Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Gardasil legislation is coming your way.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I have actually already read an article or two that says it will be recommended for boys. Furthermore-this is about as scary as it can get. It seems to me that it will have much difficulty passing in NJ(having lived there for many years) and also in Ca. Although one can never be guaranteed anything. And we have Holly in Pa-------------. This is all such a nighmare to me. Gilmore <yogilmore@...> wrote: Our friends at Merck, the guys who brought us Vioxx, are

trying to get Gardsil added to the mandatory schedule in the states. Bills have been introduced in California, Ohio and Pennsylvania so far. Their first attmept to force this on America's girls went down to a surprising defeat in Michigan where a coalition of Republicans and Democrats defeated this attmempt to turn every girl in America into a guinea pig.A pharma front group called Women in Government are leading the charge on this. (Check out their funders http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/support_sponsors.asp)They are trying to market this as some sort of great leap forward for women, kinda like Virginia Slims I guess. There immediate past president lead the charge in Michigan.You gotta wonder when they'll start trying to get boys to take it as well.

Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Search weather shortcut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in high school we used to call Virginia Slims

Vagina slimes ironic, I think not.

>

> A pharma front group called Women in Government are leading the

charge

> on this. (Check out their funders

> http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/support_sponsors.asp)

> They are trying to market this as some sort of great leap forward for

> women, kinda like Virginia Slims I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add Minnesota to that list, courtesy of Fox 9 News tonight and the

well-intentioned but underinformed Sen. Prettner Solon.

http://www.apria.com/resources/1,2725,494-581818,00.html

At least the TV news report mentioned that people can opt out, though

the story had stated that the vaccine would be " required. "

- Hokkanen

>

> Our friends at Merck, the guys who brought us Vioxx, are trying to

get

> Gardsil added to the mandatory schedule in the states. Bills have

been

> introduced in California, Ohio and Pennsylvania so far. Their first

> attmept to force this on America's girls went down to a surprising

> defeat in Michigan where a coalition of Republicans and Democrats

> defeated this attmempt to turn every girl in America into a guinea

pig.

>

> A pharma front group called Women in Government are leading the

charge

> on this. (Check out their funders

> http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/support_sponsors.asp)

> They are trying to market this as some sort of great leap forward

for

> women, kinda like Virginia Slims I guess. There immediate past

> president lead the charge in Michigan.

>

> You gotta wonder when they'll start trying to get boys to take it

as

> well.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast

> with the Search weather shortcut.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is one we need to fight. The ink in barely dry on the

rubber stamp given this by the FDA and the CDC and they want to give

it to every girl and woman in America. They have lost already in

Michigan and opposition is brewing elsewhere from all kinds of

perspectives. And it is a great way to educate legislators on the

corruption of the vaccine review and approval process at the federal

level.

This shot is really expensive, $360 for the full course and the

states will have to pick up the tab on a lot of this. They would

probably get a much greater level of protection if they used that

money to promote timely pap smears.

> >

> > Our friends at Merck, the guys who brought us Vioxx, are trying

to

> get

> > Gardsil added to the mandatory schedule in the states. Bills

have

> been

> > introduced in California, Ohio and Pennsylvania so far. Their

first

> > attmept to force this on America's girls went down to a

surprising

> > defeat in Michigan where a coalition of Republicans and

Democrats

> > defeated this attmempt to turn every girl in America into a

guinea

> pig.

> >

> > A pharma front group called Women in Government are leading the

> charge

> > on this. (Check out their funders

> > http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/support_sponsors.asp)

> > They are trying to market this as some sort of great leap

forward

> for

> > women, kinda like Virginia Slims I guess. There immediate past

> > president lead the charge in Michigan.

> >

> > You gotta wonder when they'll start trying to get boys to take

it

> as

> > well.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ---------------------------------

> > Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast

> > with the Search weather shortcut.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree .

I posted this a few days ago. It was from a cnn-money.com artcile

about a new system for doctors to ask each other questions on line.

Gradasil is approved for girls as young as 3!

Merck is saying their researh is shows Gardasil is effective for

about 5 years!! However, research into that continues.

So, will they be resommend a Gardasil booster. What health problems,

issues will that bring?

Add that to the already growing lists of concerns.

" Doctors pitch questions and test theories, and anonymity is

protected. .A physician going by the moniker docDecaf wanted to know

what other doctors thought about inoculating girls with Merck's (up

$0.10 to $44.75, Charts) Gardasil, a newly-approved vaccine for a

sexually-transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, in patients

as young as three.

The purpose of inoculating at a young age is to make sure the girls

are protected long before they become sexually active. The FDA has

approved the vaccine for girls as young as nine. But another doctor

wrote into Sermo, saying that three years is too young because the

vaccine's protection is believed to last 10 years, so its potency

would run out before most girls become sexually active.

(Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore said Gardasil's duration has been

tested out to five years and studies are continuing) "

> > >

> > > Our friends at Merck, the guys who brought us Vioxx, are trying

> to

> > get

> > > Gardsil added to the mandatory schedule in the states. Bills

> have

> > been

> > > introduced in California, Ohio and Pennsylvania so far. Their

> first

> > > attmept to force this on America's girls went down to a

> surprising

> > > defeat in Michigan where a coalition of Republicans and

> Democrats

> > > defeated this attmempt to turn every girl in America into a

> guinea

> > pig.

> > >

> > > A pharma front group called Women in Government are leading the

> > charge

> > > on this. (Check out their funders

> > > http://www.womeningovernment.org/home/support_sponsors.asp)

> > > They are trying to market this as some sort of great leap

> forward

> > for

> > > women, kinda like Virginia Slims I guess. There immediate past

> > > president lead the charge in Michigan.

> > >

> > > You gotta wonder when they'll start trying to get boys to take

> it

> > as

> > > well.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ---------------------------------

> > > Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast

> > > with the Search weather shortcut.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

South Dakota To Provide HPV Vaccine Gardasil At No Cost To Girls,

Women Ages 11 To 18

Main Category: Women's Health / OBGYN News

Article Date: 12 Jan 2007 - 3:00 PST

South Dakota Gov. Mike Rounds ® on Monday said the state will

provide Merck's human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil at no cost to

girls and women ages 11 to 18, the AP/Yankton Press & Dakotan reports

(Brokaw, AP/Yankton Press & Dakotan, 1/8). Gardasil in clinical trials

has been shown to be 100% effective in preventing infection with HPV

strains 16 and 18, which together cause about 70% of cervical cancer

cases. FDA in July 2006 approved the vaccine for sale and marketing to

girls and women ages nine to 26, and CDC's Advisory Committee on

Immunization Practices later that month voted unanimously to recommend

that girls ages 11 and 12 receive the vaccine (Kaiser Daily Women's

Health Policy Report,1/9). The South Dakota Department of Health plans

to purchase the vaccine using $1.7 million in state funds and $7.5

million in federal funds, state Health Secretary Doneen Hollingsworth

said. State officials aim to provide Gardasil to physician offices and

health department clinics by Jan. 22 for the roughly 44,000 girls in

the state eligible to receive the vaccine, according to Hollingsworth.

Physicians will be permitted to charge a fee for administering

Gardasil but only to those who can afford it, the AP/Press & Dakotan

reports. Hollingsworth said the voluntary vaccination program likely

will focus on girls ages 11 and 12 in future years, adding that South

Dakota will be the second state, after New Hampshire, to make the

vaccine available at no cost (AP/Yankton Press & Dakotan, 1/8).

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=60509

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note voluntary.

Can't argue with that.

Information provided must be adequate to allow an informed choice.

Re: Gardasil legislation is coming your way.

South Dakota To Provide HPV Vaccine Gardasil At No Cost To Girls,Women Ages 11 To 18Main Category: Women's Health / OBGYN NewsArticle Date: 12 Jan 2007 - 3:00 PSTSouth Dakota Gov. Mike Rounds ® on Monday said the state willprovide Merck's human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil at no cost togirls and women ages 11 to 18, the AP/Yankton Press & Dakotan reports(Brokaw, AP/Yankton Press & Dakotan, 1/8). Gardasil in clinical trialshas been shown to be 100% effective in preventing infection with HPVstrains 16 and 18, which together cause about 70% of cervical cancercases. FDA in July 2006 approved the vaccine for sale and marketing togirls and women ages nine to 26, and CDC's Advisory Committee onImmunization Practices later that month voted unanimously to recommendthat girls ages 11 and 12 receive the vaccine (Kaiser Daily Women'sHealth Policy Report,1/9). The South Dakota Department of Health plansto purchase the vaccine using $1.7 million in state funds and $7.5million in federal funds, state Health Secretary Doneen Hollingsworthsaid. State officials aim to provide Gardasil to physician offices andhealth department clinics by Jan. 22 for the roughly 44,000 girls inthe state eligible to receive the vaccine, according to Hollingsworth.Physicians will be permitted to charge a fee for administeringGardasil but only to those who can afford it, the AP/Press & Dakotanreports. Hollingsworth said the voluntary vaccination program likelywill focus on girls ages 11 and 12 in future years, adding that SouthDakota will be the second state, after New Hampshire, to make thevaccine available at no cost (AP/Yankton Press & Dakotan, 1/8).http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=60509

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VOLUNTARY is just the hook that sets the stage for mandatory - a back

door approach which is very transparent when one understands the

politic$ of big pharma.

>

> Note voluntary.

>

> Can't argue with that.

>

> Information provided must be adequate to allow an informed choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely.

Once you have choice, fight back.

Re: Gardasil legislation is coming your way.

VOLUNTARY is just the hook that sets the stage for mandatory - a backdoor approach which is very transparent when one understands thepolitic$ of big pharma. >> Note voluntary.> > Can't argue with that.> > Information provided must be adequate to allow an informed choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know most people with autism are boys, I happen to have 3 daughters,

1 with autism. They try to make me feel like an idiot and that I'm

againt women's rights because I happen to be a Christian and have

daughters and be against the vaccine. What they don't say is that it's

not about sex, as they'd have it be. This entire gardasil fiasco has

been offensive to women's health from the get-go. Most of the women at

my church are asking me about it. They aren't concerned about

promoting promiscuity, they're concerned about it contaminating their

daughter's bodies with toxins. Could it be that gardasil, or as I call

it, norotatwat, is really going to be the shot that sends the vaccine

religion over the top? Friends of babies are talking now about this

rotavirus thing as scary and rediculous. Every time they add a new

vaccine more and more people are becoming more and more fearful of the

vaccine program.

Debi

>

> I think this is one we need to fight. The ink in barely dry on the

> rubber stamp given this by the FDA and the CDC and they want to give

> it to every girl and woman in America. They have lost already in

> Michigan and opposition is brewing elsewhere from all kinds of

> perspectives. And it is a great way to educate legislators on the

> corruption of the vaccine review and approval process at the federal

> level.

>

> This shot is really expensive, $360 for the full course and the

> states will have to pick up the tab on a lot of this. They would

> probably get a much greater level of protection if they used that

> money to promote timely pap smears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" or as I call

> it, norotatwat, "

OMG Debi that is way too good!!!!!!

> >

> > I think this is one we need to fight. The ink in barely dry on

the

> > rubber stamp given this by the FDA and the CDC and they want to

give

> > it to every girl and woman in America. They have lost already in

> > Michigan and opposition is brewing elsewhere from all kinds of

> > perspectives. And it is a great way to educate legislators on the

> > corruption of the vaccine review and approval process at the

federal

> > level.

> >

> > This shot is really expensive, $360 for the full course and the

> > states will have to pick up the tab on a lot of this. They would

> > probably get a much greater level of protection if they used that

> > money to promote timely pap smears.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...