Guest guest Posted July 8, 2006 Report Share Posted July 8, 2006 There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result of that investigation was. I have NO DOUBT that the HELP Committee knows what the conclusion was as well. It is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE for the language regarding vaccines/environmental factors to be removed from the CAA. Period. I do believe that any legislator with half a brain can see the writing on the wall when they are being pressured by vaccine manufacturers to drop the language. They are cowards and they should be held accountable for allowing the cherade to continue. They are prolonging the suffering of many innocent people. Those that don't even have thimerosal or vaccines on their radar screen have been purposely misled for years now. It is wrong, no way around it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2006 Report Share Posted July 8, 2006 There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result of that investigation was. I have NO DOUBT that the HELP Committee knows what the conclusion was as well. It is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE for the language regarding vaccines/environmental factors to be removed from the CAA. Period. I do believe that any legislator with half a brain can see the writing on the wall when they are being pressured by vaccine manufacturers to drop the language. They are cowards and they should be held accountable for allowing the cherade to continue. They are prolonging the suffering of many innocent people. Those that don't even have thimerosal or vaccines on their radar screen have been purposely misled for years now. It is wrong, no way around it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 wrote: There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result of that investigation was. Please give more details regarding the result of the 3-year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. I believe that I did read some of the submissions, but am in the dark about the actual result of this investigation. Thanks in advance, Aasa McDonough <kevntimmcd@...> wrote: There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result of that investigation was. I have NO DOUBT that the HELP Committee knows what the conclusion was as well. It is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE for the language regarding vaccines/environmental factors to be removed from the CAA. Period. I do believe that any legislator with half a brain can see the writing on the wall when they are being pressured by vaccine manufacturers to drop the language. They are cowards and they should be held accountable for allowing the cherade to continue. They are prolonging the suffering of many innocent people. Those that don't even have thimerosal or vaccines on their radar screen have been purposely misled for years now. It is wrong, no way around it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 wrote: There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result of that investigation was. Please give more details regarding the result of the 3-year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. I believe that I did read some of the submissions, but am in the dark about the actual result of this investigation. Thanks in advance, Aasa McDonough <kevntimmcd@...> wrote: There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result of that investigation was. I have NO DOUBT that the HELP Committee knows what the conclusion was as well. It is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE for the language regarding vaccines/environmental factors to be removed from the CAA. Period. I do believe that any legislator with half a brain can see the writing on the wall when they are being pressured by vaccine manufacturers to drop the language. They are cowards and they should be held accountable for allowing the cherade to continue. They are prolonging the suffering of many innocent people. Those that don't even have thimerosal or vaccines on their radar screen have been purposely misled for years now. It is wrong, no way around it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 It's the Mercury in Medicine report http://www.vaccinationnews.com/DailyNews/2003/May/05/MercuryMed5.htm > There was a 3 year Congressional Sub-Committee Investigation into the > use of thimerosal in vaccines and autism. We all know what the result > of that investigation was. I have NO DOUBT that the HELP Committee > knows what the conclusion was as well. It is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE > for the language regarding vaccines/environmental factors to be > removed from the CAA. Period. I do believe that any legislator with > half a brain can see the writing on the wall when they are being > pressured by vaccine manufacturers to drop the language. They are > cowards and they should be held accountable for allowing the cherade > to continue. They are prolonging the suffering of many innocent > people. Those that don't even have thimerosal or vaccines on their > radar screen have been purposely misled for years now. It is wrong, > no way around it. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 Carolyn; My son has brain damage. It was caused by mercury. The thing I find offensive is the doctors who caused the damage giving it the wrong name, Autism. I agree with your attitude of saying it's not your choice to decide if one should use a cure or not. The neurodiverse are not so liberal minded. In their eyes, if you are using biomed, you are a murderer. They are vicious little bastards. Just ask anyone here who has had one of their moles who hide on this list harvest their quotes to display on their blogs. They mock us daily on their multitude of blogs. It's a shame that most of these people have also had their brains damaged by mercury. Calling it by a nicer name plays into the hands of those who want to hide their crimes. If these neurodiverse appear reasonably functional on the surface while they call themselves autistic, it makes it easier for the politicians to slough it all off. As far as IQ goes, they have their own IQ test that makes them look more intelligent than they truly are. It's like inventing an IQ test catering to horse manure shovelers that would make them look like rocket scientists because they would know a lot about horse manure. So, I'll stick with the term " brain damage " . I think it's in my son's best interest. > > > > > > > > , > > > > > > > > I agree that we need to establish the cause of any disorder, > any > > > > disease in hopes of finding a cure. However there are folks > with > > > > ASD that have voiced they don't want to be cured, that can't > be > > > > ignored. > > > > > > > > As I've said thought none of us has a right to be a voice for > all > > of > > > > the ASD community and individuals affected. But why is autism > > > > research so underfunding overall? Why do we have to carry > this > > > > burden as parents, doesn't make sense to me and I haven't seen > > much > > > > change in the twelve years we've been involved in this. > > > > > > > > Too I'm not discrediting anything anyone else is doing, > nor > > the > > > > support we given to any other organization, but I'm personally > > tired > > > > of ASD not getting parity in general across the board. > > > > > > > > Carolyn > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 I admire all of you for actually pushing for this legislation. I guess I'm rather bitter after the politicians in TN chose to poison children, but I don't know why any of you thought it would actually be passed. Are we not asking them once again to fess up to their poison? What part of me should be surprised that everyone else is surprised that the national ASA would not support it and that the gov won't allow it? Debi, who never followed this from the beginning 'cause I figured it was a pipe dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 I admire all of you for actually pushing for this legislation. I guess I'm rather bitter after the politicians in TN chose to poison children, but I don't know why any of you thought it would actually be passed. Are we not asking them once again to fess up to their poison? What part of me should be surprised that everyone else is surprised that the national ASA would not support it and that the gov won't allow it? Debi, who never followed this from the beginning 'cause I figured it was a pipe dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 I'm a board member of our local ASA. I only speak for myself, and that is to say you'd have to ask 22,000 members to know the thoughts of 22,000 members. In our local org alone we have parents who are extremely focused on biological invterventions, some who tell us we're nuts, that it's genes plain and simple, and may more who are varying degrees in between. but our local org isn't focused on lobbying efforts, we're focused on how to get the school system to come to our conferences on how to educate the kids, as well as hosting a biological-focused conference at least once a year. It's not the mission statement of our local ASA to deem the cause/treatment of autism, it's our mission to get the info out from those qualified to deem such statement. I personally have seen some parents do every biological intervention they can, with absolutely no or very little success. I've also seen other kids essentially recover. This tells me that there are different issues for different kids. I've seen one kid who essentially recovered give gfcf and td-dmps the credit. I've seen another kid, whose mom was definitely exposed to mercury several times during preg at her job say the td-dmps did nothing. It's possible it's the same root cause but they need diff treatments, and it's possible it's from two different causes. Why did Maurice's kids recover from ABA alone? Why did Karyn Seroussi's son recover from diet alone? Why do other kids recover from chelation? Why do some kids stay hopelessly severe with all of the above and more? I don't know of any ASD expert who can answer that, much less the ASA, and it's not their job to. It is their job to push for advocacy, which is what they fail to do when they fail to push for legislation that can answer some of these questions. Debi, speaking personally and not ASA capacity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ASA Expresses Support to HELP Committee > > > > > Friday, July 7, 2006 > > > > > Letter Recognizes Efforts on Combating Autism Bill > > > > > In a letter today to the Senate Committee on Health, > > Education, > > > > Labor and > > > > > Pensions (HELP), the Autism Society of America (ASA) > > recognized the > > > > > committee's efforts on behalf of the Combating Autism Bill > > (CAA). > > > > Senators > > > > > Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Dodd (D-CT) introduced > > the > > > > bill last > > > > > spring. This important legislation, currently under > > consideration > > > > by the > > > > > HELP Committee, will: > > > > > > > > > > * Double NIH spending on autism research > > > > > > > > > > * Reauthorize the Federal Interagency Autism Coordinating > > > > Committee > > > > > > > > > > * Require the National Institute of Environmental Health > > > > Sciences to > > > > > create Centers of Excellence devoted to investigating possible > > > > environmental > > > > > contributors to autism > > > > > > > > > > * Empower the director of the NIH to act as an " autism czar, " > > > > > developing an annual research budget for autism based on the > > best > > > > science > > > > > and requiring that budget be reported to Congress > > > > > > > > > > * Create a screening program in all 50 states for the early > > > > > identification of children with autism; short of a cure, early > > > > > identification leading to early intervention with behavioral > > > > services > > > > > provides the best available outcomes for children with autism > > > > > > > > > > * Fund the efforts to identify the best medical practices in > > > > the > > > > > treatment of children with autism > > > > > > > > > > * Continue funding of the epidemiological and public education > > > > > programs on autism at the Centers for Disease Control > > > > > > > > > > * Authorize nearly $1.4 billion of federal spending on autism > > > > over the > > > > > next five years, a " multi-front war on autism " from public > > > > awareness and > > > > > early diagnosis to basic biomedical research > > > > > > > > > > Text of Letter: > > > > > Dear Chairman Enzi and Ranking Member Kennedy: > > > > > On behalf of the 1.5 million Americans with autism and their > > > > families, we at > > > > > the Autism Society of America (ASA) thank you for your efforts > > to > > > > enact > > > > > comprehensive legislation to strengthen autism research and > > > > improve autism > > > > > related services. We strongly support your efforts, and look > > > > forward to > > > > > continuing to work with you on this critical legislation. > > > > > As you know, the original version of the Combating Autism Act > > was > > > > introduced > > > > > by Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Senator Dodd > > (D- > > > > CT) in 2005. > > > > > The ASA supported this initial draft, but working with the > > Senate > > > > sponsors > > > > > and others in the autism community, submitted a revised draft > > > > that, among > > > > > other changes, included additional provisions to strengthen > > > > research into > > > > > potential environmental causes of autism. > > > > > While we remain steadfast in our support for the revised > > > > legislation, we > > > > > recognize that the legislative process is one that requires > > > > compromise and > > > > > consensus building. We appreciate the competing interests that > > > > Senators must > > > > > consider, and understand that certain provision of the > > legislation > > > > will > > > > > require modification in order to build support for the > > legislation > > > > in the > > > > > entire Senate. > > > > > It is our understanding from your staff that the Committee is > > > > poised to > > > > > consider a final bill in the coming weeks. While we must > > reserve > > > > final > > > > > judgment on the legislation until we can review the draft, we > > are > > > > confident > > > > > that the Committee has done its best to craft a comprehensive, > > > > meaningful > > > > > bill that will advance autism research, but will also gain the > > > > support of > > > > > the majority of the Senate, and ultimately, be signed into > > law. We > > > > look > > > > > forward to working with you to advance this important > > legislation. > > > > > Thank you, again, for your support for people with autism and > > their > > > > > families. > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > Pratt > > > > > Chair, ASA Board of Directors > > > > > cc: Senator Rick Santorum > > > > > Senator Dodd > > > > > Members of the Senate HELP Committee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try > > > > > > > > > > > <http://pa./*http://us.rd./evt=36035/*http://music. > > > > .c > > > > > om/unlimited/> it free. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 I'm a board member of our local ASA. I only speak for myself, and that is to say you'd have to ask 22,000 members to know the thoughts of 22,000 members. In our local org alone we have parents who are extremely focused on biological invterventions, some who tell us we're nuts, that it's genes plain and simple, and may more who are varying degrees in between. but our local org isn't focused on lobbying efforts, we're focused on how to get the school system to come to our conferences on how to educate the kids, as well as hosting a biological-focused conference at least once a year. It's not the mission statement of our local ASA to deem the cause/treatment of autism, it's our mission to get the info out from those qualified to deem such statement. I personally have seen some parents do every biological intervention they can, with absolutely no or very little success. I've also seen other kids essentially recover. This tells me that there are different issues for different kids. I've seen one kid who essentially recovered give gfcf and td-dmps the credit. I've seen another kid, whose mom was definitely exposed to mercury several times during preg at her job say the td-dmps did nothing. It's possible it's the same root cause but they need diff treatments, and it's possible it's from two different causes. Why did Maurice's kids recover from ABA alone? Why did Karyn Seroussi's son recover from diet alone? Why do other kids recover from chelation? Why do some kids stay hopelessly severe with all of the above and more? I don't know of any ASD expert who can answer that, much less the ASA, and it's not their job to. It is their job to push for advocacy, which is what they fail to do when they fail to push for legislation that can answer some of these questions. Debi, speaking personally and not ASA capacity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ASA Expresses Support to HELP Committee > > > > > Friday, July 7, 2006 > > > > > Letter Recognizes Efforts on Combating Autism Bill > > > > > In a letter today to the Senate Committee on Health, > > Education, > > > > Labor and > > > > > Pensions (HELP), the Autism Society of America (ASA) > > recognized the > > > > > committee's efforts on behalf of the Combating Autism Bill > > (CAA). > > > > Senators > > > > > Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Dodd (D-CT) introduced > > the > > > > bill last > > > > > spring. This important legislation, currently under > > consideration > > > > by the > > > > > HELP Committee, will: > > > > > > > > > > * Double NIH spending on autism research > > > > > > > > > > * Reauthorize the Federal Interagency Autism Coordinating > > > > Committee > > > > > > > > > > * Require the National Institute of Environmental Health > > > > Sciences to > > > > > create Centers of Excellence devoted to investigating possible > > > > environmental > > > > > contributors to autism > > > > > > > > > > * Empower the director of the NIH to act as an " autism czar, " > > > > > developing an annual research budget for autism based on the > > best > > > > science > > > > > and requiring that budget be reported to Congress > > > > > > > > > > * Create a screening program in all 50 states for the early > > > > > identification of children with autism; short of a cure, early > > > > > identification leading to early intervention with behavioral > > > > services > > > > > provides the best available outcomes for children with autism > > > > > > > > > > * Fund the efforts to identify the best medical practices in > > > > the > > > > > treatment of children with autism > > > > > > > > > > * Continue funding of the epidemiological and public education > > > > > programs on autism at the Centers for Disease Control > > > > > > > > > > * Authorize nearly $1.4 billion of federal spending on autism > > > > over the > > > > > next five years, a " multi-front war on autism " from public > > > > awareness and > > > > > early diagnosis to basic biomedical research > > > > > > > > > > Text of Letter: > > > > > Dear Chairman Enzi and Ranking Member Kennedy: > > > > > On behalf of the 1.5 million Americans with autism and their > > > > families, we at > > > > > the Autism Society of America (ASA) thank you for your efforts > > to > > > > enact > > > > > comprehensive legislation to strengthen autism research and > > > > improve autism > > > > > related services. We strongly support your efforts, and look > > > > forward to > > > > > continuing to work with you on this critical legislation. > > > > > As you know, the original version of the Combating Autism Act > > was > > > > introduced > > > > > by Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Senator Dodd > > (D- > > > > CT) in 2005. > > > > > The ASA supported this initial draft, but working with the > > Senate > > > > sponsors > > > > > and others in the autism community, submitted a revised draft > > > > that, among > > > > > other changes, included additional provisions to strengthen > > > > research into > > > > > potential environmental causes of autism. > > > > > While we remain steadfast in our support for the revised > > > > legislation, we > > > > > recognize that the legislative process is one that requires > > > > compromise and > > > > > consensus building. We appreciate the competing interests that > > > > Senators must > > > > > consider, and understand that certain provision of the > > legislation > > > > will > > > > > require modification in order to build support for the > > legislation > > > > in the > > > > > entire Senate. > > > > > It is our understanding from your staff that the Committee is > > > > poised to > > > > > consider a final bill in the coming weeks. While we must > > reserve > > > > final > > > > > judgment on the legislation until we can review the draft, we > > are > > > > confident > > > > > that the Committee has done its best to craft a comprehensive, > > > > meaningful > > > > > bill that will advance autism research, but will also gain the > > > > support of > > > > > the majority of the Senate, and ultimately, be signed into > > law. We > > > > look > > > > > forward to working with you to advance this important > > legislation. > > > > > Thank you, again, for your support for people with autism and > > their > > > > > families. > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > Pratt > > > > > Chair, ASA Board of Directors > > > > > cc: Senator Rick Santorum > > > > > Senator Dodd > > > > > Members of the Senate HELP Committee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try > > > > > > > > > > > <http://pa./*http://us.rd./evt=36035/*http://music. > > > > .c > > > > > om/unlimited/> it free. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2006 Report Share Posted July 9, 2006 If anyone still belongs to ASA, I hope they send a letter and resign. I'm not going to resign, but rather work with the ASA to let them know that they spoke on my behalf and I didn't authorize them to. Bernie Rimland didn't quit when the ASA took a different turn, he's an honorary member and is always willing to help out the ASA and work from within, which is what I plan to do and I hope anyone else who is on this board and is a leader in the ASA will do also. I have proudly been a huge part in running our chapter for 10 years and have used the ASA to be instrumental in creating programs where there were none. We can't just quit and leave behind all that we have done as far as services go, regardless of the politics. ASA has an Options Policy which basically says don't crap on someone else's treatment or beliefs. Sally Colletti, President www.cnyasa.org ASA Expresses Support to HELP Committee > Friday, July 7, 2006 > Letter Recognizes Efforts on Combating Autism Bill > In a letter today to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP), the Autism Society of America (ASA) recognized the committee's efforts on behalf of the Combating Autism Bill (CAA). Senators Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Dodd (D- CT) introduced the bill last spring. This important legislation, currently under consideration by the HELP Committee, will: > > Double NIH spending on autism research > Reauthorize the Federal Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee > Require the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to create Centers of Excellence devoted to investigating possible environmental contributors to autism > Empower the director of the NIH to act as an " autism czar, " developing an annual research budget for autism based on the best science and requiring that budget be reported to Congress > Create a screening program in all 50 states for the early identification of children with autism; short of a cure, early identification leading to early intervention with behavioral services provides the best available outcomes for children with autism > Fund the efforts to identify the best medical practices in the treatment of children with autism > Continue funding of the epidemiological and public education programs on autism at the Centers for Disease Control > Authorize nearly $1.4 billion of federal spending on autism over the next five years, a " multi-front war on autism " from public awareness and early diagnosis to basic biomedical research > Text of Letter: > Dear Chairman Enzi and Ranking Member Kennedy: > On behalf of the 1.5 million Americans with autism and their families, we at the Autism Society of America (ASA) thank you for your efforts to enact comprehensive legislation to strengthen autism research and improve autism related services. We strongly support your efforts, and look forward to continuing to work with you on this critical legislation. > As you know, the original version of the Combating Autism Act was introduced by Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Senator Dodd (D-CT) in 2005. The ASA supported this initial draft, but working with the Senate sponsors and others in the autism community, submitted a revised draft that, among other changes, included additional provisions to strengthen research into potential environmental causes of autism. > While we remain steadfast in our support for the revised legislation, we recognize that the legislative process is one that requires compromise and consensus building. We appreciate the competing interests that Senators must consider, and understand that certain provision of the legislation will require modification in order to build support for the legislation in the entire Senate. > It is our understanding from your staff that the Committee is poised to consider a final bill in the coming weeks. While we must reserve final judgment on the legislation until we can review the draft, we are confident that the Committee has done its best to craft a comprehensive, meaningful bill that will advance autism research, but will also gain the support of the majority of the Senate, and ultimately, be signed into law. We look forward to working with you to advance this important legislation. > Thank you, again, for your support for people with autism and their families. > Sincerely, > Pratt > Chair, ASA Board of Directors > cc: Senator Rick Santorum > Senator Dodd > Members of the Senate HELP Committee > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.