Guest guest Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I learned from Sen. Klobuchar's office that she is a co-sponsor of S. 510, so she especially needs to hear from us since she will obviously vote in favor of it. The S. 510 bill is one that WAPF and many others fear will worsen the current situation and will be disastrously burdensome to small, local farms and producers, and that the critical thing to stress is that if they're voting for the bill, they must also pass the TESTER-HAGAN AMENDMENT. As the WAPF folks have explained below, the S. 510 bill is too general, too vague about these protections, but the Tester-Hagan Amendment expressly addresses this. Apparently there's a renewed effort to bring it to a vote, so our calls are needed now. Beth P.S. People living in other states should also call their senators (excellent talking points are suggested below, at the end, but it's always good to also include why it's important to you personally). _______________________________________________________ I'm including most of the previous post from Beth in case anyone else has already deleted it. Also, I've added the contact information of our MN Senators (one less step...all Minnesotans are w/o excuse!). PLEASE...let's ALL take one extra step to contribute and answer the call that the Weston A. Price Foundation put out. This is about FOOD, people! Can you believe we have to actually fight for it??? Now go out and do it! There are currently 1210 members in this TFMN Discussion Group. Don't you think we'll make an impact if we take a couple of minutes out of our day and call our 2 senators? Becca en, Al <http://franken.senate.gov/ <http://franken.senate.gov/> >- (D - MN) Class II 320 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-5641 Web Form: franken.senate.gov/contact/ [image: horizontal line] Klobuchar, Amy <http://klobuchar.senate.gov/ <http://klobuchar.senate.gov/> >- (D - MN) Class I 302 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3244 Web Form: klobuchar.senate.gov/emailamy.cfm [image: horizontal line] TAKE ACTION: Call both of your Senators. You can find their contact information at www.Senate.gov <http://www.senate.gov/ <http://www.senate.gov/> > <http://www.senate.gov/ <http://www.senate.gov/> > , or call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or toll-free at 877-210-5351. Ask to speak with the staffer who handles food safety issues. Tell the staffer that you want the Senator to amend or oppose S. 510. If you get their voice mail instead of the staff, leave the following message: " Hi, my name is _____ and I live in ______. I'm very concerned that S.510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, imposes unfair and burdensome regulations on local food sources, which are very important to me. I urge the Senator to support the Tester-Hagan Amendments to exclude small facilities and direct marketing farms from the most burdensome provisions of the bill. Please call me back at ____________. " TALKING POINTS Over 150 organizations have signed a letter of support for the Tester-Hagan amendments to exempt small-scale and local producers from the more burdensome provisions of the bill. You can borrow some talking points from the letter (posted at http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf <http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf> <http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf <http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf> > ) or use the ones below: 1. The major foodborne illness outbreaks and recalls have all been caused by the large, industrial food system. Small, local food producers have not contributed to the highly publicized outbreaks. Yet S. 510 subjects the small, local food system to the same, broad federal regulatory oversight that would apply to the industrial food system. 2. Increased regulations and record-keeping obligations could destroy small businesses that bring food to local communities. In particular, the reliance on hazard analysis and risk-based preventative controls, a concept similar to " HACCP " , will harm small food producers. HACCP has already proven to be an overwhelming burden for a significant number of small, regional meat processors across the country. Applying a HACCP-type system to small, local foods processors could drive them out of business, reducing consumers' options to buy fresh, local foods. 3. FDA does not belong on the farm. S. 510 calls for FDA regulation of how farms grow and harvest produce. Given the agency's track record, it is likely that the regulations will discriminate against small, organic, and diversified farms. Although language calling for " flexibility " may be included, but there are no enforceable limits or protections for small diversified and organic farms from inappropriate and burdensome federal rules. 4. Food safety and security both come from a diversified, vibrant local food system. Local foods give consumers the choice to buy from producers they know, creating a transparent, accountable food system without federal government oversight. State and local laws, which are often size-specific rather than one-size-fits-all, are more appropriate for local food producers. info@... <../../../post?postID=8R5TLx57_xzbYGyY09YdYIFnqqSjTBIBvARDW_P9Nb9laewFIG\ QiEfcoU1PLQaQ4OUj2WbPCZp-qGl7fJ0M> <info%40westonaprice.org> <mailto: info@... <../../../post?postID=8R5TLx57_xzbYGyY09YdYIFnqqSjTBIBvARDW_P9Nb9laewFIG\ QiEfcoU1PLQaQ4OUj2WbPCZp-qGl7fJ0M> <info%40westonaprice.org>> ---------------------------------------- Our postal address is PMB #106-380 4200 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Washington, District of Columbia 20016 Embargo Concern and Productive Suggestion Might I suggest a productive way to direct our energies at this challenging time by taking a few minutes to call our senators and representatives? Together we can enlighten and encourage them to protect small family farms and local producers, which are inherently safer and more accountable than the huge, centralized industrial producers who produce most all food-borne illnesses. Please respectfully urge their support of the Tester-Hagan amendment. 6/16/2010 WAPF ALERT: Food safety is heating up again and we need your help! Although the Senate's food safety bill was delayed, there is now a concerted effort to bring it to the floor for a vote. Unfortunately, as it is currently written, S. 510 would actually make our food less safe. S. 510 would strengthen the forces that have led to the consolidation of our food supply in the hands of a few industrial food producers, while harming small producers who give consumers the choice to buy fresh, healthy, local foods. Please contact your Senators NOW to urge them to amend or oppose the bill! Contact information and talking points are below. Congress needs to solve the real problems - the centralized food distribution system and imported foods - and not regulate our local food sources out of business. S. 510 is a " one-size-fits-all " approach that will unnecessarily burden both farmers and small-scale food processors, ultimately depriving consumers of the choice to buy from producers they know and trust. TAKE ACTION: Call both of your Senators. You can find their contact information at www.Senate.gov <http://www.senate.gov/ <http://www.senate.gov/> > , or call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or toll-free at 877-210-5351. Ask to speak with the staffer who handles food safety issues. Tell the staffer that you want the Senator to amend or oppose S. 510. If you get their voice mail instead of the staff, leave the following message: " Hi, my name is _____ and I live in ______. I'm very concerned that S.510, the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, imposes unfair and burdensome regulations on local food sources, which are very important to me. I urge the Senator to support the Tester-Hagan Amendments to exclude small facilities and direct marketing farms from the most burdensome provisions of the bill. Please call me back at ____________. " TALKING POINTS Over 150 organizations have signed a letter of support for the Tester-Hagan amendments to exempt small-scale and local producers from the more burdensome provisions of the bill. You can borrow some talking points from the letter (posted at http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf <http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf> <http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf <http://farmandranchfreedom.org/sff/Amend-S510-June-7.pdf> > ) or use the ones below: 1. The major foodborne illness outbreaks and recalls have all been caused by the large, industrial food system. Small, local food producers have not contributed to the highly publicized outbreaks. Yet S. 510 subjects the small, local food system to the same, broad federal regulatory oversight that would apply to the industrial food system. 2. Increased regulations and record-keeping obligations could destroy small businesses that bring food to local communities. In particular, the reliance on hazard analysis and risk-based preventative controls, a concept similar to " HACCP " , will harm small food producers. HACCP has already proven to be an overwhelming burden for a significant number of small, regional meat processors across the country. Applying a HACCP-type system to small, local foods processors could drive them out of business, reducing consumers' options to buy fresh, local foods. 3. FDA does not belong on the farm. S. 510 calls for FDA regulation of how farms grow and harvest produce. Given the agency's track record, it is likely that the regulations will discriminate against small, organic, and diversified farms. Although language calling for " flexibility " may be included, but there are no enforceable limits or protections for small diversified and organic farms from inappropriate and burdensome federal rules. 4. Food safety and security both come from a diversified, vibrant local food system. Local foods give consumers the choice to buy from producers they know, creating a transparent, accountable food system without federal government oversight. State and local laws, which are often size-specific rather than one-size-fits-all, are more appropriate for local food producers. [but as we can see, these need adjustment, too!!] info@... <../../../post?postID=MheEWRrg606Z5YuD_olnUjetl0De-5NFYNVgUDABbd7FFKWrm2\ lTK3mLWqU1w6v06dcGWrV_0sd9PHQ> <mailto:info@... <../../../post?postID=MheEWRrg606Z5YuD_olnUjetl0De-5NFYNVgUDABbd7FFKWrm2\ lTK3mLWqU1w6v06dcGWrV_0sd9PHQ> > ---------------------------------------- Our postal address is PMB #106-380 4200 Wisconsin Avenue, NW Washington, District of Columbia 20016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.