Guest guest Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 I'll just toss in my own favorite expression on this one: We are all walking experiments.... Choose an activity that you are " meant to do " if possible - not everyone finds the sport or event that truly suits their body and mindset immediately - and do not force yourself into a sport or activity that clearly is not working for you. If you are not getting the results you wish to attain, work on a variable within your control. Accept that eventually genetic potential or some other limiter will kick in and do not try to override yourself with drugs or other false prophets... question all gurus who claim to be able to override reality. All this being said, push your edges, try to prevent injury by good selection of exercises and sets - lift to fatigue, not failure - and realize that at some point, if you push yourself sufficiently, you may feel that it's your heart to make the lift or finish the race that will determine success or failure...and accept the results, good or bad, and continue. One battle is not the entire war - and it's a war against time and gravity! The Phantom aka Schaefer, RMT/CMT, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA Re: Genetics - out of our control? > > SNIP an excellent summation of lifetime learning experience, which in many ways parallels my own... > > > > Finally, a few words on genetics: since this is out of our control, why sweat it? We have to do the best with the hand we were dealt. > > > > I know what Yehoshua is getting at and agree to some extent, but looking at it from another perspective - are genetics out of our control? The base genetic code may be set, but gene expression, in many instances, is within our control. > > Shenk wrote a book called " The Genius in All of Us " which suggests that in the past genetics and environment has the relations 'G+E='. He maintains we have enough control over gene expression it should be 'GxE='. In the book he notes how the common wisdom is sprinters and runners of certain genetic heritage (West African and Kenyan) have a genetic advantage. Yet it wasn't that long ago the same argument was made for other races in different sports and events. > > " Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake - the human being lives far within his limits. " > > > If genetic expression can be changed (within boundaries) should we even think we can't control our genetics? We have as much control over them as we do our environment - well, in a way... > *** The answer lies in first understanding the lock (genetic " makeup " ) to determine the appropriate intervention. `If we want to be masters of our future, we must fundamentally pose the question of what today is.' Much of current athletic preparatation and nutrition is still guess work, trial and error. Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 Genetics may not be totally out of our control.  There has been an increasing number of  studies on epigenetics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics ). While we can't change our DNA we can effect how the gene expresses itself thereby modifying how it acts.  This is a relatively new field of study. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA  ________________________________ From: " deadliftdiva@... " <deadliftdiva@...> Supertraining Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 12:48 PM Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  I'll just toss in my own favorite expression on this one: We are all walking experiments.... Choose an activity that you are " meant to do " if possible - not everyone finds the sport or event that truly suits their body and mindset immediately - and do not force yourself into a sport or activity that clearly is not working for you. If you are not getting the results you wish to attain, work on a variable within your control. Accept that eventually genetic potential or some other limiter will kick in and do not try to override yourself with drugs or other false prophets... question all gurus who claim to be able to override reality. All this being said, push your edges, try to prevent injury by good selection of exercises and sets - lift to fatigue, not failure - and realize that at some point, if you push yourself sufficiently, you may feel that it's your heart to make the lift or finish the race that will determine success or failure...and accept the results, good or bad, and continue. One battle is not the entire war - and it's a war against time and gravity! The Phantom aka Schaefer, RMT/CMT, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA Re: Genetics - out of our control? > > SNIP an excellent summation of lifetime learning experience, which in many ways parallels my own... > > > > Finally, a few words on genetics: since this is out of our control, why sweat it? We have to do the best with the hand we were dealt. > > > > I know what Yehoshua is getting at and agree to some extent, but looking at it from another perspective - are genetics out of our control? The base genetic code may be set, but gene expression, in many instances, is within our control. > > Shenk wrote a book called " The Genius in All of Us " which suggests that in the past genetics and environment has the relations 'G+E='. He maintains we have enough control over gene expression it should be 'GxE='. In the book he notes how the common wisdom is sprinters and runners of certain genetic heritage (West African and Kenyan) have a genetic advantage. Yet it wasn't that long ago the same argument was made for other races in different sports and events. > > " Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake - the human being lives far within his limits. " > > > If genetic expression can be changed (within boundaries) should we even think we can't control our genetics? We have as much control over them as we do our environment - well, in a way... > *** The answer lies in first understanding the lock (genetic " makeup " ) to determine the appropriate intervention. `If we want to be masters of our future, we must fundamentally pose the question of what today is.' Much of current athletic preparatation and nutrition is still guess work, trial and error. Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are a great read. Vin , CSCS Albany, NY http://ragewellness.com < Re: Genetics - out of our control? Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits: 1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans. 2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish. 3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the title about 55% of the time. 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains the only one to do it. 5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do they hardly ever win medals? I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is related, at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and nurturing explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a genetic elemant to consider? I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these facts. And I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short run (not over the evolutionary process). Yehoshua Zohar Karmiel, Israel > > > > SNIP an excellent summation of lifetime learning experience, which in many ways parallels my own... > > > > > > Finally, a few words on genetics: since this is out of our control, why sweat it? We have to do the best with the hand we were dealt. > > > > > > > I know what Yehoshua is getting at and agree to some extent, but looking at it from another perspective - are genetics out of our control? The base genetic code may be set, but gene expression, in many instances, is within our control. > > > > Shenk wrote a book called " The Genius in All of Us " which suggests that in the past genetics and environment has the relations 'G+E='. He maintains we have enough control over gene expression it should be 'GxE='. In the book he notes how the common wisdom is sprinters and runners of certain genetic heritage (West African and Kenyan) have a genetic advantage. Yet it wasn't that long ago the same argument was made for other races in different sports and events. > > > > " Compared with what we ought to be, we are only half awake - the human being lives far within his limits. " > > > > > > If genetic expression can be changed (within boundaries) should we even think we can't control our genetics? We have as much control over them as we do our environment - well, in a way... > > > > *** > The answer lies in first understanding the lock (genetic " makeup " ) to determine the appropriate intervention. `If we want to be masters of our future, we must fundamentally pose the question of what today is.' Much of current athletic preparatation and nutrition is still guess work, trial and error. > > Carruthers > Wakefield, UK > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 In order to pass on good traits to our children we obviously have to develop the good traits before we have children.  Unfortunately sometimes we are still young and foolish when we have chidden and sometimes do not develop the good traits until after our children are born. I am not so sure that epigenetic is not in fact an important aspect of evolution. Still a lot to learn. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Plisk <ssp67047@...> Supertraining <Supertraining > Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 10:18 AM Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  Dr. Giarnella, Thank you for mentioning that. It seems to have big implications for nutrition (and maybe training?) especially re: traits that we pass along to our children. In January 2010, TIME magazine did an interesting and very readable cover story on epigenetics entitled 'Why your DNA isn't your destiny'. Here's the online version: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1952313,00.html  The bottom line is that evolution isn't necessarily the slow process we often assume; and certain environmental stresses really seem to influence the system. It sure makes sense from a survival/adaptation standpoint. Regards, Plisk Excelsior Sports Buffalo NY Prepare To Be A Champion! ________________________________ Genetics may not be totally out of our control.  There has been an increasing number of  studies on epigenetics (http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Epigenetics ). While we can't change our DNA we can effect how the gene expresses itself thereby modifying how it acts.  This is a relatively new field of study. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 Here are some conclusions from Skinner's 2001 paper " Do Genes Determine Champions " :: --Genes do influence the initial level of one’s characteristics(phenotypes), as well as how fast and how much they can change in response to training, nutrition, and other environmental factors. Athletes who have immediate success in anew sport probably have relatively high qualities of at least some of the genetically determined phenotypes required to be a champion in that sport. --Superior responders to sports participation probably have early success and positive feedback from competition. --Potential athletes should try various sports to see which ones they enjoy and in which ones they have success. These factors are probably a better guide for selection than any laboratory analysis of one’s genetic background. --It is not possible to predict who will be a champion. Nevertheless, coaches can and do select candidates based on the characteristics required for success in that sport. The genes influence many of these characteristics. --The genes do not affect other aspects of some sports (e.g., tactics and technique). Champions at the elite level must be experts at tactics and technique in addition to possessing the necessary genetically determined attributes for success in their sports. Still, less genetically gifted athletes who are talented in tactics and technique may be champions at non-elite levels of competition. Pinker's The Blank Slate might be an interesting read for those who are curious about the differences in people being biologically determined. Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote: > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are > a great read. > > Vin , CSCS > Albany, NY Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us? _____________________________ Gerald Lafon USMC, RVN 70-71 Director, Judo America San Diego www.judoamerica.com www.betterjudo.com 858 578-7748 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 Yes, Gerald. Although, now that I think about it, the intrinsic motivation required to put in the " 10,000 hours of deliberate practice " may be influenced by genetics just as much as the innate abilities that make it easier for some people do develop certain skills and characteristics. Vin , CSCS Albany, NY http://ragewellness.com < Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote: > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are > a great read. > > Vin , CSCS > Albany, NY Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us? _____________________________ Gerald Lafon USMC, RVN 70-71 Director, Judo America San Diego www.judoamerica.com www.betterjudo.com 858 578-7748 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 The truly elite athlete ( Jordan, Lance Armstrong, Tom Brady just to mention a few that come to mind) are, in my opinion, the result of  a convergence of several factors: Genetic potential (nature), environmental (nuture), obsessive behavior (possibly genetic as well).  Aside from genetic potential and proper environment they all hate to lose and are driven.  In reading about the above mentioned athletes I have always been struck by the common theme that they worked harder than their team mates, and hated to lose. I will never forget the day when, as a lowly intern, I was making the rounds with the chief of medicine and he made the statement: " to be a good physician you have to be obsessive compulsive " .  At first I did not understand what he was saying until it dawned on me that a good physician has to be obsessive about details and the desire to learn.  Why else would I put in 18 hrs a day to study medicine in medical school and be willing to put up with 36 hour on call shifts.  Some would call it desire or drive, I would call it being a little OCD. I suspect that a lot of posters on this forum have a little OCD (in the non pathological sense). Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Vin <vmiller@...> Supertraining Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 1:26 PM Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  Yes, Gerald. Although, now that I think about it, the intrinsic motivation required to put in the " 10,000 hours of deliberate practice " may be influenced by genetics just as much as the innate abilities that make it easier for some people do develop certain skills and characteristics. Vin , CSCS Albany, NY http://ragewellness.com < Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote: > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are > a great read. > > Vin , CSCS > Albany, NY Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us? _____________________________ Gerald Lafon USMC, RVN 70-71 Director, Judo America San Diego www.judoamerica.com www.betterjudo.com 858 578-7748 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 I encourage the group to research the Dynamical Systems Theory. This theory postulates that development arises from an interaction of constraints. The three constraints include the environment (outside the individual), the organism (from within including psychological variables), and the task (rules, implements, boundaries). It may not be a perfect explanation but it makes sense to me that talent is not a 1 variable pony but rather one that stems from nature and nurture. Steve , Ed.D., CSCS, USAW Lynchburg, VA ________________________________ From: Supertraining [supertraining ] On Behalf Of Ralph Giarnella [ragiarn@...] Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:17 AM Supertraining Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? The truly elite athlete ( Jordan, Lance Armstrong, Tom Brady just to mention a few that come to mind) are, in my opinion, the result of a convergence of several factors: Genetic potential (nature), environmental (nuture), obsessive behavior (possibly genetic as well). Aside from genetic potential and proper environment they all hate to lose and are driven. In reading about the above mentioned athletes I have always been struck by the common theme that they worked harder than their team mates, and hated to lose. I will never forget the day when, as a lowly intern, I was making the rounds with the chief of medicine and he made the statement: " to be a good physician you have to be obsessive compulsive " . At first I did not understand what he was saying until it dawned on me that a good physician has to be obsessive about details and the desire to learn. Why else would I put in 18 hrs a day to study medicine in medical school and be willing to put up with 36 hour on call shifts. Some would call it desire or drive, I would call it being a little OCD. I suspect that a lot of posters on this forum have a little OCD (in the non pathological sense). Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Vin <vmiller@...<mailto:vmiller%40alum.rpi.edu>> Supertraining <mailto:Supertraining%40> Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 1:26 PM Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? Yes, Gerald. Although, now that I think about it, the intrinsic motivation required to put in the " 10,000 hours of deliberate practice " may be influenced by genetics just as much as the innate abilities that make it easier for some people do develop certain skills and characteristics. Vin , CSCS Albany, NY http://ragewellness.com < Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote: > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are > a great read. > > Vin , CSCS > Albany, NY Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us? _____________________________ Gerald Lafon USMC, RVN 70-71 Director, Judo America San Diego www.judoamerica.com www.betterjudo.com 858 578-7748 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 I have always found the differences between east africans and west africans rather intriguing.  When we talk about west africans are we looking and african americans who are descendants of slaves brought  over as slaves or actual west africans living n west africa now?  Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: ambyburf <amby.burfoot@...> Supertraining Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 9:55 AM Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  What is interesting here ... > 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains the only one to do it. .... is that the exact opposite is true for East Africans and distance running. The East Africans totally dominate. Also, East Africans can't sprint, and West Africans can't run distance (huge generalities, but mostly true). Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis, golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing of the genetics-performance hypothesis. The results of this " test " are quite astonishing. Not perfect or proven by any means. But mathematically astonishing. Amby Burfoot Runner's World Emmaus PA 18049 > > Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits: > > 1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans. > 2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish. > 3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the title about 55% of the time. > 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains the only one to do it. > 5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do they hardly ever win medals? > > I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is related, at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and nurturing explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a genetic elemant to consider? > > I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these facts. And I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short run (not over the evolutionary process). > > Yehoshua Zohar > Karmiel, Israel > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Ralph, My wife tells me I have OCD all the time. LOL! I tell her that I'm proud of it. Vin , CSCS Albany, NY http://ragewellness.com < Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote: > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are > a great read. > > Vin , CSCS > Albany, NY Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us? _____________________________ Gerald Lafon USMC, RVN 70-71 Director, Judo America San Diego www.judoamerica.com www.betterjudo.com 858 578-7748 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 I have a problem with the following statement: ******************* Finally, in a biopsy of his leg muscles, it was found that the muscle fibres in his leg were utterly exceptional. Leg muscles are mainly made up of " slow twitch " , " fast twitch " and " hybrid twitch " . Not only was three quarters of his muscle fast- twitch – 50 per cent more than normal – but 25 per cent of that was " super-fast twitch " , a type of muscle fibre so rare that no more than two per cent had ever been found in any other athletes similarly tested ************************* There is evidence that training may alter the ratio of fast/slow twitch muscle fibers.  The fact that the biopsy was taken when he was already a champion does not answer the question of whether the make up of his muscle fibers was completely related to his genetics or did his training from early childhood influence the final make up of his muscle fibre type. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: carruthersjam <Carruthersjam@...> Supertraining Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:14 AM Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  The below may be of interest to members: Colin : The Making Of Me http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/film-and-tv/tv-radio- reviews/last-nights-tv-colin-jackson-the-making-of-me-bbc1br-rogue- restaurants-bbc1-882453.html ..... was curious enough about discovering as much as possible the exact combination of qualities that made him such an outstanding human to sign up with some enthusiasm as one subject in the documentary series The Making of Me. In pursuit of self-knowledge, he succumbed to all sorts of experiments and all sorts of tests. In doing so, he provided a great deal of clarity about what factors are needed in the creation of a champion. Thus far in his life, had clung hard to the belief that his success was " 75 per cent nature " . This seemed a bit hard on his parents, who, it was obvious from their appearance on telly for just a few minutes, had provided him with an exceptionally stable, loving and supportive childhood. The fact that his sister's face was spookily familiar because – it eventually dawned – Sue is also the actress Suzanne Packer, did nothing to dispel the idea that maybe he was attaching rather too little significance to family and background. The unscientific way of nudging to think a little more about childhood influences was to persuade him to have a little chat with his fellow athlete Kriss Akabusi. The latter said he won his first major medal at the ripe old age of 32, while 's first one came at 21. The reason? Akabusi explained that he was brought up in a care home, and wasn't nurtured until he joined the army and was talent- spotted by the Army athletics officer. Once someone had spotted his potential, Akabusi didn't look back. But had been training with a top-level coach from the age of 15. The more scientific way was to get to place flags on a map, charting where the top 20 sprinters in the world had their ethnic origins. This turned out to be Jamaica, where his parents had come from. A DNA test confirmed that he had the same power-sprinting gene that is possessed by 98 per cent of Jamaicans. Yet while this might have seemed like a prima facie argument in favour of nature, not nurture, it wasn't that simple. Eighty per cent of Europeans have the sprint gene too. The real differentiating factor in Jamaica, it was suggested, was the huge infrastructural and cultural support of athletics on the island. Armed with this insight, dredged his own memory, and came up with an image of his parents yelling their support of Don Quarrie as he took the 200 metres Olympic Gold back in 1976. He looked on with them and remembered thinking: " I want to be like him. " Further tests showed other remarkable qualities in . His ability to focus was measured and found to be in the top two per cent of the population. His ability to cope with failure was tested and it was found that he was unique among people tested in his ability to respond positively to triggers that most humans find morbid and depressing. Finally, in a biopsy of his leg muscles, it was found that the muscle fibres in his leg were utterly exceptional. Leg muscles are mainly made up of " slow twitch " , " fast twitch " and " hybrid twitch " . Not only was three quarters of his muscle fast- twitch – 50 per cent more than normal – but 25 per cent of that was " super-fast twitch " , a type of muscle fibre so rare that no more than two per cent had ever been found in any other athletes similarly tested. was suitably astounded to discover that he had been " blessed' in so very many different ways. " I was pretty lucky, wasn't I? " he asked. " But I took my environment for granted. It's been a hard poke in the chest. " Almost comically, though, his hunger for greatness was only reawakened by the experience. " It could have helped me in my training to have known all this, " he said wistfully. Which only affirms that the guy has a winner's mentality. ================================ Carruthers Wakefield, UK > > > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books > are > > a great read. > > > > Vin , CSCS > > Albany, NY > > Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates > Us? > > _____________________________ > Gerald Lafon > USMC, RVN 70-71 > Director, Judo America San Diego > www.judoamerica.com > www.betterjudo.com > 858 578-7748 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 I suspect that most successful people have a little ocd in them. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Vin <vmiller@...> Supertraining Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  Ralph, My wife tells me I have OCD all the time. LOL! I tell her that I'm proud of it. Vin , CSCS Albany, NY http://ragewellness.com < Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control? On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Vin wrote: > If we're talking about skill and success (rather than longevity), > genetics makes some difference for sure, but I think The Talent Code, > Talent is Overrated, and Drive (all 3 are books) present a strong case > for it being only a small factor. For anyone interested, these books are > a great read. > > Vin , CSCS > Albany, NY Are you talking about Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us? _____________________________ Gerald Lafon USMC, RVN 70-71 Director, Judo America San Diego www.judoamerica.com www.betterjudo.com 858 578-7748 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Hi Amby! In a message dated 12/4/2011 9:13:02 A.M. Central Standard Time, amby.burfoot@... writes: Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis, golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing of the genetics-performance hypothesis. I remember your RW article from several years back: " White Men Can't Run. " You raised some really interesting points in that work! Ken Jakalski Lisle Senior High School Lisle, IL USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Hi Ralph! In a message dated 12/4/2011 1:57:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, ragiarn@... writes: I suspect that most successful people have a little ocd in them. Legendary coach often refers to elite sprinters at " mutants. " He also had a few other noteworthy observations: " There are no girl scouts or boy scouts on the podium at the Olympic Games. " " Elite runners are " minimally neurotic and clinically psychotic. " Ken Jakalski Lisle Senior High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 GIbbens (_www.traniningscience.net_ (http://www.traniningscience.net) ) discusses the following studies on his website: Park J, Brown R, Park C, Cohn M, Chance B., Energy metabolism of the untrained muscle of elite runners as observed by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Evidence suggesting a genetic endowment for endurance exercise Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA Dec 1988, 85, 8780-8784 " Untrained muscles of elites are able to initially reach and maintain a high work load than non-elites and then to recover nearly twice as fast as non-elites. This indicates a strong genetic capability for endurance exercise and performance in the elite runners, a capacity much higher than that demonstrated by the controls. Finally, though the tested muscles were untrained, the possibility that the training of the elites had an effect on the untrained muscles can not be completely dismissed. However, this seems to be a remote possibility, one addressed by the researchers. " Prud’Homme D, Bouchard C, LeBlanc C, Landry F, Fontaine E. Sensitivity of maximal aerobic power to training is genotype-dependent Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984, 16(5), 489-493 " The most important finding of this study though is the evidence it provides for a strong genetic influence on response to training. The researchers write, “…75-80% of the variance in response to training are associated with genotype differences.†What the researchers are saying is that genetics account for 75-80% of the response to training. Other factors account for the other 20-25% of response to training. Presumably these factors might be related to age, sex, previous training history, and diet amongst others. " Ken Jakalski Lisle Senior High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 Hi ! In a message dated 12/5/2011 12:22:26 P.M. Central Standard Time, ssp67047@... writes: I would propose that running is nontechnical only in the sense that we don't teach sound mechanics to our youth. In my experience, we need to. The argument still remains what those " teachable " mechanics really are. Check out the following clip: _ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 And I'm going to add one more thing those coaches would say about somebody like Haile... " OH If I had coached him EARLY, he'd be EVEN FASTER " ....sigh. Athletes are individuals and sometimes the tendency they adopt naturally is the one best suited to them. IMHO, a great coach is one who takes the natural athlete and enhances rather than tries to break down the style that clearly belongs to that athlete. (I sort of see a guy like Steve Prefontaine here... other coaches may have made him want to quit running?) One can only imagine how many well intentioned folks approached Haile over the years with the " I can make you FASTER " line.... Recently, I have heard of a coach in HS sport who was overtraining baseball players to the extreme extent of tractor tire flipping and other training methods that frankly belong at a higher level and essentially telling anybody who didn't want to constantly be injured or exhausted they could quit! His argument was he had " created " stars previously at other schools...and so everyone should do his program and this would cause success and all of them would be D1 prospects! What happened of course is that some kids wisely told their parents finally why they were too tired to eat and sleep well...and the smart folks did switch sports...sigh. It's hard for a kid who has been in baseball since he was 5 years of age to switch, but this coach convinced them that they would not be playing anything if they continued to do his program! My guess was the natural athletes could endure a good deal of the punishment and were perhaps some of the few left standing - but even they would possibly be driven to give up the sport they loved? So coaching can help or hinder the athlete who is blessed with great genetic gifts - sometimes though the talent is " million dollar talent, 5 cent head... " Some athletes are so completely out of control in their behavior away from the sport that they cannot be successfully coached or managed to their own disadvantage...in this way, genetics are truly out of our control. If you cannot convince a talented person not to drug, drink excessively, or do other destructive pursuits, then sooner or later they will be a bad headline and all the talent on earth cannot save them from the inevitable. The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT/RMT, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA Re: Genetics - out of our control? Hi Ken, That's a good point. Being as unathletic as I am - and having studied what fast people do - I've found it very useful to model elite runners' kinematics and kinetics. Fortunately enough research has been conducted to do that pretty well, and teach sound mechanics based on that model. To be frank, nothing amazes me any more in terms of the 'running technique' many coaches try to teach. I worked in 6 collegiate athletic programs over the first 15 years of my journeyman/coaching career. All were D1, so you'd think the sport coaches were competent in something so basic. The stories I could tell... Disturbed regards, Plisk Excelsior Sports Buffalo NY Prepare To Be A Champion! ________________________________ Hi ! In a message dated 12/5/2011 12:22:26 P.M. Central Standard Time, ssp67047 (DOT) com writes: " I would propose that running is nontechnical only in the sense that we don't teach sound mechanics to our youth. In my experience, we need to. " The argument still remains what those " teachable " mechanics really are. Check out the following clip: http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=EAW87NsiGuI This is Haille Gebrselassie He has two Olympic gold medals and four World Championship titles at 10K, In the marathon, he won Berlin four times in a row, and Dubai three straight years. He's raced and won at every distance from 800 on up, and holds something like 61 Ethiopian National Records and 27 world records. At 35, he set the world record in the marathon (Berlin) at 2:03.59. It still holds as the Masters WR. ... If coaches did not know who this was, how many do you suspect would point out all kinds of technical flaws in his running stride? You'd be amazed how many of my high school colleagues offer technical corrections for this guy, not realizing that they're looking at arguably the greatest distance runner of all time. Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 Hi ! In a message dated 12/6/2011 12:19:45 P.M. Central Standard Time, deadliftdiva@... writes: And I'm going to add one more thing those coaches would say about somebody like Haile... " OH If I had coached him EARLY, he'd be EVEN FASTER " ....sigh. *** YES! That is so true! You've been around coaches long to know is exactly what many of them would say. Athletes are individuals and sometimes the tendency they adopt naturally is the one best suited to them. **** Charlie Francis noted this on more than one occasion throughout his career. IMHO, a great coach is one who takes the natural athlete and enhances rather than tries to break down the style that clearly belongs to that athlete. (I sort of see a guy like Steve Prefontaine here... other coaches may have made him want to quit running?) Again, very accurate! One can only imagine how many well intentioned folks approached Haile over the years with the " I can make you FASTER " line.... Recently, I have heard of a coach in HS sport who was overtraining baseball players to the extreme extent of tractor tire flipping and other training methods that frankly belong at a higher level and essentially telling anybody who didn't want to constantly be injured or exhausted they could quit! His argument was he had " created " stars previously at other schools...and so everyone should do his program and this would cause success and all of them would be D1 prospects! What happened of course is that some kids wisely told their parents finally why they were too tired to eat and sleep well...and the smart folks did switch sports...sigh. It's hard for a kid who has been in baseball since he was 5 years of age to switch, but this coach convinced them that they would not be playing anything if they continued to do his program! My guess was the natural athletes could endure a good deal of the punishment and were perhaps some of the few left standing - but even they woul d possibly be driven to give up the sport they loved? So coaching can help or hinder the athlete who is blessed with great genetic gifts - sometimes though the talent is " million dollar talent, 5 cent head... " Some athletes are so completely out of control in their behavior away from the sport that they cannot be successfully coached or managed to their own disadvantage...in this way, genetics are truly out of our control. If you cannot convince a talented person not to drug, drink excessively, or do other destructive pursuits, then sooner or later they will be a bad headline and all the talent on earth cannot save them from the inevitable. I really enjoyed this post. By the way, my current crop of high school athletes also refer to you as the " Deadlift Diva " That's something that has just followed on as tradition over the years without my having to reinforce it. When I put your insights on our bulletin board at school, they right away know...it's the " Deadlift Diva. " Regards, Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 The following article is very enlightening in sorting out genetics vs training in determination of muscle fiber type profile and individual. Any one interested in this topic should read the original article ************************** Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle. JEAN-AIME SIMONEAU’ AND CLAUDE BOUCHARD http://www.fasebj.org/content/9/11/1091.short In conclusion, many studies have revealed that skeletal muscle fiber type distribution is quite heterogeneous among human beings. It is still a matter of debate whether these interindividual differences are genetically determined or result from environmental influences. The results summarized in this paper and displayed in Fig. 1 suggest that a fraction (about 15%) of the total variance in the proportion of type I muscle fibers in human is explained by the error component related to muscle sampling and technical variance, that about 40% of the phenotype variance is influenced by environmental factors, whereas the remaining part of the variance (about 45%) is associated with inherited factors. If these estimates are approximately correct, a difference of about 30% in type I fibers among individuals could be explained exclusively by differences in the local environment and level of muscular contractile activity. However, unidentified genetic factors would have to be invoked to account for the observation that the skeletal muscle of about 25% of the North American Caucasian population have either less than 35% or more than 65% of type I fibers. .. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Ralph Giarnella <ragiarn@...> " Supertraining " <Supertraining > Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  I have always found the differences between east africans and west africans rather intriguing.  When we talk about west africans are we looking and african americans who are descendants of slaves brought  over as slaves or actual west africans living n west africa now?  Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: ambyburf <amby.burfoot@...> Supertraining Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 9:55 AM Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?  What is interesting here ... > 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains the only one to do it. .... is that the exact opposite is true for East Africans and distance running. The East Africans totally dominate. Also, East Africans can't sprint, and West Africans can't run distance (huge generalities, but mostly true). Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis, golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing of the genetics-performance hypothesis. The results of this " test " are quite astonishing. Not perfect or proven by any means. But mathematically astonishing. Amby Burfoot Runner's World Emmaus PA 18049 > > Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits: > > 1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans. > 2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish. > 3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the title about 55% of the time. > 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains the only one to do it. > 5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do they hardly ever win medals? > > I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is related, at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and nurturing explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a genetic elemant to consider? > > I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these facts. And I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short run (not over the evolutionary process). > > Yehoshua Zohar > Karmiel, Israel > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Guest guest
And I'm going to add one more thing those coaches would say about somebody like
Haile...
" OH If I had coached him EARLY, he'd be EVEN FASTER " ....sigh.
Athletes are individuals and sometimes the tendency they adopt naturally is the
one best suited to them.
IMHO, a great coach is one who takes the natural athlete and enhances rather
than tries to break down the style that clearly belongs to that athlete. (I sort
of see a guy like Steve Prefontaine here... other coaches may have made him want
to quit running?)
One can only imagine how many well intentioned folks approached Haile over the
years with the " I can make you FASTER " line...
.
Recently, I have heard of a coach in HS sport who was overtraining baseball
players to the extreme extent of tractor tire flipping and other training
methods that frankly belong at a higher level and essentially telling anybody
who didn't want to constantly be injured or exhausted they could quit! His
argument was he had " created " stars previously at other schools...and so
everyone should do his program and this would cause success and all of them
would be D1 prospects! What happened of course is that some kids wisely told
their parents finally why they were too tired to eat and sleep well...and the
smart folks did switch sports...sigh. It's hard for a kid who has been in
baseball since he was 5 years of age to switch, but this coach convinced them
that they would not be playing anything if they continued to do his program! My
guess was the natural athletes could endure a good deal of the punishment and
were perhaps some of the few left standing - but even they would possibly be
driven to give up the sport they loved?
So coaching can help or hinder the athlete who is blessed with great genetic
gifts - sometimes though the talent is " million dollar talent, 5 cent head... "
Some athletes are so completely out of control in their behavior away from the
sport that they cannot be successfully coached or managed to their own
disadvantage...in this way, genetics are truly out of our control. If you cannot
convince a talented person not to drug, drink excessively, or do other
destructive pursuits, then sooner or later they will be a bad headline and all
the talent on earth cannot save them from the inevitable.
The Phantom
aka Schaefer, CMT/RMT, competing powerlifter
Denver, Colorado, USA
Re: Genetics - out of our control?
Hi Ken,
That's a good point. Being as unathletic as I am - and having studied what fast
people do - I've found it very useful to model elite runners' kinematics and
kinetics. Fortunately enough research has been conducted to do that pretty well,
and teach sound mechanics based on that model.
To be frank, nothing amazes me any more in terms of the 'running technique' many
coaches try to teach. I worked in 6 collegiate athletic programs over the first
15 years of my journeyman/coaching career. All were D1, so you'd think the sport
coaches were competent in something so basic. The stories I could tell...
Disturbed regards,
Plisk
Excelsior Sports
Buffalo NY
Prepare To Be A Champion!
________________________________
Hi !
In a message dated 12/5/2011 12:22:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
ssp67047 (DOT) com writes: " I would propose that running is nontechnical only
in the sense that we don't teach sound mechanics to our youth. In my experience,
we need to. "
The argument still remains what those " teachable " mechanics really are.
Check out the following clip:
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=EAW87NsiGuI
This is Haille Gebrselassie He has two Olympic gold medals and four World
Championship titles at 10K, In the marathon, he won Berlin four times in a row,
and Dubai three straight years. He's raced and won at every distance from 800 on
up, and holds something like 61 Ethiopian National Records and 27 world records.
At 35, he set the world record in the marathon (Berlin) at 2:03.59. It still
holds as the Masters WR.
...
If coaches did not know who this was, how many do you suspect would point out
all kinds of technical flaws in his running stride?
You'd be amazed how many of my high school colleagues offer technical
corrections for this guy, not realizing that they're looking at arguably the
greatest distance runner of all time.
Ken Jakalski
Lisle High School
Lisle, Illinois USA
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest guest
Hi !
In a message dated 12/6/2011 12:19:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
deadliftdiva@... writes:
And I'm going to add one more thing those coaches would say about somebody
like Haile...
" OH If I had coached him EARLY, he'd be EVEN FASTER " ....sigh.
***
YES! That is so true! You've been around coaches long to know is
exactly what many of them would say.
Athletes are individuals and sometimes the tendency they adopt naturally
is the one best suited to them.
****
Charlie Francis noted this on more than one occasion throughout his career.
IMHO, a great coach is one who takes the natural athlete and enhances
rather than tries to break down the style that clearly belongs to that athlete.
(I sort of see a guy like Steve Prefontaine here... other coaches may have
made him want to quit running?)
Again, very accurate!
One can only imagine how many well intentioned folks approached Haile over
the years with the " I can make you FASTER " line...
.
Recently, I have heard of a coach in HS sport who was overtraining
baseball players to the extreme extent of tractor tire flipping and other
training
methods that frankly belong at a higher level and essentially telling
anybody who didn't want to constantly be injured or exhausted they could quit!
His argument was he had " created " stars previously at other schools...and so
everyone should do his program and this would cause success and all of
them would be D1 prospects! What happened of course is that some kids wisely
told their parents finally why they were too tired to eat and sleep
well...and the smart folks did switch sports...sigh. It's hard for a kid who
has
been in baseball since he was 5 years of age to switch, but this coach
convinced them that they would not be playing anything if they continued to do
his program! My guess was the natural athletes could endure a good deal of
the punishment and were perhaps some of the few left standing - but even they
woul d possibly be driven to give up the sport they loved?
So coaching can help or hinder the athlete who is blessed with great
genetic gifts - sometimes though the talent is " million dollar talent, 5 cent
head... " Some athletes are so completely out of control in their behavior
away from the sport that they cannot be successfully coached or managed to
their own disadvantage...in this way, genetics are truly out of our control.
If you cannot convince a talented person not to drug, drink excessively, or
do other destructive pursuits, then sooner or later they will be a bad
headline and all the talent on earth cannot save them from the inevitable.
I really enjoyed this post. By the way, my current crop of high school
athletes also refer to you as the " Deadlift Diva " That's something that has
just followed on as tradition over the years without my having to reinforce
it. When I put your insights on our bulletin board at school, they right
away know...it's the " Deadlift Diva. "
Regards,
Ken Jakalski
Lisle High School
Lisle, Illinois USA
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest guest
The following article is very enlightening in sorting out genetics vs training
in determination of muscle fiber type profile and individual. Any one
interested in this topic should read the original article
**************************
Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle.
JEAN-AIME SIMONEAU’ AND CLAUDE BOUCHARD
http://www.fasebj.org/content/9/11/1091.short
In conclusion, many studies have revealed that skeletal muscle fiber type
distribution is quite heterogeneous among human beings. It is still a matter of
debate whether these interindividual differences are genetically determined or
result from environmental influences. The results summarized in this paper and
displayed in Fig. 1 suggest that a fraction (about 15%) of the total variance in
the proportion
of type I muscle fibers in human is explained by the error component related to
muscle sampling and technical variance, that about 40% of the phenotype variance
is influenced by environmental factors, whereas the remaining part of the
variance (about 45%) is associated with inherited factors. If these estimates
are approximately correct, a difference of about 30% in type I fibers among
individuals could be explained exclusively by differences in the local
environment and level of muscular contractile activity. However, unidentified
genetic factors would have to be invoked to account for the observation that the
skeletal muscle of about 25% of the North American Caucasian population have
either less than 35% or more than 65% of type I fibers.
.. Ralph Giarnella MD
Southington Ct. USAÂ
________________________________
From: Ralph Giarnella <ragiarn@...>
" Supertraining " <Supertraining >
Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Genetics - out of our control?
Â
I have always found the differences between east africans and west africans
rather intriguing. Â When we talk about west africans are we looking and african
americans who are descendants of slaves brought  over as slaves or actual west
africans living n west africa now? Â
Ralph Giarnella MD
Southington Ct. USAÂ
________________________________
From: ambyburf <amby.burfoot@...>
Supertraining
Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Genetics - out of our control?
Â
What is interesting here ...
> 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were
of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains
the only one to do it.
.... is that the exact opposite is true for East Africans and distance running.
The East Africans totally dominate. Also, East Africans can't sprint, and West
Africans can't run distance (huge generalities, but mostly true).
Since running is a nontechnical sport learned in early childhood by all
able-bodies humans in all parts of the globe, these East vs West African
differences are somewhat removed from the usual cultural or environmental
influences that affect basketball, skiing, swimming, power lifting, tennis,
golf, and the like. To me, this makes running a good crucible for the testing of
the genetics-performance hypothesis.
The results of this " test " are quite astonishing. Not perfect or proven by any
means. But mathematically astonishing.
Amby Burfoot
Runner's World
Emmaus PA 18049
>
> Since the topis was expanded on, here a few tidbits:
>
> 1. 72% of NBA players are Afro-Americans.
> 2. 25% of all Noble Prize winners were/are Jewish.
> 3. Chess: since the formation of the FIDE in 1886 Jews have held the title
about 55% of the time.
> 4. Of the 80 sprinters to have broken the 10 second barrier, nearly all were
of west African descent. The first white runner broke it in 2010 and he remains
the only one to do it.
> 5. Why do blacks rarely appear in Olympic swimming finals and why do they
hardly ever win medals?
>
> I realize that I have brought up a very controversial issue but it is related,
at least partially, to genetics. Yes, there are cultural and nurturing
explanations (as well as socio-economic) but is there not a genetic elemant to
consider?
>
> I know that I have diverged from the original topic but my point is that
surely genetics must play at least a partial role in explaining these facts. And
I am not convinced how genetics can be modified in the short run (not over the
evolutionary process).
>
> Yehoshua Zohar
> Karmiel, Israel
>
>
Link to comment
Share on other sites