Guest guest Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 I wonder if the time that & was hiding the side- effects of risperdal (like stroke and diabetes in children) and alledgedly bribing state officials to buy the stuff coincides with the time that Bell, the CEO of CAN, was marketing risperdal? He left J & J in 2004 to take over as CEO of CAN. And I wonder if the alledged bribery of state officials by the risperdal salesmen had any relationship to risperdal being the one and only drug every approved specifically for the treatment of autism. The last head of the FDA pled guilty in October to hiding his ownership of stock over which he had direct regulatory oversight, so we can only imagine what kind of ethical consideration prevailed at the FDA under his tenure. http://biz./ap/061017/fda_crawford.html?.v=2 I don't know about you folks but I think Bell has some explaining to do. > > http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/12/16/ > 16drugs.html > Lawsuit claims state official pushed drug, was rewarded with money. > > By Embry and W. Gardner Selby > AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF > Saturday, December 16, 2006 > > A major corporation and several subsidiaries misrepresented the safety > and effectiveness of an anti-psychotic drug and unduly influenced at > least one state official to make it a standard treatment in public > mental health programs, according to a lawsuit the state has joined. > > Attorney General Greg Abbott joined a lawsuit filed in County > district court by , a former investigator for the state of > Pennsylvania, against & Inc. and five related > companies. says in the lawsuit that he learned of payments to at > least one Texas mental health official in interviews he conducted as an > investigator. No official is named in the lawsuit. > > The lawsuit, which came to light Friday, seeks to recover for the state > untallied alleged overcharges to the state's Medicaid program, which > pays for health care for low-income people. > > ' lawsuit alleges that the companies launched a drug named > Risperdal in 1994 to treat schizophrenia. About the same time, the > state was developing a protocol, or treatment guidelines, for which > drugs should be used in public mental health programs. The defendants > " provided substantial financial contributions to and improperly > influenced the development " of the protocols, the lawsuit said, and > Risperdal took precedence in the protocols over cheaper, equally > effective medicines. > > The drug later received recommendations as the medicine of choice in > the state's mental health protocol for treating children and > adolescents, even though it lacked a Food and Drug Administration > indication for those age groups, the lawsuit says. It says side effects > and health risks include increased chance of stroke, renal failure and > hyperglycemia. > > The companies pushed Risperdal in other states through paid consultants > on expert panels, peer-to-peer marketing strategies and " administrative > decisions made by a select few public officials, " the lawsuit says. The > companies sent an unnamed Texas official around the country as a > spokesman for the drug, and they hired third-party contractors to > conceal their control and funding of medical education programs, > speakers' bureaus and clinical research that promoted the benefits and > safety of Risperdal, the lawsuit says. > > The lawsuit says at least 17 states, including Texas, have implemented > the protocol or are doing so. > > " We allege it's a scheme whereby they passed off as medical science > phony representations and misleading facts about the efficacy and > appropriateness of these drugs, " said Melsheimer, a lawyer for > . > > Abbott's office declined to comment on the lawsuit, as did spokesmen > for & and the state's Health and Human Services > Commission, which oversees the Medicaid program. A commission spokesman > did say Texas paid 308,000 claims totaling $73.5 million for Risperdal > in 2005. > > Melsheimer described as a " classic whistle-blower " who filed the > lawsuit in 2004 on behalf of Texas to recover the companies' > overcharges. Because of his whistle-blower status, the lawsuit was > sealed from public view until Abbott joined it. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.