{Disarmed} RE: {Disarmed} RE: CNN weeklong series on autism

[Guest guest]

With the Rhogam shots...he was born with it makes sense.

-----Original Message-----From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ]On Behalf Of Holly BortfeldSent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 8:28 PMEOHarm Subject: {Disarmed} RE: CNN weeklong series on autism

You said “from the beginning”. when? Birth or 2 months? Was he vaccinated in the hospital? If not, he certainly was at 2 months. Can you track it back?

From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 8:23 PMEOHarm Subject: Re: CNN weeklong series on autism

In my son's case, he was born with it. I could tell from the beginning that something was not right. He had major sensory issues. I had two mercury laden Rhogam shots (62.5 micrograms per) during pregnancy and was also induced. I believe this is what pushed him over the edge.

On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:56 AM, H wrote:

You're now getting wind of the new propaganda.

The "born with it" canard replaces the "it really isn't there" canard. That will be the big push.

Because Autism Speaks has shown that it really is there, the propagandists now must change the story to protect themselves.

This dovetails nicely with the genetic research which, while mostly a canard and useless, will prove that it was all your children's defective genes anyway.

Except that everyone's starting to catch on!

CNN weeklong series on autism

CNN "weeklong" series on autism just began. My heart goes out to the family of four, the two oldest children, an 8 year old boy diagnosed with asperger's and a 7 year old girl diagnosed as "moderately autistic". An obviously loving, committed family that has four children, younger "sibblings", a 2 and 1 year old who "seem fine".

Autism was described as "complex, hard to define". Children are "born" with it as "most autism is genetic". Nothing was mentioned of a child "regressing" into autism.

No attempt was made to explain the reason that "ten years ago autism was almost unheard of" and that "autism is rising higher than ever before...affecting 1 in 166 children....boys by a margin of 4 to 1, but, girls more severely affected". Ignoring the autism epidemic, the "expert" who insists "children are born with it" and "most autism is genetic" appears deliberately disingenuous. Common sense dictates there is no such thing as a "genetic epidemic". NONE.

Is it possible the two younger children represent the first evidence of thimerosal-free vaccines? After all, the narrator explained that "sibblings are at higher risk of autism" but these two younger sibblings "seem fine".

This is a week long series. Today's segment aired approximately 9:30 A.M. Tommorrow is supposed to be on possible "causes". We shall see. Kind of hard to distance themselves from what they presented today.

Easy-to-use tools.

Get started now.

..