Guest guest Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 I played hockey ( recreation ) in the 50s and 60s. The advent of helmets for players and face masks for goalies came about in the mid 60s. Concussions I believe was the driving force. The NHL lead the way. At first the veteran players were exempt from using helmets whereas the rookies had to wear them. The use of helmets by the pros prompted the change in high schools and youth hockey. It became cool to wear a helmet. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Jerry Telle <JRTELLE@...> Supertraining Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 7:18:02 PM Subject: Re: Re: What we can do to prevent concussions? I wonder what the impact curves are with the extra outer layer of padding. I wore a helmut like this in the early mid 60's in college -- after getting a severe concussion in high school. There would have to be enough motivation to get players to try these. Naturally it will eventually boil down to money -- that is players getting hurt when state of the art equipment is available, or insurance rates or??? How long did it take hockey players to adopt helmuts -- and why Jerry " the dork " Telle Centennial CO USA On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:05 AM, CoachJ1@... wrote: > As with the ProCAP, players won't wear it. That was a key in Fusfeld's > article: " Would NFL Players Risk Looking Like Dorks For Better Head > Protection? " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 About twenty five years ago another company introduced a totally different kind of football head and neck protection. It was a solid piece helmet and shoulder pads designed for the player's head to move independently within the exoskeleton-like shell. Obviously, nobody was interested in this design at any level of football. There were two major concerns. First, there were issues with player visibility because of the limited view of the helmet " window. " To look back for a ball, the player would have to turn his entire upper body. Second, the fear was that the player would be more inclined to use his body as a weapon. Many jumped on Joe Paterno when he suggested that removing the face cages would reduce injury, but I've heard this similar position put forth by an orthopedic surgeon several years before Joe's comments. Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 For more info on concussions here are two articles in today's papers: The first is concerning a Boston Bruins hockey player plus general info on concussions from the Mayo clinic. http://slapshot.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/concussion-ends-savards-season/?utm\ _source=feedburner & utm_medium=feed & utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nyt%2Frss%2FSports+(NYT+\ %3E+Sports) The second is concerning helmets in skiing and snow boarding: http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/649803.html Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: Jerry Telle <JRTELLE@...> Supertraining Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 7:18:02 PM Subject: Re: Re: What we can do to prevent concussions? I wonder what the impact curves are with the extra outer layer of padding. I wore a helmut like this in the early mid 60's in college -- after getting a severe concussion in high school. There would have to be enough motivation to get players to try these. Naturally it will eventually boil down to money -- that is players getting hurt when state of the art equipment is available, or insurance rates or??? How long did it take hockey players to adopt helmuts -- and why Jerry " the dork " Telle Centennial CO USA On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:05 AM, CoachJ1@... wrote: > As with the ProCAP, players won't wear it. That was a key in Fusfeld's > article: " Would NFL Players Risk Looking Like Dorks For Better Head > Protection? " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2011 Report Share Posted February 13, 2011 I do not see a trickle down as much as a trickle up. Many colleges and high schools are above the curve with the programs that have been implemented. It is just that now with the NFL and now NHL (though the NHL were big on this a decade ago) paying more attention the work done at lower levels is becoming validated. Education with coaches, staff, administration, athletes and parents as well as education of our sports medicine staffs. Our basic understanding of what a concussion truly is. Less to the injury and more to the process the brain goes thru to heal. All of our athletes go thru neurocognitive testing. We use Impact Software developed by Docs at the University of Pittsburg. We have a set policy on return to participation that is under our team physician. Unless he gives the okay for an activity from light bike work to lifting all the way to full go, our athletes do not participate. We have a progression of activity and retesting until the person not only exhibits no symptoms but also baseling neurocognitive testing is back to normal. As for the addition of the shell over the top of helmets. I had many athletes use one. It was not a thought of not looking cool.... but they did not prevent the issues that led to their concussions. Leading with their own heads.... or taking a shot to the chin or side of the head.  The most serious concussions I have seen involved the athlete falling backwards and having the head slam into the ground. I am not sure how to ever stop this one from occuring. Maybe instead of a round helmet we go with a softer ound shell over a frame designed more like the front of a goalie mask to deflect forces. We can teach technique to avoid some concussions from happening. We can modify rules of the game- head shots modify equipment - hardness of soccer balls in youth (not sure on this as have not seen proof it works)          look at weight of helmets and design play individual sports in large bubbles Terry Aurora, IL  ________________________________ From: Ralph Giarnella <ragiarn@...> Supertraining Sent: Sun, February 13, 2011 4:25:06 AM Subject: Re: What we can do to prevent concussions?  I believe that what is beginning to happen in the NFL re: concussions will definitely have a trickle down effect. As th NFL takes concussions and prevention of concussions seriously the colleges and high schools will also follow their lead. The fines being levied on players in the NFL who use their helmets for tackling and in particular helmet to helmet tackles are already having their impact. The ongoing study of brain damage in retired NFL players is opening a lot of eyes. It is one thing to go through the rest of your life with a broken knee but going through life with a broken brain is an unacceptable risk. Thanks to the MRIs MRAs and PET scans we are now getting a better look at the real and lasting damage done to brains by even one concussion. Surgery can fix or replace a broken knee or hip but not a brain. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct. USA ________________________________ From: casey gallagher <gallagher2201@...> Supertraining Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 8:33:06 PM Subject: Re: What we can do to prevent concussions? When I coached high school wrestling I was essentially the athletic trainer, S & C coach as well as the assistant. During my time we had two wrestlers suffer concussions. One I didn't catch until we were at a tournament and he looked terrible his first match. After his match I talked to him and observed he was showing signs of a concussion. I pulled him from the tournament and didn't allow him to participate until he got a doctor's clearance. It still bothers me that I didn't notice this wrestler's symptoms sooner - he had a rather innocuous landing from a take down during practice - and this was over 10 years ago. The second wrestler's concussion was much more obvious and easy to spot since it was a very hard fall from a match and he was able to see the damage to his brain from an x-ray. I think that coaches and young players get caught up in the emotion of the game/match and there becomes this " win at all costs " mentality. We always told our wrestlers that we didn't care about the wins or losses but we knew they did. When a coach can teach by their actions - by actions I mean that a coach shows that the athlete's health is more important than the competition by doing things like sitting a player who might even be suspected of having a concussion - that there is more to the game than the win and there is more to life than the game their players might be less willing to hide or mask a serious injury like a concussion. Any law written to protect the health and well being of a young athlete would be supported by me. When a concussion is suspected, I would always err on the side of caution for the sake of the athlete. Such a law would also help to remove some of the brow beating by over zealous parents since the state or athletic association would require a doctor's release. , I couldn't agree more that a fundamental philosophical shift needs to occur at the youth and high school levels to protect young people better. Casey Gallagher CSCS Snohomish, WA USA Re: What we can do to prevent concussions? In a message dated 2/11/2011 2:53:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Giovanni.Ciriani@...<mailto:Giovanni.Ciriani%40Gmail.com> writes: .. If the head hits a rigid object (ground, another body etc.) at a certain speed, the internal damage to the brain will be the same, no matter how strong neck or shoulder muscles are. Consider the ProCap concept for football: Adam Fusfeld wrote the following in his article:: " Would NFL Players Risk Looking Like Dorks For Better Head Protection " " Two years before the season of the concussion, designer Bert Straus invented a _football_ ( http://www.businessinsider.com/would-nfl-players-risk-looking-like-dorks-for-bet\ ter-head-protection-2010-12#<http://www.businessinsider.com/would-nfl-players-ri\ sk-looking-like-dorks-for-better-head-protection-2010-12#> ) helmet designed to prevent concussions, called the Gladiator, that features an extra layer of foam on top of the hard plastic. Straus claims the exterior layer of foam would absorb violent hits better, and significantly reduce concussions. The concept is reminiscent of the ProCap design that a handful of players sported in the early 90s. Though anecdotal evidence suggests the helmet was successful in limiting concussions, it never caught on. The Gladiator aims for a more aesthetically pleasing design, but it's just marginally better. Which is exactly why it's unlikely to catch on in the NFL. While lineman are often willing to ditch form for function, skill position players – the ones most likely to get jarred by a vicious blow to the head – are not. They would probably claim the bigger helmets limit their speed to avoid having to wear it. There's also the toughness factor. The same NFL doctrine that mandates players play without sleeves in the snow, immediately pop up after getting hit, and play through the injuries that result from those hits, would prevent them from donning a helmet that looks like it comes from outer space in the name of protection. That points back to the problems with the concussion discussion as a whole. While onlookers want as safe a playing field as possible, players don't seem to care. They step on the field well aware of the dangers – that's why they occasionally compare themselves to soldiers– and willingly subscribe to the league wide dogma that every play could be their last. " Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, Illinois USA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.