Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Don't know if this WSJ analysis on Gardisil was posted - it was published about a week ago. Apologies if it was already posted. Interesting observations on the next blockbuster vaccine, Gardisil, and questions about mandatory vaccination for infants. " Dr. Trent, a specialist in adolescent medicine at the s Hopkins Children's Center, reminds us that what matters is getting immunized before sexual activity begins. The age at which a particular young person may become at risk, she says, is for doctors and parents to determine. If the government tries to take that choice away and mandates HPV vaccinations for schoolchildren, it will be time to argue against coercion. " http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115344800370713284-search.html? KEYWORDS=hpv & COLLECTION=wsjie/6month A Vaccine's Promise July 21, 2006; Page W11 In 1952, before the first polio vaccine was available, that paralyzing disease killed more than 3,000 Americans, almost as many as cervical cancer kills each year now. With last month's FDA approval of the first vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, there is reason to hope that this disease and a host of related afflictions may one day be as rare as polio. So why isn't everybody cheering? To read some news stories, you'd think that any controversy about the new vaccine has emanated from " right wing " and " Christian " groups. Actually, all sorts of parents were stunned when a panel of the Centers for Disease Control recommended that the vaccine be given to girls as young as 11, or even nine. The human papilloma viruses (HPVs) that can cause cervical cancer are sexually transmitted, and the reality that little children might be at risk is a dismaying reminder of the state of our society. Not surprisingly, some people also read the CDC's recommendation as an unwelcome and unwarranted suggestion that everyone's young daughter is, or soon will be, sexually active and thus in need of protection. Might this mean that in the future vaccination will become mandatory? Less fathomable in a way is the complaining in op-eds and other venues by people who might be called liberals. They can't bring themselves to fully celebrate a cancer vaccine because it won't be instantly available to everyone. Women in the Third World, where cervical cancer claims the bulk of its victims, can't afford a $360 course of HPV immunization -- so only the rich people and pharmaceutical companies benefit, one lament goes. And wouldn't more American lives be saved if the government spent money instead on reaching more people with basic health care? Let's get real, starting with a little science. Dr. Keertie Shah, a virologist at the s Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, has done crucial research linking HPV to cervical cancer. He told us that he is excited about the new vaccine not only because it can block cancer but because immunization can prevent the protracted (and expensive) treatment that many women now undergo, amid great fear, to deal with the results of problematic Pap smears, including so-called precancers. The new vaccine is made by Merck and called Gardasil. Dr. Shah believes that it and other vaccines under development may also prove effective against a range of genital cancers and, he adds, a rare but horrifying condition that affects the infants of some HPV-infected mothers, leaving the children to face perhaps 100 operations for wart-like growths in their throat. At the same time, Dr. Shah does not believe that states should or will make HPV vaccination mandatory. That's not necessary, he says, because the virus is not an infection, like measles, that can be spread by casual contact. As for those 11-year-olds, Dr. Trent, a specialist in adolescent medicine at the s Hopkins Children's Center, reminds us that what matters is getting immunized before sexual activity begins. The age at which a particular young person may become at risk, she says, is for doctors and parents to determine. If the government tries to take that choice away and mandates HPV vaccinations for schoolchildren, it will be time to argue against coercion. For now, we can predict only that the cost of delivering cervical-cancer protection to willing women and families everywhere is bound to decline as demand grows and experts develop more vaccines and simpler ways of delivering them. That will be the next great news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.