Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Fluoride & Bad ethics

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.ewg.org/issues/fluoride/20060915/index.php

For Immediate Release:

September 15, 2006

Contact: Sucher, EWG, (202)

667-6982

Connett, Fluoride Action

Network, (802) 355-0999

Harvard Professor

Cleared of Ethics Charges is Million Dollar Donor

Contribution

Creates Potential Conflict of Interest in Secret Ethics Investigation

(WASHINGTON, Sept. 15) — A Harvard Medical School

professor recently cleared by a Harvard ethics panel of charges that he

suppressed critical research findings made a million dollar contribution to the

University's Dental School.

The contribution—one of just six million dollar gifts

that helped create the Dental School's new research building—is not in

and of itself improper, but it raises questions about the willingness of the

University to censure the donor, Dr. Chester s, chairman of the Dental

School's Oral Health Policy & Epidemiology Department.

The donation revelation comes in the wake of the University's

refusal to release the report of its own ethics committee that exonerated

s of the charges, brought by the Environmental Working Group, that he

suppressed research findings on the link between fluoride and bone cancer in

boys in his reporting to the National Research Council and National Institutes

of Health. The secret investigation that cleared s also found that he

had not violated conflict of interest rules in his dual roles as fluoride

cancer researcher and employee of the Colgate toothpaste company. Colgate is a

leading advocate of fluoride. s edits the company's journal, " The

Oral Care Report. "

" We're not sure which is wackier, the politics of

fluoride, or ethics standards at Harvard, " said Wiles, Sr. Vice

President of Environmental Working Group. " There is nothing wrong with

donating a million dollars to your employer, but it does create a potentially

serious conflict of interest when the recipient of the million dollars is

investigating the ethics of the donor, " Wiles added.

After a year-long investigation into s's conduct,

Harvard issued a four-paragraph statement concluding that s " did

not intentionally omit, misrepresent, or suppress research findings, " but

the panel did not release its report on the matter, nor did it invite any

outside testimony during its review.

Over a dozen Harvard alumni, including several leading public

health experts, have expressed serious concerns to new Harvard President

Bok about the cloak of secrecy surrounding the University's ethics inquiry.

The University responded to these inquiries with a

five-paragraph letter that did not address the request for the ethics report

and other documents related to the ethics review.

Dr. Egilman, an alumnus of the Harvard School of Public

Health, said, " While I was disturbed to read the well-documented ethics

charges against s, I was even more disturbed to read Harvard's very

brief, and completely inadequate, response on August 15, 2006. "

Harvard alumnus and member of the Board of Directors for the

Journal of Public Health Policy, Dr. Orris, wrote President Bok: " I

am hopeful that your new administration would take action here to assure this

needed transparency in executing its obligations to the Harvard Community and

more broadly the public as a whole. "

Connett of Fluoride Action Network said, " Harvard owes the

public—which funds Harvard's research on fluoride and bone cancer—a

thorough explanation of how Professor s' misrepresentation of his data,

did not violate university and federal guidelines. "

###

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

EWG request for investigation and related

research: http://www.ewg.org/issues/fluoride/20050627/index.php

Fluoride Action Network research: http://www.fluoridealert.org/harvard/

Boston Fox TV story ( " Professor Cleared in Fluoride

Study as Controversy Stirs " ): http://www.myfoxboston.com/myfox/pages/News/

Detail?contentId=664746 & version=1 & locale=EN-US & layoutCode=VSTY & pageId=3.1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About 1 1/2 years ago I read a very good book. I believe it was

called The Fluoride Deception. I think at that time it was a newly

published book. What I was reading was making me so mad.

-

-- In EOHarm , " Holly Bortfeld " <maximom@...> wrote:

>

> http://www.ewg.org/issues/fluoride/20060915/index.php

>

>

>

> For Immediate Release: September 15, 2006

> Contact: Sucher, EWG, (202) 667-6982

> Connett, Fluoride Action Network, (802) 355-0999

>

>

> Harvard Professor Cleared of Ethics Charges is Million Dollar Donor

>

>

> Contribution Creates Potential Conflict of Interest in Secret Ethics

> Investigation

>

>

>

>

> (WASHINGTON, Sept. 15) - A Harvard Medical School professor recently

cleared

> by a Harvard ethics panel of charges that he suppressed critical

research

> findings made a million dollar contribution to the University's Dental

> School.

>

> The contribution-one of just six million dollar gifts that helped

create the

> Dental School's new research building-is not in and of itself

improper, but

> it raises questions about the willingness of the University to

censure the

> donor, Dr. Chester s, chairman of the Dental School's Oral Health

> Policy & Epidemiology Department.

>

> The donation revelation comes in the wake of the University's refusal to

> release the report of its own ethics committee that exonerated

s of

> the charges, brought by the Environmental Working Group, that he

suppressed

> research findings on the link between fluoride and bone cancer in

boys in

> his reporting to the National Research Council and National

Institutes of

> Health. The secret investigation that cleared s also found

that he

> had not violated conflict of interest rules in his dual roles as

fluoride

> cancer researcher and employee of the Colgate toothpaste company.

Colgate is

> a leading advocate of fluoride. s edits the company's

journal, " The

> Oral Care Report. "

>

> " We're not sure which is wackier, the politics of fluoride, or ethics

> standards at Harvard, " said Wiles, Sr. Vice President of

> Environmental Working Group. " There is nothing wrong with donating a

million

> dollars to your employer, but it does create a potentially serious

conflict

> of interest when the recipient of the million dollars is

investigating the

> ethics of the donor, " Wiles added.

>

> After a year-long investigation into s's conduct, Harvard

issued a

> four-paragraph statement concluding that s " did not intentionally

> omit, misrepresent, or suppress research findings, " but the panel

did not

> release its report on the matter, nor did it invite any outside

testimony

> during its review.

>

> Over a dozen Harvard alumni, including several leading public health

> experts, have expressed serious concerns to new Harvard President

Bok

> about the cloak of secrecy surrounding the University's ethics inquiry.

>

> The University responded to these inquiries with a five-paragraph letter

> that did not address the request for the ethics report and other

documents

> related to the ethics review.

>

> Dr. Egilman, an alumnus of the Harvard School of Public

Health, said,

> " While I was disturbed to read the well-documented ethics charges

against

> s, I was even more disturbed to read Harvard's very brief, and

> completely inadequate, response on August 15, 2006. "

>

> Harvard alumnus and member of the Board of Directors for the Journal of

> Public Health Policy, Dr. Orris, wrote President Bok: " I am

hopeful

> that your new administration would take action here to assure this

needed

> transparency in executing its obligations to the Harvard Community

and more

> broadly the public as a whole. "

>

> Connett of Fluoride Action Network said, " Harvard owes the

> public-which funds Harvard's research on fluoride and bone cancer-a

thorough

> explanation of how Professor s' misrepresentation of his

data, did

> not violate university and federal guidelines. "

>

> ###

>

> ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

>

> EWG request for investigation and related research:

> http://www.ewg.org/issues/fluoride/20050627/index.php

>

> Fluoride Action Network research: http://www.fluoridealert.org/harvard/

>

> Boston Fox TV story ( " Professor Cleared in Fluoride Study as Controversy

> Stirs " ): http://www.myfoxboston.com/myfox/pages/News/

>

<http://www.myfoxboston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=664746 & version

> =1 & locale=EN-US & layoutCode=VSTY & pageId=3.1.1>

>

Detail?contentId=664746 & version=1 & locale=EN-US & layoutCode=VSTY & pageId=3.1.1

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...