Guest guest Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 It always amazes me (even among the anti-mercury parents) when they say that they "are not against vaccination......."It is not just about the toxins -- the viruses themselves are toxic as they have been manipulated in labs and are not the true virus which I had as a child or even a naturally mutated version. Finally, injecting these into a baby whose immune system is being developed -- hopefully with the help of mommy -- is too much for them to handle -- not discounting the damage that the mercury is doing as well.Roxblessingsx10@... wrote: This was the last line in the NY times story. Why on earth would the Plaintiffs atty add this remark? What is he doing; trying to play in the hands of Vaccine manufactures? Bad move in my book. Even the plaintiffs’ lead attorney acknowledged that mass immunization programs are “a great public benefit†that have prevented tens of thousands of deaths and serious injuries. Those who shun a vaccine are at far greater risk than those who take it. See what's free at AOL.com. Sick sense of humor? Visit TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.