Re: More Matrix Training Questions

[Guest guest]

Ken,

This is a worthwhile example of what I am referring to. The latter half of

your response was a good read and your points valid, as most of your

insights are. What I, and I'm sure others find frustrating is your

condescension. Why the need to talk down with regards to UC Berkeley's

standards, and my critque of you being somehow reflective of the

University as a whole? And based on this continued need to talk down to

others I can tell from personal experience that the Berkeley specialty of

producing self-important intellectuals is one standard that apparently has

not changed.

As I said, you provide great insights to this group from your years of

experience and they are much appreciated. If you could simply answer

people's questions I am sure everyone here would be much appreciative. I

have no intention of having a war of words and this will be my last post

on this issue. Again thanks for you insights on the old-school, esoteric

of the training spectrum as well as bringing up new outside the box

approaches, JC Santana's Metabolic Protocols being one that comes to mind.

Best,

Jay

[Mod: Please don't forget to sign your posts with your full name, city and

country of residence - thanks]

> J:

>

> I don't generally respond to persons who hide their identity. But since

> your email suggests you're with UC Berkeley, I can only surmise the

> university's standards have diminished in the nearly forty years since I

> was there.

>

> People should ask honest questions in search of truthful answers. Educated

> persons should also have come away from their university experience with a

> sense of doing indepth research prior to coming to premature conclusions.

> 's published the best part of a thousand pages regarding Matrix over

> half a dozen or more books in the past 18 years. Cursory review of those

> texts would indicate that Matrix is far more complex and rests on rather

> comprehensive research and experimentation than indicated by a short

> introductory text on a commercial website. Getting all panicked over such

> a short text on a website including all of his titles over the years just

> doesn't seem to meet the test of competence - unless we're to succumb to

> the standards of irresponsible journalism!

>

> best

>

> Ken O'Neill

> Austin, TX

>

>

>

>>

>> Ken,

>>

>> With all due respect cut the arrogance and bloviating. People are asking

>> honest questions in search of further knowledge, your responses are

>> often

>> shrouded in condescension. Also, you continually seem to suggest that

>> " paradigms " blind many of those participating in this forum, yet by

>> Steve

>> even asking a question he is exercising skepticism and avoiding

>> groupthink

>> and your evil paradigms.

>>

>> _J

>> [Mod: Please don't forget to sign your posts with your full name, city

>> and country of residence - thanks]

>>

>

>

>