[SPAM?] Re: Now it's boozing moms that cause autism

[Guest guest]

Trying to endear yourself to us now, eh, Bones?

[sPAM?] Re: Now it's boozing moms that cause autism

My father had a '71 Malibu with those...and one in the center, above the hump. We also had a smoking room in high school for the seniors.> > > When I was pregnant with my daughter and just moved to Indiana, the> > > doctor I was referred to by the women my husband worked with , smoked> > > in the office. An OB-GYN smoking around pregnant women. That was in> > > 1994... BTW, I never went back and found another one on my own.> > >> > > > > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Great rationale and discussion from Kendra.

The HepB mandates were actually even more insidious than a crass profiteering scheme.

A form of medical fascism, the HepB mandates tied to the electronic tracking system were designed to force medical care on the unsuspecting and track all individuals who had the audacity to try to "opt out" of the system.

The scheme collapsed because all of the damage done.

[sPAM?] Re: Now it's boozing moms that cause autism

No, it is mandated even if the mother tests negative. It is mandated because they tried reaching high risk individuals and those darn people just didn't seem to care and come in for their vaccinations. So they mandated it for newborns, knowing it was probably not affective beyond 5 to 10 years after vaccination. They mandated it for newborns despite never being tested on anyone under the age of 12. They mandated a vaccine for a liver disease to infants despite their livers not even functioning fully before 6 months old and their inability to excrete or produce bile. So it is inappropriate for innocent infants, never tested on babies, won't last until the age of risk, and the short term and long term affects totally unknown. Less than 2% of those infected with Hep B have the chronic or life-altering affects, most recover and have immunity for life. The year before the shot was mandated, 52 children in the entire U.S. were diagnosed with Hep B. Compare that to the number that have died from the vaccine. The Hep B is the most glaring example of why profits take precedence over logic. The risks far outweigh the benefits.You say, "I will take the shot" well you can have it. I and my child will never ever take the shot, or any other for that matter.You claim reactions are associated without proof that the vaccine caused the reaction, but you will see in the VAERS reports, an innocent baby dead less than 24 hours after a vaccine or many vaccines in one visit. SIDS is listed as the cause of death, despite that being supposedly reserved for deaths without any logical explanation. Apparently being shot up with 9 vaccines in one visit is not a logical or plausible explanation. There is no proof and by God they certainly aren't going to make any effort to prove it one way or another.I'm always amazed that three cases of mumps is international news, a "preventable crisis", and any death from measles or any other disease for which there is a vaccine is a "preventable tragedy" that many in this country would not object to the parents being hung in the town square. But even baby's deaths proven and admitted to be caused by vaccines do not make the nightly news in the town it happened let alone nation wide. If the number of deaths were ever made public it would drastically affect immunization rates. The scene on the nightly news of a mother draped over the body of her dead baby from vaccines would go far in making parents educate before they vaccinate. Imagine a doctor telling you after your child had a life-threatening reaction, "well we can continue them one at a time since we don't know exactly what one caused the reaction". Oh perfect, like Russian Roulette, we can do one at a time until we find the one that finishes her off. Or imagine being told that your dead child was a "necessary sacrifice in the war on disease, some have to pay the ultimate price". So you can have the shot. I am a conscientious objector. They can never be trusted ever again. The lies, the deceit, the cover ups, the secrecy, the refusal to treat people as individuals, those making the decisions that affect the health and lives of our children sleeping in the beds of big pharma. If you want to trust them, have at it. If you want the shot, you are welcome to it. But, I have the same right to just say NO. And to do it without your judgement or ill-informed sermons.I am one of those that makes no 'bones' about it, I am anti-vaccine and I have earned that right. I don't care about political correctness or being painted as a fringe whacko by vaccine zealots. One day the truth will come out, that vaccines are the worst thing to ever happen to the human race. Death and destruction all in the name of altruism, the good of the herd. Kendra> > > >> > > > I would respectfully suggest those discussing whether the > intake > > > of alcohol > > > > or smoking during pregnancy contributed to the "autism > epidemic", > > > read these > > > > two articles that were posted this morning. While they > relate > > > to SIDS, they > > > > are, none-the-less, applicable to autism.> > > > > > > > "SIDS" is a deadly, medical mystery, that occurs too > frequently > > > in countries > > > > that practice "every child by two" vaccine policies. Indeed, > has > > > ANYONE > > > > done research that would compare the rate of SIDS with > > > undeveloped, less > > > > vaccinated countries? > > > > > > > > Bones, do you know of such research and can you educate me on > > > where the > > > > United States is ranked for "infant mortality"? I think I > read > > > we rank somewhere > > > > around 36th? That simply cannot be, as we are the most > > > vaccinated country > > > > in the world. No?> > > > > > > > In any event, yes, drinking alcohol and smoking during > pregnancy > > > is > > > > obviously harmful to the fetus, but, the alcohol and smoke > must > > > first breach the > > > > digestive system and lungs. Both are "mother nature's" (God > to > > > those of us who > > > > believe) natural defenses against viruses, bacteria's and the > > > caveman's > > > > discovery of fire. > > > > > > > > What about the HEP B vaccine, injected directly into the > baby's > > > immune > > > > system, within hours of birth? > > > > > > > > Bones? Do you know of any research that suggests injecting > the > > > HEP B virus > > > > directly into a newborn infant is less dangerous than > drinking > > > alcohol and > > > > smoking during pregnancy?> > > > > > > > After all, according to a 2003 UPI report, the CDC files > > > contained 32,731 > > > > reports of possible reactions following HEP B vaccinations > since > > > 1991, > > > > including 10,915 emergency room visits, 685 life-threatening > > > reactions, 3,700 > > > > hospitalizations, 1,200 disabilities and 618 deaths. > Jeepers, > > > Bones, even you would > > > > not mandate a car-seat for kids that had a safety record like > > > this.> > > > > > > > Read and consider the ramifications for everyone one of us: > > > > > > > > > > > > _http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/features/30630/what-> > > killed-sally-clar> > > > ks-child.thtml_ > > > > (http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/features/30630/what-> > > killed-sally-clarks-child.thtml) > > > > > > > > _Sally jury told to ignore vaccine evidence linked to > > > death ..._ > > > > (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?> > > in_articl> > > > e_id=455561 & in_page_id=1770) > > > > Daily Mail - UK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************** See what's free at > > > http://www.aol.com.> > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

> > > > When I was pregnant with my daughter and just moved to

> Indiana, the

> > > > doctor I was referred to by the women my husband worked

with ,

> smoked

> > > > in the office. An OB-GYN smoking around pregnant women.

That

> was in

> > > > 1994... BTW, I never went back and found another one on my

own.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>