information about the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE

>> UNTOLD STORY OF MILK by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC

>> DISEASE by Dr Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING

>> NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD by s, MD. There is also

>> excellent information on www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com,

>> www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org, The Farm to Consumer Legal

>> Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION HANDBOOK by Tim

>> Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy, nutritious,

>> safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>>

>> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>>

>>

>>

>

>

>

> --

> Kathy-jo

> c. 612.386.4240

> ebay store: http://stores.ebay.com/Uptown-rags

> http://finance./group/MNBlueSkyGuideExchange/

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Ditto- but we didn't have BLTs:) Very nicely worded.

Susie

On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Kathy-jo <kaje62@...> wrote:

> Will WOW this is what you do best thank you so much and damn was our BLT

> good last night! Hats off to you!

>

> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota <holistic@...>wrote:

>

>>

>>

>> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

>> " Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

>> protect families "

>>

>> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

>> farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and,

>> in addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by

>> the knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially

>> since the writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of

>> being scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

>> distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

>> " facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>>

>> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

>> example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

>> unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to

>> sail solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these

>> same critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their

>> daily supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third

>> of the children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes

>> raging in our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring

>> Sugar's Danger! " .

>>

>> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off

>> as a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " ,

>> know-nothings who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers

>> who want to poison them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled

>> fools clearly need the government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a

>> shred of scientific backbone to the article. Science begins with a

>> literature review and there was no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn,

>> MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty' milk is not `pasteurized' or

>> `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. " We all want clean,

>> wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or lettuce.

>>

>> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and

>> legalization of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The

>> typical raw dairy customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the

>> average supermarket shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents

>> who duly note the well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and

>> nutrient density of " conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is

>> no 100% safe food. We know that if every category of food that ever caused

>> an occasional incidence of food poisoning were made illegal, there would be

>> no hamburger, no lettuce, no eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach.

>> Virtually nothing to eat! We also know that improvements are always

>> appreciated and necessary. We welcome those changes.

>>

>> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family

>> farms. Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a

>> huge corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a

>> family farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that

>> feeds us. This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few

>> are exposed, and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year

>> ago, one contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory

>> farm-sourced, mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million

>> pounds of potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school

>> children had already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with

>> nearly 400 food recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm

>> outbreak, while also tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is

>> very easy to trace and correct.

>>

>> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

>> donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost

>> always consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine

>> prescribed raw milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome

>> nourishment as when God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land

>> of the Canaanites, promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw

>> milk is still consumed all around the world in vastly greater amounts than

>> pasteurized milk. It was never considered a potential pathogen-source in the

>> United States until we had " factory " dairies that employed tubercular and

>> sick immigrants who milked by hand. We never had an epic problem with

>> pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy cattle were fed by-product feeds

>> from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened animals produced dirty milk

>> that was made slightly safer by heating it. Pasteurization was offered as a

>> " band-aid " in order to continue the business of selling dirty milk. It's

>> gotten worse.

>>

>> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized

>> markets and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization

>> has become law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even

>> coliform organisms has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic

>> bacteria are NOT routinely found on small family farms using pasture-based

>> farming, clean facilities, and the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory

>> standards. Milk no longer touches dirty hands nor an open milk bucket but

>> runs through glass and stainless steel pipes to the bulk tank. Deadly

>> pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use of feedlot-runoff

>> irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary conditions. Pathogens

>> take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors, confined and

>> over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are " allergic "

>> to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive on

>> wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

>> was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus,

>> to artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces

>> of mold from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured

>> proteins from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization

>> and homogenization.

>>

>> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

>> showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and

>> elixir! Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as

>> the founders of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the

>> European " milk cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB,

>> Brucellosis, and chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by

>> inpatient treatment at the Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw

>> milk for cure. Staff physician J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that

>> after 15 years of seeing more cures with the milk cure than any other form

>> of medicine that " the medical man is disinterested in this natural cure " . It

>> was apparently " too simple to believe " . There is only one " perfect food " in

>> the world, meaning a food that would sustain your life (in excellent health)

>> alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk. Pasteurized milk will not do

>> that.

>>

>> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

>> people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness

>> until recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the

>> reports, found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit.

>> The Hartmann cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that

>> have devoted their lives towards making the best milk humanly possible.

>> Likewise, if problems exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the

>> problems. The article states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch "

>> if they saw the Hartmann farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of

>> commercial dairy farms in my work, farms that sell milk that could only be

>> sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that would definitely sicken you if you tried

>> it raw. These farms made me sick. I can't even describe here the cruelty and

>> shortcuts taken in the corporate desire to manufacture massive quantities of

>> a super cheap white liquid that vaguely resembles milk.

>>

>> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

>> found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

>> fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

>> source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness

>> from food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the

>> bacteria that may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by

>> pasteurization. Raw milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens

>> via a natural preservation system.

>>

>> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind

>> both sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More

>> states are expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific

>> information about the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE

>> UNTOLD STORY OF MILK by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC

>> DISEASE by Dr Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING

>> NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD by s, MD. There is also

>> excellent information on www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com,

>> www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org, The Farm to Consumer Legal

>> Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION HANDBOOK by Tim

>> Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy, nutritious,

>> safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>>

>> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>>

>>

>>

>

>

>

> --

> Kathy-jo

> c. 612.386.4240

> ebay store: http://stores.ebay.com/Uptown-rags

> http://finance./group/MNBlueSkyGuideExchange/

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Will!!! This is SO good.

Thank you for being you.

We love you.

>

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and, in

addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by the

knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially since the

writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of being

scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

" facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to sail

solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these same

critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their daily

supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third of the

children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes raging in

our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring Sugar's Danger! "

..

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off as

a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " , know-nothings

who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers who want to poison

them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled fools clearly need the

government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a shred of scientific

backbone to the article. Science begins with a literature review and there was

no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn, MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty'

milk is not `pasteurized' or `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. "

We all want clean, wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or

lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and legalization

of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The typical raw dairy

customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the average supermarket

shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents who duly note the

well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and nutrient density of

" conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is no 100% safe food. We

know that if every category of food that ever caused an occasional incidence of

food poisoning were made illegal, there would be no hamburger, no lettuce, no

eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach. Virtually nothing to eat! We also know

that improvements are always appreciated and necessary. We welcome those

changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family farms.

Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a huge

corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a family

farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that feeds us.

This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few are exposed,

and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year ago, one

contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory farm-sourced,

mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million pounds of

potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school children had

already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with nearly 400 food

recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm outbreak, while also

tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is very easy to trace and

correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost always

consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine prescribed raw

milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome nourishment as when

God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites,

promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw milk is still consumed

all around the world in vastly greater amounts than pasteurized milk. It was

never considered a potential pathogen-source in the United States until we had

" factory " dairies that employed tubercular and sick immigrants who milked by

hand. We never had an epic problem with pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy

cattle were fed by-product feeds from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened

animals produced dirty milk that was made slightly safer by heating it.

Pasteurization was offered as a " band-aid " in order to continue the business of

selling dirty milk. It's gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized markets

and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization has become

law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even coliform organisms

has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic bacteria are NOT routinely

found on small family farms using pasture-based farming, clean facilities, and

the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory standards. Milk no longer touches dirty

hands nor an open milk bucket but runs through glass and stainless steel pipes

to the bulk tank. Deadly pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use

of feedlot-runoff irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary

conditions. Pathogens take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors,

confined and over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are

" allergic " to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive

on wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus, to

artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces of mold

from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured proteins

from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization and

homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and elixir!

Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as the founders

of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the European " milk

cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB, Brucellosis, and

chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by inpatient treatment at the

Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw milk for cure. Staff physician

J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that after 15 years of seeing more cures

with the milk cure than any other form of medicine that " the medical man is

disinterested in this natural cure " . It was apparently " too simple to believe " .

There is only one " perfect food " in the world, meaning a food that would sustain

your life (in excellent health) alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk.

Pasteurized milk will not do that.

>

>

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness until

recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the reports,

found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit. The Hartmann

cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that have devoted their

lives towards making the best milk humanly possible. Likewise, if problems

exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the problems. The article

states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch " if they saw the Hartmann

farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of commercial dairy farms in my work,

farms that sell milk that could only be sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that

would definitely sicken you if you tried it raw. These farms made me sick. I

can't even describe here the cruelty and shortcuts taken in the corporate desire

to manufacture massive quantities of a super cheap white liquid that vaguely

resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness from

food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the bacteria that

may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by pasteurization. Raw

milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens via a natural

preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind both

sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More states are

expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific information about

the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE UNTOLD STORY OF MILK

by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC DISEASE by Dr

Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD

by s, MD. There is also excellent information on

www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com, www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org,

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION

HANDBOOK by Tim Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy,

nutritious, safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Will!!! This is SO good.

Thank you for being you.

We love you.

>

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and, in

addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by the

knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially since the

writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of being

scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

" facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to sail

solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these same

critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their daily

supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third of the

children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes raging in

our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring Sugar's Danger! "

..

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off as

a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " , know-nothings

who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers who want to poison

them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled fools clearly need the

government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a shred of scientific

backbone to the article. Science begins with a literature review and there was

no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn, MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty'

milk is not `pasteurized' or `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. "

We all want clean, wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or

lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and legalization

of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The typical raw dairy

customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the average supermarket

shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents who duly note the

well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and nutrient density of

" conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is no 100% safe food. We

know that if every category of food that ever caused an occasional incidence of

food poisoning were made illegal, there would be no hamburger, no lettuce, no

eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach. Virtually nothing to eat! We also know

that improvements are always appreciated and necessary. We welcome those

changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family farms.

Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a huge

corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a family

farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that feeds us.

This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few are exposed,

and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year ago, one

contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory farm-sourced,

mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million pounds of

potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school children had

already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with nearly 400 food

recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm outbreak, while also

tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is very easy to trace and

correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost always

consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine prescribed raw

milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome nourishment as when

God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites,

promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw milk is still consumed

all around the world in vastly greater amounts than pasteurized milk. It was

never considered a potential pathogen-source in the United States until we had

" factory " dairies that employed tubercular and sick immigrants who milked by

hand. We never had an epic problem with pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy

cattle were fed by-product feeds from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened

animals produced dirty milk that was made slightly safer by heating it.

Pasteurization was offered as a " band-aid " in order to continue the business of

selling dirty milk. It's gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized markets

and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization has become

law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even coliform organisms

has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic bacteria are NOT routinely

found on small family farms using pasture-based farming, clean facilities, and

the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory standards. Milk no longer touches dirty

hands nor an open milk bucket but runs through glass and stainless steel pipes

to the bulk tank. Deadly pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use

of feedlot-runoff irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary

conditions. Pathogens take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors,

confined and over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are

" allergic " to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive

on wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus, to

artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces of mold

from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured proteins

from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization and

homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and elixir!

Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as the founders

of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the European " milk

cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB, Brucellosis, and

chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by inpatient treatment at the

Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw milk for cure. Staff physician

J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that after 15 years of seeing more cures

with the milk cure than any other form of medicine that " the medical man is

disinterested in this natural cure " . It was apparently " too simple to believe " .

There is only one " perfect food " in the world, meaning a food that would sustain

your life (in excellent health) alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk.

Pasteurized milk will not do that.

>

>

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness until

recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the reports,

found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit. The Hartmann

cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that have devoted their

lives towards making the best milk humanly possible. Likewise, if problems

exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the problems. The article

states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch " if they saw the Hartmann

farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of commercial dairy farms in my work,

farms that sell milk that could only be sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that

would definitely sicken you if you tried it raw. These farms made me sick. I

can't even describe here the cruelty and shortcuts taken in the corporate desire

to manufacture massive quantities of a super cheap white liquid that vaguely

resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness from

food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the bacteria that

may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by pasteurization. Raw

milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens via a natural

preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind both

sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More states are

expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific information about

the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE UNTOLD STORY OF MILK

by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC DISEASE by Dr

Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD

by s, MD. There is also excellent information on

www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com, www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org,

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION

HANDBOOK by Tim Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy,

nutritious, safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota wrote:

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

That is the single best retort I've read, thank you for taking the time to read

it. Would you be able to post it to the warehouse website as an official

response to the anti- raw milk, it would also help us publicize some honest

analysis? Thanks.

--

Damien McKenna - Husband, father, unabashed geek, eater of natural food.

damien@... - http://mc-kenna.com/ - twitter:DamienMcKenna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota wrote:

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

That is the single best retort I've read, thank you for taking the time to read

it. Would you be able to post it to the warehouse website as an official

response to the anti- raw milk, it would also help us publicize some honest

analysis? Thanks.

--

Damien McKenna - Husband, father, unabashed geek, eater of natural food.

damien@... - http://mc-kenna.com/ - twitter:DamienMcKenna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Wow, Will, no one could say this better than you did. You did a

fantastic job.! Thank you.

Rebekah

On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota wrote:

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL

> entitled " Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk

> sales is needed to protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of

> Minnesota's farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at

> least a decade, and, in addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've

> been mystified and stunned by the knee-jerk reactions and hostility

> expressed by the media. Especially since the writers of inflammatory

> articles such as this one, show no sign of being scientists

> themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

> distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are

> suddenly " facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now

> " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another

> similar example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the

> torrents of easy rage unleashed towards at the parents of the 16

> year old girl who attempted to sail solo around the world.

> Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these same critical parents

> may have mindlessly bought their own children their daily supply of

> Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third of the

> children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes

> raging in our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent

> Ignoring Sugar's Danger! " .

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger "

> came off as a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet

> idiots " , know-nothings who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches

> of bad farmers who want to poison them. According to the editorial,

> these easily bamboozled fools clearly need the government to

> " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a shred of scientific backbone

> to the article. Science begins with a literature review and there

> was no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn, MD wrote " the

> opposite of `dirty' milk is not `pasteurized' or `homogenized'. The

> opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. " We all want clean, wholesome,

> humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and

> legalization of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area.

> The typical raw dairy customer is vastly more knowledgeable than,

> say, the average supermarket shopper. They are for the most part

> well-read parents who duly note the well-documented facts regarding

> the declining safety and nutrient density of " conventional " food. We

> are realistic. We know there is no 100% safe food. We know that if

> every category of food that ever caused an occasional incidence of

> food poisoning were made illegal, there would be no hamburger, no

> lettuce, no eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach. Virtually

> nothing to eat! We also know that improvements are always

> appreciated and necessary. We welcome those changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable

> family farms. Never from imported food, never from a factory farm,

> never from a huge corporation. The interpersonal connection of a

> group of consumers to a family farm builds trust and relationship.

> We want to shake the hand that feeds us. This way, if a health

> problem is suspected, at worst, only a few are exposed, and the

> problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year ago, one

> contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory farm-

> sourced, mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million

> pounds of potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of

> school children had already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to

> deal with nearly 400 food recalls last year alone! The rare small

> family farm outbreak, while also tragic, affects only a few families

> at the most, and is very easy to trace and correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats,

> sheep, donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but

> it's almost always consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the

> Father of Medicine prescribed raw milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls

> the virtues of wholesome nourishment as when God led the enslaved

> people out of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites, promising Moses

> a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw milk is still consumed all

> around the world in vastly greater amounts than pasteurized milk. It

> was never considered a potential pathogen-source in the United

> States until we had " factory " dairies that employed tubercular and

> sick immigrants who milked by hand. We never had an epic problem

> with pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy cattle were fed by-

> product feeds from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened animals

> produced dirty milk that was made slightly safer by heating it.

> Pasteurization was offered as a " band-aid " in order to continue the

> business of selling dirty milk. It's gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for

> pasteurized markets and milk that is produced to be consumed raw.

> Since pasteurization has become law, the standards for bacteria,

> white blood cells and even coliform organisms has been seriously

> watered-down. Deadly pathogenic bacteria are NOT routinely found on

> small family farms using pasture-based farming, clean facilities,

> and the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory standards. Milk no

> longer touches dirty hands nor an open milk bucket but runs through

> glass and stainless steel pipes to the bulk tank. Deadly pathogens

> come from cities, off-farm workers, the use of feedlot-runoff

> irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary conditions.

> Pathogens take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors,

> confined and over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think

> they are " allergic " to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost

> always always thrive on wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk!

> Their " allergy " or " intolerance " was merely a perfectly normal

> immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus, to artificial

> hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces of

> mold from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to

> denatured proteins from the modifications done to " modern milk " such

> as pasteurization and homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific

> study showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath

> tonic and elixir! Books have been written about raw milk by medical

> doctors such as the founders of our very own Mayo Foundation, where

> medical care using the European " milk cure " was practiced. The

> terrible diseases of the day (TB, Brucellosis, and chronic

> degenerative disease) were routinely cured by inpatient treatment at

> the Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw milk for cure.

> Staff physician J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that after 15

> years of seeing more cures with the milk cure than any other form of

> medicine that " the medical man is disinterested in this natural

> cure " . It was apparently " too simple to believe " . There is only one

> " perfect food " in the world, meaning a food that would sustain your

> life (in excellent health) alone, eating nothing else. That is raw

> milk. Pasteurized milk will not do that.

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not

> thousands of people for at least a decade and yet there have been no

> reports of illness until recently. I have been on the farm many

> times, and, in contrast to the reports, found it to be far closer to

> a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit. The Hartmann cows are truly

> loved and babied. This is a farm family that have devoted their

> lives towards making the best milk humanly possible. Likewise, if

> problems exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the

> problems. The article states that " responsible dairy farmers would

> blanch " if they saw the Hartmann farm. In actuality, I have been on

> dozens of commercial dairy farms in my work, farms that sell milk

> that could only be sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that would

> definitely sicken you if you tried it raw. These farms made me sick.

> I can't even describe here the cruelty and shortcuts taken in the

> corporate desire to manufacture massive quantities of a super cheap

> white liquid that vaguely resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by

> pathogens found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk.

> In fact, there are fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by

> any other food of animal source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-

> likely food to cause illness from food poisoning. Pasteurization

> does not kill all pathogens, the bacteria that may be associated

> with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by pasteurization. Raw milk

> has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens via a natural

> preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science

> behind both sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of

> raw milk. More states are expected to ratify sales in the future.

> For factual scientific information about the decision to drink raw

> milk, I recommend the books THE UNTOLD STORY OF MILK by Ron Schmidt,

> THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC DISEASE by Dr Porter,

> and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT

> FOOD by s, MD. There is also excellent

> information on www.rawmilk.com,www.realmilk.com,

> www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org, The Farm to Consumer Legal

> Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION HANDBOOK by Tim

> Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy,

> nutritious, safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This is very well written. Is there a way to get this into some of the smaller

local papers? Even our little local (Northfield) paper has been running articles

critical of raw milk.

>

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and, in

addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by the

knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially since the

writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of being

scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

" facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to sail

solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these same

critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their daily

supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third of the

children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes raging in

our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring Sugar's Danger! "

..

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off as

a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " , know-nothings

who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers who want to poison

them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled fools clearly need the

government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a shred of scientific

backbone to the article. Science begins with a literature review and there was

no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn, MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty'

milk is not `pasteurized' or `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. "

We all want clean, wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or

lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and legalization

of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The typical raw dairy

customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the average supermarket

shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents who duly note the

well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and nutrient density of

" conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is no 100% safe food. We

know that if every category of food that ever caused an occasional incidence of

food poisoning were made illegal, there would be no hamburger, no lettuce, no

eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach. Virtually nothing to eat! We also know

that improvements are always appreciated and necessary. We welcome those

changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family farms.

Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a huge

corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a family

farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that feeds us.

This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few are exposed,

and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year ago, one

contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory farm-sourced,

mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million pounds of

potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school children had

already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with nearly 400 food

recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm outbreak, while also

tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is very easy to trace and

correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost always

consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine prescribed raw

milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome nourishment as when

God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites,

promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw milk is still consumed

all around the world in vastly greater amounts than pasteurized milk. It was

never considered a potential pathogen-source in the United States until we had

" factory " dairies that employed tubercular and sick immigrants who milked by

hand. We never had an epic problem with pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy

cattle were fed by-product feeds from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened

animals produced dirty milk that was made slightly safer by heating it.

Pasteurization was offered as a " band-aid " in order to continue the business of

selling dirty milk. It's gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized markets

and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization has become

law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even coliform organisms

has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic bacteria are NOT routinely

found on small family farms using pasture-based farming, clean facilities, and

the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory standards. Milk no longer touches dirty

hands nor an open milk bucket but runs through glass and stainless steel pipes

to the bulk tank. Deadly pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use

of feedlot-runoff irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary

conditions. Pathogens take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors,

confined and over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are

" allergic " to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive

on wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus, to

artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces of mold

from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured proteins

from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization and

homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and elixir!

Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as the founders

of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the European " milk

cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB, Brucellosis, and

chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by inpatient treatment at the

Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw milk for cure. Staff physician

J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that after 15 years of seeing more cures

with the milk cure than any other form of medicine that " the medical man is

disinterested in this natural cure " . It was apparently " too simple to believe " .

There is only one " perfect food " in the world, meaning a food that would sustain

your life (in excellent health) alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk.

Pasteurized milk will not do that.

>

>

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness until

recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the reports,

found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit. The Hartmann

cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that have devoted their

lives towards making the best milk humanly possible. Likewise, if problems

exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the problems. The article

states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch " if they saw the Hartmann

farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of commercial dairy farms in my work,

farms that sell milk that could only be sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that

would definitely sicken you if you tried it raw. These farms made me sick. I

can't even describe here the cruelty and shortcuts taken in the corporate desire

to manufacture massive quantities of a super cheap white liquid that vaguely

resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness from

food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the bacteria that

may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by pasteurization. Raw

milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens via a natural

preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind both

sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More states are

expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific information about

the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE UNTOLD STORY OF MILK

by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC DISEASE by Dr

Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD

by s, MD. There is also excellent information on

www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com, www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org,

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION

HANDBOOK by Tim Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy,

nutritious, safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This is very well written. Is there a way to get this into some of the smaller

local papers? Even our little local (Northfield) paper has been running articles

critical of raw milk.

>

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and, in

addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by the

knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially since the

writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of being

scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

" facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to sail

solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these same

critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their daily

supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third of the

children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes raging in

our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring Sugar's Danger! "

..

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off as

a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " , know-nothings

who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers who want to poison

them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled fools clearly need the

government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a shred of scientific

backbone to the article. Science begins with a literature review and there was

no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn, MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty'

milk is not `pasteurized' or `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. "

We all want clean, wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or

lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and legalization

of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The typical raw dairy

customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the average supermarket

shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents who duly note the

well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and nutrient density of

" conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is no 100% safe food. We

know that if every category of food that ever caused an occasional incidence of

food poisoning were made illegal, there would be no hamburger, no lettuce, no

eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach. Virtually nothing to eat! We also know

that improvements are always appreciated and necessary. We welcome those

changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family farms.

Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a huge

corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a family

farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that feeds us.

This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few are exposed,

and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year ago, one

contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory farm-sourced,

mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million pounds of

potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school children had

already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with nearly 400 food

recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm outbreak, while also

tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is very easy to trace and

correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost always

consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine prescribed raw

milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome nourishment as when

God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites,

promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw milk is still consumed

all around the world in vastly greater amounts than pasteurized milk. It was

never considered a potential pathogen-source in the United States until we had

" factory " dairies that employed tubercular and sick immigrants who milked by

hand. We never had an epic problem with pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy

cattle were fed by-product feeds from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened

animals produced dirty milk that was made slightly safer by heating it.

Pasteurization was offered as a " band-aid " in order to continue the business of

selling dirty milk. It's gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized markets

and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization has become

law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even coliform organisms

has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic bacteria are NOT routinely

found on small family farms using pasture-based farming, clean facilities, and

the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory standards. Milk no longer touches dirty

hands nor an open milk bucket but runs through glass and stainless steel pipes

to the bulk tank. Deadly pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use

of feedlot-runoff irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary

conditions. Pathogens take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors,

confined and over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are

" allergic " to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive

on wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus, to

artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces of mold

from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured proteins

from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization and

homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and elixir!

Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as the founders

of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the European " milk

cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB, Brucellosis, and

chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by inpatient treatment at the

Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw milk for cure. Staff physician

J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that after 15 years of seeing more cures

with the milk cure than any other form of medicine that " the medical man is

disinterested in this natural cure " . It was apparently " too simple to believe " .

There is only one " perfect food " in the world, meaning a food that would sustain

your life (in excellent health) alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk.

Pasteurized milk will not do that.

>

>

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness until

recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the reports,

found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit. The Hartmann

cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that have devoted their

lives towards making the best milk humanly possible. Likewise, if problems

exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the problems. The article

states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch " if they saw the Hartmann

farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of commercial dairy farms in my work,

farms that sell milk that could only be sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that

would definitely sicken you if you tried it raw. These farms made me sick. I

can't even describe here the cruelty and shortcuts taken in the corporate desire

to manufacture massive quantities of a super cheap white liquid that vaguely

resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness from

food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the bacteria that

may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by pasteurization. Raw

milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens via a natural

preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind both

sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More states are

expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific information about

the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE UNTOLD STORY OF MILK

by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC DISEASE by Dr

Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD

by s, MD. There is also excellent information on

www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com, www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org,

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION

HANDBOOK by Tim Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy,

nutritious, safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks, Will. Perhaps you can save this as a file for easy access?

Unfortunately, I all too often have to defend my choices - especially when it

comes to feeding my toddler (and soon my baby) real milk. Just recently on an

extended family vacation, I had some tummy trouble and everyone yelped " It's the

milk. It's the milk. " I tire of hearing this and would love some new talking

points. (Of course my discomfort was likely due to unfamiliar chemicals that at

home I avoid: pool water, dish detergent residue, occassional unclean food,

poorly filtered water.)

Could you cite the source for raw milk being the " safest " animal product? (We

all know this to be true, but I'd love to rebut attacks by saying, " Did you know

that xyz found raw milk to cause the least illness of all animal products? " )

Anyway, thanks again.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Will - This is excellent material to print. Thank you!

Wish i was part the editorial at ST!

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:58 AM, holisticminnesota <holistic@...>wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Amazing response! I have sent this to some of my friends who have some interest

in the subject of sustainable farming, and raw dairy - this excellent writeup

explains everything far better than I have managed!

Beth

>

> COUNTERPOINT - To the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE June 28, 2010 EDITORIAL entitled

" Recklessly Ignoring Raw Milk's Danger- Ban on raw milk sales is needed to

protect families "

>

> I am a person who has been a healthy and happy customer of Minnesota's

farm-fresh, organic and clean raw milk products for at least a decade, and, in

addition, I grew up with it. As such, I've been mystified and stunned by the

knee-jerk reactions and hostility expressed by the media. Especially since the

writers of inflammatory articles such as this one, show no sign of being

scientists themselves nor do they seem familiar with the production,

distribution and actual safety record of raw milk. Allegations are suddenly

" facts " , incomplete and inconclusive investigations are now " indictments " .

>

> In the same week as the the raw milk outrage, we have seen another similar

example of harsh and simplistic judgements. Note the torrents of easy rage

unleashed towards at the parents of the 16 year old girl who attempted to sail

solo around the world. Meanwhile, throughout her sail many of these same

critical parents may have mindlessly bought their own children their daily

supply of Skittles and Sugar Pops (somebody is buying them!). A third of the

children in America are pathologically obese with type two diabetes raging in

our midst. Why no screaming headline " Reckless Parent Ignoring Sugar's Danger! "

..

>

> The recent staff editorial " Recklessly ignoring raw milk's danger " came off as

a critical scientific statement excoriating " internet idiots " , know-nothings

who, like lost sheep wander into the clutches of bad farmers who want to poison

them. According to the editorial, these easily bamboozled fools clearly need the

government to " protect them " . But yet there wasn't a shred of scientific

backbone to the article. Science begins with a literature review and there was

no evidence of that. S. Mendelsohn, MD wrote " the opposite of `dirty'

milk is not `pasteurized' or `homogenized'. The opposite of `dirty' is `clean'. "

We all want clean, wholesome, humane, sustainable food, be it milk, meat or

lettuce.

>

> I've been deeply involved with the production, distribution and legalization

of clean, wholesome raw milk in the Twin Cities area. The typical raw dairy

customer is vastly more knowledgeable than, say, the average supermarket

shopper. They are for the most part well-read parents who duly note the

well-documented facts regarding the declining safety and nutrient density of

" conventional " food. We are realistic. We know there is no 100% safe food. We

know that if every category of food that ever caused an occasional incidence of

food poisoning were made illegal, there would be no hamburger, no lettuce, no

eggs, no cheese, no hot dogs, no spinach. Virtually nothing to eat! We also know

that improvements are always appreciated and necessary. We welcome those

changes.

>

> True " food bio-security " can only come from organic, sustainable family farms.

Never from imported food, never from a factory farm, never from a huge

corporation. The interpersonal connection of a group of consumers to a family

farm builds trust and relationship. We want to shake the hand that feeds us.

This way, if a health problem is suspected, at worst, only a few are exposed,

and the problem can be stopped quickly, then corrected. A year ago, one

contaminated batch of commodity hamburger from a factory farm-sourced,

mass-produced facility caused a recall of over 120 million pounds of

potentially-dangerous hamburger! Tens of thousands of school children had

already eaten most of it! US Food Service had to deal with nearly 400 food

recalls last year alone! The rare small family farm outbreak, while also

tragic, affects only a few families at the most, and is very easy to trace and

correct.

>

> Raw milk is historical and global. It may come from cows, goats, sheep,

donkeys, camels, llamas, horses, water buffalo, or yaks, but it's almost always

consumed raw or fermented. Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine prescribed raw

milk to cure TB. The Bible extolls the virtues of wholesome nourishment as when

God led the enslaved people out of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites,

promising Moses a " land of flowing milk and honey " . Raw milk is still consumed

all around the world in vastly greater amounts than pasteurized milk. It was

never considered a potential pathogen-source in the United States until we had

" factory " dairies that employed tubercular and sick immigrants who milked by

hand. We never had an epic problem with pathogens in milk until East Coast dairy

cattle were fed by-product feeds from whiskey by-product grain. These weakened

animals produced dirty milk that was made slightly safer by heating it.

Pasteurization was offered as a " band-aid " in order to continue the business of

selling dirty milk. It's gotten worse.

>

> There is a tremendous difference between milk produced for pasteurized markets

and milk that is produced to be consumed raw. Since pasteurization has become

law, the standards for bacteria, white blood cells and even coliform organisms

has been seriously watered-down. Deadly pathogenic bacteria are NOT routinely

found on small family farms using pasture-based farming, clean facilities, and

the opposite of feedlot/concrete/factory standards. Milk no longer touches dirty

hands nor an open milk bucket but runs through glass and stainless steel pipes

to the bulk tank. Deadly pathogens come from cities, off-farm workers, the use

of feedlot-runoff irrigation water, and from confinement and unsanitary

conditions. Pathogens take root when the animals are under-nourished, indoors,

confined and over-worked. Hundreds of thousands of people who think they are

" allergic " to milk or have " lactose intolerance " can almost always always thrive

on wholesome, pasture-based, organic raw milk! Their " allergy " or " intolerance "

was merely a perfectly normal immune reaction to " cooked " bacteria and pus, to

artificial hormones, to traces of genetically modified grains, to traces of mold

from bad grain, to feed-based antibiotic residues, and to denatured proteins

from the modifications done to " modern milk " such as pasteurization and

homogenization.

>

> There is a mountain of rock-solid (non-industry funded) scientific study

showing that wholesome raw milk IS actually a powerful heath tonic and elixir!

Books have been written about raw milk by medical doctors such as the founders

of our very own Mayo Foundation, where medical care using the European " milk

cure " was practiced. The terrible diseases of the day (TB, Brucellosis, and

chronic degenerative disease) were routinely cured by inpatient treatment at the

Mayo, using nothing but their own " certified " raw milk for cure. Staff physician

J.E.Crewe ruefully wrote at the time, that after 15 years of seeing more cures

with the milk cure than any other form of medicine that " the medical man is

disinterested in this natural cure " . It was apparently " too simple to believe " .

There is only one " perfect food " in the world, meaning a food that would sustain

your life (in excellent health) alone, eating nothing else. That is raw milk.

Pasteurized milk will not do that.

>

>

>

> The Hartmann farm has been selling raw milk to hundreds if not thousands of

people for at least a decade and yet there have been no reports of illness until

recently. I have been on the farm many times, and, in contrast to the reports,

found it to be far closer to a " pastoral utopia " than a filth pit. The Hartmann

cows are truly loved and babied. This is a farm family that have devoted their

lives towards making the best milk humanly possible. Likewise, if problems

exist, they will do whatever necessary to correct the problems. The article

states that " responsible dairy farmers would blanch " if they saw the Hartmann

farm. In actuality, I have been on dozens of commercial dairy farms in my work,

farms that sell milk that could only be sold as pasteurized milk. Milk that

would definitely sicken you if you tried it raw. These farms made me sick. I

can't even describe here the cruelty and shortcuts taken in the corporate desire

to manufacture massive quantities of a super cheap white liquid that vaguely

resembles milk.

>

> Unit for unit of milk, far more consumers have been made ill by pathogens

found in contaminated pasteurized milk than by raw milk. In fact, there are

fewer cases of food poisoning by raw milk than by any other food of animal

source. Bagged lettuce is actually the most-likely food to cause illness from

food poisoning. Pasteurization does not kill all pathogens, the bacteria that

may be associated with Crohn's disease is not destroyed by pasteurization. Raw

milk has enzymes and immune cells that destroy pathogens via a natural

preservation system.

>

> In recent years at least 5 other states have looked at the science behind both

sides of the issue and decided to legalize the sale of raw milk. More states are

expected to ratify sales in the future. For factual scientific information about

the decision to drink raw milk, I recommend the books THE UNTOLD STORY OF MILK

by Ron Schmidt, THE MILK DIET AS A REMEDY FOR CHRONIC DISEASE by Dr

Porter, and THE MILK BOOK-HOW SCIENCE IS DESTROYING NATURE'S NEARLY PERFECT FOOD

by s, MD. There is also excellent information on

www.rawmilk.com, www.realmilk.com, www.westonaprice.org, and www.ftcldf.org,

The Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund sells a book called RAW MILK PRODUCTION

HANDBOOK by Tim Wightman, that explains exactly how farmers can raise healthy,

nutritious, safe and totally delicious raw milk.

>

> G. Winter, DVM, Minneapolis, retired holistic veterinarian

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oh, this should go out on the Warehouse Facebook page, too!

>

>

> This is very well written. Is there a way to get this into some of the smaller

local papers? Even our little local (Northfield) paper has been running articles

critical of raw milk.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It is on the Facebook page: Traditional Foods of Minnesota Buying Club

> >

> >

> > This is very well written. Is there a way to get this into some of the

smaller local papers? Even our little local (Northfield) paper has been running

articles critical of raw milk.

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...