Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I'll just toss in my own favorite expression on this one:

We are all walking experiments....

Choose an activity that you are " meant to do " if possible - not everyone finds

the sport or event that truly suits their body and mindset immediately - and do

not force yourself into a sport or activity that clearly is not working for you.

If you are not getting the results you wish to attain, work on a variable within

your control. Accept that eventually genetic potential or some other limiter

will kick in and do not try to override yourself with drugs or other false

prophets... question all gurus who claim to be able to override reality.

All this being said, push your edges, try to prevent injury by good selection of

exercises and sets - lift to fatigue, not failure - and realize that at some

point, if you push yourself sufficiently, you may feel that it's your heart to

make the lift or finish the race that will determine success or failure...and

accept the results, good or bad, and continue. One battle is not the entire war

- and it's a war against time and gravity!

The Phantom

aka Schaefer, RMT/CMT, competing powerlifter

Denver, Colorado, USA

Re: Genetics - out of our control?

>

> SNIP an excellent summation of lifetime learning experience, which in many

ways parallels my own...

> >

> > Finally, a few words on genetics: since this is out of our control, why

sweat it? We have to do the best with the hand we were dealt.

> >

>

> I know what Yehoshua is getting at and agree to some extent, but looking at it

from another perspective - are genetics out of our control? The base genetic

code may be set, but gene expression, in many instances, is within our control.

>

> Shenk wrote a book called " The Genius in All of Us " which suggests that

in the past genetics and environment has the relations 'G+E='. He maintains we

have enough control over gene expression it should be 'GxE='. In the book he

notes how the common wisdom is sprinters and runners of certain genetic heritage

(West African and Kenyan) have a genetic advantage. Yet it wasn't that long ago

the same argument was made for other races in different sports and events.

>

> " Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake - the human being

lives far within his limits. "

>

>

> If genetic expression can be changed (within boundaries) should we even think

we can't control our genetics? We have as much control over them as we do our

environment - well, in a way...

>

***

The answer lies in first understanding the lock (genetic " makeup " ) to determine

the appropriate intervention. `If we want to be masters of our future, we must

fundamentally pose the question of what today is.' Much of current athletic

preparatation and nutrition is still guess work, trial and error.

Carruthers

Wakefield, UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Genetics may not be totally out of our control.  There has been an increasing

number of  studies on epigenetics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics ).

While we can't change our DNA we can effect how the gene expresses itself

thereby modifying how it acts.  This is a relatively new field of study.

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA  

________________________________

From: " deadliftdiva@... " <deadliftdiva@...>

Supertraining

Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 12:48 PM

Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

I'll just toss in my own favorite expression on this one:

We are all walking experiments....

Choose an activity that you are " meant to do " if possible - not everyone finds

the sport or event that truly suits their body and mindset immediately - and do

not force yourself into a sport or activity that clearly is not working for you.

If you are not getting the results you wish to attain, work on a variable within

your control. Accept that eventually genetic potential or some other limiter

will kick in and do not try to override yourself with drugs or other false

prophets... question all gurus who claim to be able to override reality.

All this being said, push your edges, try to prevent injury by good selection of

exercises and sets - lift to fatigue, not failure - and realize that at some

point, if you push yourself sufficiently, you may feel that it's your heart to

make the lift or finish the race that will determine success or failure...and

accept the results, good or bad, and continue. One battle is not the entire war

- and it's a war against time and gravity!

The Phantom

aka Schaefer, RMT/CMT, competing powerlifter

Denver, Colorado, USA

Re: Genetics - out of our control?

>

> SNIP an excellent summation of lifetime learning experience, which in many

ways parallels my own...

> >

> > Finally, a few words on genetics: since this is out of our control, why

sweat it? We have to do the best with the hand we were dealt.

> >

>

> I know what Yehoshua is getting at and agree to some extent, but looking at it

from another perspective - are genetics out of our control? The base genetic

code may be set, but gene expression, in many instances, is within our control.

>

> Shenk wrote a book called " The Genius in All of Us " which suggests that

in the past genetics and environment has the relations 'G+E='. He maintains we

have enough control over gene expression it should be 'GxE='. In the book he

notes how the common wisdom is sprinters and runners of certain genetic heritage

(West African and Kenyan) have a genetic advantage. Yet it wasn't that long ago

the same argument was made for other races in different sports and events.

>

> " Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake - the human being

lives far within his limits. "

>

>

> If genetic expression can be changed (within boundaries) should we even think

we can't control our genetics? We have as much control over them as we do our

environment - well, in a way...

>

***

The answer lies in first understanding the lock (genetic " makeup " ) to determine

the appropriate intervention. `If we want to be masters of our future, we must

fundamentally pose the question of what today is.' Much of current athletic

preparatation and nutrition is still guess work, trial and error.

Carruthers

Wakefield, UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are

a great read.

Vin , CSCS

Albany, NY

http://ragewellness.com

< Re: Genetics - out of our control?

Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits:

1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans.

2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish.

3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the

title about 55% of the time.

4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all

were of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010

and he remains the only one to do it.

5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do

they hardly ever win medals?

I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is

related, at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and

nurturing explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a

genetic elemant to consider?

I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that

surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these

facts. And I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short

run (not over the evolutionary process).

Yehoshua Zohar

Karmiel, Israel

> >

> > SNIP an excellent summation of lifetime learning experience, which

in many ways parallels my own...

> > >

> > > Finally, a few words on genetics: since this is out of our

control, why sweat it? We have to do the best with the hand we were

dealt.

> > >

> >

> > I know what Yehoshua is getting at and agree to some extent, but

looking at it from another perspective - are genetics out of our

control? The base genetic code may be set, but gene expression, in many

instances, is within our control.

> >

> > Shenk wrote a book called " The Genius in All of Us " which

suggests that in the past genetics and environment has the relations

'G+E='. He maintains we have enough control over gene expression it

should be 'GxE='. In the book he notes how the common wisdom is

sprinters and runners of certain genetic heritage (West African and

Kenyan) have a genetic advantage. Yet it wasn't that long ago the same

argument was made for other races in different sports and events.

> >

> > " Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake - the

human being lives far within his limits. "

> >

> >

> > If genetic expression can be changed (within boundaries) should we

even think we can't control our genetics? We have as much control over

them as we do our environment - well, in a way...

> >

>

> ***

> The answer lies in first understanding the lock (genetic " makeup " ) to

determine the appropriate intervention. `If we want to be masters of our

future, we must fundamentally pose the question of what today is.' Much

of current athletic preparatation and nutrition is still guess work,

trial and error.

>

> Carruthers

> Wakefield, UK

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to pass on good traits to our children we obviously have to develop the

good traits before we have children.  Unfortunately sometimes we are still

young and foolish when we have chidden and sometimes do not develop the good

traits until after our children are born.

I am not so sure that epigenetic is not in fact an important aspect of

evolution. Still a lot to learn.

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: Plisk <ssp67047@...>

Supertraining <Supertraining >

Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 10:18 AM

Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

Dr. Giarnella,

Thank you for mentioning that. It seems to have big implications for nutrition

(and maybe training?) especially re: traits that we pass along to our children.

In January 2010, TIME magazine did an interesting and very readable cover story

on epigenetics entitled 'Why your DNA isn't your destiny'. Here's the online

version:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1952313,00.html

 

The bottom line is that evolution isn't necessarily the slow process we often

assume; and certain environmental stresses really seem to influence the system.

It sure makes sense from a survival/adaptation standpoint.

Regards,

Plisk

Excelsior Sports

Buffalo NY

Prepare To Be A Champion!

________________________________

Genetics may not be totally out of our control.  There has been an increasing

number of  studies on epigenetics (http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/

Epigenetics ). While we can't change our DNA we can effect how the gene

expresses itself thereby modifying how it acts.  This is a relatively new field

of study.

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some conclusions from Skinner's 2001 paper " Do Genes

Determine Champions " ::

--Genes do influence the initial level of one’s

characteristics(phenotypes), as well as how fast and how much they can change in

response to

training, nutrition, and other environmental factors. Athletes who have

immediate

success in anew sport probably have relatively high qualities of at least

some of the genetically determined phenotypes required to be a champion in

that sport.

--Superior responders to sports participation probably have early success

and positive feedback from competition.

--Potential athletes should try various sports to see which ones they enjoy

and in which ones they have success. These factors are probably a better

guide for selection than any laboratory analysis of one’s genetic

background.

--It is not possible to predict who will be a champion. Nevertheless,

coaches can and do select candidates based on the characteristics required for

success in that sport. The genes influence many of these characteristics.

--The genes do not affect other aspects of some sports (e.g., tactics and

technique). Champions at the elite level must be experts at tactics and

technique in addition to possessing the necessary genetically determined

attributes for success in their sports. Still, less genetically gifted athletes

who are talented

in tactics and technique may be champions at non-elite levels of

competition.

Pinker's The Blank Slate might be an interesting read for those who are

curious about the differences in people being biologically determined.

Ken Jakalski

Lisle High School

Lisle, Illinois USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote:

> If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are

> a great read.

>

> Vin , CSCS

> Albany, NY

Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us?

_____________________________

Gerald Lafon

USMC, RVN 70-71

Director, Judo America San Diego

www.judoamerica.com

www.betterjudo.com

858 578-7748

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Gerald. Although, now that I think about it, the intrinsic

motivation required to put in the " 10,000 hours of deliberate practice "

may be influenced by genetics just as much as the innate abilities that

make it easier for some people do develop certain skills and

characteristics.

Vin , CSCS

Albany, NY

http://ragewellness.com

< Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote:

> If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books

are

> a great read.

>

> Vin , CSCS

> Albany, NY

Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates

Us?

_____________________________

Gerald Lafon

USMC, RVN 70-71

Director, Judo America San Diego

www.judoamerica.com

www.betterjudo.com

858 578-7748

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truly elite athlete ( Jordan, Lance Armstrong, Tom Brady just to

mention a few that come to mind) are, in my opinion, the result of  a

convergence of several factors: Genetic potential (nature), environmental

(nuture), obsessive behavior (possibly genetic as well).  Aside from genetic

potential and proper environment they all hate to lose and are driven.  In

reading about the above mentioned athletes I have always been struck by the

common theme that they worked harder than their team mates, and hated to lose.

I will never forget the day when, as a lowly intern, I was making the rounds

with the chief of medicine and he made the statement: " to be a good physician

you have to be obsessive compulsive " .  At first I did not understand what he

was saying until it dawned on me that a good physician has to be obsessive about

details and the desire to learn.  Why else would I put in 18 hrs a day to study

medicine in medical school and be willing to put up with 36 hour on call shifts.

 Some would call it desire or drive, I would call it being a little OCD.

I suspect that a lot of posters on this forum have a little OCD (in the non

pathological sense). 

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: Vin <vmiller@...>

Supertraining

Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 1:26 PM

Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

Yes, Gerald. Although, now that I think about it, the intrinsic

motivation required to put in the " 10,000 hours of deliberate practice "

may be influenced by genetics just as much as the innate abilities that

make it easier for some people do develop certain skills and

characteristics.

Vin , CSCS

Albany, NY

http://ragewellness.com

< Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote:

> If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books

are

> a great read.

>

> Vin , CSCS

> Albany, NY

Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates

Us?

_____________________________

Gerald Lafon

USMC, RVN 70-71

Director, Judo America San Diego

www.judoamerica.com

www.betterjudo.com

858 578-7748

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I encourage the group to research the Dynamical Systems Theory. This theory

postulates that development arises from an interaction of constraints. The three

constraints include the environment (outside the individual), the organism (from

within including psychological variables), and the task (rules, implements,

boundaries). It may not be a perfect explanation but it makes sense to me that

talent is not a 1 variable pony but rather one that stems from nature and

nurture.

Steve , Ed.D., CSCS, USAW

Lynchburg, VA

________________________________

From: Supertraining [supertraining ] On Behalf Of

Ralph Giarnella [ragiarn@...]

Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:17 AM

Supertraining

Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

The truly elite athlete ( Jordan, Lance Armstrong, Tom Brady just to

mention a few that come to mind) are, in my opinion, the result of a

convergence of several factors: Genetic potential (nature), environmental

(nuture), obsessive behavior (possibly genetic as well). Aside from genetic

potential and proper environment they all hate to lose and are driven. In

reading about the above mentioned athletes I have always been struck by the

common theme that they worked harder than their team mates, and hated to lose.

I will never forget the day when, as a lowly intern, I was making the rounds

with the chief of medicine and he made the statement: " to be a good physician

you have to be obsessive compulsive " . At first I did not understand what he was

saying until it dawned on me that a good physician has to be obsessive about

details and the desire to learn. Why else would I put in 18 hrs a day to study

medicine in medical school and be willing to put up with 36 hour on call shifts.

Some would call it desire or drive, I would call it being a little OCD.

I suspect that a lot of posters on this forum have a little OCD (in the non

pathological sense).

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA

________________________________

From: Vin <vmiller@...<mailto:vmiller%40alum.rpi.edu>>

Supertraining <mailto:Supertraining%40>

Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 1:26 PM

Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

Yes, Gerald. Although, now that I think about it, the intrinsic

motivation required to put in the " 10,000 hours of deliberate practice "

may be influenced by genetics just as much as the innate abilities that

make it easier for some people do develop certain skills and

characteristics.

Vin , CSCS

Albany, NY

http://ragewellness.com

< Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote:

> If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books

are

> a great read.

>

> Vin , CSCS

> Albany, NY

Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates

Us?

_____________________________

Gerald Lafon

USMC, RVN 70-71

Director, Judo America San Diego

www.judoamerica.com

www.betterjudo.com

858 578-7748

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always found the differences between east africans and west africans

rather intriguing.  When we talk about west africans are we looking and african

americans who are descendants of slaves brought  over as slaves or actual west

africans living n west africa now?  

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: ambyburf <amby.burfoot@...>

Supertraining

Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 9:55 AM

Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

What is interesting here ...

> 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were

of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains

the only one to do it.

.... is that the exact opposite is true for East Africans and distance running.

The East Africans totally dominate. Also, East Africans can't sprint, and West

Africans can't run distance (huge generalities, but mostly true).

Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all

able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African

differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental

influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis,

golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing of

the genetics-performance hypothesis.

The results of this " test " are quite astonishing. Not perfect or proven by any

means. But mathematically astonishing.

Amby Burfoot

Runner's World

Emmaus PA 18049

>

> Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits:

>

> 1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans.

> 2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish.

> 3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the title

about 55% of the time.

> 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were

of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains

the only one to do it.

> 5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do they

hardly ever win medals?

>

> I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is related,

at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and nurturing

explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a genetic elemant to

consider?

>

> I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that

surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these facts. And

I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short run (not over the

evolutionary process).

>

> Yehoshua Zohar

> Karmiel, Israel

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ralph,

My wife tells me I have OCD all the time. LOL! I tell her that I'm proud

of it. ;)

Vin , CSCS

Albany, NY

http://ragewellness.com

< Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote:

> If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books

are

> a great read.

>

> Vin , CSCS

> Albany, NY

Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates

Us?

_____________________________

Gerald Lafon

USMC, RVN 70-71

Director, Judo America San Diego

www.judoamerica.com

www.betterjudo.com

858 578-7748

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a problem with the following statement:

*******************

Finally, in a biopsy of his leg muscles, it was found

that the muscle fibres in his leg were utterly exceptional. Leg

muscles are mainly made up of " slow twitch " , " fast twitch "

and " hybrid twitch " . Not only was three quarters of his muscle fast-

twitch – 50 per cent more than normal – but 25 per cent of that

was " super-fast twitch " , a type of muscle fibre so rare that no more

than two per cent had ever been found in any other athletes similarly

tested

*************************

There is evidence that training may alter the ratio of fast/slow twitch muscle

fibers.  The fact that the biopsy was taken when he was already a champion

does not answer the question of whether the make up of his muscle fibers was

completely related to his genetics or did his training from early childhood

influence the final make up of his muscle fibre type.

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: carruthersjam <Carruthersjam@...>

Supertraining

Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:14 AM

Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

The below may be of interest to members:

Colin : The Making Of Me

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/film-and-tv/tv-radio-

reviews/last-nights-tv-colin-jackson-the-making-of-me-bbc1br-rogue-

restaurants-bbc1-882453.html

..... was curious enough about discovering as much as possible

the exact combination of qualities that made him such an outstanding

human to sign up with some enthusiasm as one subject in the

documentary series The Making of Me. In pursuit of self-knowledge, he

succumbed to all sorts of experiments and all sorts of tests. In

doing so, he provided a great deal of clarity about what factors are

needed in the creation of a champion.

Thus far in his life, had clung hard to the belief that his

success was " 75 per cent nature " . This seemed a bit hard on his

parents, who, it was obvious from their appearance on telly for just

a few minutes, had provided him with an exceptionally stable, loving

and supportive childhood. The fact that his sister's face was

spookily familiar because – it eventually dawned – Sue is

also the actress Suzanne Packer, did nothing to dispel the idea that

maybe he was attaching rather too little significance to family and

background.

The unscientific way of nudging to think a little more about

childhood influences was to persuade him to have a little chat with

his fellow athlete Kriss Akabusi. The latter said he won his first

major medal at the ripe old age of 32, while 's first one came

at 21. The reason? Akabusi explained that he was brought up in a care

home, and wasn't nurtured until he joined the army and was talent-

spotted by the Army athletics officer. Once someone had spotted his

potential, Akabusi didn't look back. But had been training

with a top-level coach from the age of 15.

The more scientific way was to get to place flags on a map,

charting where the top 20 sprinters in the world had their ethnic

origins. This turned out to be Jamaica, where his parents had come

from. A DNA test confirmed that he had the same power-sprinting gene

that is possessed by 98 per cent of Jamaicans.

Yet while this might have seemed like a prima facie argument in

favour of nature, not nurture, it wasn't that simple. Eighty per cent

of Europeans have the sprint gene too. The real differentiating

factor in Jamaica, it was suggested, was the huge infrastructural and

cultural support of athletics on the island. Armed with this insight,

dredged his own memory, and came up with an image of his

parents yelling their support of Don Quarrie as he took the 200

metres Olympic Gold back in 1976. He looked on with them and

remembered thinking: " I want to be like him. "

Further tests showed other remarkable qualities in . His

ability to focus was measured and found to be in the top two per cent

of the population. His ability to cope with failure was tested and it

was found that he was unique among people tested in his ability to

respond positively to triggers that most humans find morbid and

depressing. Finally, in a biopsy of his leg muscles, it was found

that the muscle fibres in his leg were utterly exceptional. Leg

muscles are mainly made up of " slow twitch " , " fast twitch "

and " hybrid twitch " . Not only was three quarters of his muscle fast-

twitch – 50 per cent more than normal – but 25 per cent of that

was " super-fast twitch " , a type of muscle fibre so rare that no more

than two per cent had ever been found in any other athletes similarly

tested.

was suitably astounded to discover that he had been " blessed'

in so very many different ways. " I was pretty lucky, wasn't I? " he

asked. " But I took my environment for granted. It's been a hard poke

in the chest. " Almost comically, though, his hunger for greatness was

only reawakened by the experience. " It could have helped me in my

training to have known all this, " he said wistfully. Which only

affirms that the guy has a winner's mentality.

================================

Carruthers

Wakefield, UK

>

> > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books

> are

> > a great read.

> >

> > Vin , CSCS

> > Albany, NY

>

> Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates

> Us?

>

> _____________________________

> Gerald Lafon

> USMC, RVN 70-71

> Director, Judo America San Diego

> www.judoamerica.com

> www.betterjudo.com

> 858 578-7748

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that most successful people have a little ocd in them. 

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: Vin <vmiller@...>

Supertraining

Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:32 AM

Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

Ralph,

My wife tells me I have OCD all the time. LOL! I tell her that I'm proud

of it. ;)

Vin , CSCS

Albany, NY

http://ragewellness.com

< Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote:

> If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity),

> genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code,

> Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case

> for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books

are

> a great read.

>

> Vin , CSCS

> Albany, NY

Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates

Us?

_____________________________

Gerald Lafon

USMC, RVN 70-71

Director, Judo America San Diego

www.judoamerica.com

www.betterjudo.com

858 578-7748

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Amby!

In a message dated 12/4/2011 9:13:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,

amby.burfoot@... writes:

Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all

able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African

differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental

influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis,

golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing

of the genetics-performance hypothesis.

I remember your RW article from several years back: " White Men Can't Run. "

You raised some really interesting points in that work!

Ken Jakalski

Lisle Senior High School

Lisle, IL

USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ralph!

In a message dated 12/4/2011 1:57:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,

ragiarn@... writes:

I suspect that most successful people have a little ocd in them.

Legendary coach often refers to elite sprinters at

" mutants. "

He also had a few other noteworthy observations:

" There are no girl scouts or boy scouts on the podium at the Olympic

Games. "

" Elite runners are " minimally neurotic and clinically psychotic. "

Ken Jakalski

Lisle Senior High School

Lisle, Illinois USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GIbbens (_www.traniningscience.net_

(http://www.traniningscience.net) ) discusses the following studies on his

website:

Park J, Brown R, Park C, Cohn M, Chance B., Energy metabolism of the

untrained muscle of elite runners as observed by 31P magnetic resonance

spectroscopy: Evidence suggesting a genetic endowment for endurance exercise

Proc.

Natl. Acad. Sci USA Dec 1988, 85, 8780-8784

" Untrained muscles of elites are able to initially reach and maintain a

high work load than non-elites and then to recover nearly twice as fast as

non-elites. This indicates a strong genetic capability for endurance exercise

and performance in the elite runners, a capacity much higher than that

demonstrated by the controls.

Finally, though the tested muscles were untrained, the possibility that

the training of the elites had an effect on the untrained muscles can not be

completely dismissed. However, this seems to be a remote possibility, one

addressed by the researchers. "

Prud’Homme D, Bouchard C, LeBlanc C, Landry F, Fontaine E. Sensitivity of

maximal aerobic power to training is genotype-dependent Med Sci Sports

Exerc 1984, 16(5), 489-493

" The most important finding of this study though is the evidence it

provides for a strong genetic influence on response to training. The

researchers

write, “…75-80% of the variance in response to training are associated

with genotype differences.†What the researchers are saying is that genetics

account for 75-80% of the response to training. Other factors account for

the other 20-25% of response to training. Presumably these factors might be

related to age, sex, previous training history, and diet amongst others. "

Ken Jakalski

Lisle Senior High School

Lisle, Illinois USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi !

In a message dated 12/5/2011 12:22:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,

ssp67047@... writes:

I would propose that running is nontechnical only in the sense that we

don't teach sound mechanics to our youth. In my experience, we need to.

The argument still remains what those " teachable " mechanics really are.

Check out the following clip:

_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm going to add one more thing those coaches would say about somebody like

Haile...

" OH If I had coached him EARLY, he'd be EVEN FASTER " ....sigh.

Athletes are individuals and sometimes the tendency they adopt naturally is the

one best suited to them.

IMHO, a great coach is one who takes the natural athlete and enhances rather

than tries to break down the style that clearly belongs to that athlete. (I sort

of see a guy like Steve Prefontaine here... other coaches may have made him want

to quit running?)

One can only imagine how many well intentioned folks approached Haile over the

years with the " I can make you FASTER " line...:).

Recently, I have heard of a coach in HS sport who was overtraining baseball

players to the extreme extent of tractor tire flipping and other training

methods that frankly belong at a higher level and essentially telling anybody

who didn't want to constantly be injured or exhausted they could quit! His

argument was he had " created " stars previously at other schools...and so

everyone should do his program and this would cause success and all of them

would be D1 prospects! What happened of course is that some kids wisely told

their parents finally why they were too tired to eat and sleep well...and the

smart folks did switch sports...sigh. It's hard for a kid who has been in

baseball since he was 5 years of age to switch, but this coach convinced them

that they would not be playing anything if they continued to do his program! My

guess was the natural athletes could endure a good deal of the punishment and

were perhaps some of the few left standing - but even they would possibly be

driven to give up the sport they loved?

So coaching can help or hinder the athlete who is blessed with great genetic

gifts - sometimes though the talent is " million dollar talent, 5 cent head... "

Some athletes are so completely out of control in their behavior away from the

sport that they cannot be successfully coached or managed to their own

disadvantage...in this way, genetics are truly out of our control. If you cannot

convince a talented person not to drug, drink excessively, or do other

destructive pursuits, then sooner or later they will be a bad headline and all

the talent on earth cannot save them from the inevitable.

The Phantom

aka Schaefer, CMT/RMT, competing powerlifter

Denver, Colorado, USA

Re: Genetics - out of our control?

Hi Ken,

That's a good point. Being as unathletic as I am - and having studied what fast

people do - I've found it very useful to model elite runners' kinematics and

kinetics. Fortunately enough research has been conducted to do that pretty well,

and teach sound mechanics based on that model.

To be frank, nothing amazes me any more in terms of the 'running technique' many

coaches try to teach. I worked in 6 collegiate athletic programs over the first

15 years of my journeyman/coaching career. All were D1, so you'd think the sport

coaches were competent in something so basic. The stories I could tell...

Disturbed regards,

Plisk

Excelsior Sports

Buffalo NY

Prepare To Be A Champion!

________________________________

Hi !

In a message dated 12/5/2011 12:22:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,

ssp67047 (DOT) com writes: " I would propose that running is nontechnical only

in the sense that we don't teach sound mechanics to our youth. In my experience,

we need to. "

The argument still remains what those " teachable " mechanics really are.

Check out the following clip:

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=EAW87NsiGuI

This is Haille Gebrselassie He has two Olympic gold medals and four World

Championship titles at 10K, In the marathon, he won Berlin four times in a row,

and Dubai three straight years. He's raced and won at every distance from 800 on

up, and holds something like 61 Ethiopian National Records and 27 world records.

At 35, he set the world record in the marathon (Berlin) at 2:03.59. It still

holds as the Masters WR.

...

If coaches did not know who this was, how many do you suspect would point out

all kinds of technical flaws in his running stride?

You'd be amazed how many of my high school colleagues offer technical

corrections for this guy, not realizing that they're looking at arguably the

greatest distance runner of all time.

Ken Jakalski

Lisle High School

Lisle, Illinois USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi !

In a message dated 12/6/2011 12:19:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,

deadliftdiva@... writes:

And I'm going to add one more thing those coaches would say about somebody

like Haile...

" OH If I had coached him EARLY, he'd be EVEN FASTER " ....sigh.

***

YES! That is so true! You've been around coaches long to know is

exactly what many of them would say.

Athletes are individuals and sometimes the tendency they adopt naturally

is the one best suited to them.

****

Charlie Francis noted this on more than one occasion throughout his career.

IMHO, a great coach is one who takes the natural athlete and enhances

rather than tries to break down the style that clearly belongs to that athlete.

(I sort of see a guy like Steve Prefontaine here... other coaches may have

made him want to quit running?)

Again, very accurate!

One can only imagine how many well intentioned folks approached Haile over

the years with the " I can make you FASTER " line...:).

Recently, I have heard of a coach in HS sport who was overtraining

baseball players to the extreme extent of tractor tire flipping and other

training

methods that frankly belong at a higher level and essentially telling

anybody who didn't want to constantly be injured or exhausted they could quit!

His argument was he had " created " stars previously at other schools...and so

everyone should do his program and this would cause success and all of

them would be D1 prospects! What happened of course is that some kids wisely

told their parents finally why they were too tired to eat and sleep

well...and the smart folks did switch sports...sigh. It's hard for a kid who

has

been in baseball since he was 5 years of age to switch, but this coach

convinced them that they would not be playing anything if they continued to do

his program! My guess was the natural athletes could endure a good deal of

the punishment and were perhaps some of the few left standing - but even they

woul d possibly be driven to give up the sport they loved?

So coaching can help or hinder the athlete who is blessed with great

genetic gifts - sometimes though the talent is " million dollar talent, 5 cent

head... " Some athletes are so completely out of control in their behavior

away from the sport that they cannot be successfully coached or managed to

their own disadvantage...in this way, genetics are truly out of our control.

If you cannot convince a talented person not to drug, drink excessively, or

do other destructive pursuits, then sooner or later they will be a bad

headline and all the talent on earth cannot save them from the inevitable.

I really enjoyed this post. By the way, my current crop of high school

athletes also refer to you as the " Deadlift Diva " That's something that has

just followed on as tradition over the years without my having to reinforce

it. When I put your insights on our bulletin board at school, they right

away know...it's the " Deadlift Diva. "

Regards,

Ken Jakalski

Lisle High School

Lisle, Illinois USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following article is very enlightening in sorting out genetics vs training

in determination of muscle fiber type profile and individual. Any one

interested in this topic should read the original article

**************************

Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle.

JEAN-AIME SIMONEAU’ AND CLAUDE BOUCHARD

http://www.fasebj.org/content/9/11/1091.short

In conclusion, many studies have revealed that skeletal muscle fiber type

distribution is quite heterogeneous among human beings. It is still a matter of

debate whether these interindividual differences are genetically determined or

result from environmental influences. The results summarized in this paper and

displayed in Fig. 1 suggest that a fraction (about 15%) of the total variance in

the proportion

of type I muscle fibers in human is explained by the error component related to

muscle sampling and technical variance, that about 40% of the phenotype variance

is influenced by environmental factors, whereas the remaining part of the

variance (about 45%) is associated with inherited factors. If these estimates

are approximately correct, a difference of about 30% in type I fibers among

individuals could be explained exclusively by differences in the local

environment and level of muscular contractile activity. However, unidentified

genetic factors would have to be invoked to account for the observation that the

skeletal muscle of about 25% of the North American Caucasian population have

either less than 35% or more than 65% of type I fibers.

.. Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: Ralph Giarnella <ragiarn@...>

" Supertraining " <Supertraining >

Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:31 AM

Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

I have always found the differences between east africans and west africans

rather intriguing.  When we talk about west africans are we looking and african

americans who are descendants of slaves brought  over as slaves or actual west

africans living n west africa now?  

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct. USA 

________________________________

From: ambyburf <amby.burfoot@...>

Supertraining

Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 9:55 AM

Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?

 

What is interesting here ...

> 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were

of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains

the only one to do it.

.... is that the exact opposite is true for East Africans and distance running.

The East Africans totally dominate. Also, East Africans can't sprint, and West

Africans can't run distance (huge generalities, but mostly true).

Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all

able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African

differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental

influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis,

golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing of

the genetics-performance hypothesis.

The results of this " test " are quite astonishing. Not perfect or proven by any

means. But mathematically astonishing.

Amby Burfoot

Runner's World

Emmaus PA 18049

>

> Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits:

>

> 1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans.

> 2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish.

> 3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the title

about 55% of the time.

> 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were

of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains

the only one to do it.

> 5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do they

hardly ever win medals?

>

> I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is related,

at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and nurturing

explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a genetic elemant to

consider?

>

> I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that

surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these facts. And

I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short run (not over the

evolutionary process).

>

> Yehoshua Zohar

> Karmiel, Israel

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...