Guest guest Posted January 7, 2010 Report Share Posted January 7, 2010 The below extracts may be of interest: Taken from www.newscientist.com FITNESS FADS DOES an activity have to get you out of breath to count as exercise? Do you really have to do half-an-hour a day? Is pumping iron a good way to keep your heart healthy? These are just some of the dilemmas many of us face when working out the best way to get fit. The good news is scientists do broadly agree on the best ways to get fit, they just haven't been very good at telling us what they've discovered. " We haven't done a great job of distilling down a large number of studies and say what this means for the average person who's trying to get in shape, " acknowledges Simon Marshall, a specialist in exercise and sports psychology at San Diego State University in California. Whether because of a lack of information, or because some of us are just plain lazy, most of us don't do enough exercise. One recent survey in the UK found that only a third of adults meet the recommended goals for physical activity. Though we all know that exercise is a good thing, only recently was the extent of its influence on our health established. In the early 20th century, heart attacks were growing steadily more common in the west, and they were seen as a sinister new epidemic. It is now thought there are several explanations for this, ranging from a fall in infectious diseases enabling heart attacks to take the lead, to various changes in society that made lifestyles less healthy. A key insight into the importance of lifestyle came from a 1953 study of London bus conductors. At the time, London buses not only had a driver but also a conductor, who sold tickets to passengers after they had boarded and sat down. Most of the buses were double-deckers, so the conductors spent a lot of their day walking up and down the stairs. The landmark study published in The Lancet (vol 262, p 1053) showed that conductors suffered half as many heart attacks as their driver colleagues. " It was the first hint that this new frightening epidemic could be linked to the way we live, " said Jerry , at the time an epidemiologist at the UK's Medical Research Council, who led the study. Since 's study, hundreds of other investigations have confirmed the benefits of exercise on the heart and circulation, as well as on almost every other system of the body. Diseases that are prevented by exercise include stroke, cancer, diabetes, liver and kidney disease, osteoporosis and even brain diseases such as dementia and depression. What counts as exercise? The standard advice is we should aim for 150 minutes a week of moderate-intensity exercise. The tricky question here is what " moderate " means. Gauging the intensity of an activity by measuring how fast it makes your heart beat is old hat. These days, metabolic rate is the preferred measure. It is usually represented in units known as the metabolic equivalent, or MET. This is the metabolic rate during the activity in question divided by the rate when sitting doing nothing. Moderate exercise is defined as anything that clocks up between 3 and 6 METs (see chart). How much, and how often? Half-an-hour of moderate-intensity exercise at least five days a week used to be the required regime to keep fit. Now the consensus is that exercise doesn't have to be portioned out in daily doses. If you aim for 150 minutes per week you can divide it up however you like. That has to be good news for those of us who find it difficult to fit regular exercise into the daily schedule. So, if you can manage a one-hour hike and an hour of some energetic sport at the weekend, you only have to find time for another half-hour bout during the working week. " There's not compelling evidence that 150 minutes across five days is any better than across three or four, " says Simon Marshall of San Diego State University. Another hot question in sports science is what is the shortest period of exercise that is worth doing. The latest evidence suggests that three lots of 10 minutes, for example, are just as good as one continuous 30-minute bout (Sports Medicine, vol 39, p 29). Is pumping iron really necessary? Several studies have suggested a link between muscle strength and living longer, but for a long time it was unclear whether other factors were confusing the picture. People who are muscular are more likely to be thin, aerobically fit and generally healthy - all features known to extend lifespan. In the past few years, however, some large, well-designed studies have settled the question. One study, published in 2008, measured the muscle strength of almost 9000 American men and followed their health for 20 years. The death rates among those whose muscle strength was in the bottom third for their age group was around 30 per cent higher than for the other two-thirds (BMJ, vol 337, a439). That link remained even after the results had been adjusted to take account of the effects of aerobic fitness. " The bottom line is that both strength and aerobic fitness make independent contributions to health, " says Steve Blair, one of the study's co-authors, based at University of South Carolina's Arnold School of Public Health, who helped write the US national guidelines on exercise. ================== Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.