Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 In a message dated 8/30/2005 3:50:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, elizdelphi@... writes: I believe that everyone ought to be allowed their own values and> belief systems without persecution from others...when they are in> their own homes. When people circulate in a society that encompasses >> many different value systems, then there needs to be a baseline> moral and ethical code that allows people to have a REASONABLE> degree of freedom without any negative effects on others. Actually Tom wrote this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 In a message dated 8/30/2005 3:50:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, elizdelphi@... writes: I believe that everyone ought to be allowed their own values and> belief systems without persecution from others...when they are in> their own homes. When people circulate in a society that encompasses >> many different value systems, then there needs to be a baseline> moral and ethical code that allows people to have a REASONABLE> degree of freedom without any negative effects on others. Actually Tom wrote this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 > to : "I'm a Christian, and to those of us who are religious, what you are suggesting is profoundly disturbing and wrong. And whether one is religious or not, what you are proposing is totalitarian and goes far beyond any reasonable interest of republican civil government."I agree with and ask you at this time to stop this discussion. I certainly will not be a part of it. Rainbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 > to : "I'm a Christian, and to those of us who are religious, what you are suggesting is profoundly disturbing and wrong. And whether one is religious or not, what you are proposing is totalitarian and goes far beyond any reasonable interest of republican civil government."I agree with and ask you at this time to stop this discussion. I certainly will not be a part of it. Rainbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Actually , this was MY quote. It was meant to say that, in my opinion, people are welcome to do anything they want in their own homes, but some sense of social order must be maintained outside of homes since a society is only a society long as it can stay in peace with itself. Such a social order would be based upon a system of tolerance, but one that eliminates any sort of infringement upon one another. Because this system is technically an impossibility, it would have to be fluid and flexible. While groups like the ACLU can be instrumental in ensuring personal freedoms within society, I personally do feel that they have in some cases reached into over-stridency. As I have said, I think the ACLU started off on the premise that all people could conduct themselves reasonabley without infringing on the rights of others, but I don't think that works in practice given human nature. Tom I believe that everyone ought to be allowed their own values and belief systems without persecution from others...when they are in their own homes. When people circulate in a society that encompasses > many different value systems, then there needs to be a baseline moral and ethical code that allows people to have a REASONABLE degree of freedom without any negative effects on others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Actually , this was MY quote. It was meant to say that, in my opinion, people are welcome to do anything they want in their own homes, but some sense of social order must be maintained outside of homes since a society is only a society long as it can stay in peace with itself. Such a social order would be based upon a system of tolerance, but one that eliminates any sort of infringement upon one another. Because this system is technically an impossibility, it would have to be fluid and flexible. While groups like the ACLU can be instrumental in ensuring personal freedoms within society, I personally do feel that they have in some cases reached into over-stridency. As I have said, I think the ACLU started off on the premise that all people could conduct themselves reasonabley without infringing on the rights of others, but I don't think that works in practice given human nature. Tom I believe that everyone ought to be allowed their own values and belief systems without persecution from others...when they are in their own homes. When people circulate in a society that encompasses > many different value systems, then there needs to be a baseline moral and ethical code that allows people to have a REASONABLE degree of freedom without any negative effects on others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Your voices have been heard. We well temporarily end this line of discussion. Although at the time of this writing, many of you may youselves not see this post until after you've posted your replies. Once you all see this post, please discontinue this line of discussion for the time being. Tom > to : " I'm a Christian, and to those of us who are religious, what you are suggesting is profoundly disturbing and wrong. And whether one is religious or not, what you are proposing is totalitarian and goes far beyond any reasonable interest of republican civil government. " I agree with and ask you at this time to stop this discussion. I certainly will not be a part of it. Rainbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Your voices have been heard. We well temporarily end this line of discussion. Although at the time of this writing, many of you may youselves not see this post until after you've posted your replies. Once you all see this post, please discontinue this line of discussion for the time being. Tom > to : " I'm a Christian, and to those of us who are religious, what you are suggesting is profoundly disturbing and wrong. And whether one is religious or not, what you are proposing is totalitarian and goes far beyond any reasonable interest of republican civil government. " I agree with and ask you at this time to stop this discussion. I certainly will not be a part of it. Rainbow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Sorry , Tom, and all, I need to settle down and go do something else for a while. :-) wrote: > I believe that everyone ought to be allowed their own values and > belief systems without persecution from others...when they are in > their own homes. When people circulate in a society that encompasses > > many different value systems, then there needs to be a baseline > moral and ethical code that allows people to have a REASONABLE > degree of freedom without any negative effects on others. Actually Tom wrote this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 Sorry , Tom, and all, I need to settle down and go do something else for a while. :-) wrote: > I believe that everyone ought to be allowed their own values and > belief systems without persecution from others...when they are in > their own homes. When people circulate in a society that encompasses > > many different value systems, then there needs to be a baseline > moral and ethical code that allows people to have a REASONABLE > degree of freedom without any negative effects on others. Actually Tom wrote this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2007 Report Share Posted July 30, 2007 This is a topic that I've wondered about on and off for years now and just have never really looked into. A cursory look on the internet isn't helping much. Does anyone, perhaps one of you lawyers out there, have any idea what the ACLU's done regarding mandatory vaccinations, or the damage that they've caused? Anything at all? It seems to me that if ever a group of people have had their civil liberties stripped from them, it is the parents of vaccine damaged children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.